Global Research
The Big Picture of the Geopolitical Chess Game: Ukraine is A “Square on the Chessboard”
The
Ukrainian civil war driven by the junta of the Kiev thugs and supported
with arms and money by Washington, NATO and the European puppets,
continues killing their country-men and women in the eastern Donbass
area. The Kiev army and death squads are accompanied by hundreds of
Academi (former Blackwater) mercenaries and CIA advisors, mainly to make
sure that the Kiev troops will not defect but execute their marching
orders, namely fighting and killing their brothers and sisters, lest
they risk being shot as traitors.
To be sure, the Kiev criminal army does not take prisoners; they kill them on the spot.
Not
to mention the hundred Ukrainians killed by the infamous Maidan snipers
– by now known to be US paid mercenaries, just a day before the
illegal coup d’état of 22 February 2014, that brought to power the
current neo-Nazi government.
More
and more compassionate people around the world, including from hapless
Europe, are becoming restless, asking impatiently – how much longer
blood must flow? – When will Russia intervene? – A legitimate question,
so it would appear from the outset. Understandably, as the context is
simple: the illegal ‘regime change’ was sponsored, paid for and
instigated by the US / CIA / NATO / EU – and prepared during more than
ten years at a cost of at least 5 billion dollars – as Madame Nuland
boasted on several occasions.
This
US / EU organized coup is now turning Ukraine, a once prosperous
country, the breadbasket of the Soviet Union and the cradle of Russia
into chaos, to become easy prey for the usual western money sharks, the
IMF, European Commission (EC) and the European Central Bank (ECB).
Behind them are the FED and Wall Street, to make sure they do as told.
No mercy. For starters a US$ 17.5 billion IMF loan with the usual killer
strings attached, à la Greece – large-scale privatization of the
country’s social safety net, i.e. cutting salaries pensions (in half),
food and fuel subsidies, increasing taxes – is rapidly becoming a
nightmare for the average citizen and especially the poor.
In addition, a US / NATO sledgehammer style killing machine is
launched against the ‘pro-Russian opposition’ movement, now also called
the Neo-Rossiia Defense Force (NDF).
So
– why is Mr. Putin not speaking up – acting up – saving fellow Russian
lives? Why does he seemingly accept the sham election that brought the
corrupt and corrupted multi-billionaire, chocolate magnate, Petr
Poroshenko to power? – The straw in the wind, that bends to where the
money flows?
There is a higher agenda at stake.
Ukraine is a mere square on the chessboard of a large-scale and long-term geopolitical game; one that is about to cause a slow but steady tectonic power shift. The symbiotic alliance between the two giants – Russia and China, the world’s largest economy, has been under preparation for the last couple of decades. It came to a sudden head thanks to Washington’s bullying arrogance, thrashing around with empty threats, worthless sanctions, anti-Russia and Putin demonizing lies and propaganda.
The
historic signing on 21 May 2014 of the US$ 400 billion equivalent gas
deal between Mr. Vladimir Putin and China’s President Xi Jinping had an
important symbolic significance. It is a complement to the US$ 270
billion equivalent oil deal, signed in June 2013 between Russia’s
Rosneft and China. The treaties are not denominated in dollars but in
the two countries’ local currencies. In a larger context, the – $ 400
billion over 30 years, about $ 13 billion per year – is nothing
extraordinary. Russia’s annual trade in hydrocarbons alone is estimated
at close to one trillion dollars.
However,
the deal signals more than gas. It signals an alliance, a trusting and
lasting partnership, beyond the Putin-Jinping generation. In parallel
with the gas deal is the solidification of the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization (SCO), a Eurasian political, economic and military union
founded in 1996 as the Shanghai Five – China, Russia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, expanded in 2001 under the leadership of
China to also include Uzbekistan.
To
further solidify the Oriental pact is the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO). Created in 1992, it comprised Russia, Armenia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. In 2012 Uzbekistan
withdrew under pressure from the West, aiming to become associated with
the EU. The current membership includes Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan, with a rotating Presidency. Iran is a
possible candidate to join this alliance of otherwise all former Soviet
Republics.
In
addition, and based on the idea of the European Union, on 29 May 2014, a
day before the signing of the Russia-China gas deal, the Eurasian
Economic Union (EEU) treaty was signed. The initial members include
Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Provided the treaty is approved by the
parliament of each government, the union will enter into effect on 1
January 2015 under the umbrella of the Eurasian Commission (modelled
after the European Commission). It comprises 170 million people with an
expected economic output of 2.7 trillion dollars equivalent. Further
candidates to join the organization are Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan
and Uzbekistan.
And
then – there is the New Silk Road – recently announced by President Xi
Jinping in Duisburg, Germany, inviting Germany to become the
western-most link of the road connecting Russia, several of the former
Soviet Republics and China. Interested in joining this new alliance are
also Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran, all of which were present last week in
the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, the Russian counterpart to Davos,
when then New Silk Road was one of the priority topics.
The
new Silk Road is poised to become a huge magnet for trade, attracting
in the West most if not all of the current EU members – whose currently
largest trading partner is Germany – and in the East it may reach as far
north as Mongolia and as far east as Malaysia.
These
alliances and partnerships for trade, security and cooperation are
unions of mutual trust. Europe would do well to take a good look at what
TRUST means. They would perhaps discover that NATO is but a
neo-colonization of Europe, with the purpose of keeping Europe in the
Anglo-Zionist sphere as a buffer zone, so to speak, between East and
West, preventing them from ‘switching over’ to the rapidly growing
Eurasia Economic Union which already now looks more attractive and
promising for the future than the economically down-trodden EU in
alliance with the US. Not to mention the attraction of the new Silk
Road.
Is
it so hard to notice that the Washington – NATO gang are just a bunch
of lies and broken promises? – Proven throughout the Cold War which was
based on false anti-Soviet propaganda in order to bolster the US
military industrial complex, already then the lifeline of the American
economy and the basis for its wasteful consumer society. Lies
exacerbated by the broken promise in 1990 by James Baker, then US
Secretary of State, to Soviet President Gorbachev that NATO would not
expand eastwards? – A promise totally ignored when in 1999 NATO entered
Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, and in 2004 followed Bulgaria,
Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
Besides, who could trust a
nation with destabilizing counter-insurgency units deployed in 134
countries? – Last count, according to Joachim Hagopian, former West Point army officer -
The just congealed
eastern-oriental union – SCO, CSTO, EEU and the New Silk Road – signify a
geopolitical sea-change hard to swallow for Washington and its minion
allies. They won’t let go easily. Their world vision, though
short-sighted, is on global hegemony, control of the world’s resources,
people and economies.
Now – what if Mr. Putin would
just for a moment sidestep from its long-term objective of peace and
cooperation – and would intervene in Ukraine to safe lives? – Would he
risk US-NATO retaliation, with Europe the cannon-fodder in between?
What are the Kremlin’s options, other than a direct involvement? – (i) an indirect engagement by
arming Novorossiia to the teeth, pretty much as the US / NATO is doing
with Kiev, or (ii) ride it out until the economic collapse of the
dollar-linked Western world pulls with it the US / NATO military might –
which might comprise significant collateral damage, including a
mounting death toll in Ukraine, or (iii) a combination of both – arming
NDF and inducing the economic collapse of the West, by the introduction
of a new monetary / economic system, currently being prepared by the
BRICS. This might at once reduce casualties in the Ukraine, as well as
eliminating the chance of a new Cold War – CW II.
Why?
– Because for a CW II to flourish, the rest of the world needs to have
confidence in the dollar, since the US printing machines would run amok
churning out worthless greenbacks, flooding the ‘market’ as debt,
expected to be absorbed by central banks as reserves. But this trust is
gone, by most of the world. And those who still hope to get some
‘crumbs’ from the emperor loot for sticking to him until the very end,
become fewer and farther in between. – Europe certainly is no longer
solidly behind the White House with Obama’s bully tactics.
There
is the risk that in last desperation Washington would trigger an all
destructive nuclear war. This is doubtful, though, since the banking and
corporate elite of the Anglo-Zionist Empire, those who pull the strings
on Obama’s actions, are too self-centered to risk auto-destruction.
In
the end, and seen with a bird’s eye Big-Picture vision, Ukraine may
become the mere square on the chessboard where the arrogant and greedy
Queen was lost to a humble but wise peon.
Peter Koenig
is an economist and former World Bank staff. He worked extensively
around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He
writes regularly for Global Research, ICH, the Voice of Russia and
other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic
Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed –
fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around
the globe.Related content:
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on
community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment