The Bait and Switch History of Fraud
Forum rules
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members
1 post
• Page 1 of 1
The Bait and Switch History of Fraud
by Ricardo Johansson » Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:41 pm
When the People decide to embark on an extremely
important journey to independence it is wise to inquire as to whether a
roadmap already exists, rather than to boldly and unwisely venture out
into the unknown and thus engage the potentially self-defeating acts of
trial and error if they're at all avoidable. Fortunately, when we search
for a roadmap we find but only one: We discover that we're actually
"reviving" and perhaps enlarging upon the largest undertaking of its
kind in the history of Mankind that already occurred in 1774,
historically known as The Great American Republican Experiment. There is
no other known model of independent Republican Government from which to
compare, before or since.
What was the Great American Republican Experiment?
The great experiment was to create a government that was truly in the hands of the People, not the King or his Representatives, that would provide peace and harmony for the People and for the Earth itself.
In order for all the People to fully understand the highly significant elements of this Great American Republican Experiment, they must first be aware of the application of the original Latin in which over one third of the text of the original Colonial Declarations of candid Republican government was written. It is a well-known principle of law that the exact determination of a lawful or legal document is dependent upon a precise uniform knowledge of the grammar in which the document is written at the time it was prepared by its framing Deputies.
To begin with, original Latin, as in many of its off-shoot languages, is male-singular or feminine-plural-gender sensitive. Therefore, in order to fully understand the law of Statute, one must be aware of the law of language upon application, and be very aware of the gender being used. For example, all “manly governments corporate” of the World are defined by Latin male-singular-gender terms, because the “flow” of government is only in one direction: from the Ruling Class down. Only one government in all history is defined by a Latin feminine-gender-plural term, because the “flow” of government extends to and from the People in a plenary system at every level. With this in mind, one must fully digest the following definitions:
Democracy: Anglicized singular male expression from original Latin “demos + cratios” meaning “Upon the Majority of anything, including Men (People)”. The “flow” is singular.
Republic: Anglicized singular male expression from original Latin “res + plubicus,” meaning “For all Men (People)”. The “flow” is singular.
Republican: Anglicized plural-feminine expression from original Latin “res + plublicae” to “res + publicanus,” meaning “Of, By, For, From, and To all Men (People)”. The “flow” is not only in the plural, but also “plenary” in nature as in the natural Family Unit.
Colony: Assembly of Farm Families (natural Republican States) within a prescribed geographical boundary (of culture). This also pertains to “Tribe.”
Culture: “Land-water.”
Republican State: The family of every Natural Mother to include her husband and all of her offspring.
What Style and Form of Government did the Colonists desire?
The Form is in reference to the written framework of the government; the Style is in reference to its actual operation within the confines of its framework, sometimes referred to as The Flow of the Government.
There are only three principal styles and forms of public governments operating throughout the history of the World: (1) Manly Republic: Rule by King or Queen “For the People,” who alone is free (2) Manly Democracy: Rule by Class “Upon all People”, who alone are free; (3) Republican: “Rule Of, By, To For, From All of the People, who are All free.
Therefore we can clearly see that there is but a “hair’s breadth distinction” between a Manly Democracy Corporate and a Manly Republic Corporate “Upon” versus “For”. In both cases the “flow of government” remains in a single direction - from the top down (as in direct current).
The idea of a Government “Republican in Form and Style” is a very serious departure from the rest of the candid world’s democracies and republics because the flow of government is variable (as in alternating current), or “plenary” at each level.
The original American Colonial form of government is the only government in history that is defined by a Latin feminine-gender-plural Term: Republican; obviously because of the plural flow of government.
The official American Government was manned by Deputies at the individual Colonial level as well as at the new Perfected National Supreme Republican level; and was originally described as The Supreme Law of the People, NOT of the Land. All individuals become “Deputies” when performing specific duties for the assembly of People, because they were “Deputies” even unto themselves and their own families. Up to this time the Great American Experiment is the only assembly of people in all of history that has attempted to employ a Natural (hence Nation) Republican Government (of, by, from, to, for) in actual operation (in Style), and in writing (in Form).
There is no other governmental operation in comparison. All other Styles of Worldly government throughout all recorded history are defined by Latin male-singular terms: Republic, Democracy, Anarchy, Monarchy, Oligarchy, etc, etc; all most commonly referred to as Manly States Corporate, whereby all flow of government is in the singular (i.e. one way only) from Ruler or the Ruling Class downward, and their Written Documents are in Corporate Charter (Charta) (i.e. Latin Co-Statutere, hence ‘Constitution’ in form).
Therefore there is a vast distinction between a Constitution (a list of independent statutes for different purposes)" and a Statute (a declaration of single purpose).
Therefore, the People of (name of nation) who are concerned must decide whether they wish to maintain a Manly Corporate Representative Style and Form of Government, or erect a Supreme National Republican Style and Form of Deputy Government.
If a Republican Form is desired, the true authority of its creators - all of the People - needs to be identified in its Enacting Clause. This is NOT a preamble to a “constitution.”
The original fourteen (14) American Colonial Declaration “Enacting Clauses,” extending more or less from the original Virginia Plan, make up the “Enacting Clause of Purpose” of the Unanimous Declaration of 4 July 1776. The July 4, 1776 Unanimous Republican Declaration was “perfected” thirteen years later in September, 1787 by the very same “Deputy Framers” who penned the 1776 model, and in the very same grammar form and style, known as “Republican in Form” or in “Letter Form,” for want of a better term.
The Enacting Clause is perfectly authoritative in its source: the People; peremptory in its action: ordain and establish; definite and exact in its subject: this (Statute); and distinct, broad, and extensive in its purpose and ends: embracing the defense of liberty, safety, and welfare of the National (natural) Independent Republican States (every Natural Mother) of America as its primary objective by its established Deputies.
We have here (1) the Authority: We, the People of these United Colonies; (2) the ends for which the More Perfect 1787 Supreme National Republican Statute is made, in Six Particulars of Supreme Importance known to every natural Mother on Earth; (3) the explicit ordaining of this Statute, including this introductory clause; (4) the Nation of Republican States for whom it is made: the People of These United Colonies of America. The only distinction between this Perfected 1787 Colonial Republican Statute and the individual fourteen Colonial Statutes in place from 1774 to 1787 is the coined word Nation (National). This, in part, explains why no further oath was required at the new Perfected National Seat of Government, since the "Deputies" thereof held their respective National Seats under the same oath as their respective individual fourteen Colonial Statute counter parts. In other words in this Natural (National) plenary system, the oath of the seat and oath of fidelity pertained to every Colonial Deputy regardless of his temporary appointment level. And Statutes place limitations only upon Deputies.
The 1787 Perfected Supreme National Republican Declaration was in the very same format and graphics style as is the 1776 Unanimous Declaration of the American Republican States (all of the American Families) which is required to retain consistency in Form. Hence the term: “Republican in Form.” Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with a “Republican Fraternal Political Organization of University.” It is, in fact, an official operation of Government, distinctive in its Form (framework) and its Style (mode of operation).
To further clarify, the 1774-1812 Great American Experiment was not a representative style of government under any kind of pretext. Obviously a “Deputy” is not a “Representative” (implied power of attorney).
To best describe this remarkable Republican system, it was and still is to some extent a Plenary System of Revolving Temporary Deputies at every level: Township, Parish (County), Colonial (State), and Supreme National (diametrically opposite of federal), and in each level, the flow (style) of the government was in the Plural; and each level was completely defined and contained within one single Statute (a Declaration Letter) in Form, following its "Enacting Clause” of Authority (We, the People) and Purpose (limitations imposed only upon the Deputy). In other words, the “Limitation of Action” was imposed upon all of the Colonial Deputies uniformly, regardless of their station as set forth in that one single Statute.
The single July 4, 1776 Statute, the Unanimous Declaration of the United Colonies of America in no manner, shape or form, established any kind of alleged Representative (unlimited Power of Attorney) Government; contrary to the 1777 Articles of Confederation or the later transposed 1846 Confederate Congress’ Hickey Version of “The Constitution FOR the American People" elaborated upon below.
The Republican State is a direct reference to the Family of the Natural Mother; hence, the true Independent State of America, and to includes the Mothers of the Republican States of (name of nation) and all other parts of the World. For this reason, all 1774-1812 American instruments of government were also Republican in Style (operation) in support of the Republican Form (written framework). The Form was a Single Statute (a Declaration) - explaining why the Colonial Framers never referred to their written frameworks as Constitutions (Latin: co-statutere), i.e. in "corporate charter form”. The July 4, 1776 Declaration, for example, is in single Statute (letter) form, and therefore does not require a "committee of arrangement". The original fourteen Colonial Declarations of government and their Unanimous 1776 Declaration, and as Perfected thirteen years hence were often referred to by the Royal Family clergy as the Freeman Letters or Letters of American Republican Government, for want of a better description! Indeed, the 1774-1789 American Continental Congress was possessed of only a "Committee on Style." A Declaration (one single Statute) does not need to be arranged.
Many have a misunderstanding of the manly Democratic-Republic state (corporate) versus the natural Republican State (non-corporate). Remember, Republic is male singular; Republican is feminine plural. This misunderstanding is normal because of the European Royal Family University programming that has been instilled in the minds of the Worldly Posterity gradually since the American Colonial Archives Depository fires of 1812 to the present time (discussed in more detail below).
Neither a manly republic corporate nor a manly democracy corporate can operate within the intended feminine natural (National) non-corporate Republican system that is wholly defined and contained within a single statute for that purpose: one single statute, following its Enacting Clause of singular purpose, does not need any Arabic Numeral Symbols between its clauses because it does not need to be “arranged” or “codified” in any order and this fact alone serves as a natural “check” against outside and internal corrupt political influences.
What Style and Form of government did the King want for the Colonies?
Unfortunately, the European Royal Family's Confederate Congress and its University Publishing House Company system has reversed the intended American Colonial government, both in Style and in Form, gradually upon all subsequent Republican State generations from 1812 to the present. “Confederate” is an original Latin reference meaning a “criminal private federation of several men” in opposition to the intended “Lawful Public (we, the People) Authority.”
ALL of the original American Colonial Instruments of candid Colonial American Republican government from 1774 to 1812 were completely destroyed in the Arlington and Richmond depository fires, excepting only the Unanimous Declaration of the United Colonies of America July 4, 1776, and The Records of the Colonial Debates of the 1787 Convention of the American Continental Republican Congress of Philadelphia, which had been placed into the custody of Mr. Jonathan Elliot for printing and publication. The careful reading of the original Records of The Debates, by Elliot can put everything into proper perspective.
It is essential to understand that during this same period, from 1774 through 1812, there was only one organization operating on American soil that called itself "The United States"; and that was, and still is, the Confederate Congress of New York and its Select European Royal Family University "Representative Membership, i.e. "One House Legislative Counsel.” The term "con-federate" in its original Latin reference describes a criminal federation operating against the lawfully established style & form of public government; the slang term of which is Federal.
For the purpose of gaining a better understanding of the Law of Statute we will use the Perfected September, 1787 American Colonial Supreme National Republican State Declaration of Government (erroneously referred to by subsequent generations as a Constitution) for an example:
The first sentence of the Constitution is often called a Preamble. But that term was not applied to it by those who framed the instrument, and is not found in the original manuscript. It is not a preamble in form or substance, but is the Enacting Clause - an integral part of the statute itself. A preamble gives reasons why a resolution should be adopted or an enactment made, but is not a part of the resolution or enactment. The enacting clause, to the contrary, is mandatory. No other part of a statute is more important - such as is the introductory sentence of the 1787 Supreme National Republican Declaration (the Constitution): “We, the People of________, for certain Purposes, do ordain and establish this (Statute) for the (United Republican States) of America (for the ends as follows); That, That, That, etc". Again, in this official one-ofa- kind case example, the “States” are in fact each individual family unit collectively within each respective “Parish”, “Colony” AND all of the Colonies collectively; and NOT in reference to the Deputy Seat(s) of the government as is now the case due to the cleverly-transposed American instruments that gradually occurred between 1812 and 1860.
In this perspective, by application of a simple school classroom exercise, the Constitutional Preamble reverts back to the original Enacting Clause, and all Arabic Numeral Symbols are deleted wherever they appear in the text and are replaced by the declarative word "That". After you have completed this simple classroom exercise upon the present American transposed "1846 Hickey Constitution version", you will be among the growing number people who will know what the original perfected American Colonial Declaration of Republican Government looked like when it emerged from that historical 1787 Philadelphia Continental Congress Convention. Of course, some words and punctuation were also transposed by the Confederate Congress and its private University Publishing House Company, most of which are quite obvious once you properly apply “The Law of English/Latin Grammar” as then uniformly understood.
Bill of Rights
Needless to point out in this case, whatever actions a Deputy takes he also takes against himself, or herself, and against his or her posterity. In this sense, the question arose in the 1787 Philadelphia Convention as follows: What King or Queen, throughout all of history, ever ordered or consented to a "list of rights against themselves" after he or she had just declared himself or herself King and/or Queen over their own Culture (land & water)? In other words, their family farm and their family home!
It is strongly suggested that you are not standing in front of a mirror when you ask yourself this question; lest you might spot such a King or Queen. One must fully understand that the only time in history when a People required a “bill of rights” in defense of their private God-given liberties was when someone other than the People themselves collectively was the King and/or Queen or the Royal Family/Dictatorship ruling class.
"During the 1787 Philadelphia Convention as it was preparing to adjourn sine die, a member who had been absent rose with the need for a bill of rights to be appended. The silence in the chambers was instantly deafening with all eyes fastened on the Deputy with the motion. The chair finally broke the silence with a question to the now bewildered gentleman: ‘Does the learned gentleman know of any instance in history whereby any king or queen ordered a list of rights against themselves after they had just declared themselves King and Queen over their very own Culture?’ The now very red faced gentleman's knees seem to buckle as he slumped back into his chair as he withdrew is motion on the way down! As soon as the assembly adjourned sine die, the embarrassed gentleman rapidly made his exit leaving his papers scattered on the table. Several deputies went over and examined his abandoned papers to discover that the gentleman had obviously committed the folly against himself by taking his notes in the charter form familiar to his profession as a lawyer!” (Records of the Convention, Max Farrand, Yale University, 1911)(Private Writings, of Jefferson, Madison, Washington, and Story)
Humans
The term "human" is original Latin for “manslayer", as in the case of “Hu a tree”; and is applied by the American Framing Deputies in their Unanimous Declaration to list the dastardly Events imposed upon the Families of the Natural American Mothers of All Mankind by those World Rulers of Human Tendency, specifically by King George III. Thus the relation to Human Events pertains entirely to the control of the Natural Republican State of the World by the control of “All Worldly Culture (land & water)”. We should all feel extremely embarrassed to have bought into this flagrant assault against our Natural Mother and should use the word “Human” very judiciously in our vocabulary to self-describe ourselves and our own actions.
In every human (manly corporate) example, the flow (Style) of the government is obviously in the singular: from the Minority Ruling Family, Class, etc. authority down to, or upon the Majority of the Natural Family. It occurs in every possible aspect, commencing with the complete ownership and control of All Worldly Culture (land & water). Hence the European Royal Family University’s (Confederate Congress of New York) goal to control all World geography, naturally would thereby assume complete control of all Life Activity there-upon which is clearly set forth of purpose in its privately-owned 1777 Articles of Confederation, the 1787 Northwest Territorial Ordinance (Compact), the Constitution For the American People, 1846 by Hickey, and United States Code Statutes at Large Publication (USC), 1926 to present. It is therefore only these particular Human University Regency Order select members who have been, and still are today, calling only themselves The United States.
Call it The Parade of the Humans for want of a better term to describe only the History of the Rulers of the World and only their related events imposed upon the Natural Republican States (All of the People). Governments do not make history - only people make history.
Remember the History of World Warfare - it's primary purpose is to destroy a Mind Set within a particular Class of Republican People (a Colony) to the advantage of the Human Class Mind Set.
There are but only two WORLD classes - the majority Natural Republican Class (Families of all People) within each of their respective Geographical Boundaries, versus the minority Royal University Human Class desiring to Control All World Geography (Culture); and therefore All Life Activity there-upon. Prior to the introduction of the July 4, 1776 Unanimous Declaration to the rest of “the Candid World” by the founders of the untried 1774 Great American Republican Experiment, only The European Royal University Human Class existed in its various “manly styles.”
We are not dealing with, nor establishing communities, but in fact with assemblies of People in which their Seats of Government in no manner resemble the typical and more familiar "manly corporate Representative (power of attorney) state" vested in entirely in a King, Ruler, Monarchy, Anarchy, Leader, or such other singular synonymous terms grouped under the title of Human Events to which the term “Federal” can apply.
So, essentially what we are actually engaging is the Revival, and Enlarging of the greatest undertaking in the history of all Mankind, to make it fit the demands of Natural Republican States in this new century of nearly complete University Human Geographic Control of all Worldly Culture, and thus all forms of life activity thereupon.
How was the initial experiment derailed in America?
The framework of all candid Colonial American Republican Government was in Declarative Format until 1813. Hence, all original American Instruments of government were described as being “Republican in Form”; or sometimes referred to as “the American Republican Freeman Letters.” The American Archive Depositories in Richmond and Arlington were burned completely to the ground with all of their contents in the so-called War of 1812. Coincidently, little other additional damage was inflicted during this very short incursion.
The year 1812 was when the European Royal Family sacked Washington, D.C. and the American Colonial Archives Depositories in Arlington and Richmond were burned to the ground from within by Confederate operatives posing as librarians. This is in reference to the librarians who were actually Confederate Congress University operatives (equivalent to Rhoads Scholars today) posing as trustworthy American Librarians. Only some of the New York Confederate Congress Library contents were taken out in the street and burned with some furniture by its librarians; thus leaving only the desired "transposed versions of the official American Colonial documents.”
After the “burning” the University Press, Crown Press, and several other related private Confederate Congress Code Publishing Houses printed hundreds of different versions of the destroyed documents and scattered them throughout the land. With the help of Carnagee libraries, select members of the Congress and the Courts, the Sir William Hickey, Esq. version of “The Constitution” was chosen as the “Standard Version” adopted by resolution of volume purchase by the select membership in the U.S. Congress and the Courts in February 1847. The U.S. Congress then ordered it “Franked (mailed at the government expense)” to the public by the new March 1847 Post Roads and Postal Franking Act. This officially established the date in which the so-called Twelve Articles (Charter) of Federal Amendment (commonly known as the Bill of Rights) were first officially published in America. And this is how they were actually adopted.
From 1813 forward, the Confederate Congress and its University Publishing House Company system virtually took over by replacing all of the original American Declarations with cleverly transposed “Constitutions” in typical Royal Family River Basin Corporate (Magna Charta) Charter style, by simply transposing the word “That” wherever it appeared in the text with a capital Arabic numeral symbol. Later versions included small Arabic numeral symbols within the “Articles” of Constitution. After the 1812 Archives Depository fires, all such American official assemblies under Federal, i.e Confederate Congress control and authority, were possessed of "A Committee of Style... and Arrangement”. The clear objective was to transform the global threat of candid Republican government, back to the desired European Royal Family’s control over all Worldly Culture agenda.
Therefore, from 1813 forward, the original fourteen American Colonies no longer had a “Senate and House of Deputies,” but instead consisted of a “Senate and House of Representatives”, simply by reason of clever Private University Publication substituting the original American Republican Instruments with the transposed “Constitution Versions” to eliminate the need for a public vote.
“Representative” simply means implied unlimited or limited power of attorney. By 1816 all original “Fourteen American Republican Colonies” had been cleverly transformed into “Corporate Democratic Republics” by the Confederate Congress of New York and its notorious private University Publish House Companies.
This points out that from 1813 forward, the University transpositions remained continuous and uniform to coincide with United States Statutes at Large (i.e. formerly known as Lawyers Guides of Great Britain...for the American Colonies). The connection here is "When in the course of Human Events, it becomes necessary for one people..., etc, etc.” (July 4, 1776). This Unanimous Declaration made it clear to the rest of the Candid World (this one People), that henceforth all connection (all ties whatever) is absolved and dissolved from the European Royal Family and its University clergy (lawyers and professors of Degree), and its diverse Culture Control agenda. That would include those lawyers’ Guides, wouldn't it?
In this respect, our undertaking is certainly much greater now in this century than what confronted those American Framers between 1774 and 1812, primarily because of the massive increase of the World's Republican (Family) population compounded by the University's near-complete control of all World Media and Public Education at the public expense since 1910 forward to the present time. Other than that feature, the only thing that has changed is technology, and the speed of communications.
At this point, we must necessarily switch our focus to another very important Natural Law known as Law of Language (grammar) in order to establish that desired "Uniformity of Understanding among the Natural Republican State of the World”, which is the most important single element to the winning of any public issue, to include winning of any war.
Law of language
Interestingly, the Law of Language is formerly the sole property, so to speak, of only The Candid English/Latin Speaking World. Since the turn of the 19th Century, the Law of Language has extended, more or less, to include a major segment of The Non- Candid World adopting the English / Latin language due to the development of global communications and commerce. And this is a good thing. However, this Natural Republican State of the World exists and extends to both the Candid (white) World and the Non-Candid (non-white) World equally, regardless of the mode of communications between individuals thereof, especially for the purpose of this writing.
The European Royal Family Rule has been in fact, up to this time, Rule by Class via an illusion of ‘Collective Sovereignty.’ It’s been an illusion because the People have been barred from assembling as a whole due to the lack of technologies, and their elected “representatives” have, by default of the People, taken on the role of “Collective Representative Sovereignty.” The University has cleverly substituted “equality” in lieu of the actual state of being “equal.” But now the People have the necessary technology - the Internet - to assemble for the first time in history, and, in fact, as “Equals,” but the real key at all times is “Uniformity of Understanding what is written and read.”
See: http://www.upworldgov.org
What was the Great American Republican Experiment?
The great experiment was to create a government that was truly in the hands of the People, not the King or his Representatives, that would provide peace and harmony for the People and for the Earth itself.
In order for all the People to fully understand the highly significant elements of this Great American Republican Experiment, they must first be aware of the application of the original Latin in which over one third of the text of the original Colonial Declarations of candid Republican government was written. It is a well-known principle of law that the exact determination of a lawful or legal document is dependent upon a precise uniform knowledge of the grammar in which the document is written at the time it was prepared by its framing Deputies.
To begin with, original Latin, as in many of its off-shoot languages, is male-singular or feminine-plural-gender sensitive. Therefore, in order to fully understand the law of Statute, one must be aware of the law of language upon application, and be very aware of the gender being used. For example, all “manly governments corporate” of the World are defined by Latin male-singular-gender terms, because the “flow” of government is only in one direction: from the Ruling Class down. Only one government in all history is defined by a Latin feminine-gender-plural term, because the “flow” of government extends to and from the People in a plenary system at every level. With this in mind, one must fully digest the following definitions:
Democracy: Anglicized singular male expression from original Latin “demos + cratios” meaning “Upon the Majority of anything, including Men (People)”. The “flow” is singular.
Republic: Anglicized singular male expression from original Latin “res + plubicus,” meaning “For all Men (People)”. The “flow” is singular.
Republican: Anglicized plural-feminine expression from original Latin “res + plublicae” to “res + publicanus,” meaning “Of, By, For, From, and To all Men (People)”. The “flow” is not only in the plural, but also “plenary” in nature as in the natural Family Unit.
Colony: Assembly of Farm Families (natural Republican States) within a prescribed geographical boundary (of culture). This also pertains to “Tribe.”
Culture: “Land-water.”
Republican State: The family of every Natural Mother to include her husband and all of her offspring.
What Style and Form of Government did the Colonists desire?
The Form is in reference to the written framework of the government; the Style is in reference to its actual operation within the confines of its framework, sometimes referred to as The Flow of the Government.
There are only three principal styles and forms of public governments operating throughout the history of the World: (1) Manly Republic: Rule by King or Queen “For the People,” who alone is free (2) Manly Democracy: Rule by Class “Upon all People”, who alone are free; (3) Republican: “Rule Of, By, To For, From All of the People, who are All free.
Therefore we can clearly see that there is but a “hair’s breadth distinction” between a Manly Democracy Corporate and a Manly Republic Corporate “Upon” versus “For”. In both cases the “flow of government” remains in a single direction - from the top down (as in direct current).
The idea of a Government “Republican in Form and Style” is a very serious departure from the rest of the candid world’s democracies and republics because the flow of government is variable (as in alternating current), or “plenary” at each level.
The original American Colonial form of government is the only government in history that is defined by a Latin feminine-gender-plural Term: Republican; obviously because of the plural flow of government.
The official American Government was manned by Deputies at the individual Colonial level as well as at the new Perfected National Supreme Republican level; and was originally described as The Supreme Law of the People, NOT of the Land. All individuals become “Deputies” when performing specific duties for the assembly of People, because they were “Deputies” even unto themselves and their own families. Up to this time the Great American Experiment is the only assembly of people in all of history that has attempted to employ a Natural (hence Nation) Republican Government (of, by, from, to, for) in actual operation (in Style), and in writing (in Form).
There is no other governmental operation in comparison. All other Styles of Worldly government throughout all recorded history are defined by Latin male-singular terms: Republic, Democracy, Anarchy, Monarchy, Oligarchy, etc, etc; all most commonly referred to as Manly States Corporate, whereby all flow of government is in the singular (i.e. one way only) from Ruler or the Ruling Class downward, and their Written Documents are in Corporate Charter (Charta) (i.e. Latin Co-Statutere, hence ‘Constitution’ in form).
Therefore there is a vast distinction between a Constitution (a list of independent statutes for different purposes)" and a Statute (a declaration of single purpose).
Therefore, the People of (name of nation) who are concerned must decide whether they wish to maintain a Manly Corporate Representative Style and Form of Government, or erect a Supreme National Republican Style and Form of Deputy Government.
If a Republican Form is desired, the true authority of its creators - all of the People - needs to be identified in its Enacting Clause. This is NOT a preamble to a “constitution.”
The original fourteen (14) American Colonial Declaration “Enacting Clauses,” extending more or less from the original Virginia Plan, make up the “Enacting Clause of Purpose” of the Unanimous Declaration of 4 July 1776. The July 4, 1776 Unanimous Republican Declaration was “perfected” thirteen years later in September, 1787 by the very same “Deputy Framers” who penned the 1776 model, and in the very same grammar form and style, known as “Republican in Form” or in “Letter Form,” for want of a better term.
The Enacting Clause is perfectly authoritative in its source: the People; peremptory in its action: ordain and establish; definite and exact in its subject: this (Statute); and distinct, broad, and extensive in its purpose and ends: embracing the defense of liberty, safety, and welfare of the National (natural) Independent Republican States (every Natural Mother) of America as its primary objective by its established Deputies.
We have here (1) the Authority: We, the People of these United Colonies; (2) the ends for which the More Perfect 1787 Supreme National Republican Statute is made, in Six Particulars of Supreme Importance known to every natural Mother on Earth; (3) the explicit ordaining of this Statute, including this introductory clause; (4) the Nation of Republican States for whom it is made: the People of These United Colonies of America. The only distinction between this Perfected 1787 Colonial Republican Statute and the individual fourteen Colonial Statutes in place from 1774 to 1787 is the coined word Nation (National). This, in part, explains why no further oath was required at the new Perfected National Seat of Government, since the "Deputies" thereof held their respective National Seats under the same oath as their respective individual fourteen Colonial Statute counter parts. In other words in this Natural (National) plenary system, the oath of the seat and oath of fidelity pertained to every Colonial Deputy regardless of his temporary appointment level. And Statutes place limitations only upon Deputies.
The 1787 Perfected Supreme National Republican Declaration was in the very same format and graphics style as is the 1776 Unanimous Declaration of the American Republican States (all of the American Families) which is required to retain consistency in Form. Hence the term: “Republican in Form.” Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with a “Republican Fraternal Political Organization of University.” It is, in fact, an official operation of Government, distinctive in its Form (framework) and its Style (mode of operation).
To further clarify, the 1774-1812 Great American Experiment was not a representative style of government under any kind of pretext. Obviously a “Deputy” is not a “Representative” (implied power of attorney).
To best describe this remarkable Republican system, it was and still is to some extent a Plenary System of Revolving Temporary Deputies at every level: Township, Parish (County), Colonial (State), and Supreme National (diametrically opposite of federal), and in each level, the flow (style) of the government was in the Plural; and each level was completely defined and contained within one single Statute (a Declaration Letter) in Form, following its "Enacting Clause” of Authority (We, the People) and Purpose (limitations imposed only upon the Deputy). In other words, the “Limitation of Action” was imposed upon all of the Colonial Deputies uniformly, regardless of their station as set forth in that one single Statute.
The single July 4, 1776 Statute, the Unanimous Declaration of the United Colonies of America in no manner, shape or form, established any kind of alleged Representative (unlimited Power of Attorney) Government; contrary to the 1777 Articles of Confederation or the later transposed 1846 Confederate Congress’ Hickey Version of “The Constitution FOR the American People" elaborated upon below.
The Republican State is a direct reference to the Family of the Natural Mother; hence, the true Independent State of America, and to includes the Mothers of the Republican States of (name of nation) and all other parts of the World. For this reason, all 1774-1812 American instruments of government were also Republican in Style (operation) in support of the Republican Form (written framework). The Form was a Single Statute (a Declaration) - explaining why the Colonial Framers never referred to their written frameworks as Constitutions (Latin: co-statutere), i.e. in "corporate charter form”. The July 4, 1776 Declaration, for example, is in single Statute (letter) form, and therefore does not require a "committee of arrangement". The original fourteen Colonial Declarations of government and their Unanimous 1776 Declaration, and as Perfected thirteen years hence were often referred to by the Royal Family clergy as the Freeman Letters or Letters of American Republican Government, for want of a better description! Indeed, the 1774-1789 American Continental Congress was possessed of only a "Committee on Style." A Declaration (one single Statute) does not need to be arranged.
Many have a misunderstanding of the manly Democratic-Republic state (corporate) versus the natural Republican State (non-corporate). Remember, Republic is male singular; Republican is feminine plural. This misunderstanding is normal because of the European Royal Family University programming that has been instilled in the minds of the Worldly Posterity gradually since the American Colonial Archives Depository fires of 1812 to the present time (discussed in more detail below).
Neither a manly republic corporate nor a manly democracy corporate can operate within the intended feminine natural (National) non-corporate Republican system that is wholly defined and contained within a single statute for that purpose: one single statute, following its Enacting Clause of singular purpose, does not need any Arabic Numeral Symbols between its clauses because it does not need to be “arranged” or “codified” in any order and this fact alone serves as a natural “check” against outside and internal corrupt political influences.
What Style and Form of government did the King want for the Colonies?
Unfortunately, the European Royal Family's Confederate Congress and its University Publishing House Company system has reversed the intended American Colonial government, both in Style and in Form, gradually upon all subsequent Republican State generations from 1812 to the present. “Confederate” is an original Latin reference meaning a “criminal private federation of several men” in opposition to the intended “Lawful Public (we, the People) Authority.”
ALL of the original American Colonial Instruments of candid Colonial American Republican government from 1774 to 1812 were completely destroyed in the Arlington and Richmond depository fires, excepting only the Unanimous Declaration of the United Colonies of America July 4, 1776, and The Records of the Colonial Debates of the 1787 Convention of the American Continental Republican Congress of Philadelphia, which had been placed into the custody of Mr. Jonathan Elliot for printing and publication. The careful reading of the original Records of The Debates, by Elliot can put everything into proper perspective.
It is essential to understand that during this same period, from 1774 through 1812, there was only one organization operating on American soil that called itself "The United States"; and that was, and still is, the Confederate Congress of New York and its Select European Royal Family University "Representative Membership, i.e. "One House Legislative Counsel.” The term "con-federate" in its original Latin reference describes a criminal federation operating against the lawfully established style & form of public government; the slang term of which is Federal.
For the purpose of gaining a better understanding of the Law of Statute we will use the Perfected September, 1787 American Colonial Supreme National Republican State Declaration of Government (erroneously referred to by subsequent generations as a Constitution) for an example:
The first sentence of the Constitution is often called a Preamble. But that term was not applied to it by those who framed the instrument, and is not found in the original manuscript. It is not a preamble in form or substance, but is the Enacting Clause - an integral part of the statute itself. A preamble gives reasons why a resolution should be adopted or an enactment made, but is not a part of the resolution or enactment. The enacting clause, to the contrary, is mandatory. No other part of a statute is more important - such as is the introductory sentence of the 1787 Supreme National Republican Declaration (the Constitution): “We, the People of________, for certain Purposes, do ordain and establish this (Statute) for the (United Republican States) of America (for the ends as follows); That, That, That, etc". Again, in this official one-ofa- kind case example, the “States” are in fact each individual family unit collectively within each respective “Parish”, “Colony” AND all of the Colonies collectively; and NOT in reference to the Deputy Seat(s) of the government as is now the case due to the cleverly-transposed American instruments that gradually occurred between 1812 and 1860.
In this perspective, by application of a simple school classroom exercise, the Constitutional Preamble reverts back to the original Enacting Clause, and all Arabic Numeral Symbols are deleted wherever they appear in the text and are replaced by the declarative word "That". After you have completed this simple classroom exercise upon the present American transposed "1846 Hickey Constitution version", you will be among the growing number people who will know what the original perfected American Colonial Declaration of Republican Government looked like when it emerged from that historical 1787 Philadelphia Continental Congress Convention. Of course, some words and punctuation were also transposed by the Confederate Congress and its private University Publishing House Company, most of which are quite obvious once you properly apply “The Law of English/Latin Grammar” as then uniformly understood.
Bill of Rights
Needless to point out in this case, whatever actions a Deputy takes he also takes against himself, or herself, and against his or her posterity. In this sense, the question arose in the 1787 Philadelphia Convention as follows: What King or Queen, throughout all of history, ever ordered or consented to a "list of rights against themselves" after he or she had just declared himself or herself King and/or Queen over their own Culture (land & water)? In other words, their family farm and their family home!
It is strongly suggested that you are not standing in front of a mirror when you ask yourself this question; lest you might spot such a King or Queen. One must fully understand that the only time in history when a People required a “bill of rights” in defense of their private God-given liberties was when someone other than the People themselves collectively was the King and/or Queen or the Royal Family/Dictatorship ruling class.
"During the 1787 Philadelphia Convention as it was preparing to adjourn sine die, a member who had been absent rose with the need for a bill of rights to be appended. The silence in the chambers was instantly deafening with all eyes fastened on the Deputy with the motion. The chair finally broke the silence with a question to the now bewildered gentleman: ‘Does the learned gentleman know of any instance in history whereby any king or queen ordered a list of rights against themselves after they had just declared themselves King and Queen over their very own Culture?’ The now very red faced gentleman's knees seem to buckle as he slumped back into his chair as he withdrew is motion on the way down! As soon as the assembly adjourned sine die, the embarrassed gentleman rapidly made his exit leaving his papers scattered on the table. Several deputies went over and examined his abandoned papers to discover that the gentleman had obviously committed the folly against himself by taking his notes in the charter form familiar to his profession as a lawyer!” (Records of the Convention, Max Farrand, Yale University, 1911)(Private Writings, of Jefferson, Madison, Washington, and Story)
Humans
The term "human" is original Latin for “manslayer", as in the case of “Hu a tree”; and is applied by the American Framing Deputies in their Unanimous Declaration to list the dastardly Events imposed upon the Families of the Natural American Mothers of All Mankind by those World Rulers of Human Tendency, specifically by King George III. Thus the relation to Human Events pertains entirely to the control of the Natural Republican State of the World by the control of “All Worldly Culture (land & water)”. We should all feel extremely embarrassed to have bought into this flagrant assault against our Natural Mother and should use the word “Human” very judiciously in our vocabulary to self-describe ourselves and our own actions.
In every human (manly corporate) example, the flow (Style) of the government is obviously in the singular: from the Minority Ruling Family, Class, etc. authority down to, or upon the Majority of the Natural Family. It occurs in every possible aspect, commencing with the complete ownership and control of All Worldly Culture (land & water). Hence the European Royal Family University’s (Confederate Congress of New York) goal to control all World geography, naturally would thereby assume complete control of all Life Activity there-upon which is clearly set forth of purpose in its privately-owned 1777 Articles of Confederation, the 1787 Northwest Territorial Ordinance (Compact), the Constitution For the American People, 1846 by Hickey, and United States Code Statutes at Large Publication (USC), 1926 to present. It is therefore only these particular Human University Regency Order select members who have been, and still are today, calling only themselves The United States.
Call it The Parade of the Humans for want of a better term to describe only the History of the Rulers of the World and only their related events imposed upon the Natural Republican States (All of the People). Governments do not make history - only people make history.
Remember the History of World Warfare - it's primary purpose is to destroy a Mind Set within a particular Class of Republican People (a Colony) to the advantage of the Human Class Mind Set.
There are but only two WORLD classes - the majority Natural Republican Class (Families of all People) within each of their respective Geographical Boundaries, versus the minority Royal University Human Class desiring to Control All World Geography (Culture); and therefore All Life Activity there-upon. Prior to the introduction of the July 4, 1776 Unanimous Declaration to the rest of “the Candid World” by the founders of the untried 1774 Great American Republican Experiment, only The European Royal University Human Class existed in its various “manly styles.”
We are not dealing with, nor establishing communities, but in fact with assemblies of People in which their Seats of Government in no manner resemble the typical and more familiar "manly corporate Representative (power of attorney) state" vested in entirely in a King, Ruler, Monarchy, Anarchy, Leader, or such other singular synonymous terms grouped under the title of Human Events to which the term “Federal” can apply.
So, essentially what we are actually engaging is the Revival, and Enlarging of the greatest undertaking in the history of all Mankind, to make it fit the demands of Natural Republican States in this new century of nearly complete University Human Geographic Control of all Worldly Culture, and thus all forms of life activity thereupon.
How was the initial experiment derailed in America?
The framework of all candid Colonial American Republican Government was in Declarative Format until 1813. Hence, all original American Instruments of government were described as being “Republican in Form”; or sometimes referred to as “the American Republican Freeman Letters.” The American Archive Depositories in Richmond and Arlington were burned completely to the ground with all of their contents in the so-called War of 1812. Coincidently, little other additional damage was inflicted during this very short incursion.
The year 1812 was when the European Royal Family sacked Washington, D.C. and the American Colonial Archives Depositories in Arlington and Richmond were burned to the ground from within by Confederate operatives posing as librarians. This is in reference to the librarians who were actually Confederate Congress University operatives (equivalent to Rhoads Scholars today) posing as trustworthy American Librarians. Only some of the New York Confederate Congress Library contents were taken out in the street and burned with some furniture by its librarians; thus leaving only the desired "transposed versions of the official American Colonial documents.”
After the “burning” the University Press, Crown Press, and several other related private Confederate Congress Code Publishing Houses printed hundreds of different versions of the destroyed documents and scattered them throughout the land. With the help of Carnagee libraries, select members of the Congress and the Courts, the Sir William Hickey, Esq. version of “The Constitution” was chosen as the “Standard Version” adopted by resolution of volume purchase by the select membership in the U.S. Congress and the Courts in February 1847. The U.S. Congress then ordered it “Franked (mailed at the government expense)” to the public by the new March 1847 Post Roads and Postal Franking Act. This officially established the date in which the so-called Twelve Articles (Charter) of Federal Amendment (commonly known as the Bill of Rights) were first officially published in America. And this is how they were actually adopted.
From 1813 forward, the Confederate Congress and its University Publishing House Company system virtually took over by replacing all of the original American Declarations with cleverly transposed “Constitutions” in typical Royal Family River Basin Corporate (Magna Charta) Charter style, by simply transposing the word “That” wherever it appeared in the text with a capital Arabic numeral symbol. Later versions included small Arabic numeral symbols within the “Articles” of Constitution. After the 1812 Archives Depository fires, all such American official assemblies under Federal, i.e Confederate Congress control and authority, were possessed of "A Committee of Style... and Arrangement”. The clear objective was to transform the global threat of candid Republican government, back to the desired European Royal Family’s control over all Worldly Culture agenda.
Therefore, from 1813 forward, the original fourteen American Colonies no longer had a “Senate and House of Deputies,” but instead consisted of a “Senate and House of Representatives”, simply by reason of clever Private University Publication substituting the original American Republican Instruments with the transposed “Constitution Versions” to eliminate the need for a public vote.
“Representative” simply means implied unlimited or limited power of attorney. By 1816 all original “Fourteen American Republican Colonies” had been cleverly transformed into “Corporate Democratic Republics” by the Confederate Congress of New York and its notorious private University Publish House Companies.
This points out that from 1813 forward, the University transpositions remained continuous and uniform to coincide with United States Statutes at Large (i.e. formerly known as Lawyers Guides of Great Britain...for the American Colonies). The connection here is "When in the course of Human Events, it becomes necessary for one people..., etc, etc.” (July 4, 1776). This Unanimous Declaration made it clear to the rest of the Candid World (this one People), that henceforth all connection (all ties whatever) is absolved and dissolved from the European Royal Family and its University clergy (lawyers and professors of Degree), and its diverse Culture Control agenda. That would include those lawyers’ Guides, wouldn't it?
In this respect, our undertaking is certainly much greater now in this century than what confronted those American Framers between 1774 and 1812, primarily because of the massive increase of the World's Republican (Family) population compounded by the University's near-complete control of all World Media and Public Education at the public expense since 1910 forward to the present time. Other than that feature, the only thing that has changed is technology, and the speed of communications.
At this point, we must necessarily switch our focus to another very important Natural Law known as Law of Language (grammar) in order to establish that desired "Uniformity of Understanding among the Natural Republican State of the World”, which is the most important single element to the winning of any public issue, to include winning of any war.
Law of language
Interestingly, the Law of Language is formerly the sole property, so to speak, of only The Candid English/Latin Speaking World. Since the turn of the 19th Century, the Law of Language has extended, more or less, to include a major segment of The Non- Candid World adopting the English / Latin language due to the development of global communications and commerce. And this is a good thing. However, this Natural Republican State of the World exists and extends to both the Candid (white) World and the Non-Candid (non-white) World equally, regardless of the mode of communications between individuals thereof, especially for the purpose of this writing.
The European Royal Family Rule has been in fact, up to this time, Rule by Class via an illusion of ‘Collective Sovereignty.’ It’s been an illusion because the People have been barred from assembling as a whole due to the lack of technologies, and their elected “representatives” have, by default of the People, taken on the role of “Collective Representative Sovereignty.” The University has cleverly substituted “equality” in lieu of the actual state of being “equal.” But now the People have the necessary technology - the Internet - to assemble for the first time in history, and, in fact, as “Equals,” but the real key at all times is “Uniformity of Understanding what is written and read.”
See: http://www.upworldgov.org
No comments:
Post a Comment