Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Why Does RFK Jr. Need Access to the Government's Healthcare Databases? A Credible and Effective Class 1 Recall Requires U.S. Data Analysis Apr 2   READ IN APP   April 2, 2025: In a March 26, 2025, post on X, HHS Secretary Kennedy explained how ‘defiant bureaucrats’ were stopping his from accessing closely guarded databases that might reveal the dangers of certain medical interventions - also known as - vaccines. Share “Some of these little fiefdoms are, for example, are so insulated and territorial that they actually horde our patient medical data and sell it for profit to each other… A few isolated divisions are neglecting public health all together and seem only accountable to the industries that they’re supposed to be regulating. In one case, defiant bureaucrats impeded the Secretary’s office from accessing the closely guarded databases that might reveal the dangers of certain drugs and medical interventions (aka vaccines).” - HHS Secretary Kennedy Upgrade to paid HHS Secretary did not mince his words when he said, “defiant bureaucrats impeded the Secretary’s office from accessing the closely guarded databases that might reveal the dangers of certain drugs and medical interventions (aka vaccines).” You can read about the closely guarded databases in this Kingston Report. Why Does RFK Jr. Need Access to the Government's Healthcare Databases? RFK Jr. needs this data to properly execute a Class 1 recall strategy for the

Video: America! Some Assembly Required - Episode 24

 Anna and Lisa will pick up stalking about questions that did not get answered last week. They will then move on to the Bondsman's role

“The True Story of the Bilderberg Group” and What They May Be Planning Now A Review of Daniel Estulin's book By Stephen Lendman Global Research,

 

A Review of Daniel Estulin's book

By Stephen Lendman

Global Research, May 25, 2014

Global Research 1 June 2009

Region: USA

Theme: Global Economy

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808

 46K

 3901  4598

 

 363K

For over 14 years, Daniel Estulin has investigated and researched the Bilderberg Group’s far-reaching influence on business and finance, global politics, war and peace, and control of the world’s resources and its money.
His book, “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” was published in 2005 and is now updated in a new 2009 edition. He states that in 1954, “the most powerful men in the world met for the first time” in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, “debated the future of the world,” and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who’s who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others – some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his top officials.
Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB’s Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England’s Mervyn King.

For over half a century, no agenda or discussion topics became public nor is any press coverage allowed. The few invited fourth estate attendees and their bosses are sworn to secrecy. Nonetheless, Estulin undertook “an investigative journey” that became his life’s work. He states:
“Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this withot help of ‘conscientious objectors’ from inside, as well as outside, the Group’s membership.” As a result, he keeps their names confidential.

The Hidden Dangers of Infant Formula and The Incredible Benefits of Natural Milk

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Why Is What We Feed Infants So Unhealthy? The Hidden Dangers of Infant Formula and The Incredible Benefits of Natural Milk A Midwestern Doctor Mar 30 ∙ Preview   READ IN APP   Story at a Glance: •The infant formula industry has almost 100 billion dollars in annual sales. This was accomplished by unscrupulous marketing that trained doctors and parents to discard breastfeeding and tricked them into believing infant formula is “safe and effective.” •Infant formula is full of corn syrup and seed oils, which cause metabolic dysfunction and excessive weight gain. Remarkably, that weight gain has been normalized, making it possible to diagnose normal children as “underweight” and thereby push formula on them. •Infant formula is full of seed oils due to a 1980 law based on a 1963 study that concluded their fats were essential for development and hence must be in all formula. Since then, a mountain of evidence has emerged showing they’re actually harmful, but nonetheless, the 1980 formula requirements were never updated. RFK Jr. is thus the first H.H.S. Secretary ever to attempt to address this colossal mistake. •In contrast, breastmilk (alongside a healthy maternal diet) is one of the most nutritious substances an infant can consume, providing a myriad of benefits including developing the infant’s brain, gut, and immune system, decreasing many serious diseases, enhancing the critical mother-child bond, and reducing the mother’s risk of many severe illnesses (e.g., cancer). • Before the introduction of infant formula, mothers would often supplement their children’s diets with animal milks. If raw, these milks can yield significant benefits to children, while in contrast, when pasteurized, they have many issues (e.g., they frequently create allergies).

The Bundy Bloodline: Bloodlines of the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeire

 

The Bundy Bloodline: Bloodlines of the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeire

 

 

 

The Bundy Bloodline

Families in the world who are allied

with the Illuminati

Who and what kind of family are allied with the top 13 llluminati bloodlines? The Illuminati seeks to capture the occult power of powerful occult bloodlines around the world. They have intermarried with American Indians to gain the spiritual power resident within the leading spiritual American Indians. Various Indian reservations are used for llluminati rituals. They have been doing this type of thing for thousands of years Powerful families around the world participate on different levels with the Illuminati. Some participate on a business level- such as the various crime (Mafia type) families around the world. Mafia families might not subscribe to the occult philosophy but they do recognize power and business. Some powerful families around the world participate simply on the level that they have been sucked into the world’s system and are dependent upon going along with the flow of the world’s system. An example of this would be the King of Nepal. The King of Nepal rules aver a poor Hindu kingdom. The British empire has done a great job in trying to make Nepal dependent upon them. Nepal was given British protection, their leading families were given British educations, and their leading tribe of warriors, the Gurkhas have been serving as British mercenaries. Should the King of Nepal break loose from his advisers and take an anti-NWO track, his throne could be taken away via revolution, or invasion. The NWO has the capacity to arrange for the Indian Congress Party to invade or some other destablizing factor. The British MI-6 and the American CIA have also stationed assets (agents) in the country. However, the trump card in sucking nations like Nepal in, is to create conflict like the Cold War and then apply Hegelian dialectics. Many nations around the world have been forced to cosy up with the British and Americans, because of the cold war. Secretly manufactured and secretly controlled international conflicts are a great way to take away the independence of some of the smaller nations. The King of Nepal has for many years feared invasions from either India or China. However, Switzerland has been afforded the luxury of not having to take sides in the Illuminati’s secretly created wars, because the bloodlines have had such total control over Switzerland for so many centuries. There is no need for Switzerland to participate in Hegelian dialectics.

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more I got ChatGPT to tacitly admit that all the COVID vaccine efficacy studies are flawed I asked for the best study of COVID vaccine efficacy. It gave me two. I then pointed out both studies showed that the vaccine didn't work. ChatGPT agreed with me. Steve Kirsch Mar 29   READ IN APP   ChatGPT tried to gaslight me. Didn’t work. I pointed out the flaws, and it agreed and agreed that the paper conclusions were misleading. Executive summary Since no living person on the pro-vaccine side is willing to engage in an interactive civil debate on COVID vaccine efficacy, the only remaining option is to chat with the highly blue-pilled ChatGPT. I made two key points and ChatGPT produced no credible evidence to the contrary. And when ChatGPT tried to gaslight me into believing there were supportive studies, I pointed out the flaws and ChatGPT agreed with me. In particular: I established that there is dispositive government data that is detailed enough to reveal the truth, yet there are no analyses at all that use that data to validate the “safe and effective” claims. This is because any such analyses would be discredited immediately. Instead, they all produce studies that rely on data sources that are all hidden from view and unavailable to other researchers so that nobody can challenge their findings. I claimed that all the studies on vaccine efficacy of death (VEdeath) were flawed since NONE of them took into account the selection bias causing a 3.3X lower non-COVID all-cause mortality in those who chose to be vaccinated. ChatGPT could not produce even a single study that properly adjusted for this difference. Bottom line: the vaccine efficacy studies were all poorly done and the claimed

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Official UK ONS data shows the COVID vaccines didn't reduce your risk of death from COVID. Whoops! It doesn't get any more obvious than this. And still, nobody in the mainstream media or medical community is speaking out? How long will they keep ignoring their own data? Steve Kirsch Mar 28   READ IN APP   Executive summary The UK’s official data tracking the vaccine showed that the vaccine made you more likely to die during COVID periods. The mainstream media is silent about all of this of course! Don’t take my word for it. You can see this for yourself. Here’s a pivot table I made from Table 1 in a recent version of the UK ONS death by vaccination status data. It took all of 15 seconds to make. Pivot table derived from Table of the UK ONS death by vax status data. The vaxxed unvaxxed ratio is supposed to get bigger during high COVID periods. It gets smaller. Whoops! The rightmost column is the unvaxxed/vaxxed mortality ratio which is normally around 2 to 3 due to selection bias (unvaxxed cohorts generally have 2x to 3x higher mortality; we see the same effect in the US as this CDC study noted). It’s not the vaccine making people healthier; it’s because healthier people opt to be vaccinated.