Shooter Theories on Trump Assassination Attempt
July 22, 2024
Good analysis about the possible origins of the shots.
I may have share with you a long time ago that the Las Vegas
terrorism case is the last one I paid close to attention to. This one I
paid attention to because it’s so ubiquitous. I know terrorism. I was
in one place when I gave a feedback to a PCR article, in another place
two days later, and in state of awareness and knowledge when I wrote my
“The Young Man was ‘a Patsy.'” Up to this point, I was simply going
along with the information as it’s given.
The Kennedy Autopsy 2:...
Buy New $7.95
(as of 01:22 UTC - Details)
Yesterday, I arrived at (the) “terrorism” as it is, and I was in another place which is the final place. Again, I am not interested in chasing it because it is too consuming for no particular service to anyone. There is the problem that most people can’t bear the issue. But I write this t give my feedback to these intelligent people – maybe enlightened people is a better description. It is very important not to be deceived. It’s important for even mental health reasons. I will be quick on the issue below because to seek a clarity like I normally would is too time-consuming for me in such a thing. I had given on a 9-11 article after much trying, when finally the one you published was written like any other and I am happy with it, but it’s like all we write – taking our sense of what the audience is ready to consider and avoiding facts that will simply make them end their attention (close their minds).
Some facts on the attack:
.- We know with absolute certainty that the young man was a patsy. I tried to be very respectful to him, but he is much better than I described. He graduated from a college “with honours” just two months ago.
.- It is a terrorist attack from exactly the same source as 9-11, the Las Vegas case, and the case Alex Jones apologized or asked forgiveness for (I always forget its name, excuse me), and more.
.- We see how 9-11 was that’s the enemy of humanity: There were no planes, there no were no 19 terrorists, there was supernatural phenomena at all levels. We depend on what people name “God.” We depend on the help of superior powers who are against this terrorist power, and who in fact must have made it what it is to begin with, as a curse and a punishment.
.- We have “the easy part” since we must be the intelligent human beings we are against a power that has zero intelligence, as demonstrated by its nature and its actions. Of course, it has zero power too. It is doomed.
.- In 9-11, there is a false reality presented with videos that are pre-recorded in some if not all parts. In the Las Vegas case, the man accused who had no criminal record, who was good to his mother, kind to the family of his girlfriend or bride, who was wealthy – I think he was killed elsewhere and his body dumped in the Las Vegas room. They put grenades in his car, in his home, but under the control of the real 9-11 power, a supernatural attacker. In this other case, we see the local police, the Secret Service Director speaking weirdly in a manner reminiscent of the NY policewoman who said she saw the first plane that hist the Northern Tower “half way in, half way out” on the wall. This Director says she placed no agents there because the roof was sloped (!). The police boss of the agent who climbed the roof and went down as soon as he saw a “rifle” also looks like something is wrong with him.
.- In this attack, the videos are all pre-recorded (I realized yesterday). They are fake, from the same attacker. I include an ABC video below where this point is very noticeable. I marked 1:29, 1:33, 1:37, 1:39 as places where we see that the witness videos are fake, and there are more later. Besides the building size and surroundings differences, the NYT video had a vertical object on the right corner of the roof apex which the real building does not have and there are many differences. I think we have noticed at some level that the images and trees do not match with the surroundings of the crime area. This video shows the discrepancy clearly. The differences are easy to note because it is part of the evil mental attack to mock the people by having them not notice obvious things, and it may well be like a test for us, too, since a superior anti-terrorist power exists that really has all the power (the terrorist has none).
.- The young person (Crooks) is much better than I portrayed him without thinking the videos were fake. Like with 9-11, the witnesses are going along with the falsehood and the falsehood is a mental attack. The NYT videos were delivered to them by the enemy of humanity (period).
.- There is not enough analysis of videos. This remains a big problem.
The JFK Assassination ...
Best Price: $25.01
Buy New $35.00
(as of 12:00 UTC - Details)
.- It’s very risky to have been attacked and then act with ignorance of what happened. I wish Trump at least knew what is happening before he decided to continue under a false belief that the “attacker” was killed on the roof.
.- The actual building is much bigger than in the false video where “he” is seen climbing. Somebody could have been firing from such a big, wide building without being seen by any city witnesses (the witness videos are fake, pre-recorded). The young man must have been killed elsewhere. On 9-11, the two buildings fell but much of what we saw on TV and videos was unreal. There were no commercial planes; we know that no planes can go through that steel and concrete wall as if through dust and come out the other side with the plane nose as intact as is seen in the video I ended “On Terrorism” with (and as seen in all 9-11 videos).
The mentioned ABC video is the first inserted video in this article. The police boss of the agent who climbed the roof and went down as soon as he saw a “rifle” also looks like something is wrong with him.
‘ABC Exclusive: Trump rally shooting ‘unacceptable,’ Secret Service Director says’
I write with some haste, pardon me if something is not as clear here as it should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment