Monday, July 15, 2024
4935-4937: An Example of the Idiocy from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Quote:
"Rotary International, the WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, WEF, and the Gates Foundation have poured tens of billions of dollars into vaccinating malnourished children who lack sanitation, water, refrigeration and education. Instead of pushing money into polio, measles and rotavirus vaccines, think of the global problems that would have been solved if those same dollars had been allocated to the most important health intervention in the world’s history: clean water."
This quote comes from Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and is part of a more extensive article here: https://expose-news.com/2024/07/14/clean-water-saved-the-world-not-vaccination/
It's
simple and it's true. Clean drinking water and basic water recycling
and sanitation are far more effective than any amount of vaccine in
preventing diseases of all kinds.
No vaccination in the world has ever had the impact on public health that simple water sanitation has had.
Continuing
to push vaccination or patent drugs in the absence of clean water is
like preaching abstinence to alcoholics in a pub: a nice thought, so far
as it goes.
We
have to arrive at a point where we can do what is practical (clean
water and sanitation for everyone) and meanwhile test to see if any form
of vaccination is actually effective.
Since
beginning our investigation, it is more apparent than ever that there
is no solid groundwork proving the efficacy of vaccination.
You
would think that such a sacred cow would have tons of proof validating
the efficacy of vaccines to prevent disease and prevent the transmission
of disease, but no.
School
children who are "fully vaccinated" are 30% more likely to develop
diseases and co-morbidities including cancers than unvaccinated
children.
There
are no such convincing studies linking use of vaccines and reduction in
incidence or severity or transmission of disease.
How's that for a Big Surprise?
Even
with regard to transmission of diseases like Measles and Smallpox and
Diphtheria, there isn't any convincing correlation between beneficial
results from the use of vaccines versus herd immunity.
In
other words, if we didn't do vaccines at all, much less the over 90
"childhood vaccines" now mandated, we would be just as well off. Minus
the trauma of the injection and pain and swelling and possible
infection, possible anaphylactic shock, and infection of the injection
site, that is.
What
we also find are an astonishing number of synchronicities in which
industrial pollution and diseases resulting from industrial pollution
are palmed off as naturally occurring maladies conquered by
vaccination.
Polio,
for example, has the same exact symptoms as poisoning and neurotoxicity
caused by water soluble pesticides that were marketed in the 1940s and
1950s by the usual suspects --- Monsanto and Dow Chemical.
When
these ill-begotten pesticides were withdrawn from the market, polio
disappeared and it was safe to go swimming again--- but not, as we
assumed, due to the Salk vaccine.
The
penile cancers caused by Agent Orange just happen to be identical to
those caused by vaccines administered against tropical malaria.
It
is more than past time that the chemical corporations and defense
contractors paid for their sins, including the most recent round of
deaths by injection of experimental "vaccines" that were already known
to provide no benefit against prevention of disease or transmission of
disease.
These
mRNA experimental vaccines were already known to have a seven year 100%
mortality rate, but Pfizer wasn't required to publish these
experimental results. Read that: everyone injected can expect to be
dead within seven (7) years of receiving the injections, absent some
kind of divine or practical intercession.
If
you are as sickened by this self-serving commercialization as we are,
take a moment to remember your own instinctive resistance to vaccines
and your intuitive mistrust.
Isn't
it obvious, in retrospect, that vaccines don't prevent disease and
don't prevent transmission of disease? We didn't really need 20,000
studies to prove that point.
Vaccines
provide a convenient excuse to charge people money for services and
pawn off commercial liability for the harm caused by industrial
pollution.
They do nothing to prevent disease or its transmission, according to those who sell these worthless products to us.
So why have we spent billions of dollars on vaccines instead of clean water and sanitation?
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: Our Position
By Anna Von Reitz
There
can be no "re-inhabitation" of our American Federal Republic by British
Territorial persons and forces who never "inhabited" our Federal
Republic in the first place.
Our
Federal Republic is a uniquely American institution operated by and
under the direction of the original Confederation of States.
We
do not accept and will not tolerate a substitution of the American
Federal Republic by a British Territorial "look alike, sound alike"
impersonator.
See this nonsense:
These
people never inhabited and are prohibited from inhabiting our American
Federal Republic; they must (correctly) perceive that the only rightful
re-inhabitation of the Federal Republic must be through the States of
America; the States of America itself can only be Reconstructed via the
States themselves.
The
States have to be reborn and have been reborn via the exact formula we
have put in place: declaration, record, and publication of the unique
individuals having the provenance and standing to provide the correct
political basis for the creation of American States of States and Heirs
to the American States of States, then enabling the reconstruction of
the Federal Republic.
None
of the British Territorial U.S. Citizens including Donald Trump and the
Generals and Admirals of the U.S. Forces have the standing to
repopulate the American Federal Republic.
They must, therefore, stand down.
There
is only one political entity having the natural power and jurisdiction
to sort this mess out and that is the Delegator of all federal
authorities, the unincorporated Federation of States dba The United
States of America.
The
delegating authority, dba, The United States of America,
Unincorporated, and the unincorporated and sovereign and independent
States thereof, must take charge and must reconstruct the American
Federal Subcontractors known as the States of America and the Federal
Republic too.
This requires that both the American Confederation of States and the Federal Republic must be reconstructed by the States.
It cannot be done by any fiat means.
It cannot be done by other foreign federal subcontractors "offering" to reconstitute our Federal Republic.
They
were not given the authority and were not enabled to function as our
Federal Government in the first place and are not given that permission
now.
This
is straight forward and contractual: the British Territorial
Subcontractors cannot and are not allowed to enter upon the duties and
are not enabled to function "as" the States of America nor are they
enabled to function as the Federal Republic.
These
are uniquely American institutions and functions and our British
Territorial Subcontractors are not enabled to usurp upon nor otherwise
enter into our lawful domains.
We object to any attempts on their parts to misrepresent us or to misrepresent our American Government.
They
are not properly declared as Americans and they are not allowed to
enter upon any American property or asset, including the American
Federal Republic.
We
do not recognize any right or duty or obligation of any British
Territorial entity to claim or occupy any aspect of our Confederation
nor our Federal Republic. They need to stand down, mind their own
business, fulfill their contractual obligations, and otherwise get out
of our way.
We are not entertaining any more British Territorial Substitution Schemes.
The
Americans are back, are present, are here and in possession. The Brits
need to back off and get back into their proper orientation as
Subcontractors and otherwise they need to leave us alone to do the work
of reconstruction that has been so long delayed by their failure to
honestly communicate with their employers.
We
do not recognize any undeclared "states" -- Union or otherwise -- that
have not provided proper provenance and have not published their
existence within the lawful State governance we have invoked.
We
do realize that the original states were formed from the outset by
establishing the soil jurisdiction and then the land jurisdiction and
from there establishing all other jurisdictions; however, thanks to
British misrepresentations, we are not initially "located" in the
original states anymore, and must begin from the jurisdiction of the air
and sea and back to the land and cannot claim to be on the soil or the
land apart from reversal of the presumptions created by registrations,
enrollments, and enlistments.
Those people promoting the idea of an ersatz American Republic are ignorant of the facts and the jurisdictions.
The
only way that an American Federal Republic can be reconstructed, is if
the States of the Union act upon the issue and make it possible.
Donald Trump and the U.S. Military cannot make it so by wishing it so.
They
need to stand down and accept the civilian authority of the delegator
of all "federal" powers --- The United States of America, our
unincorporated Federation of States.
All
"federal" agents are called "federal" with respect to the Federation of
States that they are empowered by and required to honor.
Please
notify all Parties --- Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals ---
that we are back on the land and soil of our country and do not empower
unknown legal fiction entities to act on our behalf.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
July 14th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Note: 130 Yards, 390 Feet, is Nothing for a Sniper
By Anna Von Reitz
As
more details emerge, we are told that the 20 year-old Pennsylvanian who
attempted to shoot Donald Trump was "130 yards" away from the speaker's
podium.
To most people that sounds like a long distance, but it is absolutely nothing to a sniper.
Snipers regularly take out targets that are a mile away, over 1700 yards, using heavy caliber long-trajectory 50 mm bullets.
So the failure of the security team to lock down elevated platforms only 130 yards away is stunning.
They knew, and we know, that lapse is not explainable within the purview of normal security operations.
Apparently, even the House Oversight Committee knows and wants answers:
For
example, when former President Richard Nixon went grocery shopping, a
perimeter of 2000 yards was cleared and all rooftops monitored.
Now
you can see how puny and failed the security effort around Trump really
was -- 2000 yards for Tricky Dick, but less than a 130 yard sweep for
Trump.
With
really long range shots snipers use heavy caliber guns-- "Whopping
Mollies" of 50 mm or more; with short range targets (like 130 yards)
they use small caliber high velocity ammo, typically 9 mm, and
light-weight, long-barreled sniper rifles.
So,
it was a headshot and high velocity small caliber sniper fire, just as
you would expect at 130 yards, and nobody needs to wonder anything about
it. This was an assassination attempt according to standard operating
procedures for snipers worldwide.
What
wasn't "standard" is the Secret Service's failure to control access to
elevated positions within easy shooting range of the former President.
What
also isn't "standard response" is the fact that numerous witnesses saw
the shooter and made efforts to draw the attention of Secret Service
agents, saying things like, "He's got a gun!" and pointing at the gunman
minutes before any shots were fired.
If
you were part of a security detail and someone started waving and
shouting, "Hey, look, he's got a gun!" would you respond with rapid
investigation and interception, or turn away and continue chewing your
cud?
No doubt that's part of what the House Oversight Committee will want to ask about:
Unfortunately
for Donald Trump, the cud-chewing response yielded predictable results.
Trump was shot and came within half an inch of being killed, and his 20
year-old assailant is dead along with innocent bystanders killed and
injured.
This
was a mammoth and inexplicable security failure on the part of the
Secret Service. They failed Personal Security Protocols 101 when it
comes to DJT, and they also failed the Attendees at the rally.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment