THE RUSSO-UKRAINIAN WAR AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
This story, shared by V.T., is one of those stories that had me wondering, and I imagine it will have you wondering as well. And if you, like me, have been searching for an explanation of what, exactly, this crazy and completely unnecessary war between Russia and The Ukraine was all about, then this story is for you. Indeed, when I saw it, I thought what better way to end the blogging year of 2025 than with a bit of a mystery and another whopper doozie of a high octane speculation, for in searching for explanations for this crazy war, everything has been advanced: NATO-European lust and greed to break up Russia, and expand eastward, crazy Merkelian-Medusala-von-der-Lyin' schemes to recreate the Central Powers' puppet state of the Hetmanate of the Ukraine after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (1918), Mon(ster)santo plots and and GMO privileges in the Ukraine and access to its rich agricultural markets, biogenetic weapons laboratories, plots to break up the Russian Orthodox Church by the interference of the neo-papal claims of the Ecumaniacal Patriarchate of Constantinople and its financial backers (which include the Vatican, of course), and on and on we could go, and all of them are, to some degree, true.
But according to this story, there may even be some other ingredient in this bizarre stew:
The World's First AI State is Doomed
Note the following(and yes, I've restored proper English diction to the article):
Ukrainian Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov declared that his nation will become a “sovereign AI state” after partnering with Nvidia to create the world’s first government development LLM project by 2030.
Mykhailo stated that (The) Ukraine plans to move from a “digital state” to an “agentic state” where AI actively delivers services across government while making its own decisions that bypass humans. (The) Ukraine already launched Diia.AI, the world’s first national AI assistant. Citizens can access the platform to request services, ask questions, or retrieve documentation.
And this:
Tech companies across the globe are investing heavily in (The) Ukraine, with a specific
emphasis on the AI sector. Google created Diia.AI and permitted the program to operate on Gemini. Kyivstar, recently listed on the US stock exchange, set up 3,500 backup generators to maintain AI services during energy attacks. The AI Factory and WINWIN Centre programs have partnered with European companies to build up (The) Ukraine’s AI system. Microsoft, naturally, has its claws in the public-private partnership as well. Interesting to see companies pouring billions into a nation at war.Sovereign AI is merely a centralized system that gives the state new powers of surveillance, data-processing, and control in real-time. Elite consolidation of power is the entire premise of the (Ukrainian) war and why every bureaucrat has pledged a portion of their nation’s GDP to a prolonged conflict that does not involve them. The European Union would have loved to implement such a program, but their people still have voting rights. Zelensky sold out his people long ago.
(The) Ukraine will attempt to use the program to say they’re no longer corrupt and should be permitted into the EU or even NATO.
So in other words, The Ukraine has not only allowed itself to be the laboratory rat for whatever experiments were going on in those biolabs, and has not only allowed itself to be used as a catspaw for whatever goofy globaloneyist agenda of its Eurogibbering masters in Brussels wanted, but it is now allowing itself to be used as a petri dish to culture the tissue of an artificial intelligence-run "state".
But what if this agenda was part of the plan all along, and only recently has been publicly announced? If so, it would put the whole war between Russia and that country into yet another intriguing interpretive context, one emphasizing again the cultural-civilizationational nature of the conflict, hitherto hinted only by the recent ecclesiastical shenanigans of the Ukrainian Church with the Ecumaniacal Patriarchate of Constantinople. If the goal all along has been to integrate a Ukrainian puppet state into the Grossdeutschestechnoreich of the Eureopean Union, then this artificial intelligence state experiment was probably definitely part of the secret agenda, and may therefore be lurking in the background of Russia's motivations for protecting the Donbass Russians, and reintegrating the Crimea into the Russian Federation.
There is, oddly enough, a curious factor and circumstance that would seem to argue in favor of this view. How many of you remember this story from 2013?
Russia considers going back to typewriters
The move was being pondered after it became clear that the electronic signals in computers (and for that matter, in old electric typewriters) could be monitored and thus communications typed on them could be recreated. Not so for communications typed on real paper on a real analogue typewriter and conveyed by real human messengers to real human leaders who would read the sensitive communication. In other words, Russian security services recognized the vulnerability of digital systems, and the country was pondering a move back to as much analogue information creation and communication as possible. We do not really know how much of this, if any, was ever implemented, but it would not surprise me if at least some of it was. Then, in similar fashion, as The Ukraine was opening the gates of mercantile privilege to western GMO companies like Mon(ster)santo, Russia was taking the opposite tack and putting GMOs under close long-term intergenerational scientific scrutiny, and turning away from GMO seeds. These two odd and seemingly unrelated policy "events" tend to indicate that while Russia would certainly stay abreast of technological developments, it was not prepared either as a state or a civilization to rush into them uncritically, much less endorse them, without some study and analysis, and in the case of typewriters, was willing to contemplate a step backwards in order to maintain its current security. If so, then the conflict between Russia and The Ukraine has civilizational dimensions that run very deep, with Zelensky's pro-western, and therefore pro-technocratic, government at odds with his own country's more traditional (and religious) Orthodox culture, Russia's action might even be interpreted as an attempt to secure its own freedom from such a future. Of course, Russia has all the trappings of technocracy as well, and has openly been pushing digital ID's and so on.
Which puts the conflict with The Ukraine in an even more interesting light, for in that perspective, it's a conflict between two technocratic states, one of which wants to be part of an expansionist globalist West, and the other, which does not. And that's a conflict about fundamental visions and goals: is everything to be amalgamated into one all-encompassing globalist security state, or can real national and sovereignties be preserved by a technocracy? Or to put that point differently, can Russia's experiment to be an independent cultural-technocratic state succeed? Or must all technocracies end in the homogenous swamp of a unitary globalist "state" devoid of cultural uniqueness?
That question means, in all likelihood, that the underlying tensions that led to the Russo-Urkainian war are not going to be resolved any time soon, even should that war "end" in the new year.
See you on the flip side.
(If you enjoyed today's blog please share it with your friends.)
No comments:
Post a Comment