The Rogers Test for vetting health science reporters
Think of it like the Bechdel Test applied to medical freedom
|
| |||||||||||||||
Following up on my recent article, “The genocidal, neocolonial, bigotry of mainstream health science reporting,” I have developed a six-part test to vet reporters who want to interview the warriors in the medical freedom movement. It’s inspired by the Bechdel Test which is a measure of representation of women in film. Because medical freedom activists face extreme bigotry from the mainstream media, we need a reliable way to gauge whether a reporter sees us as human before we agree to speak with him/her. In political science game theory, past behavior (time T−1) is the best predictor of future behavior (time T+1). With that in mind, here’s what I propose:
The Rogers Test for vetting health science reporters
Any
reporter who wants to interview anyone from the medical freedom
movement should first demonstrate their bona fides as follows. Send a
link to an article you wrote where you:
☐ Respectfully interviewed a parent of a vaccine injured child.
☐ Respectfully interviewed someone who was injured by a Covid vaccine.
☐ Cost the pharmaceutical industry money (bit the hand that feeds you and survived).
☐ Critically reviewed a Pharma-funded study and showed how it was rigged.
☐ Acknowledged that none of the shots on the childhood vaccine schedule have been tested against a proper saline placebo.
☐ Acknowledged that Covid shots cause more harms than benefits.
Any reporter who cannot meet these six basic conditions has no business talking with the people who risk their lives every day standing up to the pharmaceutical cartel.
I cannot think of any mainstream reporter who meets this minimal threshold of human decency. So we should not waste our time and energy talking with them.
Of course there are a few legendary examples of activists who converted a hostile reporter in connection with a particular article or news story. However, those reporters are under tremendous pressure to return to their previous biases because all of the incentives in the mainstream media are to take care of the pharmaceutical mafia that pays the bills. The few reporters who have become long term champions — Sharyl Attkisson, Del Bigtree, and Tucker Carlson come to mind — have continued to tell the truth by building their own programs and distribution channels outside of the mainstream system.
Ten years ago, the only way we could get our message out was by talking with mainstream reporters who hated us, who we hoped might allow a tiny bit of the truth to shine through their dripping contempt. Today, allies including Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, DarkHorse Podcast, The WarRoom, and The Highwire have audiences five to 10 times larger than the highest rated cable news programs. Substack, X, Rumble, Spotify/Apple podcasts, and Wordpress allow anyone to get a message out (although Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, and Square continue to censor us). Heck, on a good day I can reach a larger audience than most cable news shows even though I have no paid marketing. The point being that we don’t have to beg for table scraps from the genociders anymore. We are the media now, we’re part of the government, our movement grows larger every day — there’s no need to help awful people, who belong in jail, sell more newspapers or generate more clicks.
So if a reporter asks you for an interview, just send them The Rogers Test and see how they measure up!
Blessings to the warriors. 🙌
Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏
Huzzah for everyone building the parallel society our hearts know is possible. ✊
In the comments, please tell me how you would improve the Rogers Test.
As always, I welcome any corrections.
You're currently a free subscriber to uTobian. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
No comments:
Post a Comment