5689-5691: International Public Notice: Freezing in the Dark and Likely Danger from Lincoln County Watch

Saturday, December 27, 2025

5689-5691: International Public Notice: Freezing in the Dark and Likely Danger from Lincoln County Watch

 By Anna Von Reitz

After destroying the Nordstream pipeline in 2022, those who cheered the destruction of their own energy security are freezing in the dark. 

There is no easy answer to this.  While it is widely assumed that Joe Biden ordered the destruction and it is known that the Swedish submarine service investigated the incident successfully, the results of that investigation have not been made public.  

The same loud-mouthed politicians who called Russia a "terrorist state" when it exercised the provisions of its own international treaties,  have learned two important lessons: (1) winter doesn't care about politics; (2) America is in no position to replace Russian gas via LNG that costs twice as much, is weather dependent, and limited by access to LNG terminals.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFXCu4vjZKA

While it was always recognized that Russian gas supplies were the most practical solution to Western European energy needs, those benefiting from cheap Russian gas were both prideful about "retaining" energy independence they never achieved, and at the same time, afraid of the specter of being dependent on Russian resources -- even though Russia acted as a straight-forward business partner and delivered gas as agreed, on time, without using gas supplies as political leverage. 

Western Europe would have used gas as leverage against Russia, so they assumed Russia would do the same to them, but Russia is led by men who graduated from the School of Hard Knocks, not the self-centered "theoretical" indoctrination provided by western Universities and Think Tanks. 

The traditional respect for keeping business and politics separated was something the western corporate oligarchs failed to understand or appreciate.  The simple mechanics of good trade relations -- and human need -- was too complex for these idealogues raised by political parties, isolated from the realities of life.  

The same failure of "educational indoctrination" absent common sense is observable throughout Europe and the same sickness has infiltrated much of the political structure of The United States and the former Commonwealth, too.  

That's not saying anything about Keir Starmer and the British Labour MPs who are a new brand of "out of touch" entirely. We keep waiting for the British people to set Westminster on fire, or at least torch Number 10 Downing Street; Starmer, the penultimate Charles Brown, still doesn't seem to know why nobody likes or respects him.  

Any expectation that the British Government will deal with reality in its own realm, much less do anything about NATO or the need to repair relations with Russia, is like expecting a stage show combination of Oklahoma! and Rocky Horror Picture Show --- to be a hit. 

The Russians, unlike the incompetent acting troupe of "Presidents" and "Prime Ministers"  of commercial corporations acting as governments for the seventeen still-occupied Western European nations, held the line and kept business separate from politics --- not because it was politically expedient, but because this is a crucial element of all business relationships and key to ultimate economic success. 

Putin and his advisors know that in business, reputation and trust and reliability are all-important.  So they have carefully performed all obligations required by all contracts with every business partner, regardless of politics.  They have done this, often at cost to themselves, for decades.  

Why?  

To secure new business opportunities, to keep existing customers happy, and to be competent competitors.  

Years ago we observed to the Brits that their constant position at the bottom of every dogpile would eventually cost them, that other governments would catch on to their duplicity, war-mongering, racketeering and meddling ---- and then what?  

Nobody in their right mind would want to do business with the Roman Curia, the Committee of 300, the WEF, or the Government of Great Britain--- aka, Code Name "Smelly Grandma"--- and, here it is, and it's their own fault.  

Recently, all the politically entrained and arrogant Western European Governments headed by commercial corporation oligarchs threw away generations-worth of good reputations in business, and Europe's reputation as a safe haven for business,  by not only freezing Russian assets in Europe, but by proposing to steal the profit from those assets and predicate return of these profits on payment of war reparations to Ukraine by Russia.  

At most, these reckless idealogues stood to gain $245 Billon -- not even paying attention to the fact that they, themselves, had more than $800 Billion at risk in Russia.  

Where we come from, this is called "shitting in your mess kit", and like 'Steer Karmer', it represents an utterly new kind of incompetence strutting across the world stage. 

You can stand in a quiet space and watch the computer screens track the "giant sucking sound" as investors flee Western Europe. 

Where are they fleeing?  

To Russia.  To China.   To India.  To Africa.  To South America. To anywhere where the business climate is apolitical and stable, any place that investors can grow good stable supplier and customer relationships without the fear that political motives and short-sighted economic gains will prompt Crazy Charlie moves to curtail market access, impose tariffs or economic sanctions, destroy needed infrastructure, or seize upon assets that belong to someone else. 

So here the Worst Offenders are, hat in hand.  It's winter.  Without cheap Russian gas, their factories are at half-capacity, jobs endangered.... German Chancellor Merz's weak chin faded into the neck of his dress shirt this week....Volkswagen alone is suffering billions -- with a "B" -- in undeserved losses thanks to gross incompetence on the part of Germany, Incorporated.

One is almost forced to suspect that the Witch of Endor died and left her Flying Monkeys in charge.  All of this couldn't be going so spectacularly wrong and all at the same time, without careful and cynical preplanning. 

Merz still wants to find a way to blame Russia instead of his own intellectual atrophy for this circumstance, but instead, he has to face the large number of German Corporations down on their knees, back to the wind, and plans to open up German coal mines again.  

Shoulda-coulda thought of that before blowing up the Nordstream pipelines, dontchya think, fellas?  Maybe tempered the rhetoric and allowed peace in the Ukraine a long time before this? 

The Russians aren't impressed or moved to move.  

The Russians are the only ones who have the equipment and capability to repair the Nordstream pipelines, and they aren't inclined to do so. It's winter.  On the Baltic Sea.  Why risk Russian ships and equipment and lives to repair gas pipelines that should never have been attacked and broken in the first place?   

Why do such a job to save arrogant, ungrateful, and yes, too-stupid-to-live neighbors, who sent aid and armaments to your enemies?  Called you a "terrorist state" when you exercised treaty rights guaranteed to you?  And probably thought they were doing something great by blowing up the pipelines, too?  

Russia has imposed its own reasonable retaliation and seized upon an equal amount of foreign assets belonging to the loudest mouthed members of the EU who cheered the destruction of the Nordstream pipelines and who have been sending billions to Ukraine.  Notably, Hungarian assets in Russia are safe, but not German or French assets.  Putin was paying attention.  No doubt, he was shaking his head the whole time.

To paraphrase what must be going through Vladimir Putin's head:

 
"Let's get this straight.... you blow up Russian pipeline infrastructure that was built so that we could supply you with cheap gas to heat your homes and factories and provide you with electricity.... you cheer this act of industrial terrorism on international television.... you call Russia a "terrorist state" when we exercise treaty guarantees and protect our own people.... you denounce Russia as an "aggressor" and send billions in aid to Ukraine throughout a long and horrible and bloody war, running your mouths the whole time.... and now, in the middle of the winter, you want Russia to repair its ruined gas pipeline infrastructure.... so Russia can supply you with cheap gas again?"

If we were Vladimir Putin, having to interact with this level of self-centered cluelessness, we wouldn't be shaking our heads. We would be banging them full on against a wall somewhere, asking God why such people are allowed to prosper and live? 

Huge corporations that are the political lifeblood of Germany, France, Belgium and other We-Hate-Russia Bandwagoneers, are desperate.  They can't stay competitive without Russian gas.  They are losing billions in assets because of retaliatory Russian asset seizures. By the end of this winter, their factories may all be shut down as they huddle around coal fires made possible by hastily reopening coal mines that have been closed for forty years. 

That's how lacking in basic common sense these  politicians -- all these commercial corporation oligarchs supported by political parties--  really are.  

Along with Lessons 1 and 2 already noted, let's add Lesson 3 -- it doesn't matter how much money you have, if you can't buy what you need at a price you can afford. 

Russia is standing back and saying, okay, well, to begin negotiations on reopening the Nordstream Gas Pipelines... first, admit who ordered their destruction, and second, agree to pay for the damage. Then, perhaps we can agree to do the repairs and resume gas delivery.  

Meanwhile, the Russians have unleashed a brilliant international law suit against Euroclear, the European Clearinghouse responsible for allowing the EU to seize Russian assets for political reasons in the first place.  Where is the governing law and authority?  

There isn't one. Oh.... 

So what was that, an act of war? Or was the EU engaged in opportunistic war profiteering?  Aiding and abetting an enemy of Russia --- an enemy, Ukraine, that was running a criminal empire that threatened the lives of every European, not just the Russians?  

Condemning Russia as an "aggressor" when NATO has been encroaching inch-by-inch on Russia ever since Reagan, in violation of agreements promising that they wouldn't do this at all?  When NATO affiliates murdered the elected Ukrainian government in 2014 and forced the whole Zelensky Regime on the Ukrainian people?  

We think the nature of the "aggression" and the perpetrators of this aggression are well-known and identified: NATO and CIA and Mossad playing Bully Boy from behind the safe and taken-for-granted shield provided by the United States, Inc. 

This link is a fan-based put-together of commentary --theoretical but typical of Jeffery D. Sachs-- that runs down the facts like a grocery list:   https://youtu.be/g3tJ0N9LtsM?si=wzY1VWfUlOr5VADu

The "US" no longer has unimpeded access to the American population for gun fodder and no longer enjoys unquestioned access to American credit resources, either.  Their attempts to invoke the always illegal and non-contractual "Monroe Doctrine" have fallen flat.

This country has a defense services contract that requires defense of our borders (you may judge how well that obligation was respected) and defense of our commercial shipping on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.  

The Monroe Doctrine is something that our Service Vendors did on their own accounts, for their own enrichment, then turned around and charged all their operational costs off onto us, the hapless American Public.  

They got the profit, we got the bill, and it was all done without any respect for their contractual limitations; they simply said it, and without the actual States being in Session to object, they got away with this.  They pretended that we "acquiesced" and allowed them to act as mercenaries and rampage around the world, indebting us and enriching themselves. 

That option has finally come to an end. 

Britain has been strong-armed into making some recompense, by giving them most of, if not all, of Western Canada; that may be very nice for the still-British Territorial Government, and welcomed by the Western Canadians, too, after what they have put up with under Trudeau ---- but we note that this does nothing to bring back sanity and restitution to America.  It just adds another element of Crazy Charlie to the mix.  

There is no need to invade us, if they join us as "Territorial States" and then attack.  Given everything else that has gone on worldwide, and all the "Free Trade Zones" already prepared as military forward bases, it's not beyond imagining that Donald Trump might try to create a "who is who" confusion and attack the actual Americans with a center drive straight into and through the American heartland.  

Everyone expected China to attack from the Pacific, and then, everyone expected Mexico and the long underbelly of the Southern Border to be the focus for an amphibious attack, but no, look at the whole lack of planning and fortification from the North, the Great Lakes, and the Free Trade Zones that can be used as military airports and bases?  

With Territorial States poised on our northern border, claiming to act as new "States" but meaning British Territorial "States" not States of the Union --- we could be looking at the most serious threat to American sovereignty that we have seen yet.  And it would come at the hands of our own "federal" government employees. 

Please note that Canadians have the worst reputation for committing war crimes -- bar none.  Our mild-mannered, Chatty Cathy neighbors to the North with their charming accents and Mounties and yodeling contests might not seem like a dark and dangerous threat, but remember the massacres, the residential schools, and the tradition of "scalping" brought to us by our Canadian neighbors. 

There is a dark and desperate side to Canada, one that should make a strong man step back and think twice. 

These people have tamed a wild frontier, faced down wolves and grizzly bears, built highways and railroads across vast plains and trackless swamps, survived wildfires that make California wildfires look like campfires, survived plagues, locusts, mosquitoes, flies, spiders, snakes, and snake oil.  Canadians are a weird combination of Alaskans and Aussies.  

They are wild men, and they are right at our back door.  And most of them are still loyal to "the Queen" and now, "the King".  

Remember Ticonderoga.  Remember Lake Champlain.  Add in the Saint Lawrence Seaway.  

Strangely, Mr. Trump's proposed addition of all these new "States" which are not States of the Union --- may be the biggest threat America has ever faced.  

It was the late Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer who called us in the wee hours of the morning one day and basically warned us that Canada was making plans to invade The United States.  He also pointed out that the unused and thought-to-be undeveloped Free Trade Zones dotting the northern tier of States and also dotted throughout Southern Canada, were actually set up as military forward bases and already set up with airfields adjacent to key railroad and highway junctions.  "Ready to go." 

Just sayin' "Make America Great Again" might refer to a different version of "America" --- one with a British accent and no scruples. 

Everyone needs to stay on their toes and make sure that nothing gets turned sideways and upside down; the British Empire is in its death throes and losing control, but that doesn't mean that the Old Evil has lost its fangs, or that it won't thrash around a great deal as it goes down "to dusty death, unwept, unhonored, and unsung." 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 27th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: The Good "Bad" News

 By Anna Von Reitz

It appears that there is considerable confusion about my office as Fiduciary for The United States of America (Unincorporated).  

I am an American Officer working for the American Government, which is the Federation of States.  I am a Federation Officer, not a "Federal" Officer.  I am no kind of "United States" Officer at all and never have been.  

As the name implies, the "Federal Government" is obliged to work for the Federation of States.  We created and employed these service vendors as stipulated in three famous sequential service contracts known respectively as: 

The Constitution for the united States of America, issued in 1787 and delegating some certain enumerated land jurisdiction "powers" to the States of America, our American Confederation of States --- which lost quorum to operate in 1861 and has stood vacant, awaiting reconstruction ever since.  

The Constitution of the United States of America, issued in 1789, to British Territorial Service Providers, delegating certain Territorial "powers" in the international jurisdiction to the sea, obligating the recipients to, in the main points, protect our borders, our commercial shipping on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, to administer territorial expansions under the Northwest Ordinance, provide a maritime and admiralty court system under American Admiralty Law, etc.. The Successor to this contract is the LLC that Donald Trump is "Commander in Chief" of.  

The Constitution of the United States, issued in 1790, delegated certain powers in the jurisdiction of the air to the Post Offices, Customs Offices, Trademark and Patent Offices, etc., to perform administrative duties and functions in defense of American intellectual property.  The erstwhile Successor to Contract was the UNITED STATES, INC. which was bankrupted by Pope Francis under the Obama Administration.  

This is the way it is, the way it has been for 160 years, and there is no point in anyone getting all excited because they just got the memo. 

We, the Americans, were kept in the dark for decades by self-interested service vendors, but no more;  that is the good news -- the Americans are awake now, and able to conduct their own business. 

Depending on your position, that may also be the bad news. 

I am not a Fiduciary for any incorporated entity at all.  My caretaking extends only to living people and lawful persons.  

I am an American Federation Officer, not an officer attached to any Federal Service Vendor.  

Incorporated entities don't have "fiduciaries" --- they have trustees, they have representatives, they have shareholders, they have beneficiaries, but they do NOT have "fiduciaries".  Only lawful governments and physical asset holders have fiduciaries.  

So, I do not owe the British Crown Corporation any duty or service that I am purportedly neglecting, am not "at war" with them, and have no relationship with them apart from enforcing their service contract known as The Constitution of the United States of America. 

As the primary Fiduciary for the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America (Unincorporated) I am the natural Receiver of the delegated powers and assets of the dependent federal corporations when they enter bankruptcy or otherwise default on their contractual obligations ---  or,  they can claim to be "independent vendors", in which case the costs of their bankruptcies have to be borne by their citizens, and not by the American people.   

It's one way or the other.  They can't have it both ways.  

They've since claimed to be independent vendors.  Good enough.  Now we are going to test who is and who is not a British Territorial U.S. Citizen and who is and who is not a Municipal "citizen of the United States" --- Federal Civil Servant, that is, to see who belongs to which "public" responsible for the bankruptcy debts of these respective foreign corporations. 

Americans are no longer going to willy-nilly "accept" all the costs and charges presented by these service vendors, no longer acquiescing by default to false claims to the effect that all federal expenses are constitutionally allowed or mandated.  They are not.  

The "powers" delegated are strictly enumerated and so are the costs associated with the proper exercise of those powers. 

For example, when we authorized action in "defense" of our States of the Union, we did not imply, mean, or authorize mercenary action against "commercial threats" in places like France or Vietnam.  

We did not agree to pay for war-for-profit under the Monroe Doctrine, did not agree to use our sons and daughters as mercenaries, did not envision owning or paying for 950 military bases on foreign soil, etc., etc., etc.  

What we meant and what we contracted to receive was simply defense of our shipping on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways and defense of our borders as stipulated.  That is the beginning and end of our contractual agreement and therefore also the beginning and end of our fiscal accountability with regard to payment for these stipulated services. 

The public capacities and duties of these "governmental services corporations" are owed to me together with all public assets acquired using American assets; their private capacities and duties and assets are not my concern.  

In recent days, I have received all sorts of nonsensical suppositions about me, my political status, my role --- and even confusion resulting from the activities of the World Martial Authority, which is operating a commercial court system and trying to address remedy for gross malfeasance on the part of commercial operators providing essential government services. 

The operations of these corporations are within the jurisdiction and province of the World Martial Authority and commercial jurisprudence in general, but it is self-evident that people are not corporations and are not rendered corporations by virtue of anyone else's suppositions about them.  

This circumstance has been adequately addressed by our recent International Public Notice: Concerning Misapplication of Law.  

My jurisdiction pertains only to living people and lawful persons. I am not the Fiduciary for any incorporated entity at all.  Incorporated entities may have trustees, directors, shareholders, representatives, donors, beneficiaries, proxies, and so on, but they do not have Fiduciaries.  Only living people and lawful governments and actual asset holders have Fiduciaries.  

I R 1. 

The bankruptcies of the commercial and municipal government service corporations are matters that don't overly concern me, as I act as the Receiver of dependent franchise assets, and assets purchased using American assets. 

Recent fisticuffs over the improper assumption of ownership and salvage interest in the United States Federal Republic seized upon in 1871 without proper notice and disclosure to the American Public may have caused further confusion and consternation. 

Additional ground-laying regarding commercial remedies and solutions being proposed by the International Court of Justice and the World Martial Authority and others, may also be confusing because although I don't represent any incorporated entity, I do represent the presumed public trust donors, the inheritors and beneficiaries and their lawful government(s). 

We conducted our Due Process from 2007 to 2014, when we issued our Final Judgment against the Perpetrators; it was only at that time, 2014, that the World Martial Authority began its efforts.  So we had already concluded full scale Court of Record and Due Process deliberations on land and sea prior to or concurrent with the commencement of the World Martial Authority action in the jurisdiction of the air.  

We had already taken action to defend the interests of the living people and lawful persons and their lawful governments and we continued to carry through with subsequent Uniform Commercial Code claims on behalf of the actual beneficiary-inheritors who have hands and feet and their lawful government(s). 

As that process adequately demonstrates, all assets of the UNITED STATES franchises doing business as, for example, UTAH or IOWA, and all United States of America, Incorporated, franchises doing business as the State of Florida or State of Wisconsin, were given Notice and liened sequentially, providing yet another layer of due process, and establishing irrevocable and timely claim upon the assets of these organizations in favor of The United States of America (Unincorporated) which then separated out its mutually-held international assets from national assets, and returned the national assets to The United States (Unincorporated) and each nation-state.

This was all done properly, timely, and in sequence.  The primary claims and actions were lodged prior to 2007, with Due Process beginning in 2007 and finished by April 2014; the concurrent commercial claims were finished by 2016 and stand upon the records of the Uniform Commercial Code Unit in Anchorage, Alaska.   

All public assets in international jurisdiction belong under the administration of The United States of America (Unincorporated) and all private assets belong under the administration of the individual living people, their lawful Persons, and their sovereign nation-states according to the laws and customs of our country.  

As a result, foreign commercial claims against American assets protected by these prior and preferential claims on behalf of the American people/People, cannot be honored; and, even though I am the Fiduciary of the living people and their lawful persons, my Name exclusive of any unauthorized British Crown Copyright (rebutted on the record by my Mother and affirmed by the Vatican Chancery Court) stands as Witness and Claimant and "Return to" Addressee as an American Officer of the American Government dba The United States of America (Unincorporated).  

We showed up.  We showed up timely.  We stated our claim.  We proved our case.  We executed due process.  We issued the judgement of our Court of Record.  All this has been published worldwide since 2015.  

Nobody can claim that they have a higher or more substantial claim to American assets in international jurisdiction going all the way back to the Armorican Treaties, and all American assets in national jurisdiction stand protected by these actions and by the customs of our traditional government(s). 

Thus, a Fiduciary acting for the living people and their lawful persons can, nonetheless, in pursuit of that duty, make claims on their behalf in foreign jurisdictions of the law, and may as an International Officer stand in the doorway between the worlds, defending the interests of the living against the interests of the dead. 

Let it be clear to all concerned that I am an American working for the American Government.  I am an Officer of the Federation of States, the unincorporated instrumentality and Holding Company doing business as The United States of America (Unincorporated), in possession of the mutually-held powers, both delegated and non-delegated.  

I am a Federation Officer, not a "Federal" Officer; I don't work for any of the federal corporations, I don't stand under any federal constitution, don't naturally inhabit any commercial jurisdiction, and I don't hold any "federal" office.  Rather, the Federal Government is obligated to work for the Federation of States and the Federation of States works for the States of the Union, which are in Session now in all fifty (50) States.  

The "Federal Government" is called the "Federal Government" because it is obligated to work for the Federation of States and the American People serving as State Citizens of the Federation's member States of the Union.  

So, let's keep this straight in our minds going forward.  

The American Government stands upon The Declaration of Independence and won its freedom and borders and land assets via eight long years of honorable and successful warfare against the British Empire. 

This American Government is the Government I work for and which I represent as a Fiduciary Officer in international jurisdiction.  

The so-called United States Federal Government is supposed to be a for-hire instrumentality of the American Federation of States, dba, The United States of America --- Unincorporated. Each one of the Federal Subcontractors is supposed to operate under its own Constitution.  

As things stand, with regard to the Federal Service Vendors, the intended American Federal Republic Subcontractor and the American Confederation of States doing business as the States of America, have both been inoperable since 1861. 

Their delegated powers naturally return to the Delegator, but in this case, the Delegator, the unincorporated Federation of States was deliberately misidentified and misrepresented as the Confederate States of America, denied information, deprived of required notices, and suffered persecution of its elected and commissioned officials under False Pretenses. 

The British Territorial Subcontractor and its Successor organizations have been horribly mismanaged and have misrepresented themselves and their authorities to promote substitution and identity theft schemes on a national and international level, illegal confiscation of American assets, crimes of personage and barratry, racketeering, and fraud against their employers. 

The Papist Municipal Subcontractors and their Successor organizations have ultimately followed suit and participated in gross fraud and breach of trust against their employers in collusion with the British Territorial Subcontractors from 1937 and the publication of The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States, to 2008, when correction began. 

We, the American Government, stand in a "transition" -- but we still stand and still have standing under the actual Law.  We still have Fiduciaries.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 27th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Launching your documents correction

 By Anna Von Reitz

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 12:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Launching your documents correction
To: <sdipietro@ajc.state.ak.us>, <ammers@gci.net>, <postmaster@ajc.state.ak.us>, <jordan.shilling@alaska.gov>, <membree@akcourts.gov>, <pio@supremecourt.gov>

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Subject: Fwd: Launching your documents correction
To: <sdipietro@ajc.state.ak.us>, <ammers@gci.net>

This information --- in the criminal code sense of the word -- has been provided to all the offices, officers, and persons noted below, as well as several hundred others.  It is now being provided to you in your capacity as the contact for the Alaska Judicial Council.  The facts discussed in this International Public Notice have been independently checked and verified by the Justices of the World Court, the Vatican Chancery Court, and the British High Court of Chancery.  There is no doubt whatsoever that the following description of the situation is true and that it has been verified by all these courts and their officers, and moreover, there is no doubt that these facts and circumstances have been served Due Process for a period of seven (7) years, from 2007 to 2014, all of it exhaustively published and presented and tracked and confirmed.  

The entire district court system residing in the States of the Union is ending; its tenure from May of 1865 to today has ended in disgrace and criminality against the American people -- the same people that all federal citizens are supposed to serve, whether in the capacity of British Territorial U.S. Citizens --- the condition of all Bar Esquires, or, in the condition of all Municipal Roman "citizens of the United States" working for the Federal Civil Service.  

The recent "attack" of Municipal STATE OF ALASKA TROOPERS acting as a "local government" for the State of Alaska Administration against me and against many other Alaskans has been promoted using the idea that we owed "property taxes" for performances by the bankrupt MATANUSKA-SUSTINA BOROUGH.  In fact, the only contract in existence enabling the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH to exist here and operate in Alaska at all, is a contract between the British Territorial State of Alaska, Inc. and its employees, and the Roman Municipal STATE OF ALASKA, INC.  enshrined as The State of Alaska Constitution.  

These two groups of Federal Citizens/citizens agreed to a mutual services and benefits pact in the form of The State of Alaska Constitution and that service contract in no way applies to me or any other Alaskan. 

As I am not and have never been a Federal Citizen nor a Federal citizen of either kind, not a British Subject, it remains before the Alaska Judicial Council to forswear any pretense that I owed the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH any "property taxes" at any time, and to instead consider the fact that I am the Primary and Preferential Creditor of this bankrupt entity, a person owed back every penny of tax ever paid to the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC., as property taxes or title fees or any other cost extracted by their foreign administration or paid to them under duress and by mistake.  What is self-evidently clear is that I am not a British Subject, and absent that status, my name cannot be consigned to the status of a Roman Inferior Trust, either.  

I am the victim of aggravated identity theft and breach of trust practiced against me by Ms. Ahearn, Mr. Hanley, and the "district" court improperly operating in Anchorage, Alaska.  This is a matter for the Chief Justice (made responsible by the same State of Alaska Constitution referenced above) and the Alaska Judicial Council which I am holding responsible for this gross misapplication of law and practice of personage and barratry against someone who is totally and naturally outside the bonds of the district courts and district court system as a whole, and who is contractually owed "good faith service" from all persons concerned. 

And I am not alone.  The fact that the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. is a bankrupt entity speaks to the further fact that its bankruptcy was occasioned because of its indebtedness to me and the other living people --- not federal "persons" --- and the bankruptcy trustees owe me full recognition and recoupment rights.  

At this point, my home has been illegally confiscated and seized upon by Third Party "property managers" working for the British Crown, when the British Crown has never had any valid "public salvage interest claim" or other cause to "mistake" my identity as a Wisconsinite living in Alaska.  My Mother cleared up any misunderstanding about my identity as a Wisconsinite and not any form of "United States" citizen, many years ago.  It is a matter of public record and has been widely discussed and repeatedly presented to the United States District Attorneys that have cycled through this state.  The purported "tax sale" that resulted from a foreign Clerk's Deed did not take into account the vast amount of money already owed to my estate by the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. and my repeated claim under duress of the Federal remedy -- the debt swap provisions of Title 12, whereby the service fees owed by a British Subject named "Anna Riezinger" or some form thereof, merely presumed to exist and merely presumed to be a ward of the British Monarch, should have been swapped against the debts owed to me by the State of Alaska and STATE OF ALASKA organizations, that have both benefited themselves by holding my property in trust as collateral backing their debts, without my knowledge or consent.  

This is the dirty pile of laundry you have all stepped in, to your disgrace and detriment. 

We, the actual, factual living Alaskans live in Alaska, a State of the Union, fully enrolled as such since October 1st 2020 -- with such enrollment made retroactive to the day that Alaska purportedly entered Territorial "Statehood" back in January of 1959 --- have "returned" and you are all under notice and demand to recognize us, which has already been fully admitted by the U.S. Supreme Court and upheld extraterritorially. 

This action accepting enrollment of Alaska as a State of the Union by the properly identified and provenanced living Alaskans supersedes all mere legal presumptions or suppositions entertained by foreign persons residing here. 

You are being given Due Process and Due Notice and true reference to the pertinent law and you are under demand to return my inheritance unharmed.  What you have done and allowed to be done here is criminal.  Our law, the actual law of the land, does not provide for any benefit for "wronged Third Parties", such as the Person(s) of Pacific Rim, LLC.  It provides under international law for the prompt return of estate property belonging to those "returned over the sea" --- no matter how long they have been away, or in the case, merely presumed to be absent and also presumed to be adopting a foreign political status by default and misrepresentation.  

Any recoupment made by the Bankruptcy Trustees of the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. is owed to me, not by me.  Any restitution owed to Pacific Rim, LLC/PACIFIC RIM, LLC is owed by the Bankruptcy Trustees who misidentified me as a British Territorial Subject and misidentified me and my property assets as part of a Roman Inferior Trust franchise of the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC.  

Immediate return of my property to my possession is required to prevent further damage and cost and inconvenience, which will inevitably be charged to the State of Alaska, Incorporated, as the Party most responsible for this continuing and obstinate misadministration of justice and deliberate, knowing misapplication of law.  See following International Public Notice.

So said, so signed, so sealed this 26th Day of December 2025: 

Anna Maria Riezinger--a private name, not for foreign public use, not subject to British Crown copyright.  

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Launching your documents correction
To: Adriaan Rudolph Fondse <ucc1.law@gmail.com>
Cc: <postmaster@hummingbirdman.nl>

International Public Notice: Concerning Misapplication of Law

The fact is that we are not constrained by Third Party contracts at birth or at any other time. 

The problem is that we don't have a name and the Given Name is not ours unless we accept it. 

If we accept it, we must accept it conditionally in commerce, because we do not want to be held responsible for the spending of any foreign state. 

If we don't accept it, we run the risk of being disregarded as a donor-beneficiary. 

So there, neatly summed up, is the crux. 

And here is the answer: no living man engages in commerce, therefore, no code, rule, or law merchant applies to the living man. 

Commerce by definition is business carried out between two or more corporations. 

The presumptions of the Federal Subcontractors and their state-of-state franchises are thus unjustifiable absent impersonation, a condition that must be fully disclosed and freely and knowingly agreed to; in addition, in the particular case of the Americans, no government entity has regulatory authority over commerce taking place within the borders of a State of the Union.  

The only Federal "regulatory authority" over commerce ever granted is summed up by the interstate commerce clause present in all three federal constitutions. So even actual commercial business taking place within the borders of a single state is unregulated. 

The entire scheme seeking to impersonate living people appears to be an effort to bring them under the regulatory authority granted by the interstate commerce clause -- a gross and fanciful overreach of any intended granted authority.   

Are you a corporation or choosing freely and voluntarily and knowingly to operate as one, when you buy a cup of coffee? 

 

No.

Is the person selling you that cup of coffee actually a corporation or knowingly acting as one?  No. 

 

No, and consider this --- none of the elements of lawful contract exist in any of the scenarios, systems, or suppositions that people are attempting to apply to any of this, so that tells you again, that contract law and commercial law are both foreign to living people and have been misapplied. 

People cannot engage in contracts because people are not immortal; people can only make agreements in good faith. 

Contract requires the ability to perform in life or death, hence the necessity to create and use corporations "representing" living flesh in order to subject living flesh to the system of contract law.  

We are all bound as was the prophet, Jeremiah, and cannot control and tell from day to day which foot will go before the other. 

Unlike God, we can't promise (as in "promissory note") to do something tomorrow, much less thirty years from now.  

This tells you explicitly, and you have "cause to know" that contracts like mortgages, are not in the province of living flesh and cannot be applied to living men.  

The Universal Postal Union operates according to code, not law.  It applies only to those employed by the Postal Union and to a very limited extent to those who freely choose to use the postal service.  

As that word, "service" implies, it is convenience offered for sale like any other service and Postal Union "law" cannot be supposed to apply beyond the reasonable and customary limits 

All the wrangling over Erie Railroad v Tompkins is nonsense, too. 

The court in this case had the temerity to state something that is commonplace and directly observable to any schoolboy --- of course, the Federal Government has no Common Law and could not have any Common Law.  It never did and still doesn't and the fact that the court observed this fact has no bearing on the price of tea in China. 

The Common Law ---unless you euphemistically "stretch" the meaning of the term to include such things as Martial Law--- is the law of living men, and none of the Federal entities can have any such law, because all Federal entities operate exclusively in international or global jurisdictions.  All such entities and the personnel serving them have to operate as persons, not people, as a result. 

The province of the Common Law was and is reserved to the lawful State Government, which in this country is reserved to the State Assemblies. 

The fact that our lawful government vested in the State Assemblies was not in Session meant that the people of this country lost access to the Common Law, which then prompted the courts to embark on this long and sordid business of impersonating everyone and subjecting them via this pretense to the law of corporations and contracts. 

As Milligan Ex Parte provides (2 USC 71) when the people's courts survive and the Common Law becomes available again, the impersonation ruse must cease and the business of men must be separated from the business of corporations.  As all fifty State Assemblies are now in General Assembly, that return to Common Law has been achieved, if only as Courts of Record in some cases. 

The problem has been forcing the existing commercial courts to recognize the limitations of their own presumptions. They garnered too much power over both living flesh and private property via these False Presumptions, and they don't want to give it up. 

So there it is, a matter of rogue courts failing to recognize their limitations and lack of actual authority.  We, living people, are not willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily impersonating ourselves, accepting impersonation by any other power, or participating in commerce ---interstate or otherwise. 

Now that our State Assemblies are in operation, we again have access to our own customary Common Law, and both the District Courts and their State-of-State franchise courts need to be dissolved and/or strictly limited to addressing actual corporations, absent any supposition that living people are represented by public trusts operated in their names without their knowledge or consent. 

Is that plain and clear enough for everyone to grasp?  

If not, I can belabor the points individually or collectively until hell freezes over, and the facts will still remain as they are.  

The current system was imposed as an "emergency" matter absent any actual granted "emergency powers" and has continued to operate without any lawful granted authority ever since May of 1865; the longevity of the deception in no way clothes it with any rectitude or excuse for continuance.  

The pertinent Maxims of Law are: "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived." -- which applies only until fraud and overreach is discovered, as it now has been; "When what is true comes, fiction of law disappears." --- which has now happened; and "Possession by pirates does not change ownership." 

This misapplication of law is what we are dealing with,  not any fine points of who is holding the hot potato or why.  

Living people are living people and they are not subject to the laws of contracts or corporations -- they are not and never have been; and the creation of public trusts operated "in their names" without their knowledge and consent and then used as a device to unnaturally subject living people to the laws of contracts and corporations is nothing but fraud and aggravated identity theft and has resulted in vast crimes of illegal confiscation, unlawful taxation, personage and barratry. 

Every attorney in America deserves to be arrested, charged, and thrown in jail for their willing participation in this farce against justice. 

And now, brothers, can we have a big, "Amen!" and an end to the underlying evil and untrue legal presumptions that have been the cause of so much injustice and suffering?    No public trusts named after living Americans exist.  No action undertaken by any court based on the false presumption that such public trusts --- or shall we be more blunt? --- any such "public salvage interest" exists, is valid.  

All Americans who have been incarcerated for non-violent crimes and statutory infractions must be released. 

All Americans who have been presumed to be "taxpayers" must be released from foreign tax obligations of all kinds, including mortgages. 

All the homes and lands illegally confiscated from Americans based on the foregoing false legal presumptions and suppositions must be returned to the living and the living people must be made whole to the extent possible. 

All Americans born or naturalized in this country must be presumed to be Americans, not British Subjects, not employees or dependents of the Holy Roman Empire. 

Is that all clear and concise enough for everyone?  Can we stop trying to "reframe" the situation we find ourselves in, and stop making vain appeals to other forms of law that don't fit the foot any better?  Postal law?  Really?  

That's all nonsense, and it arises as people desperately try to find some acceptable basis to move onward without, however, facing the actual truth -- that a legal system has been operating unlawfully and in gross breach of trust for over 150 years, right under our noses, and those operating this legal system have committed gross crimes of personage and barratry against the interests of the American People whom they are contractually bound to serve "in good faith".  

That's the actual and factual truth, and like it or not, correction must be taken and restitution paid, and the sooner the better.  

Prolonging injustice and criminality once discovered and failing to take prompt action against it becomes a crime in itself, and those who delay justice in this matter may themselves be considered accomplices to these crimes against humanity if they don't move off the dime.   

Waffling around and acting as poltroons stabbing at legalistic smoke rings and "interpretations" and arguing about what form of law applies, when it is perfectly obvious that no "federal" law applies to the living people, and therefore, no federal franchise "state of state" law applies, either --- is the height of evasion, stupidity or delusion.  

The Common Law of the nation-states applies to the people, and no other form of law seeking to redefine living people as incorporated entities or foreign "persons" can ever be valid. What begins with a false premise, ends as a false premise, no matter how one embroiders it.  

A pig wearing lipstick is still a pig.  

As our courts of record are all standing and our trial courts are forming rapidly, the Common Law of the living people is invoked and accessible and operational again.  

As everyone reading this knows, I have fought long and hard to bring this misapplication of law and the illegal and unlawful functioning of the courts to the attention of all concerned. The facts have been fully and exhaustively established and full Due Process has been applied; the only remaining obstacle to understanding and proper corrective action is the sheer lunacy that prompted the inception of this legal system in the first place.  

People find it hard to imagine that grown men endowed with logic conspired to pretend that living people are corporations, in order to subject living people to the law of corporations and contracts.  

It reeks of little children pretending that Johnny is a goat and Mindy is a pig; you can play games of Pretend all you like, and still never change a man into a corporation. 

This fanciful pretension, however, unlawfully converting the identity of living men into that of public trusts, is precisely what our predecessors indulged in, and what the courts are still doing now; it was inexcusable and fraudulent then, and is just as inexcusable and fraudulent now.  

Let us graciously, with humility, and alacrity--- put an end to this practice, and an end to the court system(s) dependent on this outrageous and obviously False Presumption.  This puts an end to all "district" courts operating outside the District of Columbia.  Immediately.  Permanently.  

The only work remaining for these courts and their officers residing within the States of the Union is their obligation to self-correct and exonerate all the cases that they put in place under these described False Pretenses, and provide restitution to all the people they have harmed.  Any business they may have administering the needs of legitimate corporations formed in the District of Columbia may be pursued within the borders of the District of Columbia.  

Nobody here is operating as a corporation; nobody here is represented by any public trust.  We don't belong to the British Monarch or the Pope and are in possession of our own sovereignty guaranteed by international treaty and venerable commercial service contracts.  

So -- everyone take your cajones in hand and do what is right.  Admit the wrong.  Correct it.  Respect the Common Law that all living men are heir to.  Stop the senseless attempts at evasion and excuses and reinterpretations.  You've been operating court systems like rigged gambling casinos, you've been caught at it, and that is all there is to it.  Nothing more "special" than that. 

Your own law demands that you be keel hauled and/or gibbeted for what you've done; we don't care about that.  It isn't our law. We're not obligated to enforce it on you. 

Perhaps it's time that you all just stopped acting like evil children and stopped pretending about anything at all --- time to come home to the actual factual world, dear old Kansas, where everything may be black and white, but is nonetheless not subject to interpretation or judicial discretion.  

And one other point: my decision and agreement to operate as a person-- an officer--  of the Federation of States does not make me a "federal" person.  The Federation of States existed prior to any and all Federal Vendors and is a separate unincorporated corporate entity, a lawful instrumentality of the States of the Union.  I don't work for or under the direction of any federal vendors of services. 

The reason that the "Federal" Government is called the "Federal" Government is because it is obligated to work for the Federation of States.  All Federal Subcontractors receive their delegated powers from and through the Federation of States and when the contracts of federal service providers are defaulted upon, those same delegated powers return to the Federation of States. 

Thus, I am working for the employer of the federal service vendors as an officer operating in international jurisdiction, to bring correction and direction to their operations.  I am an American working for the American Government. 

As long as people insist on playing childrens' games for real, I crack the whip. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 23rd 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.