5670: International Public Notice: Why There is No Fraud Wand from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Those
who have deeply studied the history of the American Revolution will
remember a central character in the debate over American Independence, a
very wealthy Pennsylvanian Tory named John Dickenson, who argued
passionately against American independence throughout his tenure as a
member of the Pennsylvania Delegation attending the Second Continental
Congress.
Dickenson
felt that things could not possibly be bad enough in terms of overall
conditions in the Colonies to justify separation from England; he
abhorred the bloodshed and destruction of property and cancellation of
normal business routines that would attend a war.
Like
many Americans at the time, Dickenson valued the cultural roots we
share with the British, the common language, and to some extent, our
shared history; by any standard of the day, he was a confirmed Tory,
short for "British Territorial Citizen".
Yet,
John Dickenson was an honorable man, and once the Congress had decided
the issue of American Independence --- and while not hiding his
disappointment --- Dickenson resigned his position as a Pennsylvania
Delegate and joined the Continental Army and fought in America's
defense.
Today, he is most remembered as the president of Delaware (1781-83) and the president of Pennsylvania (1782-1785).
These
were commercial company offices entrusted with conducting the day to
day business of Delaware and Pennsylvania, both positions that Dickenson
excelled in. From the time that the States of America Confederation
was ratified in 1781, Dickenson's acumen in business affairs was both
trusted and recognized by Tories and Patriots alike.
It
was Dickenson who argued most convincingly that the choice of political
loyalty, like any freedom of conscience--- and like the more celebrated
issue of freedom of religion--- must ultimately be a matter of free
will choice.
When
the issue of confiscating Tory land and business holdings in America
came to the fore in the years immediately following the end of the armed
hostilities, it was Dickenson who argued persuasively -- and
successfully -- in favor of letting Tories retain their business
interests in America and their allegiance to the British King, too, so
long as they honored the peace.
As
Dickenson often reiterated, and personally demonstrated, a man need not
be of the same religion, nor hold the same views about government, to
be a good neighbor and obey the law.
The
idea that nobody should be torn from their cultural and political
affinities against their will -- and the absolute right to expatriate
from changes in government -- which is enshrined throughout modern
jurisprudence, was championed by Dickenson throughout his public life,
even to the point of becoming a namesake for the "Dickensonians" who
continued his legacy of championing individual political free will for a
hundred years after his death.
Like
many other influences that are not household names today, but which
nonetheless had profound influence in the past and which continue to
have effect today, Dickenson and his followers are the root reason that
we are obliged to consciously choose our political status and place it
on the public record today.
Upon
hearing that this is necessary and that they have otherwise been
"registered" as British Subjects without their knowledge and consent,
many Americans are outraged. They consider it preposterous that anyone
could "mistake" them for a Brit -- much less tax them as a Brit or take
title to their land as a Brit -- and yet, it is self-evident that from
the Revolutionary War onward, Tories who maintain allegiance to the
British Monarch and the British Crown have lived among us.
One
notable expression of this "separate nation" is provided by the
Residence Act of 1790 that served to set aside the District of Columbia
and provided for a separate Federal Capitol, Washington, DC, within the
District.
While
our American National Capitol remained in Philadelphia, their Federal
"National" Capitol moved to the District of Columbia in December of
1800.
The
British Territorial U.S. Citizens were not the only citizenry occupying
this new Federal Capitol and District. They initially shared it with
Americans who immigrated to the District of Columbia and adopted the
political status of United States Citizens while working for the
American Federal Republic (1787-1861). A third population of "citizens
of the United States" who were largely Federal Civil Service workers,
shared the same turf.
You
can also see this at work in Puerto Rico; while generally considered
part of the United States Territories and Possessions, Puerto Rico is
and continues to be a British Commonwealth nation.
Many
nations can co-exist and inhabit the same piece of land and soil,
whether that land and soil is delineated by the borders of a sovereign
state, a district, a municipality (city-state), a province or a
principality, a territory, kingdom, or commonwealth.
Thus,
largely as a result of John Dickenson's enduring opinion that a man's
political conscience must be as free as his religious conscience, we
have always had British Territorial U.S. Citizens living with us cheek
and jowl, as well as "citizens of the United States" -- Federal citizens
working for the Holy Roman Empire (and Successors) as members of the
Federal Civil Service.
Coming
to grips with this, and also realizing that from 1787-1861 there was
also a brand of American Federal Citizen, too, working for the American
Federal Republic as a United States Citizen (See the first Immigration
and Naturalization Act), it is apparent that, yes, it's entirely
possible that you could be a British Subject, but be born on the land
and soil of this country.
As
an American born on the land and soil of one of the States of the
Union, you have a birthright --- not as a "citizen" but as a national.
It's up to you, whether you claim that birthright or accept one of the
foreign citizenships that are also available.
Unfortunately,
as the years have gone by and the British Territorial U.S. Government
has dominated everything, a program purportedly meant to register babies
born to U.S. Citizens as British Subjects has been used to willy-nilly
register everyone in sight, without any explanation or disclosure. As a
result, millions of Americans have been "accidentally-on-purpose"
misidentified as British Subjects and as U.S. Citizens, without their
knowledge or conscious consent.
These
unconscionable citizenship contracts and "birth registrations" have
been used to evade the guarantees owed to these same Americans under the
terms of The Constitution of the United States of America and construed
so that these same Americans and their birthright estates are
considered to be chattel property backing the debts of the British Crown
Corporation.
Now,
many people have asked me as Fiduciary, why it should be necessary for
us, Americans, to one-by-one reclaim and revest our birthright estates
and identity as Americans?
Why
can't we just look at this situation and wave a magic "Fraud Wand" over
the whole mess and declare all presumptions of foreign political status
null and void?
Answer:
(1) The process undertaken to entrap each American baby happened on a
one-by-one basis, and to undo it requires a one-by-one process in
answer. By Maxim of Law, as a thing is bound, so it is unbound. Thus,
we are obliged to declare our birthright standing as American State
Nationals, not British Subjects, and publish our will on a one-by-one
basis. (2) Some people born in this country actually are British
Subjects and they wish to remain so. For them, birth registration is
required by their statutory law and their citizenship obligations begin
at birth. Any attempt to invoke a generalized action addressing the
systemic fraud against Americans would result in denying the British
Tories their right to engage in life as British Subjects and U.S.
Citizens--- the same freedom to choose political loyalties that John
Dickenson compared to freedom of religion.
So
that is why we, Americans, can't just wave our hands and do a little
song and dance for our friends and say, "Of course, I'm an American!" in
an offended tone of voice, implying --- what Luddite thinks
otherwise?
No
doubt, the same people who hold a contract saying that you are a
British Territorial Subject, signed by your own Mother and a Medical
Doctor, whose signature counts as two separate witnesses.
That
makes three Witnesses standing against your single denial, and bear in
mind that the Witness of a Medical Doctor outranks all but the highest
officers of the British Territorial courts.
Also
bear in mind that because you were a baby at the time that your Mother
unknowingly signed you up as a Brit, you have no credible firsthand
knowledge and can't testify on your own behalf.
Who's the Luddite now?
Add
the fact that by the time anyone tells you what is going on, or you
figure it out on your own, your Mom has probably passed on and half the
people who could testify about your birth and family and natural status
as an American, are dead, too.
Things
are a bit easier now, as the situation has become known and people
including doctors and lawyers and judges worldwide are catching the
drift of the Scheme, and as more and more astonished Americans are
weighing in and saying -- "I'm not British! And I'm not a Roman
municipal citizen, either!"
We,
Americans, have had no cause to deny or rebut either one of these
claims, because we were deliberately kept in the dark and the
Perpetrators remained silent, motivated by the thought that they could
"latch onto" us and to our physical assets, subject us to their own
foreign courts, and take everything we have including our Good Names and
identities, without firing a shot.
The
thieves who created and worked this multi-generational impersonation
scheme against us have been found out; the war-mongering murderers who
lied to us and used our sons and daughters as cheap mercenaries have
been discovered; those who illegally occupied our country and who
"borrowed" our money and credit under False Pretenses are now known.
This game of Wizard's Chess is at an end. Their cover is blown.
The
nature and extent and history of their "Lawfare" against the living
people, and their use of non-conventional atypical warfare against us
--- Medical Doctors and Registered Nurses --- mostly unaware of what
they were doing, but used as "civilian military Uniformed Officers" to
inject deadly "shots" into our arms, is known.
Their
selfishness, depravity, criminality, greed, dishonor, cowardice,
immorality and deceitfulness is exposed for all the world to see, along
with the "fruits" of their existence --- human trafficking, drug
smuggling, war for profit, pollution, social psychosis, corporate
feudalism, peonage, slavery, racism, asset theft under color of law, and
so much more that is destructive, unjust, and despicable.
There
is no Magic Wand to wipe away their fraud and impersonation scheme,
only the individual will to rise up, claim back one's true identity, and
put an end to their lies to us and about us.
The
same scheme that they applied to Americans has been foisted off on
dozens of other countries, too. The home islands of Britain, the former
Commonwealth, seventeen Allied occupied countries in western Europe,
Japan, the Philippines, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and many more including The
United States, and Ukraine, have all fallen victim to the same
criminals.
Notice to Principals is notice to Agents; notice to Agents is notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 9th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment