Sasha Latypova reports that US AG Pam Bondi has dismissed the case against Dr. Kirk Moore.
Below,
August 2023 Bailiwick reporting on the US federal government’s
prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore for conspiracy to defraud the United
States and conspiracy to convert, sell, convey and dispose of government
property, including some draft discovery materials Sasha Latypova and I
prepared to support Dr. Moore’s defense and other cases in which public
exposure of regulatory simulation (fake product regulation) can help
more people understand the many intentional deceptions surrounding
vaccination programs and the intentional harmfulness of vaccine
products.
In
January 2023, the US Department of Justice charged Dr. Kirk Moore and
three other individuals by indictment, alleging criminal violations of 18 USC 371 (conspiracy to defraud the United States); 18 USC 641 (conspiracy to convert, sell, convey and dispose of government property); and 18 USC 2 (aiding and abetting.)…
The US government alleged that Dr. Moore and his colleagues:
“...ran
a scheme...to defraud the United States and the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention ("CDC"), whereby they destroyed hundreds of doses
of government-provided COVID-19 vaccines, and in exchange for either
direct cash payments or required "donations" to a specified charitable
organization, defendants distributed COVID-19 vaccination record cards
to persons without administering a COVID-19 vaccine to them and
administered saline shots to minor children to trick them into thinking
they had received a vaccine...”
Moore’s
case is unusual because the US government is prosecuting alleged
criminal acts, allegedly committed by civilians, relating to the
products known as Covid-19 vaccines.
Most
other Covid-19 vaccine cases are civil cases (not criminal
prosecutions) and the parties are individual civilians and military
personnel as plaintiffs, suing Department of Defense manufacturing
contractors (including Pfizer and Moderna) and the US government as
defendants — for violations of plaintiffs’ civil and constitutional
rights.
Whether
the US government is the prosecutor or the defendant in any given case,
DOJ attorneys work to delay or prevent discovery: the phase of trial
preparation in which parties exchange evidence on which each party
intends to rely for making their claims and defenses.
But in criminal prosecution cases, government prosecutors sooner or later must disclose evidence, or else drop the charges.
The
more the prosecutors want to make a timely public example of a
defendant to discourage others inclined to engage in similar conduct
that the government doesn’t like, the sooner the prosecutors must
disclose the evidence they claim will incriminate the defendant and
bring the case to trial.
In criminal prosecutions brought by an infiltrated government comprised of un-indicted war criminals, who are themselves
engaged in criminal conduct (suppressed by government/media censorship
and obscured by government/media propaganda) — which is the situation in
the United States since January 2020 and the start of the global and
nationwide ‘public health emergency’ — the DOJ calculus shifts again.
The
evidentiary exchange goes both ways, at least for so long as the
Attorney General wants to uphold any semblance of a credible criminal
justice system, rather than simply convict, sentence and imprison
citizens on accusations alone, without evidence and without trial.
For
as long as American prosecutors and courts want to keep up the
appearance that due process and rule of law remain functional, criminal
defendants have the right to request and receive records and other
evidence to prepare their defenses.
So prosecutors
have to weigh the benefits of disclosing the evidence they believe is
incriminating for the defendants, against the risks of being forced to
disclose evidence that tends to incriminate themselves, through their
conduct (acts and omissions) as treasonous government officials and
corrupt prosecutors.
This
is particularly tricky for DOJ in cases concerning the alleged
“Covid-19 vaccines,” because the development, manufacturing, testing,
labeling, serialization, distribution, chain-of-custody and use of the
products — under Emergency Use Authorization procedures — have been
subject to secrecy.
Cloaked
by the secrecy, identifiable men and women impersonating US government
officials have committed discernible, lethal fraud, to carry out mass
murder behind ‘public health emergency’ camouflage…
By
program design, the infiltrators posing as US government officials
cannot prove that the contents of any vial or batch include or exclude
any specific ingredients, nor can they prove the potency or inertness of
any ingredients that may or may not have been in each allegedly
mishandled vial.
Even more importantly, the
infiltrators posing as US government officials do not want the complete
lack of label conformity, verification procedures, purity or
standardization to become widespread public knowledge.
Using Kirk Moore’s case as an example, a useful defense strategy would be for Moore to ask the DOJ to prove two things:
That
the US government ever produced and delivered any regulated
pharmaceutical products or ‘vaccines’ to his business premises and;
That
the contents of any vials that may have passed through Moore’s office
included any ingredients complying with any alleged ‘vaccine’ labels,
information sheets or product specifications listed in applications
submitted to FDA and other regulators.
DOJ can’t provide that proof, because it doesn’t exist.
The
proof doesn’t exist, because the products allegedly delivered to
Moore’s office, which he and his staff allegedly improperly disposed of,
were and are prohibited biological and chemical weapons, manufactured
and adulterated with a wide variety of known and unknown ingredients.
These biochemical weapons are exempt from, and therefore non-compliant with, all pharmaceutical regulation…”
No comments:
Post a Comment