Sharing a useful cautionary essay by Jessica Hockett and Jonathan Engler.
This
morning (in a different email thread) I had an opportunity to summarize
my views on the “roots” of of what happened under SARS-CoV-2/Covid
pretenses and will continue to happen under any other pretense presented
by HHS Secretaries and their colleagues in the whole-of-government
system.
On the legal and military side, the roots lie in the 1902 virus-toxin law and the 1944 PHSA.
On
the science and medicine side, the roots lie in the falsification of
bench science, medical diagnosis and statistical data starting with
Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch, Paul Ehrlich and Rudolph Virchow, to enable
the projection of illusions of communicable diseases as threats, which
enable the projection of undefined and indefinable viruses, toxins,
serums and vaccines as prophylactics and treatments for the illusory
communicable diseases, and enable the projection of legal and military
preparedness and responses as justifiable.
I
don’t know of anyone who has looked at a lot of evidence used to
underwrite claims for a new virus, which they called “SARS-Cov-2” says
“viruses don’t exist”.
The scientific method is NOT able to yield evidence of non-existence of anything.
A
more precise and more correct statement, which the scientific method
can yield information on the basis of which to express an opinion, is
“There is no scientific evidence for the existence of viruses”.
That’s
the position I’ve reached. Initially, it seemed an absurd notion,
because of the horrifying implications (which include organised fraud
over several decades on “viruses” themselves as well as meaning many
diseases were misattributed, that contagion must also be fraudulent and
have alternative explanations & finally that all vaccines with the
possible exception of those against bacterial toxins, such as Tetanus,
are also wholly fraudulent.
It’s not necessary to be a scientist in order to understand the evidence that led me to my current opinion.
The claim for their existence rests upon several techniques which could be termed “pillars”.
These
are routinely used & have become widely accepted as “the kind of
information that’s needed to validate the existence of a new virus”.
Pillars
include “isolation” in which oddly enough, no separation whatsoever is
involved. On the contrary, isolation in virology involves adding a
sample purporting to contain the claimed pathogen to cells in culture
and watching these calls die, described as a “cytopathic effect” (CPE).
What
you’re never told is that the cells have had their culture conditions
altered in several ways, such as starvation of essential nutrients and
addition of drugs, claimed to be required to prevent bacterial infection
of the culture, which however are directly toxic to the starving cells.
We know this because control experiments are never conducted, in which
all steps except adding the claimed virus are done. The results of such
control experiments are simply missing from every paper, or its stated
they were done yet nothing happened to the cells, so it MUST be die to
the new virus!
The
scientific method has been breached since 1956 in the fake discipline
called Virology. The key journals must be controlled by those in on the
fraud, because everyone I know who had ever been a peer reviewer would
decline to consider the manuscript on the basis of failings of the most
serious kind.
There
are a handful of other pillars, such as claimed visual identification
using a special kind of microscopy, called “Electron Microscopy” (EM).
The
objects, if they existed, are claimed to be so tiny that they remain
invisible to the human eye, even magnified to the optical limits
inherent in “Light Microscopy”, the kind you might have peered down at
college. The most important thing to know about the results of EM, which
are images assembled by computers from beams of electrons fired at the
prepared sample, which has been distorted beyond recognition by being
coated with platinum, gold or other materials, are simply declared as “a
virus” by the investigator.
There
is no evidence linking the objects visualised by EM and a disease, or a
genetic sequence or anything at all. Some call this “the point and
declare” school of virology. Because nobody has ever really “isolated a
virus”, using techniques that pass muster using the scientific method,
there is simply no basis to claim that anything seen on an EM images is a
particular thing.
Genomic
methods make up at least two other “pillars”, and in here we find PCR, a
method for amplifying the amount of a gene sequence (the method
originally invented by Kary Mullis). It is not valid to use this method
to then declare that a sample “contains virus X”. It’s circular logic.
Recognise we cannot know what the genetic sequence of a novel thing is.
Yet “probes” are designed in order to amplify particular sequences on
the grounds that “the new virus is thought to be related to a previous
family of viruses called “virus A”, “virus B” and “virus C”. Since
neither A, nor B, nor C have ever been isolated, I hope you can
immediately see the circularity of this.
The
PCR method in any case picks out only 2 or 3 tiny pieces of the claimed
“full length genetic sequence” of the purported virus. Further
sequencing is done on all the other pieces sitting, it is claimed,
between the pieces that were claimed to have been identified by the PCR
method.
What
you end up with are hundreds of thousands or short pieces which could
have derived from anything including the animal or human from which the
original sample was taken, or from bacteria or fungi present in that
sample.
It’s
impossible to assemble this molecular jigsaw & what is now
introduced is computer trickery called Next Generation Sequencing, which
assembles all the huge number of short pieces in every conceivable
manner by means of common ends to the short pieces, a technique of
assembling “Contigs” (potentially overlapping or contiguous endings).
The
permutations & combinations that this software can yield are
nonsensical unless you constrain the “full length sequence” in some
ways.
As
soon as you apply limiters (such as conditions, requirements and
exclusions) you’re not discovering anything, you’re MAKING it up.
Contagion
or transmission is another “pillar”. Clinical symptomatic transmission
has never been demonstrated for any claimed “viral illness”. Not one.
I could go on but here’s the key point:
Anyone
familiar with the absolute minimal requirements of the discipline of
the scientific method for examining the physical world soon realises
that EVERY single one of the evidential “pillars” is not only invalid
nonsense but it’s knowing fakery.
The person doing it knows key controls are missing.
The
reviewer knows that none of the lodged genetic sequences have valid
connections to anything in the real world & the journal editors must
be in on this long lived, systematic fraud.
I
will have missed some “pillars” but I hope you’ve at least understood
my realisation that these are not of stone but pretend supports of
papier mache, assembled to create an illusory world.
I
don’t want anyone to “believe me.” Science doesn’t care about my or
your beliefs. You can however verify any or all of what I’ve said here.
I recommend anyone who understands the scientific method well enough to review the evidence for themselves.
I put it to you that, having done so, you realise that the answers to many other questions become completely obvious: all
claims made by the authorities about viruses, illnesses claimed to be
caused by them, their transmission, their treatment and all vaccines are
definitely, unambiguously, deliberately lies.
No comments:
Post a Comment