Video: Dr. Sam Bailey: Virus, Bacteriophage & Single “Virus” Genomics

 

This is the video version of Dr Mark Bailey’s essay "Virus, Bacteriophage & Single “Virus” Genomics." It was written to address the fallacy that technological advances in the 21st century have provided evidence for the virus model. In essence, the technology-driven approach cannot change the fact that the concept of ‘virus’ remains as it was in the 1800s: a mental construct [only] that attempts to explain why organisms become diseased. The paper also examines the misinterpretations concerning bacteriophages and giant “viruses” and how these entities have been inappropriately placed in the virological realm. As former virologist Dr Stefan Lanka has explained, these entities can be found in nature, isolated and characterised, but they are not pathogenic. The linguistic legerdemain employed by the virologists cannot change biological reality. Mark views this latest publication as a companion to Virology’s Event Horizon with both papers outlining the pivotal flaws in the methodologies employed by the virologists. We have dozens of videos, articles, interviews and books covering this topic at drsambailey.com with the most extensive refutation of the virus model being A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition), a freely-downloadable treatise that was also made into a three part video series by Steve Falconer. A HUGE silver lining to the otherwise tyrannical disaster that was the “Covid-19 pandemic” has been the widespread exposure of the fact that the entire field of “modern virology” is built on a fundamentally fraudulent process that claims to identify “viruses” and establish that these “viruses” are contagious and cause diseases, none of which is true. “Like all of the previous experimental methodologies in virology, the cell-culture technique did not demonstrate the existence of viruses — it only served to perpetuate a reification fallacy, that is, the imagined concept had been inappropriately declared to have a confirmed physical existence.” — Dr. Mark Bailey [Reification (also known as the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity.] “Without a tangible asset for virologists to engage with, the term ‘virus’ has taken on a protean quality, shimmying its way from one prêt-à-porter* definition to the next in order to keep up with the latest viral theory. A pervasive theme in virology’s development is that the notion of a contagious entity was imagined and then subsequent indirect observations have been advanced to support the hypothesized entity.” — Dr. Mark Bailey *prêt-à-porter definition: literally, “ready to wear” — somewhat synonymous with the phrase “fashion of the day" References: 1. Virus, Bacteriophage & Single “Virus” Genomics (Essay) — Dr Mark Bailey