Orientation for new readers
American Domestic Bioterrorism Program
Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law
Meryl Nass, highlighting a petition filed by the Attorneys General of fifteen US states in July 2022:
Notes
After
the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) refused the
states’ petition in October 2022, Texas and Oklahoma filed a federal
case in January 2023.
The
federal judge dismissed the case by order dated Aug. 18, 2023, and the
Texas and Oklahoma AGs chose not to appeal the decision to the circuit
court of appeals.
PDF links to the case documents below.
Bailiwick reporting and analysis
Oct. 17, 2023:
It
would be good if some state AGs filed a new complaint, challenging the
first two definitions of a “public health emergency” as promulgated by
HHS by regulatory notice on Jan. 19, 2017, in addition to the latter three definitions the states have already challenged during this first litigation.
The
states should challenge HHS to provide any factual, evidentiary basis
for the claim that a “public health emergency” is different from the
mere fact that human beings sometimes get sick, sometimes recover (with
or without treatment), and eventually, inevitably die.
This
would help expose other fraud-based elements of the global criminal
enterprise, including mass-testing of populations to present
pseudo-diagnostic data to the public, fraudulently characterized as
evidence that a pandemic is occurring.
To
pursue this legal strategy, state AGs will need to reject the
foundational lie they have swallowed hook, line and sinker to date: that
a pandemic happened.
They
will need to understand the Covid-19 fraud in its entirety — from the
centuries of propaganda-based preparation (fear-mongering and
pharmaceutical idolatry) that created the conditions for the present-day
crimes to occur, right through to the intentional misrepresentation of
illegal US DoD biochemical weapons as FDA-regulated “Covid-19 vaccines”
and the injury and death toll caused by the intentional military attacks
as conducted within each state.
They will also need to reckon with the role that their own states’ disease surveillance, detention, quarantine and forced treatment laws
play in 1) maintaining many mutually-reinforcing public fictions and 2)
rendering their state populations vulnerable to State-sponsored mass
theft, mass torture and mass murder conducted under public health law
pretexts…
Oct. 18, 2023:
…One
reason why the Texas federal judge dismissed the petitioner states'
case against Xavier Becerra and the Department of Health and Human
Services is that the judge didn't think the states presented any
evidence of actual harm, concrete injury or threatened imminent injury
to the people living in the states.
HHS
argued, and the judge agreed, that the harm from the WHO-based
definitions of "public health emergency" were speculative, hypothetical,
conjectural, and therefore the states lacked standing.
Soon, the next "deadly global pandemic" performance will begin.
If
and when state AGs file new cases to protect state residents from
“public health emergency”-predicated arrest, detention, torture and
murder, it will be very important that they incorporate the information
that has so painfully been brought into the light these last few years.
They must lay out the evidence that "deadly global pandemic" stories are fiction.
They
must incorporate the facts about the injuries and deaths caused in each
state by use of products known as "Covid-19 vaccines" under Emergency
Use Authorization status: the actual harms and concrete injuries.
They
must lay out how deployment of EUA products, as covert biochemical
weapons, is directly connected to HHS declarations that a "public health
emergency exists."
And
they must lay out how HHS declarations that a "public health emergency
exists" are directly connected to all five of the legal definitions
inserted into American regulatory law through the January 19, 2017
edition of the Federal Register, and connected to the whole system of treaties and laws built to enable State-sponsored mass murder, which grows more ripe for dismantling with every passing day…
Case documents - Texas, Oklahoma v. HHS, Becerra
See also
The Crucifixion. Painting by Andrea Mantegna.
No comments:
Post a Comment