Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., The Demolition of Justice in the USA
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.
The latest affront to the administration of justice has come from
the decision in the E. Jean Carroll “fantasy” trial, where a woman who
appears to be obsessed with sex has won a
staggering $83.3 million verdict against Donald Trump for an alleged
defamation for denying her claim that he had raped her at a Bergdorf
Goodman store, where she cannot even remember the year of its occurrence.
A woman who has been raped (absent roofies) will not ony remember the
year but the month, the week, the day and even the minute the
transgression took place.
And in Georgia, the sanctimonious DA Fani Willia, who threatened to
fire anyone working for her who slept with a coworker, turns out to
have been indulging
a lavish affair with her married lover, whom she has selected to
prosecute Donald Trump in a complex RICO case with 19 defendants, when
he was inexperienced at litigation and had not expertise with this type
of law. These cases appear to manifest TDS (“Trump Derangement
Syndrome”) by zealous Democrats eager to tarnish or destroy the
reputation of the one-man wrecking ball they despise to the core.
Far more serious, however, are acts by the Supreme Court of the United States, which have been manifest most seriously in the
current decision regarding the right of the Biden administration to
curtail the Governor of Texas in his efforts to staunch the flood of
millions of illegal migrants across our Southern Border, where the
President of the United States has abdicated his role to insure that the
laws are faithfully executed and that the federal government will
protect the states from invasions. Abbott is doing what Biden refuses to
do in defending the state–yet SCOTUS rules against him!
While the Carroll and Willis’ cases may be viewed as laughing
matters (demonstrating the extent to which one party will go after their
most influential political opponent), the border matter represents a
threat to the integrity of the nation, where at least 25 other governors have now sided with Governor Abbott and we appear to be on the verge of a Constitutional crisis.
While there’s talk of a civil war between the states, this development
has to do with the legitimacy of the federal government and has more of
the character of a revolution of the kind envisioned by the Declaration
of Independence.
And this is not the first time that SCOTUS has failed the nation.
In the wake of the (obviously fraudulent) election of 2020 (where by my
best estimate, Trump earned over 100,000,000 votes and Biden around
37,000,000), the rejection of the (once again) Texas lawsuit against the
swing stages of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and
Pennsylvania) for
violating their own state protocols for the selection of electors on
the specious grounds of “lack of standing” was not only a massive insult
to the nation but placed our future by permitting an illegitimate
regime.
Unlike the New York and Georgia offenses, these two are enormous
cases fraught with consequences for the nation. They concern the
integrity of the federal election process and the security of our
nation’s borders. Another case No. 21-7916 (far less familiar but which I brought to the Supreme Court) underscores the complete irresponsibility and abdication of commitment of
SCOTUS–at least, if you believe as I believe that our 7th Amendment
right to trial by jury may be our most important (by safeguarding the
people from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process).
The Courts of Wisconsin deprived me of my right to a trial by jury
by claiming that there were no disputed facts, which was an outcome
manufactured by the Circuit Court simply setting aside the mass of facts
I had on the ground that they were “unreasonable”. The case arose out
of a
suit for defamation over my declaration that a death certificate for a
purported Sandy Hook victim (Noah Pozner), which had no file number and
neither state nor town certification) was fake, where I introduced the reports of two forensic document experts on my behalf.
After my Petition for a Writ was denied, I persevered and submitted a Petition for Rehearing, which was also denied. What may escape the eye, however, is that the supporting appendices (Appendix A-D and Appendix E)
were not made accessible to the public, where a note was added to the
Petition, “Additional material from this filing is available in the
Clerk’s Office”. If that strikes you as strange, should you take a look
at their contents you will immediately discern why they had to be
suppressed.
They include the FEMA manual for the “mass casualty exercise involving children” held at Sandy Hook on 13-14 December 2012, the CT FEMA Schedule showing the drill to be conducted on that date, a Crime Scene Investigation van in the parking lot (when the windows of Classroom 10 are not yet broken), and the affidavit of a Texas-licensed P.I.,
who accessed the files of the CT State Police and found proof not only
that there had been no mass murder but that it was not even an operating
school.
In 2015, I brought together 13 experts on Sandy Hook (including 6
Ph.D.s) and we determined that the school had been closed since 2008,
that there were no students or teachers there, and that it had been a
FEMA exercise presented as mass murder to promote gun control. The book we published was banned by amazon.com less than a month after it had gone on sale and had sold close to 500 copies. So I released it to the public for free as a PDF–but it was taken as a consequence of the lawsuit.
So the book was banned by amazon.com and
taken by means of a lawsuit, which was (from every perspective I can
bring to bear) completely improperly by setting aside my evidence as
“unreasonable”–which continues to deprive the residents of WI their rightto
due process under the 7th Amendment. Nobody seems to care–most
certainly not the Supreme Court of the United States. But my research
has continued, including communication with participants in the event that our courts do not want you to know. Not even SCOTUS stands up for our Constitutional rights.
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer, is
McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of
Minnesota and now resides in Wisconsin.
No comments:
Post a Comment