4618: The Dead Baby Scam -- Update One from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Stories
of dead brothers and sisters are pouring in from across America, and
through all these stories runs one totally amazing, gobsmacker,
unbelievable thread.
All
these families were simply told about the "stillborn fraternal twin"
--- none of them, not one, reports that they ever actually saw the
baby.
No Mother or Father actually held their dead baby in their arms and no siblings gazed on the tiny face.
Priests,
nuns, doctors, nurses, or hospital staffers simply told them about this
tragic outcome, they believed, they paid the extra expenses, some held
funerals with little caskets, but the caskets were all sealed. Every
single one.
Nobody
out of thousands of families ever actually saw the dead baby.
Apparently, this whole practice peaked in the 1930's and tapered off
gradually. The most recent cases we've found are in the very early
1970's.
So
I am hearing from the Grandsons and Granddaughters, Siblings who are
now middle-aged to elderly, and a few Mothers and Fathers who are still
grieving, still concerned, still left wondering.
The
emotional anguish is still in their words and voices. They suffered a
terrible loss, yet when they look back they can't even prove that it
happened.
Many
people know where their lost babies were purportedly buried, at least
in terms of a marker or a cemetery plot. But in all cases
of traditional burial, the little casket was sealed. Again, nobody ever
actually saw the baby.
Same thing with cremations. The casket was sealed. Nobody saw the baby.
In
a few cases where there have been small communities and
intergenerational funeral home businesses, family members have been able
to go back to the morticians who handled the burial and inquire about
their records related to the baby's funeral, only to find that the
records have disappeared from the otherwise complete record of everyone
who has been buried in the last seventy years.
Same thing at the hospitals. There's no record of a baby being born and no record of a baby dying. None at all.
Come
to that, if you go to the hospital and inquire about the live baby and
records of the live birth, they don't have those, either.
It's
as if these families had a nightmare or a group hallucination. There's
no evidence of these lost babies at all, except in a few cases, we've
found a Death Certificate from the Coroner's Office, and sometimes
blurbs in the local newspapers, "A son, Gregory Matthew,
stillborn....".
In
all cases, when we track it down, and can track it down, the newspaper
announcement was either paid for by the family as a memorial or included
in the "Births and Deaths" page along with all the other funerals.
But
a funeral, as we've seen, doesn't prove the existence of a dead baby,
and uniformly, when we get a chance to interview Mothers, they do not
remember a second baby as part of the labor.
As
anyone who has actually had twins can verify, you normally feel both
and they are two separate labors and events, very definite and
palpable.
That
isn't what happened with all these missing stillborn babies. The
Mothers experienced no separate labor--- weren't even aware that they
had a second baby, but then, they didn't see the placenta, either.
They had to be told about the stillborn fraternal twin afterward.
"Everything happened so fast...." is what we hear again and again and again.
So, what's going on here?
Was
there a baby at all, or was this just a cruel con to scam some extra
bucks worth of death services, burial and funeral costs?
It
was certainly a money laundering and taxation-based peonage racket
targeting the survivor. The "death" was used as a premise to create an
intestate joint infant decedent estate "administered" by the Bar
Association Members -- we know that. For sure.
We
know that the Roman Catholic Church and the British Monarch split the
take 60/40 on Protestants and the Church got 100% on Catholics. For
sure.
But
nobody ever saw the baby and nobody ever saw any emergency baptism or
Last Rites being performed, and those two facts taken together make up
the most startling and macabre thread of evidence I've ever seen.
How
could all these stillbirths occur and all these charges for hospital
services and religious services be added on the bill -- when nobody saw
the baby and nobody from the family was ever present when the services
were performed?
The
whole prospect that something like this could happen, is mammothly
improbable, even implausible -- but there it is. Nobody saw the baby.
Nobody saw the emergency baptism. Nobody saw the Last Rites.
One
other thing that runs absolutely true in the recounts from the Mothers
is that yes, they were pumped for money----and many Mothers report that
they were somehow made to feel guilty, as if they hadn't done their best
by the child, or that they were being punished for lust, or didn't eat
right, or didn't pray enough.
It all leaves us unable to prove, except by possible forensic evidence obtained by exhumation, that a baby ever existed.
An
underground facility in the vicinity of an old "home" for unwed mothers
in Ireland was excavated in 2017 and found to contain the corpses of
800 babies and young children:
The Catholic-run home ran from 1925 to 1961.
Many
questions remain. Who were all these children? Who were their
families? What did they die of? Most were dated to the 1950's? Why was
that decade prone to such mammoth losses? Are there hundreds more
buried on the property somewhere from the 1920s, 30's and 40's? Why
weren't they given a proper Irish burial?
Even
the use of charnel houses, which is still a tradition in some areas of
Europe, requires burial for a number of years before the bones can be
removed to the community charnel house-- if that is what the French nuns
were attempting to do in Ireland.
If
that was what was going on, there would be a steady accumulation of
bones from the earlier decades and many of the 1950s burials would still
be in place as burials, awaiting their final exhumation and journey to
the charnel house. Instead, most of the skeletons are from the 1950's,
the decade immediately before the facility closed.
This incident at least gives some substance to the claim that thousands of stillbirths and deaths actually occurred.
This
story and the whole surrounding "stillborn fraternal twin" story that
so many families have heard also impetus and credibility to the work
undertaken by Kevin Annett addressing similar concerns at Residential
Schools in Canada.
To sum up the possibilities:
(1)
No actual baby ever existed and what got buried or incinerated was the
placenta described as a "human creature" by Pope Boniface VIII, and more
recently as a "stillborn fraternal twin"; (2) a stillborn baby was
born, but nobody from the family ever saw it or witnessed its baptism or
Last Rites in 100% of the cases, and in all cases with burials or
cremations reported, the caskets were sealed; (3) --- and this is the
really tough one: a healthy baby was born, but was then stolen.
Why?
Again, more questions than answers.
(1)
Sale of the baby to adoptive parents willing to pay big bucks for one
that met their requirements; the colluding hospital staff would simply
sit back until they saw a good candidate, snatch the baby, transfer them
to the buyer and be done. Even in the 1920s babies sold for five times
the yearly wages of a working man, so illegal adoption rings have always
been very lucrative.
(2)
From what we've learned from Witnesses and house searches and forensic
evidence obtained from a wide variety of locations provided by
Witnesses, ritual human sacrifice, especially of babies, has always been
a big part of the Babylonian Cult and has survived into the present
day.
The
religion's use of sex as a sacrament meant there was always a great
surplus of babies in the days prior to birth control, so they were
sacrificed, traditionally by throwing them into a fiery furnace like
stovewood.
But where to get babies to sacrifice in the 1950's?
Sadly,
similar to the situation with orphanages and residential schools, it
would be too easy for the hospital staff to simply lie, tell the parents
the baby was stillborn, and sell the child.
There
are first hand eye-witness accounts that ten Native children left a
Residential School in Canada in the company of Queen Elizabeth II and
Prince Philip. Those children never returned to school and were never
heard from again by their friends and family.
Has
the disappearance of ten children become so commonplace that it doesn't
deserve investigation, especially when photographs, eye-witness
accounts, and school records confirm the facts?
This
is just one example, indicating that yes, this ancient evil of
child sacrifice appears to be continuing and in the highest levels of
government, too.
If
those Native children came to any good end, why wouldn't Buckingham
Palace be trumpeting the news and proving that they were treated kindly
and went on to live good lives?
The
noisome Brits recorded what the Queen ate for breakfast every day of
her life. So how could they not "note down" ten children added to the
royal entourage?
We
are left with the repugnant assumption that the former Queen and her
Consort went to a Catholic Residential School in Canada and picked out
ten Native children the same way that we might go down to the dock and
choose ten lobsters.
These
dark issues remain unaddressed by the governments and those responsible
to society to provide answers. And whether they like it or not, and no
matter how far-fetched it seems, a pattern is emerging.
The
Perps in a combined illegal adoption and Cult Supplier ring would have
been a mixture of Cult Members who knew the truth, and greedy
collaborators who thought the babies were going into adoptive homes.
No
doubt there would be an even fatter "honorarium gift" made available to
the suppliers of the Cult, so it would be easy to maintain the illusion
that adoptive parents were paying the freight and both operations could
be going on at the same time.
We
have seen many instances where one lucrative illegal activity was
paired with one that was much, much worse, so as to draw in
collaborators who thought they were engaged in a different scheme.
It would not surprise us to find an illegal adoption ring supplying a child sacrifice cult.
(3) The babies were being shunted into government-sponsored scientific experiments.
This
seems far-fetched until you start seeing numerous variations of
"cabbage patch postcards" and pictures of certain sideshow exhibits
featuring babies in incubators at places like the New Jersey Boardwalk
and World Fairs from the 1890's to the 1940s.
Did
anyone ever tell you that babies come from cabbage patches? I heard it
growing up, as it was running in a competition with the stork story.
The
cabbage patch postcards show dozens of babies being grown like row
crops, often with a cabbage plant used as their seat and a big cabbage
leaf being used like a cap on their heads. There's something incredibly
creepy about these black and white and color tinted photographic
postcards and the thought does arise that we were being shown early
cloning programs.
The
same aura surrounds the traveling incubator shows billed as science and
industry exhibits. The photos show dozens of old-fashioned incubators
and dozens of babies that are being cared for by women who appear to be
nurses. Again, where are all these babies coming from? Where are their
parents?
What happened to them after the shows closed down?
Were the Perps giving us a "soft disclosure" of cloning or gene splicing or....?
These images are surreal, inexplicable, and weird.
And they record large numbers of unattended babies in odd scientific environments.
Superficially,
the babies appear healthy, and there is nothing overtly threatening in
these photos, but everyone I show these postcards and photos reacts the
same way: something macabre is lurking just out of sight.
We
keep coming back to the Office of the Roman Pontiff, its odd
triple-tiered crown, the three crossed keys representing enslavement of
mind, body, and soul --- supposedly to "Christ", the Anointed One, who
may have been anointed as a priest of Baal, if we are to believe the
Gospels in the context of their times.
Is there anything in the New Testament suggesting that Yehoshua would condone enslaving anyone for any reason?
Or
was the whole Mary-Magdalene-was-a-(possibly temple) prostitute, just
another Big Lie embroidered onto the whole cloth by the likes of Saint
Jerome? Jerome included books and letters written as homages by Paul of
Ephesus as part of the Biblical Canon, as if they had been written by
Saint Paul himself. They still haven't been removed.
Thanks
to these writings being added to the Bible as the writings of "Paul",
we have a distorted image of Saint Paul as a mean-spirited misanthrope
fixated on blaming women for the downfall of Mankind, a brow-beating
misogynist after Jerome's own heart and serving the purposes of the
Roman Patriarchs, but a thousand miles away from the actual Saint who
wrote with great insight and from the heart about the nature of love and
forgiveness.
Is
it really so unlikely that the transformation of Yehoshua to Jesus to
Christ was anything but the advent of the familiar slavemaster caste
system, practiced by and approved of by the Roman Patriarchs?
The
system certainly left the Jew-boy at the bottom of the heap of the
social caste system, and all but forgotten as he was substituted for by
the Roman Jesus and Babylonian Christ, both.
We
have proof that Constantine didn't actually convert to Christianity.
His Triumphal Arch constructed years after his purported conversion
features Dacian priests wearing their traditional hats and costumes. His
correspondence shows that he was still actively promoting an Imperial
Roman Ancestor Cult years afterward, too.
Was
Constantine simply a Big Liar? Did he convert to the Church or did the
Church convert to him? A startling 26 Roman Emperors came from Romania
which also gave its name to Rome. Why aren't we taught this fact in
school? Why do we know virtually nothing about the Dacian religion and
priesthood?
Most importantly, did it involve child sacrifice?
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment