Friday, December 22, 2023

CO Failed Constitutional Law – Tries To Supersede Federal Law

 

CO Failed Constitutional Law – Tries To Supersede Federal Law

 

 

 

The Colorado Court’s decision to take Trump off the “Primary Ballot’ is basically doomed before it gets off the ground.   The decision was made without Constitutional due process.   The justices are creating an ‘opinion’ without a trial or conviction.   An appeal has no grounds because there is not a crime.   Opinion – is not law.   Therefore, Trump’s option is to bring it before the Federal Supreme Court which will immediately over-rule as to the Constitutionality – and likely punish the associate justices for their illegal action.

The Colorado Constitutional justices making this decision are not justices, they are associates, they have no Constitutional legal background, and have no legal authority because there has been no conviction.

Essentially, it is a distraction. 

Technically, the ruling has been ‘stayed until January 4th’ when holidays are over and Justices return to court.   It is also the same time frame, January 1st, as the release of 177 Epstein associate names that will likely upend quite a few political careers.  The List is based on a civil lawsuit brought by one of the abused against Ghislaine Maxwell.   The names had been sealed from the public, and Federal Judge Preska has called for the List to be ‘unsealed’.   Some of the names include those of minor victims – who will likely remain sealed.

Many of the names on the List have already been mentioned in the media before – however, they are subjects of a lawsuit – a Legal Web of tangled proportions that could result in ‘whistleblowers’ coming forward for immunity.

The Colorado distraction is simply a means of deflection which the Media is all too happy to oblige.   The Justices that voted against Trump do not have a background in Constitutional Law to support their use of the 14th Amendment.  They include:
Richard Gabriel – an “Associate” justice whose specialty is business law.

William Hood III – an “Associate” justice who was previously a District prosecutor.

Monica Marquez – a former deputy AG, her expertise was employment law.

Melissa Hart – prior to being appointed to Colorado Supreme Court, Hart taught legal ethics and professionalism.  She gave a week long class for the Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literary project which teaches high school students about discrimination.   The Project was created by Jamie Raskin, a far-left Jewish attorney whose ancestors came from Bolshevik Soviet Union.   A Constitutional Law teacher turned Congressman, Raskin refused to certify Trump’s 2016 election win based on Russiagate.   In 2021, Raskin was named the Impeachment Manager for Trump’s second impeachment with regard to the “Insurrection” – for which he was acquitted. Social Security For Du... AARP Best Price: $8.87 Buy New $16.79 (as of 03:46 UTC - Details)

A Federal acquittal vs a Colorado non-trial illegal accusation… is a rather blatant form of election interference.   “The Supreme Court held that under Article III of the Constitution, the federal courts have the final jurisdiction in all cases involving the Constitution and laws of the United States, and that the states therefore cannot interfere with federal court judgments.”

They have no ability to convict Trump to support their argument.   Without a conviction, the entire stage play is simply another judicial comedy that could backfire and see these justices reprimanded for blatant disregard of Due Process.

“Due process of law is application by the state of all legal rules and principles pertaining to a case so all legal rights that are owed to a person are respected.”   Trump was not tried and convicted – his Federal acquittal supersedes their ability to impose this claim of Insurrection.

And once again the liberals have provided the American People with yet another reason to support Trump over every other candidate.  

Reprinted with permission from Helena-The Nationalist Voice.

No comments:

Post a Comment