9/11 News: Terrorism in 2015: Following a False Flag Formula by Kevin Ryan from DigWithin
Terrorism in 2015: Following a False Flag Formula
Posted on January 4, 2016 by Kevin Ryan
In 2015,
there were 385 terrorist incidents around the world according
to Wikipedia. Of these, 94% were attributed to Muslim perpetrators or
occurred in Muslim countries surrounding the world’s most resource-rich region.
The geographic pattern behind these and previous attacks suggests that
terrorism is more a function of the need to seize
resources than it is about religious or political beliefs. The terrorist
events of 2015 continue to fuel speculation that most terrorism is
government-sponsored and focuses on achieving political objectives.
Most of the terrorist attacks in 2015 were attributed to groups located in the
relatively small region of southwestern Eurasia that has been the focus of
competition for resources among the world’s superpowers. The political will to
drive seizure of those resources requires Western governments to generate a
fear of terrorism in their own societies so that “responses” can happen without
interference from the public. Maintaining the fear is what appears to be the
primary objective behind the fewer, better publicized, attacks in Western
countries.
Since 9/11, terrorist acts in Western countries have exhibited a formulaic set
of common features that suggest the government might have been involved in the
crimes. Here are ten such features.
- Evidence against the accused is usually composed of hearsay claims or dubious documents that originate with military or law enforcement sources.
- The hearsay evidence typically includes vague accusations that the suspects were in contact with, had “links” to, or made recent pledges of allegiance to, terrorist leaders.
- The documentary evidence includes things like passports conveniently left at the scene or social media postings that imply a commitment to terrorism.
- There is an overly obvious attempt to associate the terrorists with Islam.
- The suspects are usually dead by the time the first reports come out.
- People who knew the accused often say they had absolutely no idea that their friend/neighbor/family member was involved or interested in terrorism in any way.
- The testimony of eyewitnesses is ignored as authorities provide contradictory stories that quickly become the official, media-driven accounts.
- Eyewitnesses often describe the attackers as armed and outfitted like highly trained, and well-supported, special operations soldiers.
- The attacks usually coincide with military or law enforcement exercises that mimic what happens.
- The incidents are used to justify rapid military attacks against countries of strategic interest before any investigation is conducted.
In 2015,
two acts of terrorism in the U.S. were attributed to white men who survived and
were not said to be associated with Muslims. These were the June shooting of
nine African Americans in a South Carolina church and the November killing of
three people at a Planned Parenthood facility in Colorado. But the remaining
six terrorist events in the West were all attributed to Muslims. Here are quick
summaries of how those terrorist events exhibited the features listed above.
Paris in January—The Charlie Hebdo and Kosher
Grocery attacks: The first of two major terrorist acts in Paris resulted in a
considerable number of as-yet
unanswered questions. Not the least of these was that the military-style
attackers wore balaclavas to conceal their identities yet left a passport for
quick identification. The attackers took pains to associate themselves with
Islam yet also displayed professional training like that of special operations
soldiers.
Copenhagen in February—Two people
were shot dead in separate shootings that were allegedly motivated by art that
was disrespectful to Muslims. Police said that Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein
committed both crimes and that he died during the second attack. El-Hussein was
reported to be well known to Danish intelligence and had been in and out of
prison. Despite being sentenced to two years in December 2014 for “serious
violence,” he was released
in January 2015 and was allegedly engaged in the shootings just two weeks
later. Danish citizens have
raised questions about the possibility of this being a false-flag attack.
Texas in May—At an anti-Islamic art
exhibit featuring images of the Prophet Mohammed in Garland, Texas, two heavily
armed gunmen wearing body armor began shooting. One school security officer was
shot in the ankle before both of the alleged attackers were killed. The two men
had police records and one was the subject of an FBI investigation.
Australia in October—In Parramatta,
a 15-year old boy was said to shoot a police employee after visiting a mosque
and listening to a lecture by an extremist Islamist leader (according to
police). Although Australian authorities called it an act of political terrorism,
like most 15-year olds the boy was not politically active and the lecture
he attended was about “charity and how to worship God and help others.” His
family and friends had no idea that he had any violent tendencies.
Paris in November—In a coordinated
series of attacks, terrorists killed 130 people. Just two days later, before an
investigation was completed, France began a new bombing campaign in Syria. Only
one of the ten suspects, Saleh Abdeslam, survived the attacks. He was first questioned
and released by French authorities, even when it was known that he had
rented a car used in the crimes. It was reported that Belgian authorities later
let
him escape. In November it was revealed that Paris police were engaged in a
mass shooting exercise the very morning
of the attacks.
California in December—The San
Bernardino Shootings: The only eyewitness to the shootings said the
perpetrators were three
tall, athletic, white men in combat-style gear. The witnesses to the
getaway said they saw three
men in black masks fleeing the scene with rifles in hand. Another said it
was three white men in
military gear. The attackers got into a black SUV with tinted windows and
“calmly” left the scene. Despite these eyewitness reports, the official account
quickly became that two small, brown-skinned Muslim people committed the
crimes. A few days later, President Obama promoted
the new myth without proper investigation or trial and took pains to remind
the nation that, “Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11.”
Citizens later learned that there are glaring
questions that remain unanswered about the San Bernardino shootings but the
media frenzy in support of the government account had already become an
entrenched myth. Even as the New York
Times retracted reporting on the subject and the Washington Post admitted that American law enforcement officials
were “famous for feeding contradictory and unfounded information to the media,”
the myth continued to go unchallenged.
Despite the fact that government-sponsored false flag terrorism has been well
documented as a fact throughout
modern history, terrorism remains a powerful tool for controlling public
opinion. The events of 2015 have shown that the propaganda tools for presenting
terrorism are being continually refined. The formula used by government and
media to report new accounts of terrorism may one day become so well tuned that
it will be effective in presenting anyone as a terrorist with little or no
actual evidence. It would therefore be wise for all citizens to question all
acts of terrorism in order to prevent greater abuses of power.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged False Flag, Paris Attacks, Terrorism | 16 Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment