[Editor’s note. Clare was the first to suggest
to me that Paul had died and been replaced (by someone I now regard as
an even better musician. I became convinced when I discovered the research of two Italian forensic scientists, who started out in the expectation of refuting the claim but instead confirmed it.
The the current “Paul”–often referred to as “Faul” for “False (or
Fake) Paul”–is not the original James Paul McCartney is not in doubt.
They have different heights and shapes of head and different teeth and
palates, where Paul had bad teeth and a narrow palate, but Faul has good
teeth and a normal palate:
There are other theories of the case, including those of Richard Balducci (that Paul was killed as punishment for John’s claim that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus) and of Mona Alexis Pressley (who believes that Paul lives on as the caretaker of his own home).]
Henry Makow Intro:
It’s the weekend. As a change of pace, I present an article
by a reader, Clare Kuehn, that casts Paul McCartney’s murder and
replacement in a new light.
“Mark Lane said Paul was convinced “Oswald couldn’t have
done it,” and wanted to write his very first film score for Lane’s
upcoming film of his book, Rush to Judgment.
Had Paul written his first film score and backed such a
film, in the heady days for the Beatles, in 1966, and only
three-and-a-half years after the assassination of JFK, the dam against
JFK-assassination conspiracy case-making would have broken.”
By Clare Kuehn
In mid-September, 1966, something happened with the Beatles that would rewrite the history of music forever. JPM was missing from media coverage for months.
When he supposedly appeared again in mid-December, he appeared in
all ways to be very different than he had been just seven or eight weeks
before. Photos now and then are often doctored, films stretched, and
music pitch altered.
Back then, when the film of the Beatles “Hello Goodbye” aired
in 1967 on the Ed Sullivan TV show, the figure of Paul was extremely
awkward and lanky. And why did they send a film instead of doing an
in-person appearance, as before? He moved awkwardly, not with the
effortless fluid movements of Paul. Numerous fake and distorted films
began to appear; music was altered in pitch, during remastering; cryptic
comments were made. What had happened to the “beautiful boy”?
The rumor that Paul died started almost immediately, we now know.
Most sources say it was created in late 1969, but it was in print in
early 1967 and others heard it before.
‘
Beyond the fact that if Paul was replaced in the public eye, some
powerful people had to manage passports and legalities, and the powerful
economic export the Beatles represented had to be continued. Some
people now are considering that he was murdered, instead of dying in a
natural accident. If he was murdered, some common suggestions follow.
Mark Lane’s “Rush To Judgment” Book and Movie on the JFK Assassination
One of the big theories of murder centers around the JFK assassination.
If he was murdered, the JFK assassination links may not have been
the sole reason for Paul’s death, but were, perhaps the final “nail in
the coffin”, making more people willing to “sign off” on killing the
immensely popular British “cash cow”, Paul McCartney.
The evidence comes from two books. Mark Lane, the Washington lawyer
who wrote the first bestseller on basic legal evidence and arguments
surrounding Lee Harvey Oswald’s defense, wrote later that Paul and he
met in early 1966 and
Paul read his manuscript for “Rush To Judgment”
book (published summer 1966). He said Paul was convinced “Oswald
couldn’t have done it,” and wanted to write his very first film
It started filming in Dallas, in 1966, showing eyewitnesses and
legal arguments. It was released in 1967, to far less fanfare than
Paul’s version would surely have been. PID theory says that Paul did not
quite live to see the filming start.
Lane discussed his experiences with Paul (and the JFK movie musical score plans) in several interviews and two books:
“A Citizen’s Dissent” (Lawrence Hill Books, 1968, pp. 56-7); “Citizen Lane” (Hill Books, 2012, pp. 162-4, 174-6).
Had Paul written his first film score and backed such a film, in
the heady days for the Beatles, in 1966, and only three-and-a-half
years after the assassination of JFK, the dam against JFK-assassination
conspiracy case-making would have broken.
A beating (fake moped accident) seems to have happened before Paul
met Mark Lane, however, in December, 1965. Although the exact timing of
the first Lane meeting is unknown, it was likely in early 1966.
Other options for murder exist, as we will see below, perhaps in
combination with the JFK movie situation. All reasons to murder Paul
could have played some role.
Mind Control: Sexual Liberation as a Form of Social Control
There are other plausible theories of Paul’s murder if he was
murdered. Moreover, if he was, it may have been with many purposes in
mind, depending upon the particular group signing off on the plot.
After Paul died, the members of the band, Sir Paul especially,
became pawns in a more direct promotion of wild lifestyles. Paul had
been loose, personally, but was not given to public extremes. In fact,
although counter-cultural with longer hair and clever music, the Beatles
were not publicly well-known for drug and sex escapades, until after
Paul died.
It may be that he was “in the way” of a more sinister destruction
of society planned by social scientists, using the replacement.
In this theory of the death, a Freemasonic, “Enlightenment Liberal
Atheism” agenda, along with politically weaponized social scientists and
psychologists, were set to push a liberalized, false Christianity,
especially a false Roman Catholic church, to promote sex and drugs more
than Paul himself really wanted to.
A replacement, instead of an announcement would be to keep the
money flow and the social power of the Beatles going, for promoting
social liberalism. Other bands have been implicated in being spies or
affiliates, as well.
Background:
David McGowan, “Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon,
Covert Ops & The Dark Heart of The Hippie Dream” (Headpress, 2014).
Dr. E. Michael Jones, “Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation And Political Control” (Fidelity Press, 1999).
Satanism, Crowley, Lennon, Satanic Backwards Music Clues?
The Beatles, as British subjects, were somewhat proud of their
status as cultural changers. They might have dabbled in Freemasonry and
been so upset at Christianity as an institution, that they temporarily
became “anti-Christ”, as their press agent remarked above. Their
feelings adjusted back and forth over the years, but they did not hang
out upside-down crosses; the following is a doctored photo. The
quotation is accurate, however.
They actually held out their Masters of the British Empire (MBE) awards in the original photo.
Others have said that the Beatles added hidden backward phrases to
their music. These were all done after Paul supposedly died. Because of
their secret and creepy aspect, some called them Satanic.
It is a regular historical fact that the Beatles said they were
inspired by Aleister Crowley, at some point, and that they were part of
the counterculture of the time. The hype around the Beatles also links
to some evidence that they were especially promoted when they were, to
the USA, to distract from the assassination of JFK.
Sacrificial symbology present in the case evidence has also
suggested to some, that Paul died partly in Satanic style, gangland
style.
Crowley, possibly a British agent and spy, created his own branch
of Masonry with thaumaturgy (supposedly real magic), called the Ordo
Templi Orientis (OTO). Indeed, Crowley promoted backward messages, to
create mastery of nature and control of others. They are also used by
intelligence apparatuses, in cryptography.
No comments:
Post a Comment