by Peter and Ginger Breggin First Published October 15, 2023
Is
it possible that the elite of the world, for almost one hundred years,
have been knowingly damaging the brains and minds of billions of us to
make us more docile, dependent, and easily controlled? Did they start in
the mid-1930s with lobotomy, which earned the inventor a Nobel Prize,
and then follow up with electroshock, which still goes on? Then in the
mid-1950s, did they intentionally continue assaulting us with
lobotomizing antipsychotic drugs like Thorazine and Haldol, crushing the
brains of hundreds of millions of souls confined to state mental
“hospitals”?
Are
they now purposely continuing to damage our brains, minds, and spirits
with newer lobotomizing antipsychotic drugs, such as Risperdal, Invega,
Zyprexa, and Abilify, as well as the SSRI antidepressants? Is it
possible that their greatest achievement is the continuing assault on
the brains, minds, and spirits of all humanity with the spike protein of
COVID-19 and the same spike protein that the jabs make our bodies
produce against ourselves?
I
begin our examination with a recent malpractice trial in which I was
the medical expert in a death case involving antidepressants.
On Thursday, September 14, 2023, I testified as a medical expert in a malpractice trial in Upstate New York. James Townsend,1 44
years old, had hanged himself less than 24 hours after being discharged
from a psychiatric hospital. His wife, Serena, brought the case. She
had told doctors, including the hospital psychiatrist, that
antidepressants had changed Mr. Townsend from a loving and responsible
family man into an emotionally withdrawn, extremely anxious individual
with violent tempers (without harming anyone) and suicidal reactions,
but none of the professionals seemed to listen or care.
John
DeGasperis from Kingston, New York, a dedicated and insightful attorney
representing Mr. Townsend’s wife and family, asked me to evaluate the
case. After I confirmed that malpractice had caused the suicide, we
worked long, hard hours preparing for the trial.
The
success of my testimony had special personal meaning for me beyond the
usual satisfaction of helping the injured individual or family and
spreading the truth about the medications. The remarkable immediate
impact of my testimony at trial reassured me that I had indeed fully
recovered from the severe case of COVID-19 pneumonia that caused me to
be hospitalized earlier in April of this year. My recovery from COVID
seemed rapid to my experienced and sophisticated physicians who were a
volunteer committee from around the nation, but to me, the “brain fog”
that lasted six months seemed potentially interminable. It alerted me
that many people might not ever fully recover.
There
were many insights from the case, from my first live appearance in
court for several years, and from mulling on the meaning of it all for
the future of humanity. The death of Mr. Townsend occurred in 2017, but
the lessons for COVID-19 and for the future were only beginning to fully
dawn on me, leading to this presentation of my ideas.
My Background
The
Townsend tragedy centered around the so-called “miracle drugs,” the
SSRI antidepressants, including Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Celexa, and
Lexapro. Trintellix and Viibryd are among the newer additions. The
Townsend case is one of many times that I have testified about violence,
suicide, and psychosis from these psychiatric drugs, and I have written
about them in many books and scientific articles. Some of my legal
cases and all of my scientific publications can be found in my resume
at www.breggin.com.2 My
publications included many books that involved these drugs,
including Talking Back to Prozac (a big bestseller coauthored with my
wife Ginger Breggin in 1994) and Medication Madness in 2008, which drew
upon 50 clinical and legal cases of drug-induced severe mental and
emotional disasters caused by psychiatric drugs of all kinds.
In
1993-1994, I was selected by a consortium of attorneys and approved by a
federal judge in Indiana to be the single scientific expert for all
approximately 150 cases against Eli Lilly, the manufacturer of Prozac
(fluoxetine). My extraordinary task was to examine and testify about all
the discovery materials. First and foremost, it empowered me to
thoroughly examine Eli Lilly’s otherwise private and proprietary
documents about the development and marketing of Prozac. In addition, I
would gather every relevant piece of information from the FDA and from
the scientific literature about Prozac and the class of SSRI
antidepressants. I would interview key FDA officials, attend conferences
usually reserved for drug companies and FDA officials, and learn about
the relationships between drug companies and the FDA.
As
one of the first to identify the dangers of SSRIs, I also testified
about them before the FDA on two occasions when Ginger and my public
education campaign helped force the agency to consider increasing their
warnings about SSRIs in 2003-2004. Most importantly, the FDA provided
every one of its drug committee members with a copy of my 2003/2004
article on SSRI antidepressants in the International Journal of Risk and
Safety in Medicine.3 In my article, I introduced the concept of a stimulant syndrome that the SSRIs frequently create in varying degrees:
Mania
with psychosis is the extreme end of a stimulant continuum that often
begins with lesser degrees of insomnia, nervousness, anxiety,
hyperactivity, and irritability and then progresses toward more severe
agitation, aggression, and varying degrees of mania. At the lower end of
the continuum, an ordinarily shy young woman acted silly and more
outgoing on fluoxetine, and then developed suicidal feelings when she
missed doses. (Pp. 32-33)
My article also provided a lengthy analysis and literature review of akathisia. Echoing
my scientific paper, the stimulation syndrome, more euphemistically
called activation by the drug advocates, appeared in various parts of
the official Full Prescribing Information for Prozac, Lexapro, and all
other SSRI drugs.4 As
a result, doctors, and especially psychiatrists, should be well aware
of the SSRI antidepressant risks; but, instead, psychiatrists,
especially among all medical professionals, have a long history of
ignoring the well-being of their patients while defending their own
malfeasance.
Psychiatry as an Evil Force in the World
How
badly has organized psychiatry behaved? For several centuries
psychiatrists directed and staffed giant state hospital lockups and
totalitarian institutions, housing thousands of victims, where they
perpetrated unspeakable atrocities against their “patients.” The inmates
were subjected to various methods of poisoning, straitjackets,
isolation, freezing, lobotomy, and the still common electroshock (ECT).
No more than one or two psychiatrists even voiced objections in public,
until I came along, and systematically criticized the institutions. The
relative demise of these institutions resulted not from concern for the
patient, but because the drugs made them so apathetic and docile they
could be housed almost anywhere, including on the streets.
In
Germany in the 1930s, high-ranking psychiatrists established a formal
murder program for “useless eaters” using starvation and poisoning in
the state mental hospitals and then gas chambers in newly built highly
organized special “euthanasia centers.” These efforts became a
feasibility test before Hitler initiated the Holocaust. Once again, no
American psychiatrist publically denounced psychiatry’s role in the
“euthanasia” murders and wrote about their relationship to the Holocaust
until I did, although the facts were well-established at the Nuremberg
trial of physicians and a few other sources in Europe.5 In
general, as my lifelong reform work confirms, nearly all psychiatrists,
especially those in influential positions, think nothing about
routinely drugging people, even into near oblivion. Meanwhile, they will
countenance anything from their colleagues, from electroshock to
lobotomy, and on to ruining innumerable lives and killing many with
their drugs.
Testifying about the Death of Mr. Townsend
During
my testimony in the Townsend case, I demonstrated that the medical
records confirm how Mrs. Townsend, from early on, had been warning
doctors that the antidepressants had changed her husband from a kind and
loving husband and father into a withdrawn, uncaring, and emotionally
disturbed man. For the first time in his life, Mr. Townsend lost his
normal caring and loving engagement with his family. This early change
in personality came before the aggressive and suicidal tendencies
emerged. Each of the antidepressants given to him in succession were
SSRIs — the so-called Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors — in his
case, including Paxil, Zoloft, and Lexapro. In addition, he was given
trazodone, an antidepressant with SSRI functions that is routinely used
as a sleeping aid.
When
her husband was finally hospitalized, Mrs. Townsend again reported to
his new doctor that he had become much worse on the antidepressants and
should not be given them anymore. The response to her lacked any seeming
awareness that Mrs. Townsend was reporting actual severe adverse drug
reactions previously documented in the earlier medical record as well as
in the scientific literature6 and in the FDA’s Full Prescribing Information for these antidepressants, such as Lexapro.7 Seemingly
to mollify her without informing her, the psychiatrist replaced the
offending SSRI antidepressants with another nearly identical SSRI
antidepressant, Lexapro, which was given every day in the hospital,
preventing his recovery and worsening his condition.
Based
on details in the medical records, my testimony documented that in
addition to a general mental decline since starting on psychiatric
drugs, he was also experiencing a specific adverse drug effect called
akathisia, or psychomotor agitation, that is commonly caused by the SSRI
antidepressants. Some degree of akathisia may occur in 20% to 30% of
patients, so it should be familiar to any professional working with
people on the drugs.
Even
“mild” akathisia can be experienced as a dreadful condition in which
the person feels tortured from the inside out, causing moving about,
pacing, and fidgeting. Mr. Townsend, as many patients have done,
described his torment as if he were jumping out of his skin, but the
psychiatrist never identified it as akathisia. A severe akathisia drives
people over the edge into psychosis, violence, and suicide, a result
recognized throughout the scientific literature, including the latest
2022 edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s official Diagnostic of Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5TM).8 The 2022 edition states: The
subjective distress resulting from akathisia is significant and can
lead to noncompliance with antipsychotic or antidepressant treatment.
Akathisia may be associated with dysphoria, irritability, aggression, or
suicide attempts. Worsening of psychotic symptoms or behavioral
dyscontrol may lead to an increase in medication dose, which may
exacerbate the problem. (p. 813, italics added). Mr.
Townsend’s desperate akathisia probably could have been helped with a
specific drug, propranolol, which is the best available yet still
unreliable treatment for this drug reaction. More certainly, his
drug-induced torment could have been quickly ended by simply withdrawing
him from any and all SSRI medications, which could have been
accomplished easily and safely within the hospital.
The
treatment of Mr. Townsend in 2017 reminds me how psychiatric treatment
has always smacked of a gross lack of concern for the patient. There is
no other way to explain why it took my arrival in the profession for a
psychiatrist to openly oppose atrocities such as lobotomy and
electroshock. There is no other way to explain why I had to become the
first psychiatrist to testify successfully in court against lobotomists
and shock doctors. Knowing
the perfidy of my own medical specialty prepared me better than most
doctors to see and criticize the untrustworthy and even dangerous and
deadly behavior of physicians denying access to the best treatments for
COVID-19 and then lock-step supporting the dangerous and too often
deadly COVID genetic pseudo-vaccines. Nowadays, the vast majority of
physicians from every specialty deny how the current official narrative
deprives their patients of life-saving treatments such as
hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and sometimes even prednisone, while
insisting on deadly “treatments” like remdesivir and the “vaccines.”
In COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey,9 with
my wife Ginger as coauthor, we have described the fraud behind most or
all of COVID-19 and the global predators who perpetrated it. Meanwhile,
the global predators continue to profit from the harm they continue to
spread throughout the world. The highly toxic spike proteins originally
attached to SARS-CoV viruses in Chinese and American labs are being
made, usually without their knowledge, within the bodies of people
jabbed with COVID pseudo-vaccines.
The Perfect Storm of Negligence Before Mr. Townsend’s Death
After
11 days as an inpatient, Mr. Townsend was discharged despite evidence
in the medical record that his release was dangerously rushed. It was
much too premature to let him go home. On the day before discharge, he
remained suffering from multiple adverse drug effects, including
akathisia with pacing and severe anxiety, and displayed difficulties
taking care of himself. Much as we see happening surrounding COVID, a
health insurance company had a hand in the neglect of the patient by
refusing to pay for continued hospitalization.
Once
again, at the time of her husband’s discharge, Mrs. Townsend told the
psychiatrist that the antidepressant her husband was taking was not
helping him. In response, the doctor stopped the Lexapro cold turkey the
day before his patient’s discharge with no warnings to the patient or
his wife and no attempt at safely withdrawing him under direct medical
supervision. Much like akathisia, potentially severe withdrawal from
SSRI antidepressants is well-documented10 but commonly ignored by psychiatrists and other prescribers.
Unknown
to the patient or his family, Mr. Townsend was sent home in a very
dangerous state of combined ongoing drug intoxication with Lexapro
complicated by the first day of an acute drug withdrawal from the same
drug. That, along with the drug-induced akathisia, led to his suicide
less than 24 hours after his discharge.
Conclusion of My Testimony and the Surprising Settlement
After
the conclusion of my time as a medical expert on the witness stand,
instead of waiting for several more witnesses and a jury verdict, the
defendant’s psychiatrist and her insurance company settled the case
against them. The insurance provider agreed to pay $825,000 in
compensation to the family, which was near the $1-million limit of the
doctor’s malpractice insurance. As I mentioned earlier, in addition to
helping the family and addressing the dangers of psychiatric drugs, it
reaffirmed my sense that I was mentally recovered from the “brain fog”
induced in my mind in early 2023 by COVID-19 pneumonia.
After
I returned home, the trial continued for a few days. The hospital was
the only remaining defendant, and the jury found in its favor. The
evidence for negligence in my testimony had been almost entirely focused
on the psychiatrist rather than the facility. Suing the drug companies —
for example, the manufacturers of Lexapro — was not possible because
the doctor’s use of the drug had been outside the “safe and effective”
standards. These standards are established in part by the Full
Prescribing Informations for the medications, which are written by the
drug companies and approved by the FDA and also by the DSMs written by
the American Psychiatric Association. Marketing the SSRIs: A Prelude to the Marketing of COVID “Vaccines”
The
marketing of SSRIs, beginning with Prozac, was probably the most
successful and fraudulent PR campaign in the history of medicine — until
the COVID-19 narrative and the genetic COVID “vaccines.” Eli Lilly, the
manufacturer of Prozac, claimed that depression was caused by a
“biochemical imbalance in the brain,” characterized as too little
activity of the neurotransmitter serotonin. The drug company vigorously
advertised that blocking the removal of serotonin from synapses where
the nerves connect to each other would increase serotonin’s activity and
overcome depression.
The
flaws in this theory were and remain monumental. They are Big Lies.
First, there are no known biochemical imbalances at the root of
depression. Second, the intrusion of Prozac into the brain immediately
begins causing potentially horrific biochemical imbalances, starting
with its disturbing effects on serotonin, followed by disruption of
dopamine, and finally, disruption of the whole brain. Third, the brain
fights back in multiple ways against these drug-induced neurotoxic
biochemical abnormalities. The result is an unstable, unpredictable
continuum of adverse effects such as irritability, anxiety, and insomnia
and, in the extreme, psychosis, violence and suicide, as in Mr.
Townsend’s tragedy.11
SSRI Rapid Destruction of Normal Brain Activity and Electrical Rhythms
A
paper published in 2014 confirmed the immediate destabilizing effects
of SSRIs on the overall electrical activity of the brain. I was not
surprised, since I had already reviewed scientific literature
demonstrating that the brain reacts to the first dose of an SSRI by
shutting down its production of serotonin for a week or more. A Press
Release from the famed Max Planck Institute graphically described the
effect of the SSRI antidepressant Lexapro:12
Escitalopram alters functional brain architecture in a matter of hours.
Anti-depressants reduce connectivity between resting-state networks
in some areas of the brain and increase it in others
A
single dose of one of the world’s most widely prescribed drugs for the
treatment of depression causes quantifiable changes in the global brain
functioning in a matter of a few hours. Scientists at the Max Planck
Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig have
discovered that the active ingredient escitalopram, which influences the
availability of the neurotransmitter serotonin, causes major changes in
connectivity between functional networks at rest – in other words, the
synchronous brain activity in various areas of the resting brain.
Subtle Brain Injury—an Enormous Escalating Threat to Humanity
Subtle
damage to the brain caused by psychoactive drugs or by anything
else that interrupts or damages the function of the whole brain or the
frontal lobes, produces changes in the character, personality, and finer
mental abilities of people. The harms can sometimes improve on their
own, and strong-willed people may learn to partially compensate, but the
damage can remain permanent and disabling. A subtle, profound, and
usually overlooked change in the victims is to make them less engaged
with themselves, other people, and life — leading individuals to become
docile and more subject to the sources of their suffering, including
authoritative manipulation and political abuse.13
This
tragedy common effect share by all psychoactive substances, including
all psychiatric drugs, consists of the loss of fine-tuning for personal
relationships and especially for loving relationships. Along with it,
these psychoactive substances, when taken long enough, will dull all the
higher human capacities, including overall engagement with life,
awareness of spiritual values, self-understanding, motivation, judgment,
and energy.
All Injuries to the Brain Cause Subtle Losses of Our Humanity
Mr.
Townsend’s case was a gross tragedy. Most people who take
antidepressants or any other psychoactive substances are not going to
suffer a gross adverse effect or die from them. However, my experience
and research confirm a personal tragedy that every person experiences
during the use of all psychoactive substances, including the use of
marijuana, nicotine, and alcohol. It includes all illegal substances
that affect the mind and emotions. But most dangerous, deceptive, and
sinister are the psychiatric drugs that are supposed to help us.
All
psychoactive substances disrupt the highest aspects of brain function,
and hence they stifle individualism, personal creativity, and the love
of freedom, and so all psychoactive substances make us more amenable to
authoritarian control.
Knowledge
of the ultimately subduing effect of all psychoactive chemicals cannot
have escaped the global predators who make, market, and enforce these
substances through fraud on enormous numbers of people, draining
humanity of energy and higher values, while enormously increasing their
wealth and power. Damaging, disrupting the brains, and dulling the minds
of billions of people around the world make them less engaged in life
and unable to fight for their freedom from predators in both their
personal and political lives. This, in part, accounts for the vast
involvement of the global predators in both the psychopharmaceutical
industry and in illegal drug cartels alike. It’s not imply about making
money, it’s about keeping the population in a mental state the inhibits
insight into their oppression and rebellion. It one of the reasons they
want to keep the southern border open, to increase the uptake of illegal
drugs by America, killing an estimate 100,000 or more annually and dull
the brains, minds and spirit of many millions more. Because it kills so
many people, we hear the most about the fentanyl that has been produced
by Chinese Communists or by Mexican cartels using Communist products.
But all the illegal drugs can dull the brain, mind and spirit, molding
us into docile subjects for political control.
This
subtle brain injury, leading to mental dysfunction, is almost never
mentioned in any discussion, review, or textbook about pharmaceuticals
or psychiatry. Hardly anyone seems concerned that drugs are destroying
or inhibiting the ability of so many people to care and to love or to
engage life. This incredibly important observation is one I had to reach
on my own. It is a forbidden subject, perhaps because it afflicts all
people who regularly take a sufficient dose of a psychoactive substance
to impact on their brain and mind, and therefore is a global tragedy too
remunerative and also horrifying to recognize. This vastly important
reality has barely begun to be investigated but its rapidly escalating,
especially with the jabs, and needs many others to join me in spreading
the word. There are rendering us more suitable to totalitarian control.
Medication Spellbinding
In
retrospect, the patient’s families are more aware of what is happening
to the patient’s themselves and also to the drug addicts in their
families. When I mention these drug effects, they often realize that
these were seen at the very beginning of the drug use, including both
psychiatric and illegal drugs, but they especially did not imagine that
the medications given to them by trusted physicians and others
prescribers were so harmful.
These
personal tragedies that weaken our character and personalities are a
covert plague upon humanity, but most of the people exposed to these
drugs do not even know what’s happening to the more subtle and sensitive
aspects of themselves. In scientific articles and in books,14 I
have labeled this phenomenon “medication spellbinding.” The harm done
to the highest centers of the brain in the frontal lobes blunts the
victims’ insight into their more subtle mental and emotional losses.
Implications for COVID-19
Billions
of people worldwide — most of humanity — are similarly at risk of harm
to their brains and minds from the mistreatment of the COVID pandemic
and the extremely dangerous and highly experimental COVID
pseudo-vaccines. Under the umbrella of treating a “pandemic,” the global
elites are damaging people in ways to make them less resistant to their
growing authoritarian and totalitarian control.
The
toxic pike protein, whether from the disease itself or the genetic
vaccines, crosses the blood-brain barrier and is causing the “brain fog”
that people are suffering from, and that lasts for months after my
severe case of COVID-19 pneumonia. In addition, there is growing concern
about the toxic effects of substances added to the blood by vaccines,
including lipid nanoparticles and graphene oxide15
There
is a mountain of evidence that the so-called vaccines are causing a
great deal of neurological harm, such as dementia, stroke, and
cerebellar ataxia, and psychiatric harm, such as anxiety, depression,
severe psychosis, and suicide.16 Google
Scholar has a limited number of pertinent scientific studies. And a
good popular review in The Epoch Times looks at the range of psychiatric
harms from COVID vaccines, in an article titled, “Psychosis, Panic
Attacks, Hallucination: Bizarre Psychiatric Cases Among the COVID
Vaccinated.”17
But
the concept of subtle harms first seen in the finetuning of human
relations—including capacities for love, caring, self-determination,
spirituality, and engagement with life in general —are rarely if ever
considered in medicine, including neurology and psychiatry, and go
completely ignored. For that reason, in 2011, I published an article on
suggested new ways of defining brain injury, “Psychiatric drug-induced
Chronic Brain Impairment (CBI): Implications for long-term treatment
with psychiatric medication.”18 I included these more subtle harms as one of the criteria for brain injury, including from psychiatric drugs: Apathy
or loss of energy and vitality, often manifesting as indifference (“not
caring”) and fatigue. The individual commonly loses interest in
creative activities, as well as other endeavors requiring higher mental
processes, sensitivity to others, and spontaneity. The loss of empathy
seen in these patients is probably an aspect of apathy as well as an
aspect of the overall affective worsening Both
COVID-19 and the genetic jabs produce these same effects and are
sometimes described as “brain fog.” It’s really brain dysfunction and
damage.
Summary and Conclusions
The
deluge of psychiatric medications, recreational drugs, and illegal
psychoactive substances has combined with the neurological and mental
impact of COVID-19 and the “vaccines.” Increasing numbers of people are
being rendered unable to love and to care, to stand up for themselves in
their personal lives, and unable to resist the escalating oppression in
the world today. Along with other physicians, journalists, and
attorneys, I have been expressing this overall concern about the short-
and long-term consequences of improperly treated COVID-19 and, even more
so, the experimental and too often deadly pseudo-vaccines,19 but the issue is much broader in light of the similar effects of all psychoactive substances.
Even
without including all the other possible environmental and governmental
threats to our brains, it is clear that everyone on the planet must
think—while they can still think—about protecting the integrity of the
brains and minds.
Keep
in mind that the same exploiters of humanity who flood the world with
legal and illegal psychoactive substances have escalated their efforts
under the guise of treating COVID-19 and preparing for future pandemics
and related emergencies. The assaults with legal and illegal drugs, and
now the brain damage inflicted on humanity through the fraudulent
mishandling of COVID-19 and the pandemic of pseudo-vaccines, exposing
multi-billions to the spike protein, will continue to have an enormous
personal and political impact in the form of a citizenry too physically,
mentally and emotional wounded to fight for their freedom.
There
are, of course, other forces that are making the citizens of the world
almost universally passive in the face of the growing worldwide
totalitarianism, including threats, coercion, the potential loss of
professional identity and income, and a deluge of fraudulent
information. Ginger and I continue to write about these multiple
assaults on the personal sovereignty and freedom of individuals
throughout the world. But the harm to higher mental and emotional
capacities caused by psychoactive substances, from psychiatric and
street drugs to COVID-19 and COVID jabs, requires considerably more
attention. Most
personally important, with the knowledge in this report, we can better
protect ourselves in the future by rejecting substances that compromise
our brain, mind, and spiriting, causing the potential loss of our higher
faculties, including our overall engagement with others and with life.
Go to the Breggin Substack to read, comment, and discuss further.
References
1 This
name is fictional, made up to protect the family from unwanted
publicity or attention. The lawyer’s real name is John DeGasperis from
Kingston, New York. 2 Dr. Breggin’s Resume: Microsoft Word – Steve edits of Resume-FN.docx (breggin.com) 3 Breggin, Peter. Op. Cit. 4 Full Prescribing Information for Lexapro: label (fda.gov) and the 2022 DSM-5-TR, p. 818-819. 5 Breggin,
Peter. “Suicidality, violence and mania caused by selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs): A review and analysis.” International
Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 16: 31-49, 2003/2004.
Simultaneously published in Ethical Human Sciences and Services,
5:225-246, 2003. https://breggin.com/admin/fm/source/6905_breggin/uploads/2008/01/suicidalityviolence.pbreggin.2003.pdf.pdf 6 Ibid. 7 FDA-approved Full Prescribing Information for Lexapro, typical of all SSRIs. label (fda.gov). 8 The
2022 DSM-5-Text Revision has a little more than 100 pages of additions
or revisions over the 2013 DSM-5. The 2013 DSM-5 had expurgated all the
gory details about akathisia but some are reinstated in the Text
Revision. The best edition for adverse effects of SSRI akathisia
is DSM-IV. I believe they may have cut these sections because I so often
have used them in my writings and in malpractice and product liability
cases. Why they resurrected them in 2022 is a mystery to me, unless they
mistakenly thought I was no longer writing or testifying in court. 9 Our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators, can be purchased directly from the Breggins at www.WeArethePrey. It can also be obtained through all bookstores, including Amazon. 10 See the Full Prescribing Information for Lexapro: label (fda.gov). 11 Breggin, Peter. Op. Cit. 12 The press release: Escitalopram alters functional brain architecture in a matter of hours | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (mpg.de). The actual scientific report: Serotonergic Modulation of Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Current Biology (cell.com) 13 See,
for example, seem medical book on the effects of drugs and ECT:
Breggin, P. (2007). Brain Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry: Drugs,
Electroshock, and the Psychopharmaceutical Complex (2nd Edition). New
York, Springer Publishing Company. Brain
Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry: Drugs, Electroshock, and the
Psychopharmaceutical Complex: 9780826129345: Medicine & Health
Science Books @ Amazon.com and also see my popular book, Breggin, P. (2009). Medication Madness. New York: St. Martin’s Press. https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Peter+Breggin%2C+Medication+Madness&crid=3D1YK0O1V4S60&sprefix=peter+breggin%2C+medication+madness%2Caps%2C80&ref=nb_sb_noss 14 untitled (breggin.com) 15 https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/blurring-lines-nanotechnology-vaccines 16 https://vaersanalysis.info/2023/09/22/cdc-vaers-safety-signals-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-9-15-2023/ 17 https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/psychosis-panic-attacks-hallucinations-bizarre-psychiatric-cases-among-the-covid-vaccinated-5500128 18 Breggin2011_ChronicBrainImpairment.pdf 19 Reiner Fuellmich, Naomi Wolf and Peter Breggin Discuss Stunning Personality Changes Due to the mRNA Covid Jabs (rumble.com) and (74) Plague of Psychiatric Drugs and Illegal Drugs (substack.com)
Find us at X— formerly known as Twitter: @GingerBreggin @AmericanMD Find us at our website: www.Breggin.com Find us at www.AmericaOutLoud.com Find us on Substack at: Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposing the Global Predators
| 
No comments:
Post a Comment