Saturday, August 12, 2023
4353-4354: The Three Federal Populations - Retrospective Details from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
I
am forwarding a pdf copy of the Georgetown Law Review, November, 1912,
and directing your attention to the first article by Hannis Taylor.
Please
consider that unique work by Pelatiah Webster, The Constitution for the
united States of America adopted in 1787 and resulting in what would
later be termed, the Federal Constitution, or, The Constitution of the
United States (old language conventions apply here with "the United
States" then being synonymous with The United States as defined in
1851).
Most
Americans have heard vaguely of "the Federal Constitution" and "the
Federal Republic" but even in 1912 during a review celebrating the 125th
Anniversary of this key document, people writing for the Georgetown Law
Journal had lost track of the actual name of the Constitution being
celebrated and were ignorant of the 1851 change in style conventions,
too.
The
less favored in society are left to suppose, erroneously, that Pelatiah
Webster's famous work was the same as The Constitution of the United
States that we see published under that name today by the Municipal Government in Washington, DC.
What a comedy of errors promulgating more errors.
Even
in 1912, more than a hundred years ago, nobody remembered the actual
architect of the 1787 Constitution, and nobody remembered the style
convention changes of 1851, either, so we wind up talking about "the
Constitution" and don't even know the actual name of the document or the
identity and nature of the political body that issued it.
This country is well and truly lost, if a mammoth effort of self-education is not made.
The
Federal Constitution issued in 1787 was titled The Constitution for the
united States of America --note the use of the word "for" which is
unique and the use of the word "united" as an adjective written in small
case letters.
This
was a second run at crafting a Constitution for the Confederation of
States doing business as the States of America. The original effort,
The Articles of Confederation, begun in January 1777 and ratified in 1781, left much to be desired.
The
States of America was a doing-business-as name of the original Union
nation-states, which joined their individual State of State
organizations into a Confederation with the intention of leveraging
their mutual economic and trade interests in international and global
jurisdictions.
It
was this Confederation of State of State business organizations that
operated the American Federal Services Contractor known as the Federal
Republic from 1787 to April 15th 1861, and which provided the bulk of all Federal Government services during that time period.
It
was this Confederation that was rendered inoperable for lack of a
quorum when the seven Southern States walked out and left it without a
date set to reconvene, April 1st 1861.
Within
days, and despite Lincoln's Inaugural Address in which he declared that
changing the institution of slavery in the Southern States was not his
intention little more than a month prior, our country was plunged into
an illegal Mercenary Conflict euphemistically called The American Civil
War.
It
was the break-down of the Confederation operating under Pelatiah
Webster's brainchild, The Constitution for the united States of America,
that led to the spin-off Confederate States of America, which proposed
to bargain independently for their trade relationships and commercial
contracts.
The
intent of The Articles of Confederation was to form a "perpetual union"
of the business interests of the States joined together as a single
economic power. Pelatiah Webster's new Constitution first published for
discussion on February 16, 1783.
The
Confederation operating as the Federal Republic was so far successful
in applying the mutual economic and trade powers of the States that by
the 1850's the United Kingdom and most of Europe was frightened of this
new world economic power.
In
unity was our safety and our strength in dealing with the rest of the
world, but disagreements about economic priorities and policies between
the industrialized North and agricultural South found their breaking
point.
Looking
back with 20/20 hindsight it seems that there were many possible
solutions short of going to war, chief among them the Federation of
States' desire to simply buy all the plantation slaves and set them
free. This was what was done in England and other European countries.
Why not America?
As
The Articles of Confederation were already bypassed in 1787, together
with the "perpetual union" clause, there was nothing so wrong with the
industrialized North tending to its knitting and allowing the Southern
States to do the same. They could have simply split into two camps and
negotiated separate trade agreements.
Why didn't they?
The
most likely reason is that slavery was a much bigger issue than the
General Public knew, and it was not an issue of only Southern economics,
or injustice, or the repugnance of elitist claptrap.
No,
slavery has a much deeper and darker history---and profitability for
both North and South was at stake. More to come regarding that snippet
of additional history you never knew and the Dutch Government's
complicity in it all.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Fast Eddie of the Fab Five
By Anna Von Reitz
Eddie has told everyone that I don't know what I am doing with banking ----and I have to smile.
Eddie doesn't know what I am doing, but that's all right. I never intended that he would.
He said that Hunter isn't a banker, too, and that's correct. Hunter isn't a banker.
He's a Prosperitor.
If
people had been listening to me and really hearing what I said, they
would know that my Bilateral Banks are not about depositing anything,
and that these new institutions ---that are somewhat analogous to credit
unions but not the same--- are prepaid credit facilities instead.
What have I said over and over and over?
That the funds in these new banks are prepaid. The people don't pay into the banks, the banks pay out to the people.
That's
why I don't understand why anyone would make deposits in a conventional
credit union and think that they were dealing with "my" banks or with
"my" version of credit unions, either.
What
we are now doing with banking has never been done before in the history
of the world, but there's no reason why not. It's not illegal or
unlawful. It's beneficial to everyone concerned.
Just as the Lincoln Conspirators turned the world upside down, we are turning it right side up again.
Soon,
war and slavery and pollution and other kinds of crime won't be
profitable anymore, so these activities will naturally fade away.
People will have to do something good to make a profit. Plant
vineyards. Raise bees. Clean the streets. Repair the plumbing. Dig the
wells....
The Perps pulled off an unlawful conversion, and we are doing a lawful conversion.
Guess who has the law on their side?
Eddie
has all the classic ear-marks of an Unwilling Snitch. He was in Federal
Prison and they let him out. He says it was because of research he and
Michael Kearns did, but Michael Kearns is dead and I can't ask him to
confirm Eddie's backstory.
The
Federales knew Michael Kearns. They basically killed him by repeatedly
arresting him and not giving him his heart medication. They could have
told Eddie all about Michael and his research without breaking a sweat.
My
best guess is that the Agency Goons offered Eddie a deal -- IMHO he did
what he had to do to get out of jail and into a position where he could
protect himself and his family. He was being threatened, his family
was being threatened (the Stick) and on the other side, he was being
paid (the Carrot).
I
don't blame Eddie for that. I talk to him from time to time. He teaches
me things about the conventional banking system. I teach him about the
jurisdictions and forms of law. It's amiable enough.
If
a person isn't really motivated to do evil but winds up doing it
because of circumstances they can't control, it's a different matter
than those who are evil for the sake of evil.
I
also forgive people who are genuinely confused and deluded. Like the
Bible says, they confuse good for evil and evil for good, but it isn't
their fault that they are confused. They are just weak-minded.
Eddie is right ---I don't know all the ins and outs of the conventional commercial banking system. I admit it. So what?
I'm not building a conventional commercial bank, so that's a moot point.
Eddie
did damage to us and what we are accomplishing, that's true, too. He
and the other Fab Five members spread panic and fear and gossip that
they knew was untrue. They've done the classic Satanist thing.
They
pretended to represent me and my banks. They did evil in my name. Then
they blamed their victims, as Satanists always do, and have left Hunter
to clean up and clear away the giant mess they created.
Our
Creator knows people better than I do, knows their internal story, why
they are afraid, why they believe evil things, why they do evil
things--- and the best I can do is surmise. So, the sensible thing to
do is to let the True God do the battling for us.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment