Monday, July 24, 2023
4319-4320: De-Construction Before Reconstruction - 2 from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Rebuttal of "Crown History in America" Continued
The “Crown History in America” next asserts that: "U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law, leaving the people as Surety and Debtor on the bankruptcy."
1. The abbreviation U.S. specifically refers to the British Territorial United States, not America and not any of our sovereign States of the Union.
2. So, “U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law” means “British Territorial United States Law is Private Merchant Law”, which translates in the case of the USA, Inc., as “a foreign Federal Subcontractor which is a British Crown Corporation operates under Private Merchant Law.”
3. Our country and our people certainly do not operate under Private Merchant Law (Admiralty) so the only “people” who can be referenced as the “Surety and Debtor” of
the bankruptcy of this foreign corporation are the people occupying the British Territorial United States. Think Puerto Rico, which is a US Possession, operating as a British Commonwealth. The same is true of the Mariana Islands and various other offshore enclaves, but not The United States in general.
4. None of this has anything to do with the Mainland United States, nor with our actual American Government, nor our sovereign States, nor our people.
Anyone reading this “Crown History in America” unaware of the meaning of the “U.S.” abbreviation would be misled into thinking that Americans in general – rather than a small number of Territorial British citizens living in the United States Possessions -- function under Private Law Merchant (Admiralty) Law.
This misunderstanding would then generate and promote a pervasive fraud and deceit, to the effect that Americans living in our States of the Union are responsible for the debts of this foreign British Crown Corporation and are standing as “Surety and Debtor” providing bankruptcy protection for this foreign entity, when in fact the population being referenced is the relatively tiny population of people living in the United States Insular Possessions in British Territorial enclaves like Puerto Rico and the Mariana Islands.
This is precisely the “mischief” and misrepresentation that Chief Justice Harlan could foresee, and which was discussed in a veiled way throughout the Insular Tariff Cases, for example, Downes v. Bidwell and Hooven and Allison v. Evatt, that were decided between 1900 and 1905, leading up to the 1906 bankruptcy of the Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as “The United States of America” – Incorporated.
It was via this semantic deceit and jurisdictional trespass that British Crown interests gained access to American credit and also via this misrepresentation of our political status that they imposed “Special Admiralty Courts” on our people who, of course, were left with no disclosure concerning the private business dealings and condition of the Crown Corporation(s) involved in this Swindle, and had no means of defending themselves from the foreign Legal Presumptions that have been misaddressed to them ever since.
A private admission of a Federal Judge published by Howard Freeman recounts: “In 1938, all the higher judges, the top attorneys, and the U.S. Attorneys were called into a secret meeting, and this is what we were told: “America is a bankrupt nation. It is owned completely by its creditors. The creditors own Congress, they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the State Governments. Take silent judicial notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly. Your court is operating under Admiralty Jurisdiction – call it anything you want, but do not call it Admiralty.”
Thus, the Plotters – British Crown Interests – again misrepresented the facts and committed fraud upon the courts and the court officers.
“America” could not be bankrupt, because “America” is an unincorporated and undefined entity, and none of our sovereign States are eligible for bankruptcy, so what was bankrupt was self-evidently the foreign British Crown Corporation(s) operating as first “The United States of America” incorporated in Scotland and running from 1868 to 1906, then the “United States of America, Inc.” running from 1907 to 1933, and then the USA, Inc., and so on.
These British Crown Corporations have been operated under deceptively similar names to deliberately confuse themselves with our country and as a means of impersonating us, accessing our credit, and charging off their bills against us under the mistaken idea that we – not just a few Puerto Ricans and other Territorial Citizens -- were standing as “Surety and Debtor” for their spending.
So, who are the Creditors who “own the Congress, own the Executive, own the Judiciary….”? It can only be the purportedly “absent” American Government and People who are the owners-in-fact, as we have paid all the bills and stood as the Principals defining and underwriting the limited operations of the Federal Subcontractors throughout, however much we have been misrepresented by the banks acting as Creditors “on our behalf” – without the benefit of our permission.
Having unlawfully converted and subverted the proper functioning of Government from Public Law to Public Policy, having deliberately misrepresented and hidden the conversion of our Courts into Admiralty Courts, having misrepresented the circumstance to the Court Officers, having misrepresented us as British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and having misrepresented us as “Surety and Debtor” for their unlimited spending, the members of the British Territorial United States Congress acting as a Board of Directors for the USA, Inc. in its various iterations, have used these devices to pillage and plunder the innocent population of our country, to illegally and unlawfully confiscate property belonging to our States and our people, and to illegally and unlawfully impose a foreign form of law upon us --- all under color of law and conditions of non-disclosure.
De-Construction Before Reconstruction
By Anna Von Reitz
Rebuttal of “Crown History in America”
There is a popular history that has been spread among patriot communities for many years that has to be annotated, regurgitated, and largely rebutted. I have fainted before the task not because it is difficult, but because the premises against which I must contend are so consistently wrong-headed and confused.
Even though this work is properly titled, “Crown History in America”, it promptly veers into making all sorts of claims and suppositions that are incongruent with the Title. Crown History, by definition, is not American History, yet the Author(s) constantly confuse the two.
1. Simply because something takes place in America does not make it American.
This misleading history concerns the life and times of a British Crown Corporation calling itself “the United States of America”. This corporation has long been owned by British interests, first as an unincorporated trading company, and later as an incorporated Municipal Corporation owned by the British Crown. This entity has suffered many reorganizations and bankruptcies and redefinitions of which we, the General Public of this country, are not aware.
1. Our country is not rendered bankrupt because this foreign corporation (in any of its iterations) is bankrupt.
2. Our individual sovereign States are not eligible for bankruptcy of any kind and our country is not eligible for bankruptcy of any kind, so let’s dispense – once and for all time – of the pernicious idea that America is bankrupt.
Why should we be aware of the internal workings and conditions of a foreign corporation that is owned and operated by a foreign government? And which is only here on our shores for the purpose of providing essential governmental services? Answer: we wouldn’t be aware of such information and would not naturally be interested.
That accounts for the pervasive ignorance of our General Public regarding the status of any iteration of the United States of America, Incorporated or USA, Inc. (one of the other names it runs under as a Successor Corporation).
The USA, Inc., is not our business. It’s the British King’s business. And if he runs it into the ground, it’s still not our business.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment