BOOM! My new novel, THE GRID LAID OVER THE WORLD has been released! To learn more, click here.
March 30, 2020 [America in ‘lockdown’: Day 18.]
Nailed them, with their own words.
In
this article, I’ll present quotes from official sources about their own
diagnostic test for the coronavirus. I’m talking about fatal flaws in
the test.
Because
case numbers are based on those tests (or no tests at all), the whole
“pandemic effect” has been created out of fake science.
In
a moment of truth, a propaganda pro might murmur to a colleague, “You
know, we’ve got a great diagnostic test for the virus. The test turns
out all sorts of results that say this person is diseased and that
person is diseased. Millions of diseased people. But the test doesn’t
really measure that. The test is ridiculous, but ridiculous in our
favor. It builds the picture of a global pandemic. An excuse to lock
down the planet and wreck economies and lives...”
The widespread test for the COVID-19 virus is called the PCR. I have written much about it in past articles.
Now
let’s go to published official literature, and see what it
reveals. Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test
are devastating.
From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:
“Detection
of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that
2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Translation:
A positive test doesn’t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing
infection at all. And, ahem, reading between the lines, maybe the COVID
virus might not be in the patient’s body at all, either.
From
the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” [2]:
“Several
assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under
development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only
the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g.
SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”
Translation: Some
PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing
to do with COVID---including plain old coronas that cause nothing more
than a cold.
The
WHO document adds this little piece: “Protocol use limitations:
Optional clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been
validated.”
Translation: We’re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient, in order for the test to have any validity.
From
the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED
EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST
(LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)” [3]:
“...The
SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory
specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are
indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with
patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to
determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE
DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the
United States and its territories are required to report all positive
results to the appropriate public health authorities.”
Translation:
On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally” detect the presence
of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected”
on the test, by which we mean COVID, “may not be the definite cause of
disease.” We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection,
we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients”
confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for
COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests
must be reported---and they will be counted as “COVID
cases.” Regardless.
From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:
“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”
Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.
“non-specific
interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata),
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3,
type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia
Pneumoniae, etc.”
Translation:
Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states
the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of
other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving,
then? Who knows? Flip a coin.
“Application Qualitative”
Translation:
This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is
in the patient’s body. I’ll cover how important this admission is in a
minute.
“The
detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it
should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and
treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in
combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests
and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly
used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the
reference of clinicians.”
Translation:
Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with
COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all
over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government
agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.”
Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific” basis of the test.
And
now, I’ll add another, lethal blow: the test has never been validated
properly as an instrument to detect disease. Even assuming it can detect
the presence of the COVID virus in a patient, it doesn’t show HOW MUCH
virus is in the body. And that is key, because in order to even begin
talking about actual illness in the real world, not in a lab, the
patient would need to have millions and millions of the virus actively
replicating in his body.
Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body. To which I reply: prove it.
Prove it in a way it should have been proven decades ago---but never was.
Take
five hundred people and remove tissue samples from them. The people who
take the samples do NOT do the test. The testers will never know who
the patients are and what condition they’re in.
The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found.
“All right, in patients 24, 46, 65, 76, 87, and 93 we found a great deal of virus.”
Now
we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have
so much virus replicating in their bodies. Are they sick? Are they
running marathons? Let’s find out.
This
OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done. That is an enormous
scandal. Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients, a
thousand patients? Nowhere.
The test is an unproven fraud.
And, therefore, the COVID pandemic, which is supposed to be based on that test, is also a fraud.
“But…but…what about all the sick and dying people…why are they sick?”
I’ve
written thousands of words answering that question, in past articles. A
NUMBER of conditions---none involving COVID, and most involving old
traditional diseases---are making people sick.
Sources: [1]: [2]: [3]: [4]: Click on blog link below. ~~~
(The link to this republished COVID article posted on my blog is here. For the republished COVID article before that, click here.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport) | 
No comments:
Post a Comment