Friday, November 18, 2022

The “Fact Check” Scam/In Arizona the Election Was Slowly Stolen Day by Day

 

The “Fact Check” Scam

The “Fact Check” Scam

Paul Craig Roberts

Last Monday I received an email from  NewsGuard, “an independent organization that rates and reviews news outlets based on nine apolitical journalistic criteria.”

The analyst asked me to comment on two statements in my columns  in which I am accused of “advancing false and unsupported claims.”

One  false and and unsuopported claim is “a March 2022 article titled ‘Ukraine Hosted Illegal US Biowarfare Laboratories,’ repeated Russian and Chinese propaganda about the presence of U.S.-run bioweapons labs in Ukraine, which has been repeatedly debunked by fact-checking organizations and refuted by U.S. government officials.”

The alleged “fact checker’s” claim that I made a false and unsupported claim is incorrect for two reasons.  One is the fact that a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Defense Threat

Reduction Agency produced official US government documents that state that the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, a component of the U.S. Department of Defense, funded anthrax laboratory activities in a Ukrainian biolab in 2018. The US government’s records also show over $11 million in funding for the Ukraine biolabs program in 2019.  https://www.judicialwatch.org/dod-records-anthrax-lab/?utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members

See also:  https://www.globalresearch.ca/defense-department-records-reveal-us-funding-anthrax-laboratory-activities-ukraine/5799255

Apparently, it never occurred to the dumbshit “fact checker” that relying on assurances from a proven liar such as the US government is no way to check a fact.  How, “fact checker,” does the government refute its own admission?  Notice also that the “fact checker” thinks that a statement by the Russian government is  “unsupported,”  but a statement by the US government is considered “supported.”  How does this obvious bias serve to verify any fact?

The second reason the “fact checker” is incorrect indicates that the “fact checker” is incapable of understanding that to report what the Russian government claims to have discovered in Ukraine is not misinformation or propaganda. It is correct information reporting Russian claims.  What we see here is a “fact checker” who thinks or has been trained to see any report, whether or not endorsed by the reporter, of an item in the “impermissible to be mentioned” category as a “false and unsupported claim.”  In other words, all is false except official narratives.

My other “false and unsupported claim” is that 100,000 vote spikes are indications of fraud, a conclusion endorsed by numerous experts.  The “fact checker” alleges that vote spikes “are commonplace and due to the release of large batches of results all at once from solidly Democratic or Republican districts, or from mailed ballots.” What the “fact checker” does not account for is the extreme unlikeliness of a vote dump of 100,000 or more ballots that is all for one candidate, or how votes were mailed in such a way that all Democrat votes arrived in the same delivery.  Perhaps it is statistically possible for 100,000 votes to arrive in an unbroken stream all for the same person, but the probability of such an event is far too low to account for the large number of times it throws a close election to a Democrat. Are there that many voting precincts in which not a single Republican voter lives?  Republican vote spikes are rare and seem to happen when the algorithm of the voting machines has created an unbelievable margin of Democrat victory and has to be narrowed.

In my opinion, “fact checkers” are unintelligent people devoid of integrity who are hired to support official narratives by stamping out truth and dissenting opinion.  Who checks the “fact checkers?”  There is no reason to trust a “fact checker.”  Anyone can set up a “fact check” site to protect any material or ideological interest from examination.  Note that “fact checkers” appeared only after the official narratives became so blatantly false that they had to be protected from examination.  Never before did we have an industry of censors employed to protect official narratives.  “Fact checkers” are the true enemies of truth.

In Arizona the Election Was Slowly Stolen Day by Day

In Arizona the Election Was Slowly Stolen Day by Day

Paul Craig Roberts

Many Americans are easily intimidated and let the presstitutes control their beliefs.  But Trump supporters are not easily intimidated.  This is why Democrats hate them and demonize them as “Trump Deplorables,” “white supremacists,” and “domestic terrorists.”  Democrats are determined to stamp into the ground those Americans whose belief they cannot control..

In this interview with Rep. Marjorie Greene, Alex Jones shows news clip after news clip of the presstitutes declaring, as if it were a fact, that it is normal for elections to take days to count the votes.  This is a blatant lie.  All my life, until recent  Democrat “reforms” and Diebold electronic machines that can be programmed to count votes differently from how they are cast, the election vote was known by the time you went to bed and if not by then by the next morning.  

The reason Democrats take days to count votes is that they are constantly estimating how many fraudulent votes they need to offset the Republican candidate’s lead,  The Democrats know that they cannot have a landslide win, so they have to run the fraudulent votes in in tranches.  When the Republican vote is too large to overcome this way, they have to lose some of the votes as they did in Arizona by mixing uncounted votes with counted votes.  

The useless Rino Republicans are in lockstep with the media in denying the stolen election, instead blaming the totally unexpected results on Trump, and explaining the Democrats’ unexpected success as the public’s rejection of Trump.  

There is talk that some of the Rino Republicans are considering letting the Democrats choose a “bi-partisan” Speaker of the House.  This, of course, would prevent the Republican majority from having subpoena power to investigate the many crimes associated with the Biden regime and the stolen election.

The Republicans are likely to be ineffectual simply because such a large chunk of them are members of the Washington Establishment and go along to get along. They enjoy being there and are unlikely to put themselves at risk by fighting for truth, the public, or the country.  By delivering no results that aroused Trump Americans desire, the Rino Republicans are destroying the Republican Party.  

https://assets.infowarsmedia.com/videos/3db1019c-0ab9-433a-9b86-6c73f676d2d7.mp4 

In Arizona the Democrats fixed it so that the voting machines did not work in Republican precincts.  If a Republican got to vote at all, it was after a 7 hour wait.  The Democrats whine about the disenfranchisement of blacks and immigrant-invaders, but themselves disenfranchise Republicans.  In Maricopa County, Arizona, where 60% of the Arizona population reside the control of Elections and vote counting is in the hands of Democrats.

https://www.westernjournal.com/lake-campaign-calls-redo-maricopa-county-due-widespread-vote-machine-malfunctioning-election-day/ 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment