Continuing my "greatest COVID hits" articles. To read my introduction to this ongoing series, go here. To support my work and get value for value, order my Matrix collections here and subscribe to my substack here.
February 3, 2020
This is a big one.
How do experts tell the story of the origin of the China epidemic?
The story is always important. The medical professionals need to make it sound credible.
If
it has major flaws, it’s as if a stage magician screws up a trick in
full view of the audience. As he’s sawing a woman in a box in half,
everyone sees her sneaking out of the back of the box. Busted.
That’s what’s happening in the case of the so-called China epidemic.
According
to Chinese and international public health agencies, the epidemic
started in Wuhan, in a hospital, with a single patient who had
pneumonia. The doctors could find no cause. Soon, researchers discovered
the never-before-seen coronavirus in the patient.
Really? Let’s
break this down. The doctors couldn’t find a cause for the patient’s
pneumonia. That means they didn’t locate the usual bacteria or viruses
said to be responsible for pneumonia. They were puzzled.
BUT
as I’ve pointed out in past articles, the city of Wuhan is famous for
clouds of foul pollution. The unprecedented combination of toxic
compounds in the air constitutes a clear and present danger. Last
summer, there was a large protest in the city focusing on this very
issue. When lots of people take to the streets in China, you know the
issue is serious---because the brutal government doesn’t take kindly to
public expressions of dissatisfaction.
SO…who
cares if doctors in a Wuhan hospital couldn’t find familiar bacteria or
viruses in a PNEUMONIA patient? LOOK AT THE AIR POLLUTION. You want a
cause for lung problems? THERE IT IS. In other words, why would this
patient be a mystery in the first place? Why would researchers look for a
virus no one had ever seen before? This whole origin-story is
absurd. It vibrates with ripples of FAKE.
It’s
as if emergency workers bring a person into a hospital after a car
accident…and the doctors are puzzled because they can’t find a bacterial
explanation for the person’s injuries.
There is more. Much more.
The
medical professionals had to deal with the possibility that this “new”
coronavirus wasn’t new at all. Suppose it had been in the world for
decades or centuries, obviously causing people no harm? If so, that
would sink their ship. They couldn’t have that. They couldn’t
admit---“Oops, sorry, everyone, we made a mistake. Finding this
coronavirus in people all over the world means NOTHING because, you see,
it’s been around for a long, long time, and it’s never caused
problems. So when we said we’ve found people who have been ‘infected’,
we really mean they have this harmless virus in them.” No, no, that
would never do.
Instead,
the pros would have to claim the coronavirus JUST EMERGED in humans for
the very first time. A FEW MONTHS AGO, it crossed over from animals
(bats, snakes) to humans.
And that’s exactly what they are saying.
Here
is a statement from StatNews ("DNA sleuths read the coronavirus genome,
tracing its origins and looking for dangerous mutations," January 24,
2020). It’s a bit complicated, but read it over, and then I’ll comment:
“Given
what’s known about the pace at which viral genomes mutate, if nCoV [the
coronavirus] had been circulating in humans since significantly before
the first case was reported on Dec. 8, the 24 genomes [from, presumably,
24 different samples of the virus in 24 people] would differ more.
Applying ballpark rates of viral evolution, Rambaut [one of the
“experts”] estimates that the Adam (or Eve) virus from which all others
are descended first appeared no earlier than Oct. 30, 2019, and no later
than Nov. 29.”
My,
my. That’s quite a precise peg: the coronavirus jumped from animals to
humans, for the very first time, between October 30 and November 29,
2019. The experts can assure us that it never existed in humans until
that one-month period. Absurd. No one can perform such an exact
analysis. Therefore, their whole story about the human origin of the
coronavirus wobbles out of the range of credibility. By miles. Whether
they’re just winging it, or fabricating it, or making gross errors in
bolstering their tale…there is no reason to believe anything they say
about when the coronavirus surfaced in humans.
The coronavirus could have existed for a long time in humans---causing no damage or harm whatsoever.
The entire “origin story” of the “coronavirus epidemic” is riddled with exaggerations and fabrications.
Finding
traces of the virus in humans and then calling these people “infected”
and “carriers” and “spreaders” and “epidemic cases” is ridiculous.
Claiming
the virus has spread out from Wuhan across the world is typical
nonsense. The virus could have ALREADY been present in MANY different
places. It didn’t spread. It was THERE.
To
cite a precedent, several years ago the Zika virus was called an
ominous germ that was spreading around the world, causing women to give
birth to babies with smaller heads and brain damage (microcephaly). I
then reported that, according to mainstream medical sources, ANY injury
to a pregnant woman could cause microcephaly. No virus necessary. And it
emerged that the Zika virus had actually been discovered in…1947. It
had never been known to cause harm.
In
yet another fake epidemic story---this one, also a coronavirus---the
SARS “epidemic” of 2003 turned out to be a dud. The official death toll,
when all was said and done? 800 people out of a population of 7
billion. And in Canada, a World Health Organization microbiologist,
Frank Plummer, confessed to the press that the number of SARS patients
who actually had the coronavirus in their bodies was approaching
ZERO. In other words, these patients, who had nothing more than typical
flu symptoms, couldn’t have SARS, because they didn’t have the virus
that was supposed to be causing SARS.
“Excuse me, waiter, I ordered dinner and you brought me a bowl of stale soggy cereal.”
“No,
sir. You must be mistaken. Can’t you see the dinner on the table in
front of you? We’re the experts. Leave the facts to us.”
Sorry. No sale.
Some
people, reading what I’ve laid out in this article, will say, “But what
about all the people who are sick in this epidemic?” Take a step
back. A so-called confirmed case of the coronavirus doesn’t necessarily
refer to a person who is sick. If “tests show” a person “has the virus,”
he is counted as “a case.” He may have no symptoms at all. Or he may
have very mild symptoms. Most so-called cases ARE mild---and, as I’ve
explained in other articles, the diagnostic tests for the coronavirus do
not prove a patient’s symptoms are CAUSED by the virus. The causes can
easily come from other sources. This fact applies to anyone with any
degree of illness who is called “a case of the epidemic.”
Finally,
keep in mind that people all over the planet have the symptoms that are
now being labeled, “China epidemic”: ordinary flu symptoms---fever,
weakness, cough, headache, and lung problems. These symptoms can and do
come about from a whole catalog of various reasons, none of which need “the story of the coronavirus.” It’s
as easy as pie to claim, without evidence, that someone who has these
symptoms, and “tests positive for the virus,” is a “confirmed epidemic
case.”
This
is exactly how some of the fake epidemics ARE synthetically put
together and fabricated. Form a hypothetical “cluster” of people in
different locales who all have typical flu-like symptoms. Claim they are
all suffering from the direct effects of a single virus. Deploy
diagnostic tests to test for the presence of the virus that---if the
tests work at all---merely establish that the virus is in some of these
people’s bodies. The tests say NOTHING about whether the virus is
causing harm. But gloss over that vital fact. Skip ahead and say: WE
HAVE A SPREADING GLOBAL EPIDEMIC ON OUR HANDS. QUARANTINES ARE
NECESSARY. WHEN WE DELIVER A VACCINE, EVERYONE MUST TAKE IT.
No.
Case unproven and therefore dismissed.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport) | 
No comments:
Post a Comment