Continuing my "greatest COVID hits" articles. To read my introduction to this ongoing series, go here. To support my work and get value for value, order my Matrix collections here and subscribe to my substack here.
January 25, 2020
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but…history matters.
When
you see a new story on the horizon, and it looks a lot like an old
story you know was a hoax, you have to dig up that history and report
it.
Yes,
many people hate history. It tends to stretch their attention spans,
which are rooted in the present, where the action is: Twitter, Facebook,
Instagram—little crumbs of NOW and NOW and NOW.
Oh well. Here we go, back into the Dark Age of 2009, an ancient time.
What
was happening then? There was a grim pandemic spreading like an angry
cloud over the world, threatening to kill millions of people. Sound
familiar? Sound like China right now? It was called Swine Flu.
Just
like now, the 2009 announcements were coming out of the World Health
Organization and the CDC; the germ was a virus; it was spreading;
travelers were carrying it; people were being tested at airports; the
source of the germ seemed to be animal-to-human transmission; deaths
were being reported; fear was rising. People were saying, THIS IS THE
BIG ONE. Other people were saying: THIS IS A WEAPONIZED VIRUS ALTERED IN
A BIOWAR LAB. Just like now.
So
here is what I wrote about the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic in its
aftermath—I hope you can shake off the idea that the following facts are
IMPOSSIBLE, “THE AUTHORITIES WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE THAT,” IT COULDN’T
HAVE HAPPENED. The following facts are possible and true, the
authorities did do that, and it did happen:
In
the late summer of 2009, the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky by
the CDC [and the World Health Organization]. The CDC was calling for
all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine.
The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.
At
the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was
working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly
stopped counting US cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to
warn Americans about its unchecked spread.
Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What was the Agency up to?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport:
In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic.
You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease
Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting
Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the
“pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that
another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to
find out?
Attkisson:
The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered
through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped
counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases
they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of
flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very
enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the
whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was
published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television
news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up
the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new
light on all the hype. It [Attkisson’s article] was fair, accurate,
legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true
Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave
their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.
—end of interview excerpt—
It
was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from
patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu
patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were
coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.
That
was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they
stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had
discovered. That’s why she was shut down.
But it gets even worse.
Because
about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS
News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If
one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.
Here,
from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response:
“Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best
guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).
Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.
In
the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in
America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely
Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.
There is no Swine Flu epidemic.
Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
So…the
premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a
vaccine causing autism…you can lay that one to rest.
The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.
—That’s what I wrote about the Swine Flu fraud years ago.
I
reprint it here to give people some perspective on what health agencies
like the CDC and the World Health Organization will do to pump up the
idea (not the reality) of an epidemic.
Now,
if you don’t mind, I’ll blow my own horn a little. After the
mind-blowing revelations Sharyl Attkisson exposed in print, in 2009,
about the Swine Flu hoax, how many other reporters understood the
implications and followed up by writing their own stories and pressing
home the astonishing hoax? How many interviewed Attkisson and hammered
on her findings and spread the facts far and wide? How many went all-out
to emphasize the outrageous guilt of the CDC on this scandal?
Most
reporters, when an epidemic is announced, take the bait. Automatically.
They fall for the con and the hustle like rookies going to Vegas for
the first time, thinking they’re going to score at the betting tables.
They make the crucial mistake of believing that some virus has really
been discovered, and it is about to wreak havoc in the population.
A
new virus story always sounds good. It will have legs. People will want
to know about it. Some reporters—blithely accepting the existence and
dire impact of a virus—will take that ball and run with it into new
territory: “the virus was created in a lab.” They don’t stop and
consider the possibility (confirmed by history) that the hoax goes all
the way to the bottom—no virus was actually discovered, or if it was,
there is a zero proof that it’s harmful. They miss that vital step.
There
is more to discuss along this line—and I have, in print. It involves
asking the questions, “How do researchers actually isolate a new virus
and identify it?” and, “What are the correct standards for proving a
particular germ causes a particular disease?” When you ask those
questions and pursue the answers, you find yourself wading hip-deep in a
swamp. The garbage floating around you is formidable. Everybody and his
brother in the official medical community has answers, and most of them
turn out to be self-serving propaganda, not science. It’s as if you’re
hearing: THE WAY TO ISOLATE A VIRUS AND PROVE IT CAUSES A PARTICULAR
DISEASE IS THE WAY WE SAID WE DID IT. NOW DON’T BOTHER US ANYMORE.
But it turns out that bothering is good. Necessary.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport) | 
No comments:
Post a Comment