Continuing my "greatest COVID hits" articles. To read my introduction to this ongoing series, go here. To support my work and get value for value, order my Matrix collections here and subscribe to my substack here.
January 22, 2020
NEW
VIRUS IN CHINA. WATCH OUT. SPREADING. ANIMALS TO HUMANS? PANDEMIC
COMING UP? OBEY MEDICAL AUTHORITIES. ALL HANDS ON DECK. CENTERED IN
WUHAN. CITY OF 11 MILLION. WILL THEY QUARANTINE AND SHUT DOWN HONG
KONG? TRAVELERS WITH THE VIRUS GETTING THROUGH TO EUROPE AND
AMERICA? WHAT’S THE NAME OF THE VIRUS? 2019-nCOV or
nCoV2019. WHAT? THANK GOD THE CHINESE ARE UNDER A TIGHT DICTATORSHIP,
THEY CAN CRACK DOWN AND QUARANTINE ANYBODY ON A WHIM. IF YOUR BODY
TEMPERATURE IS ELEVATED ON A TEST, THEY STOP YOU? WOW. WE MAY NEED THAT
IN THE USA, AS LONG AS THEY DON’T STOP ME. IMPEACHMENT? FORGET THAT,
IT’S THE VIRUS.
In
the 19 years of this website, the one story I’ve researched and covered
more than any other is the DEADLY VIRUS hustle. SARS, Swine Flu, Ebola,
etc.
Now, we have a new one. The possible maybe CORONAVIRUS from China.
In
each case of these could-be killers, we have an official warning. “This
could be the big one.” Millions of people could fall ill and die. In
each case, there are travelers. “People returning from X have the virus
and they are spreading it.” In the case of SARS and Swine Flu, the
patients’ symptoms were typical “flu” symptoms: fever, fatigue, cough,
weakness. In other words, there was no reason to think the “new disease”
was any different from ordinary traditional illness.
The big and only difference is the claim that researchers have found a new virus as the cause of illness.
But in each case, there are serious problems with that claim.
First,
only “official researchers” are involved with the “discovery” of the
new virus. There is no confirmation from independent researchers. For
example, in the case of SARS (2003), ten labs belonging to the World
Health Organization (WHO) performed the “discovery” of that
coronavirus. They were connected through closed circuit---no outsiders
allowed.
Eventually,
a Canadian biologist working for WHO, Frank Plummer, told the press he
was quite puzzled by what he was seeing: more and more SARS patients
didn’t have the SARS virus at all. In fact, almost no new SARS patients
had the virus. Well, when you stop and think about that ridiculous state
of affairs, you realize you can’t say a person, with ordinary flu-like
symptoms, is suffering from a new disease if he doesn’t have the cause
of that disease. But the mainstream press took no notice of this and
moved on.
In
the case of the Swine Flu “epidemic” (2009), the US Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) was reporting thousands of cases in America---but CBS
star reporter Sharyl Attkisson found out that the CDC had, mysteriously,
stopped counting cases. How could this be? She came up with the
devastating answer. The overwhelming percentage of blood tests on Swine
Flu patients were coming back from labs with no sign of the Swine Flu
virus or any other flu virus. That story ran on the CBS News site, but
as Attkisson told me in an interview, the bosses at CBS wouldn’t allow
it on the national television news broadcast. Censored. And that was the
end of the CBS exposure of the Swine Flu hoax. Yet, as I reported:
about three weeks after CBS shut down the story, WebMD ran a piece in
which the CDC estimated there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the
US. If your head is spinning, it should be.
The
second major problem with the announcement of a “new disease” or an
epidemic is the absence of research on what we could call the “infection
factor.” Let me explain. To even begin to say a particular germ is
causing a particular disease, you have to prove the germ is present in a
patient’s body IN GREAT NUMBERS. A few little viral particles floating
around here and there are irrelevant. You need millions. So if an
ignorant doctor or a researcher states, “Well, this patient has the
coronavirus so he has the disease,” he’s falling far short of proving
anything useful. Where are the tests proving the patient has millions of
the virus in his body? Nowhere.
The
third major problem with the announcement of a “new disease” or an
epidemic is the “test factor.” What test is being run on a patient to
prove he has the “new virus” in his body? Most of the time, it is an
antibody test. Stay with me here, this is important. Prior to 1984, it
was generally recognized that a positive antibody test was a good
outcome. In short, it indicated that the patient’s immune system had
come in contact with a germ and successfully defeated it. But then, for
several reasons, this science was turned on its head. A positive
antibody test, from that time on, was evidence that the patient
currently had the disease in question. Boom. Now, disease numbers could
easily be inflated. And they were. And they are.
Automatically assuming that the announcement of a possible epidemic is accurate---well, it’s a major mistake, to say the least.
The
CDC and WHO are operated by virus hunters. Running a new virus up the
flagpole is their stock in trade. They rush to an area where an
“outbreak” has been announced, and they roll up their sleeves and look
for the virus. They pay no attention to environmental factors, such as
contaminated water supplies or toxic chemicals or malnutrition or lack
of basic sanitation.
Epidemics
are good for business. Pharmaceutical business, inducing fear business,
shutting down travel business, diverting the public from key events
business, surveillance and quarantine business, and so on.
I’m
sure, at some point, there will be THANK YOU, CHINA, BUSINESS,
too. Thank you, China, for your rule by iron fist over the
population. Your ability to stop anyone for any reason and test for “the
virus” may have saved the planet from an extinction
event. Freedom? Forget it. Public safety is the ace in the deck. It wins
every time. Hell, we may need a good epidemic in the US, so we can
exert more control over the unruly citizenry. The doctor is king. Do
what he says. Always. How many vaccines are there now? Take all of
them. Everyone must.
Nineteen
years ago, when I started this website, I told you that, of all the
cartels in this world, the most important and powerful one, long-term,
was the medical cartel. Nothing since that time has changed my mind.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport) | 
No comments:
Post a Comment