The prodigious author and researcher, Antony Sutton (1925-2002), wrote about hidden men behind momentous events.
In 1999, Kris Millegan, researcher and head of TrineDay publishers, wrote:
“Antony
C. Sutton, 74, has been persecuted but never prosecuted for his
research and subsequent publishing of his findings. His mainstream
career was shattered by his devotion towards uncovering the truth. In
1968, his Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development
was published by The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Sutton
showed how the Soviet state's technological and manufacturing base,
which was then engaged in supplying the North Vietnamese the armaments
and supplies to kill and wound American soldiers, was built by US firms
and mostly paid for by the US taxpayers. From their largest steel and
iron plant, to automobile manufacturing equipment, to precision
ball-bearings and computers, basically the majority of the Soviet's
large industrial enterprises had been built with the United States help
or technical assistance.”
Here is a telling Antony Sutton quote from his book, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986):
“By
using data of Russian origin it is possible to make an accurate
analysis of the origins of this equipment. It was found that all the
main diesel and steam-turbine propulsion systems of the ninety-six
Soviet ships on the Haiphong supply run [to the North Vietnamese] that
could be identified (i.e., eighty-four out of the ninety-six) originated
in design or construction outside the USSR. We can conclude, therefore,
that if the [US] State and Commerce Departments, in the 1950s and
1960s, had consistently enforced the legislation passed by Congress in
1949, the Soviets would not have had the ability to supply the
Vietnamese War – and 50,000 more Americans and countless Vietnamese
would be alive today.”
“Who
were the government officials responsible for this transfer of known
military technology? The concept originally came from National Security
Adviser Henry Kissinger, who reportedly sold President Nixon on the idea
that giving military technology to the Soviets would temper their
global territorial ambitions. How Henry arrived at this gigantic non
sequitur is not known. Sufficient to state that he aroused considerable
concern over his motivations. Not least that Henry had been a paid
family employee of the Rockefellers since 1958 and has served as
International Advisory Committee Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, a
Rockefeller concern.”
If
you think such traitorous actions could never have occurred, I point
you to another researcher, Charles Higham, and his 1983 classic, Trading with the Enemy.
Higham focuses on World War 2. The men behind the curtain Higham exposed are in the same basic group that Antony Sutton exposed.
Higham, Trading with the Enemy:
"What
would have happened if millions of American and British people,
struggling with coupons and lines at the gas stations, had learned that
in 1942 Standard Oil of New Jersey [part of the Rockefeller empire]
managers shipped the enemy's [Germany’s] fuel through neutral
Switzerland and that the enemy was shipping Allied fuel? Suppose the
public had discovered that the Chase Bank in Nazi-occupied Paris after
Pearl Harbor was doing millions of dollars' worth of business with the
enemy with the full knowledge of the head office in Manhattan [the
Rockefeller family among others?] Or that Ford trucks were being built
for the German occupation troops in France with authorization from
Dearborn, Michigan? Or that Colonel Sosthenes Behn, the head of the
international American telephone conglomerate ITT, flew from New York to
Madrid to Berne during the war to help improve Hitler's communications
systems and improve the robot bombs that devastated London? Or that ITT
built the FockeWulfs that dropped bombs on British and American troops?
Or that crucial ball bearings were shipped to Nazi-associated customers
in Latin America with the collusion of the vice-chairman of the U.S. War
Production Board in partnership with Goering's cousin in Philadelphia
when American forces were desperately short of them? Or that such
arrangements were known about in Washington and either sanctioned or
deliberately ignored?"
Getting the picture?
War,
what is it good for? With the same elites backing both sides, it’s good
for business. It’s good for creating chaos and destruction. It’s good
for launching new global organizations, in the aftermath; organizations
that exert a level of control and reach that didn’t exist before. It’s
good for launching organizations like the United Nations and the
European Union and the World Trade Organization---dedicated to
Globalism, which in turn is dedicated to planned civilization, in which
the individual is demeaned and the group is All.
Freedom is demeaned; and dominance by the few over the many is hailed as peace in our time.
~~~
(Episode 24 of Rappoport Podcasts -- "OPERATION
PERMANENT LANDSCAPE: How the Planners Are Installing a Present and
Future of Fake Viruses, Deadly RNA Injections, Fear, and Medical Slavery
for Planet Earth" -- is now posted on my substack. It's a blockbuster. To listen, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab and/or Twitter at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment