Friday, October 28, 2022
3836-3839: Happy Places 2.0 from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Many
years ago, my Sister and I learned to retreat from life's many
challenges, simply by closing our eyes and going to our "Happy Place".
By the rules of our game, our Happy Place could be a favorite actual
place, or a place we created in our imagination. Either way, it had to
be a place where we felt safe and at peace and.....well,...... happy.
This little game between Sisters kept our hearts and minds free.
Bored
senseless waiting for a dental appointment? Never mind. It's okay.
Check out for a few moments and visit one of your Happy Places.
Frustrated to tears? No problem. That special beach is waiting for you.
Tired? Sad? Bury your senses and your grief in the comforts of nature. Feel the wind or the water washing away your cares.
Sure, it's all in your mind, but would you rather stare steadfastly at the back of an airplane seat for four hours?
Or let somebody else, like Hollywood, pick your mental destination?
Our own dreams are always better.
My
Sister's favorite Happy Place is a little wooden beach cabin, weathered
and grey, with wood shingles and a front porch that has a railing, and
bright colored flowers, red geraniums and pink petunias, in hanging
baskets, well-worn rocking chairs, and a table with a checkerboard.
Braided rugs in tones of blue and white, cream and orange.
Over the years she has described her Happy Place until it has become one of my special places, too.
I know where she goes when she is hurt, or frightened, or lonely.
Whatever
"real" life throws at you, you are blessed to have your Happy Places,
your little bits of Heaven, to comfort you, close by as a thought.
In your Happy Place, you can always draw a deep breath.
So,
now, I am encouraging everyone to step it up a bit, and stretch your
imaginations. Add to your Happy Places. Expand upon them. Take a walk
down the beach to the next cove.
Think
about the setting of your Happy Place. What kind of place is it? What
kind of community would it belong to? Imagine that community. Would
it have a bakery? A General Store? A ballpark?
What
kind of people live in your town? Are they happy, healthy, and
friendly? Do they know you? What have you been doing in this
community? Fixing cars? Building houses? Working at the library?
Pulling fresh loaves of bread out of the big oven at the bakery?
Selling tickets at the railway station? Nursing the sick and the
elderly? Maybe you are a brewmaster, making a fine single malt
whiskey? Or a grocer, putting up a display of fresh blueberries in
paper boxes?
Maybe you are a writer, a fisherman, or a garlic farmer.
It's
up to you, it's your town. It's your life. You are in control of what
goes on inside your head, even if the world around you seems dangerously
out of control. You have the right and the ability to create your own
town, and your own world.
Soon,
you will carry this ability forward into your physical life, too, and
what you create will only be limited by you. Instead of just imagining
it, you will be able to build it. And share it.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Something in the Air
By Anna Von Reitz
Does
everyone recall, as I do, the late Queen Elizabeth II, letting her hand
fall in consternation on the arm of an overstuffed couch covered in
fine Jacobin floral patterns, and declaring, "Charles shall never be my
Successor."
She
said this clearly, with perfect enunciation, and no small amount of
energy. Her expression was one of calm and final determination. There
was nothing to suggest that she had the least doubt remaining, and her
jaw was set with that little tell-tale fold mark at the right corner of
her mouth. Nobody who knew the Queen had any question or doubt that
Charles had pimped his last gasp, ruined his last horse, and caused his
last scandal as Heir Apparent.
Mother had, over-flowingly, had enough.
And
nobody present, not members of the Royal Family, not the Prime
Minister, not the assorted members of the Privvy Council ---- nobody
dared say a word, raise a question or even cock an eyebrow. They'd all
been properly and surely informed concerning what was not going to
happen, and left to wonder what would happen and who else would be named
as the Queen's Successor.
There
was a short flurry of speculation surrounding who might rise in the
Queen's estimation and profit from Charles' political demise. After
brief casting about, it was decided that Prince William was the most
likely candidate to simply brush past his Father, but not before a
process akin to a Fraternity Rush had taken place and all the other
possibilities had been remembered, examined, and for one reason or
another discarded from the "Most Likely" spot.
Those
of us who witnessed this brief cut-and-dried drama during an unguarded
moment of BBC "coverage" --- which usually means covering something up
--- have remembered it. It had the quality of one brief blinding shaft
of sunlight striking through the clouds. I would hazard a guess that it
was in 2009 that this occurred, at about the same time that Michael
Jackson's death was reported--- so by my estimate, anyway, more than a
decade ago.
Much
has happened since then. Charles' marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles
seemed to calm his restless and often unhappy spirit, and thing settled
down, with Charles lapsing into his more solid role as a man of
intellectual depth interested in architecture, city planning, water
pollution remediation, animal welfare, and an endless list of similar
proper concerns, well-distanced from chasing skirts and tromping around
the celebrity circuit. Once he turned sixty-five even the papers
stopped chasing him around like hounds.
There
seemed to be a pause, almost like a pleasant intake of breath held
comfortably, and at a time in his life when most men consider themselves
retired, a few people were heard to say, with a slight bit of wonder,
"Prince Charles appears to have come into his own."
Despite
the Queen's solemn pronouncement that Charles would not be her
Successor, nobody seemed to question it much when Charles was heralded
as King Charles the Third, but I questioned it for the simple reason
that I have been watching Queen Elizabeth for most of my life.
Via
the miracle of modern telecommunication, I have heard Elizabeth II
speak on hundreds of occasions, watched her reactions to sporting
events, the openings of Parliament, romps in the country, tender moments
with family, and every other kind of scene one might imagine. I have
watched her sign death warrants condemning some hapless Territorial to
the gallows with the same business-like acumen with which she performed
so many other duties.
Through
this long-standing Observation, I believe that I have developed a fine
sense of the Queen's indomitable, fixed character. I believed her when
she said that Charles would never be her Successor all those years ago;
she meant it, and I don't think she changed her mind. I think she did
something totally unexpected and brilliant.
As
the last of her days played out, I believe that she sensed the end
coming and retired to Balmoral in Scotland, where she prepared for her
Successor, King Charles of Scotland.
Even
Native Heirs of Britannia don't realize that under the terms of the
formation of Great Britain, any one of the four (4) kings -- England,
Ireland, Scotland, and Wales -- can serve as the King of Great Britain
in a pinch.
This
would adequately explain the otherwise completely inexplicable recent
swearing-in ceremony of the members of the Parliament and Judiciary,
wherein they all swore allegiance to "King Charles", not "King Charles,
the Third".
Astonished
commentators, including myself, gave side-long glances and knew,
absolutely, that something is afoot. Top British Barristers could never
and would never make such an omission, and neither would the seasoned
members of the Queen's Government. I would sooner bet on Mount Everest
falling down, than consider that swearing-in ceremony anything but
deliberate and precise.
Almost
immediately people jerked awake and speculations started to fly about
this very odd spectacle. Were they all swearing allegiance to King
Charles I, the second son of James VI, one of the Catholic Stuart Kings,
who was beheaded in 1649? He was one of the casualties of the
still-ongoing English Civil War, which was more about religion than our
American Civil War, but in the end, just as illegal and interminable.
Our
early research on the subject suggests that what we have suffered in
America was also suffered first in England: an undeclared Civil War
steeped in violence and mercenary intrigue, excused as a religious war
just as the American Civil War was propagandized as a moral crusade
against slavery when the real motivations were commercial. The real bone
of contention in the English Civil War appears to have been the wealth
of the Roman Catholic Church and the extensive spread of its "Common
Wealth" holdings.
Is
it possible that the actual history has been unearthed and the Stuart
Kings are being put forward by the Roman Catholic Church? And faced
with overwhelming evidence, the Parliament and Judiciary are standing
for this?
That's one theory, not mine.
I
think that the present King Charles of Scotland would be a logical and
historically supported choice to rule Great Britain, to protect the land
and soil and cultures of the British peoples, rebuild the strength of
the military apart from dependence on Allies, and restore Britain's
maritime industries and time-honored crafts. He is, after all, Scottish
through and through, not a German in tweeds.
At
a time when we are otherwise all left with apparent acceptance by the
UK Government of spectacles like the Dead Baby Procession at the London
Olympics and this more recent example of WTF? -- presided over by then
(definitely) Prince Charles earlier this year:
----King Charles of Scotland would be a relief as King of Great Britain, as well as a true son of the British Isles.
In
the end, I think Elizabeth II had her way and it won't be long before
we all know the Successor she named. It's possible that she split her
many roles and left Charles to rule "the Kingdom of the Dead" --- the
Chair of the Estates, that she sat on herself for so many years. The truth will become apparent as part of the Coronation process.
The
true king will wear the Christian Crown of Saint Edward. The false
king will wear the Imperial Crown. If past practice continues, we won't
see the Coronation of the true king, which will be a private ceremony
with few attendees at the Canterbury Chapel, but we will see the giant
tabloid-like coronation of the false king, who will appear to take the
proper Coronation vows and wear the proper crown, only to take up the
Imperial Crown and go sit on the Chair of the Estates within three days
of the public coronation.
The
King of Life and the King of Death are both enthroned in England,
according to the ancient seasonal calendar of the Celtic peoples, and
always remember that the wheel of the year turns in a way you might not
expect: the King of Death is always enthroned in the summer, during the
high holidays of Midsummer, while the King of LIfe is always enthroned
in the winter, during the darkest, coldest times.
Keep your eyes open and your ears perked up; something more than usually odd is going on in England.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
"When We Find Error"
By Anna Von Reitz
And
now, I shall give you an example of what I have been talking about in
the last three articles concerning the need of Americans to become
better able to sift facts from fictions, and establish the context and
meaning of what they read.
I
am using the very last section of factual evidence presented in the
"Who Founded and Owns Washington, DC?" TABU article as an example of how
the interpretation of factual evidence changes. Bear in mind, I am not
disputing that this is factual evidence; I am disputing what the
factual evidence means --- it's interpretation.
The original text appears in normal font, while my commentary as a Reader follows in bold-face type:
Quote ---"The following 15 points are based upon factual historical evidence:
1st: In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today – what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.
My
comment: Everything Lincoln did and said was in the context of being
the "President" of a Corporation, not The President of this country.
His very first "Executive Order", General Order 100, otherwise known as
The Lieber Code, went into effect the day before he declared the
bankruptcy of his Territorial Crown Corporation doing business as "the
United States of America, Incorporated".
All
the acts of the Territorial Congress then in Session, including its
declaration of Martial Law, can pertain only to the functions of the
British Territorial United States, its officers, citizenry, and
instrumentalities. Not us. Not the Americans they work for.
This
information (above, plain faced type) is about a foreign, British
Territorial Corporation, and the actions it took to save itself and
maintain order during its insolvency. Although this corporation worked
for us as a Federal Subcontractor, its fortunes and administrative
"laws" and corporate Public Policies are not ours, are not about us and
are not addressed to us; Mr. Lincoln was speaking to his shareholders
and creditors and giving instructions to his employees in the form of
his "Executive Orders" as the President of a corporation.
At
no time did he ever act as The President of The United States of
America ---- our unincorporated Federation of States. In fact, Lincoln
couldn't ascend to the actual Presidential Office, nor even the
Presidency of the Federal Republic, because Lincoln was a Bar Attorney,
an Esquire, in receipt of that Title from the Queen, and he was
prohibited as all attorneys still are, from holding any Public Office in
our Government by the Titles of Nobility Amendment passed by our States
of the Union in 1819.
It
is in this guise as the President of a foreign corporation
Subcontractor that all subsequent "Presidents" have operated and it is
only in reference to corporations that such things as "Public Policies"
and "Administrative Law" and "Executive Orders" and bankruptcies apply.
Unincorporated entities, like our actual Federation of States, are not
eligible for bankruptcy protection. So we know for sure that Lincoln's
"Union" wasn't ours and we know that he was not occupying our
Presidential Office.
And
we know that the context of his words and acts and those of the
Territorial Congress could logically only refer to their own citizenry
and operations, not to ours.
2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.
My
comment: This action, The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, was
undertaken by the British Territorial Congress to establish a new
corporation to function as the purveyor of "essential government
services" owed to us---- and as their British Crown Corporation, "the
United States of America, Inc." was still in reorganization, they
structured it as a Municipal Corporation, instead. Now we have the
British Territorial U.S. Government with one Crown Corporation in
reorganization and one Municipal Corporation, US Corp, just starting
up.
In
no case is the "District of Columbia" our "actual" government. The
District of Columbia is a foreign British Territorial Enclave created to
give it a location to conduct its business and organize the services it
is under contract to provide to us, the Americans and our States of our
Union. The Municipality of Washington, DC, was similarly established
to allow the Pope and his Holy Roman Empire Government to have a bit of
ground where they could organize to provide such services as Postal
Service.
3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment. The national constitution’s 13th, 14th and 15th amendments are respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th amendments in their constitution.
My
Comment: The only Constitution that ever contained the Titles of
Nobility Amendment (often called the Original 13th Amendment) is the
American Federal Constitution passed in 1787, called "The Constitution
for the united States of America". This Constitution passed into disuse
because the American Subcontractors that were Party to it were rendered
inoperable in 1860 and the Federal Republic this Constitution referenced
was never Reconstructed.
There
is no "renumbering" involved. The British Territorial Constitution of
the United States of America and the Municipal Constitution of the
United States never contained the Titles of Nobility Amendment in the
first place.
On
top of that, the "Constitutions" being discussed here, which were being
published as "Constitutions" in 1868 and in 1871--- are both Corporate
Charters deceitfully called "Constitutions". As such, they are
completely different kinds of documents, existing in a different
jurisdiction, serving different purposes, and being subject to different
forms of law than the actual and original Constitutions which are still
valid "in original jurisdiction" but largely moth-balled as part of The
Great Fraud against us.
Under
this scheme, the British Territorial United States owns two
corporations, one British Crown Corporation calling itself "The United
States of America" [Incorporated] formed in Scotland in 1868, and one
Municipal Corporation calling itself "the United States" [INCORPORATED]
formed in the District of Columbia a decade later. These Corporations
and their "Corporate Constitutions" are used to pull off a Substitution
Scheme, similar to a Bait-and-Switch.
The
Perpetrators appear to be operating under the original Constitutions,
but they are not. The process of amending an actual Constitution, which
requires ratification by our States of the Union, is reduced to a by-law
amendment process of a corporation charter. This is why, when you look
into it, you find that "Congress" operating either as the British
Territorial Congress or the Municipal Congress can amend their
"Constitutions" at will with no ratification by the States or People.
The
14th so-called Amendment to the Scottish Commercial Corporation
"Constitution" was never ratified by the States of the Union, and
neither was the 15th, 16th, or any other such "Amendment". All these
so-called Constitutional Amendments exist as By-Law Amendments of a
commercial corporation, and in this case, the Scottish Commercial
Corporation doing business as "The United States of America" ---
Incorporated, went bankrupt in 1906 and has been totally defunct since
1913.
The
Perpetrators and their progeny who have benefited from this Fraud and
Gross Breach of Trust have continued to invoke these Corporate
Constitutions and their By-Law Amendments as if they had authority over
Americans, when in fact, the only authority these documents ever had was
over the officers, shareholders and employees of these commercial
corporations and now, all the original corporations that started this
Fraud are bankrupted and defunct.
Nonetheless,
this Fraud is why the Perpetrators have been at such pains to
mischaracterize and misidentify average Americans as U.S. Citizens and
as Municipal citizens of the United States --- to create the legal
supposition that we are subject to them and their Corporate
"Constitutions" instead of them being subject to us and our
Constitutions.
4th: The corporation began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.
My Comment:
As these foreign corporations issued the bonds and created the debts
under conditions of fraudulent misrepresentation and non-disclosure, the
entire activity and its fruits are criminal in origin. Our Public
never owed any bankruptcy protection to these foreign corporations, and
yet, we were left to stand as the Security for their debts, and the
other Principals who are Signatories to the actual Constitutions and the
Treaties underlying the Constitutions, all sat mum
as posts and did nothing to fulfill their Lawful and Legal obligations
to this country and to the American States and People.
These
Principals, including the Popes, the British Monarchs, and the Lord
Mayors of the Inner City of London, have acted in Gross Breach of Trust
and Dereliction of Duty and in violation of their commercial service
contracts. They have unjustly enriched themselves while purposefully
misrepresenting the entire situation to us, their clueless American
Employers, and also to the rest of the world.
To
us, they pretended that everything was fine and safe and just and
normal and everything related to the American Civil War had been
Reconstructed and settled long ago ---- while they continued to carry on
this Mercenary Conflict on our shores and pillaged and plundered our
people and our natural resources while taking their paychecks and
pensions from our pockets.
To
the rest of the world, they pretended that we, Americans, and our
original American Government, were mysteriously "absent, presumed to be
in interregnum" and using this pathetic excuse for their own dishonesty
and lack of disclosure to their Employers, they began "salvage
operations" in 1921, secretively and under force requiring the
"registration" of American babies as Wards of their State-of-State
franchise corporations, thereby reducing their Employers to Dependents
and illegally, immorally, and unlawfully converting and seizing upon
American land assets for their own benefit.
5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”. Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system-again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.
My
comment: This was clearly an accommodation among thieves, two
corporations, both of them deceitfully named to make people think they
were associated with our Federal Government, both conspiring to
impersonate us and use our assets as "Securities" so that they could
access our credit without disclosure, hypothecate debts "in our names",
and force us to pay unlimited interest for the "privilege" of accessing
our own credit.
Why
should we ever pay them to issue our money, when we have the ability
and wealth to issue our own? Why should we agree to pay them gross
amounts of interest for the use of our own credit? Why should we
"voluntarily" pay Federal Income Taxes, when we are not Federal citizens
of either stripe, and we receive no "Federal Income" from these loutish
criminal corporations?
We,
the Americans, never agreed to any of this. None of it was disclosed.
All of it was misrepresented. And the end result is a massive balloon
of Odious Debt --- that is, debt created by means of subterfuge and
fraud, of which the victims are unaware and from which they do not
benefit.
6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. It must be noted that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.
My
Comment: As we have already seen, the 16th Amendment, like the 14th
Amendment, were not part of any legitimate Constitution the American
People signed, and were instead attached to Corporate Charters
deliberately and deceitfully called "Constitutions" designed to closely
resemble the actual Constitutions that the Perpetrators owe us. Such
Corporate "Constitutions" do not require ratification by the States,
because the States are not Party to them, and any such "Amendments" as
the Corporation's Board of Directors and Shareholders may make, are
merely By-Law Amendments completely unrelated to us.
Thus,
the Schemers could tax their own corporation's employees for the
privilege of being employed --- an "income tax", as a condition of
employment, and take refuge in their own corporation's By-Law
Amendments, but where they went completely off the trolley was in
conspiring to impersonate and misrepresent average Americans as "Federal
Dependents".
They
have used False, Coerced, and Undisclosed Registrations as a Pretense
to latch onto and unlawfully convert the personal and political status
of Americans first to that of British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and
second to that of US PERSONS --- which are individual Municipal
Corporation franchises considered to be Municipal citizens of the United
States. All this is grossly illegal and unlawful and clearly forbidden
by our Constitutions, by their own Federal and Municipal Codes, and by
both the Hague and the Geneva Conventions.
And
they have done this while receiving their paychecks and pensions from
us and while being strictly under contract -- Article IV of every
Constitution in every jurisdiction, ever -- to protect us and protect
our persons and protect our assets.
7th: Next (also 1913) Congress passed and entered the 17th amendment as ratified, even though the states had no opportunity to ratify the same. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected.
My
Comment: We have already discussed how they worked a Substitution
Scheme to substitute their Corporate Charters misrepresented as
Corporate "Constitutions" closely resembling the actual Constitutions
already in effect, and also how they evaded the requirement of
ratification by the States and unlawfully converted the Constitutional
Amendment Process to a Corporate By-Law Amendment process. Nothing that
they have done within the realm of their corporations should be allowed
to impact us, but instead, they have openly conspired to latch onto and
misrepresent Americans as Employees and/or Dependents of their foreign
corporations.
They
have absolutely no contract nor any excuse for what they have done to
their honorable and steadfast Employers --- as they have sought to
deceive us and disinherit us and defraud us, while receiving payment to
protect us, our persons. and our assets.
8th: In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for re-election in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only.
My Comment:
This is true and disgraceful, and it has continued unabated to the
present day. The really peculiar thing, though, is that only some
members of the Territorial "Congress" know that they are operating in
this capacity, and only this capacity, while others assume that they are
operating properly and apparently never catch on otherwise. This
indicates an ongoing conspiracy within the Congress itself to further
control and hide what they are doing, even from members of the same
body.
9th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters WWI and passes their Emergency War Powers, and Trading with the Enemies Acts.
My
Comment: None of what the Territorial United States Congress did in
1917 applies to us, though people often mistake what is going on and who
is doing it and in what capacity, including even some members of the
Territorial Congress and employees of theirs at the DOJ --- the misnamed
"Department of Justice" which is really an in-house corporate legal
firm hired to defend the phony corporation and its officers from
complaints, all paid for by us, of course.
The
actual Constitutions don't provide for any "Emergency Powers" and the
American People who signed the Constitutions as Principals would laugh
at the entire idea. The only "Powers" our Constitutions grant are
strictly enumerated, no more, no less.
Americans
by definition cannot be "Enemies" and "Employers" at the same time, so,
yes, we had to be excluded and exempt from the Trading With the Enemy
Act and were never the intended targets. The exemption is found in
Section 25 of the Appendix if you can understand sneaky lawyer-speak
well enough, and the "Enemies" discussed are "domestic" with respect to
what? The District of Columbia. So what the Trading With the Enemy Act
is actually about is trading with the Municipal citizenry and any other
foreign nationals that the British Crown Corporation is having a
Mercenary Conflict with at the time.
10th:
In 1918, President Wilson is re-elected by the Electoral College but
their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set
Senate; where in the new Corp. U.S.,
only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote
confirmation. The only authority that could possibly have been used for
electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson
was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the
United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S.
Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s
seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original
jurisdiction government officers.
My
Comment: Right here, above, is an example of where forgetting who we
are and who they are can be a real detriment, as it leads to logical but
wrong conclusions.
The
Electoral College elected President Wilson to a Second Term as
President of both the USA, Inc. and the US, INC., but the corporation
officers pretending to be "United States Senators" --- which "United
States" was that? Wink-Wink.... disagreed. The "Senators" representing
the USA, Inc. had had enough of Wilson as "their" British Territorial
"President" and refused to confirm.
We
have a similar situation going on right here, right now, where the
popular vote and the Electoral College both confirmed Donald Trump for a
second term as both President of the USA, Inc. and the President of the
US, INC., but the "SENATORS" the Municipal "US, INC." had had enough of
Trump and refused to confirm, even without a whole bunch of foreign
intrigue to hack the election.
What
happens is that we have two (2) "Presidents" both acting as "President"
of a foreign commercial corporation. Trump has been kept on as the
"President" of the USA, Inc. version --- whatever they are calling their
corporation now, and Biden has been elected as the "President" of the
US, INC., or what they are now calling the "White House Office, INC."
The
contract of collusion both corporations agreed to and published back in
1937, The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The
United States, is falling apart.
Nobody
knows what is really going on, and mass confusion reigns as these
behemoths try to hide their assets and shuffle off their obligations and
get set up for another round of fraud, all while pointing fingers and
blaming each other for their joint gross disregard for their actual
Employers --- the American States and People.
11th: In 1933, the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.
My
Comment: This "adjustment" isn't really any adjustment of the
Territorial Corporation's Trading With the Enemy Act issued in 1917,
rather, it's the Municipal Corporation's reply sixteen years later.
In
the first round, the Territorial Corporation identified their favorite
whipping boys, the Federal Civil Service and Municipal Corporations and
all "citizens of the United States", as their domestic Enemies. Sixteen
years later the Municipal Corporation identified the U.S. Citizens
acting as the citizenry of "the" United States of America as the
"Enemy".
The
actual Americans still have to be explicitly excluded from the "Enemy"
list, because we are the actual Employers of the Municipal citizens,
too, and we remain "non-domestic" --- permanently domiciled outside both
the District of Columbia and the Municipality of Washington, DC.
The
problem, of course, is that both Corporations and their actual
"citizens" conspire to claim and misidentify Americans as either
Territorial or Municipal citizens, or both. We get "caught in the
cross-fire" so to speak and it doesn't help that most of us are confused
about who "they" are and about who "we" are.
12th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.
My
Comment: Those of you old enough to remember World War II or the years
immediately following will remember seeing "US CORP" plastered on
virtually every surplus canteen, Jeep, fork, and olive green tent. This
is the US CORP that was deliberately used as the scapegoat and made the
"Debtor" and made to pay "War Reparations" as the Winner in the War.
I
know. Makes as much sense as mud on a skewer, but the Pope and the Boyz
in Rome had a big Brain Fart and decided that no matter who starts a
war, from now on, whoever wins the war has to pay for it. So, better
pray you lose, or be determined not to let a war ever get started, and
if it does start, avoid getting involved.
This
was what inspired the Peter Seller's movie, The Mouse That Roared. All
you had to do was lose a war to the United States and like Secretary of
Defense McNamara, fail your way to success.
Certain
parties are currently remembering this little agreement and how it was
used to justify soaking us after WWII. It is discouraging further
opportunistic "investments" by European states and the Biden
Administration in the War in Ukraine. They are suddenly all thinking,
"What if Russia loses? What if we are found with our hands in the pot
on the winning side? We will have to pay for all the damage!"
For
once, it appears that the Vatican's intrigues are serving to put a lid
on war-mongering, but I think they were prompted by more practical
considerations --- the losers in a war are less likely to be able to pay
debts.
So
they sacrificed the US CORP and gave it to the IMF, but remember ---
this country hasn't had a Treasury since 1924, when the IMF took over
that job. They were really just transferring the loot from one pocket to
another, and using a European distribution channel because, well, all
the damage was in Europe.
13th: Sometime after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. They create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and a depository account number in the Social Security General Trust Fund (GTF). They give you the Social Security card which identifies you as the single person with authority to control the entity they created (on review: you may notice that the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, the GTF is its beneficiary and you were made its Trustee.) More importantly: this capacity does not limit you or your capacity to act in your sovereign capacity in any way.
My
Comment: Beware of anything that requires you to "enroll" or "make an
application" for "benefits" of any kind. The soldiers in the Civil War
were unwittingly enrolled as Mercenaries and an application makes it
appear that you volunteered and sought and wanted whatever it is you are
applying for.
I
know for sure that I and my comrades in High School were lied to and
told that we "had to" have a Social Security Number to have a job. We
were also told that we "had to" pay Federal Income Taxes. The Liars
didn't mention that this was only true if you were applying for a
Federal job --- and of course, none of us were.
The
"depository" account number is the only number you are likely to see;
its called a Cusip Number because it is attached to a clearinghouse
certificate which attaches your name to a Municipal citizen of the
United States --- and that US individual franchise corporation, now
called a "UCC Contract Trust" is liable not only for collecting deposits
to pay for your retirement "benefits" but makes sure you pay for
everything else, too.
There
is no longer any Social Security General Trust Fund. That was long ago
merged with the Public Charitable Trust, turned into a Ponzi Scheme, and
spent. And there was never, as some people supposed, any specific
trust account set up for you, there was only a money in and money out
accounting function attached to these two differently formatted
numbers.
While
it is perfectly true that from the Municipal Government's side of
things, having this account in no way impairs your political status and
is not meant to impersonate you as a Municipal citizen of the United
States---- but, you now have such a PERSON attached to you, with your
house as its last known address, and that PERSON is a Universal Debtor, a
felon, and a slave, in the eyes of the British Territorial
Government.
It
has been that way ever since the end of the American Civil War and the
adoption of the Fourteenth By-Law Amendment to a certain Corporate
Constitution belonging to a Scottish Commercial Corporation passing
itself off as The United States of America ---- Incorporated.
Merely
having a Municipal PERSON named after you makes you a suspect and a
criminal so far as the Territorial Government is concerned, and they
will spare no expense to bring that PERSON to justice and wring every
penny out of it.
Put nicely, when you were pushed to apply for a Social Security Number, you were unknowingly painting a target on your back.
The
Pope liked that because there were more PERSONS to spread the debt
around to, and the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor liked that,
because they had more targets to harass and charge and impound and
confiscate assets from.
This
was at the heart of the whole Substitution Scheme -- with the Municipal
Government looking for chumps to pay their debts, and the Territorial
Government let loose to collect from Americans who didn't know what was
going on or why they were having their assets confiscated to pay foreign
taxes, both the US, INC. and the USA, Inc., were sitting pretty on the
backs of their Employers
It
was all fraud. It was all criminal. It still is. There is no "trust
fund". There is no "social insurance" or pension policy. And the Social
Security Administration like the Internal Revenue Service has nothing
whatsoever to do with our American Government.
The
Number One, Most Ludicrous, Most Obscene, Most Preposterous, and Most
Destructive Lie Nomination goes to the so-called Fourteenth Amendment,
and the idea that a By-Law Amendment adopted by a long defunct and
criminally deceitful Scottish Commercial Corporation is still owed
enforcement by anything or anyone.
As
recently as two years ago, I heard President Trump telling reporters to
go look up the Fourteenth Amendment, and it was clear that he was
either taking this bunko seriously himself, or he wanted other people to
take it seriously.
Here for the record books is the God's Honest Solemn Truth:
There
is no authority vested in the Fourteenth Amendment, nor is there any
valid Corporate "Constitution" and none of this has anything whatsoever
to do with me or any living American. If possible, it has even less to
do with our lawful Government.
14th: In 1968, at the national governors’ conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people.
My
Comment: Forget using a private military script issued by foreign banks
as currency displacing and using our actual gold and silver and land
and labor as the assets backing the script, and then forcing us to pay
usury to use credit that belongs to us. That's all bad enough, but
there's worse.
Mischaracterizing
our marriages as business Joint Ventures, and claiming an ownership
interest in our children as "products" of our "Joint Ventures" ---
that's worse.
Sending
thugs into our hospitals to bully new Mothers into signing undisclosed
paperwork giving up their babies and their babies' estates and
inheritances for the benefit of foreign State-of-State franchise
corporations --- that's worse.
Using
these and other means of coercion, fraud, and illegal conscription to
enslave, indebt, bully, demean, and defraud people who have saved your
butts through two World Wars -- that's worse.
Collecting
taxes long after taxes are no longer needed, and using those taxes to
pay non-existent interest on non-existent National Debts --- that's
worse.
All
the funny money crap is bad enough, but these are crimes of state,
carried out by for-profit commercial corporations masquerading as
legitimate governments preying upon the people they are supposed to
serve and protect.
15th:
By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such
private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition,
and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials
in their State government seats.
My
Comment: Although it may be hard to imagine, the seats of our actual
American Government have been "vacated", "mysteriously absent", presumed
to be "in interregnum" since 1860 when all this fraud and predation
began. It started when Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha married in 1840.
Prince
Albert "seized upon" the Queen's body, which included all her Earthly
(physical) wealth, and promptly carried off the management of it to
Germany, where his collaborators in the House of Wettin planned the
destruction of the Kingdom of Prussia, which had overtaken their
Hanoverian dynasty and ancestral lands.
They
also plotted the conquest of India by the British Raj. And they used
"enfranchisement" of the British Working Class---in the sense of a Dairy
Queen franchise --- as an excuse to latch onto their Good Names, and
unlawfully converted them into chattel estates, to use as collateral,
converted their political status as Freemen into the status of
Indentured Servants, and all their material wealth-- bodies, houses,
businesses, livestock, and land, everything down to their toenails was
seized upon to finance all this war-mongering and grudge-matching.
I
hate to break it, considering that I am of German stock myself, but
yes, Germans engineered all this and only pretended to be British. And
it wasn't just the Nazis financed by Rome and their "British" allies,
the infiltration and fraud and the disease of Corporatism began in 1840,
a full hundred years before the invasion of Czechloslovakia and
Poland.
If
you read the actual Constitutions you will see that forming Confederate
States (that is, States-of-States) and forming Confederations is
forbidden to the States of the Union. So where did these business
organizations --- and the Mercenary Conflicts they have spawned --- get a
foot in the door?
In
the very beginning, in 1776, the former Colonies -- British, French,
Papist --- all unanimously declared their independence from former
associations and foreign rule. That fateful July the original Union of
former estates thus formed called itself, the States of America.
In
September that year, the pro-American side of the original United
States of America Trading Company started operations as a Federation of
States, functioning as a Holding Company, and doing business as The
United States of America --- unincorporated.
Five
years later, in 1781, the original Confederation formed under The
Articles of Confederation. The members of this Confederation were all
American businesses organized as States-of-States, also known as
Confederate States.
Basically
a decade after the initial fight started, the new Constitutions
implemented the details of the Peace Treaties ending The War of
Independence.
If
our States were prohibited from forming Confederate States, where did
all these States-of-States and the entire idea of a paid, for-hire
business bureaucracy come from? The original Union, the States of
America.
We
know this because the American Federal Subcontractor, known as the
Federal Republic, received its new Constitution in 1787 as "the united
States of America".
Even
then, big business had its nose in the tent, pushing inexorably for its
own self-interest. This is what created the horrible debacle and
Mercenary Conflict known as The American Civil War. It wasn't about
slavery, it was about the economic advantage and market edge that
slavery gave the Southern Plantations in the cotton market over Egyptian
Cotton Investments made by the British Parliament.
Tories
entrenched in the business affairs of the Northern States pushed for
abolition of slavery --- not as a moral imperative, but as an economic
imperative to save British cotton investments in other countries and
make British textile mills more profitable. Thus it was that some
influential business and professional organizations in the Northern
States held their attachment to Great Britain more dear than their
attachment and duty to their Southern States brethren.
All
the Confederate States, both North and South, were divided by a common
enemy wearing sheep's clothing and a beggar's cloak. It remains to be
seen if we will fall for the same song and dance again.
Final words from the other authors:
"Now,
having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but
rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us
with any evidence you find that proves or disproves these facts.
When you find there is no error, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.
The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations, remember that is what they are and stop calling them government."
My
Final Comments: I have undertaken this exhaustive commentary not
because the earlier authors were wrong, in the main, about their facts.
Rather, I have undertaken it because their interpretation of the facts
is so often wrong. Mostly they are wrong because they get confused
about the similarly-named entities involved and make wrong assumptions
as a result.
Still
to my lasting admiration, they managed to carry on to the overall
primary insight and deliver their message to us, the later generations:
"When you speak about these private foreign corporations, remember that
is what they are and stop calling them government."
And to that I can only lend my most hearty agreement, and my deep gratitude, to all those who kept the watchfires burning.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
A Precious Learning Module
By Anna Von Reitz
The
last couple days I have focused your attention on two worthy, but in
some ways, dangerously misleading articles from other sources. The
first is a very intelligent discussion from Family Guardian, otherwise
known as FamGuard:
The
second is from the TABU Blogspot (Toward A Better Understanding) and
one of their blog articles entitled, "Who Founded and Owns Washington,
DC?"
Both
of these two otherwise entirely respectable pieces of scholarship
contain very valuable information and fine reasoning, but they are
marred by a common error that renders much of our Patriot Literature
incorrect and unreliable.
I
discussed the fundamental reasons for this flaw in both articles: we
don't know the code used to write Federal Code, we weren't taught our
own history, and last, but not least, we confuse "the United States of
America" (Incorporated) with The United States of America
(unincorporated) and we confuse "the United States" (INCORPORATED) with
The United States (unincorporated).
It
helps to know that, except for the very early years prior to the
adoption of the Constitutions, these look-alike entities calling
themselves "the United States of America" and "the United States" are
certainly the names of foreign businesses, and don't refer to us or any
business we own, at all.
Yes,
you read that correctly. If you see a reference to "the United States
of America" written after 1789, it refers -- with certainty -- to our
British Territorial Subcontractors, not to us. If you see the words
"the United States" written after 1790, it refers to the Municipal
United States Government, not to us
These
very similarly named foreign business entities were entrusted under
contract (the Constitutions are service contracts) to provide us with
certain enumerated services and we granted them specific "delegated
powers" to enable them to provide those services.
Every
school boy in the country knows that, and yet, an astonishing number of
Americans can't distinguish the fact that there is a difference between
the Proper Name of our country doing business as a Nation, The United
States, and the Improper Name of our Municipal Subcontractor, "the"
United States.
In
the same way, people mistake our British Territorial Subcontractor,
doing business as "the" United States of America, for the Proper Name of
our country in international jurisdiction: The United States of
America.
And this leads to all sorts of confusion and wrong assumptions and ignorance.
Go
back and read both of the articles cited above with the firm
understanding that "the United States of America" isn't us and that "the
United States" isn't us, but instead these names refer to our British
Territorial and Municipal Subcontractors, respectively --- and both of
them are operating as commercial corporations in the business of
providing us with "essential government services" --- and all while
fighting with each other in an interminable Mercenary Conflict on our
shores.
Know
that, because that is what these entities really are, and this is what
is actually going on. Over the past decade, both these foreign
corporations, the US, INC., and the USA, Inc., have gone bankrupt.
That
doesn't mean our country is bankrupt or that we are bankrupt. It means
that two foreign commercial corporations doing business "in our names"
are bankrupt.
This causes confusions, but doesn't change the facts.
The
bankruptcies of these foreign Federal Subcontractors and their
relations with the British Monarch and the Pope are their business and
have nothing to do with us, especially not now, when our American
Government has been called back into Session and our States are seen to
be populated and functioning in General Assembly.
Our
ancestors went so far as to make a distinction between "those" United
States and "these" United States, and between "thuh" United States of
America --- meaning our British Territorial Employees --- and "thee"
United States of America, meaning our American Government.
Once
you have this firmly in mind and are no longer fooled into assuming
that we, Americans, are the subject of the conversation, or are the
natural Subjects of any Territorial or Municipal Congress, everything
falls into place.
We
no longer imagine that we are the "Enemies" being referenced the
Trading With the Enemy Act, for example, and we look until we find our
explicit exemption buried in the Appendix of that Act.
We
understand why Mr. Obama referred to "the fifty-seven states of "our"
Union" --- because he was referring to the British Territorial United
States, not America --- and the British Territorial United States
includes the "Seven Insular States" ---- Puerto Rico and Guam and other
"United States Possessions".
We
also understand why the Brit-affiliated Territorial U.S. is always
prattling on about "our democracy" and never about "our" republican
states of the Union" --- It's because they are talking about a different
"union" and different "states" and a different system of government
entirely. We aren't them and they aren't us, even though they continue
to live here as "residents" among us.
We know why Rod Class couldn't bring a deer rifle into the foreign capitol of Washington, DC, and why the January 6th Protestors have been so cruelly abused and misrepresented.
We
understand that the "District Government" that stands between us and
the "Municipal District Government" is run as a British Territorial
Government "at war" with the Pope's Municipal Government --- even
though, the Pope ultimately owns both corporations.
And
we have the blessed comfort that none of this, absolutely none of this
endless quagmire of deceit and war and fraud, has anything to do with
us--- except that we have often been the victims of it, and we have been
treated as "collateral damage" --- literally, by our own Employees.
Now
that we know who is who, and we know what is what, we are prepared to
stand up for ourselves and draw the line on our Employees and their
presumptions about us, including their presumption that our American
Government is "in interregnum".
When
more of the worthy Patriots in this country study a little harder and
expand the scope of their inquiries they will inevitably come to the
same conclusions we have, and in that day, they will stand with us, as
Employers, ready, willing, and able to deal with any wrong-doing or
rebellion foisted off on us by our Employees, who have been evading
their constitutional obligations and abusing our delegated Powers.
Anyone born or naturalized in this country needs to go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net
This is your country. Own it today.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment