(Episode 2 of Rappoport Podcasts -- "HIV, The White House, and The Montana Prophet; When The HIV Debate Went Public, Almost" -- is now posted on my substack. To listen, click here. To learn more about Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)
~~~
With
the release of COVID vaccines, and then the mandates, we’ve seen a new
resurgence of people attempting to gain religious exemptions.
Many of these attempts focus on fetal tissue obtained through abortion.
On January 19, 2021, AnnaMaria Cardinalli published an explosive article in Crisis Magazine, headlined, “Catholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine.”
Cardinalli details the collection of fetal tissue for the cell line named HEK 293.
The tissue was taken from an aborted infant in the Netherlands in 1972-3.
This cell line was used for “testing” the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.
Cardinalli
writes: “We know that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not use any
cells derived from abortion in the production process. That is, we know
that we are not being directly injected with fetal cells or their
engineered descendants (though this fact differs with other
manufacturers). We hear that the abortion-derived cell lines were only
used in testing, which should somehow comfort us, though it still means
that the vaccines from which we seek to benefit depend on the
involvement of abortion. We are told that the cell line used in testing
came from one abortion, which took place decades ago. These things are
all true, but they do not serve to inform us fully.”
“What we may not know follows. The most prominent cell line, called HEK 293, comes from an abortion performed in the 1970’s…”
“HEK
stands for human embryonic kidney. To harvest a viable embryonic kidney
for this purpose, sufficiently healthy children old enough to have
adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive,
typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must
take place without anesthesia for the child, which [anesthesia] would
lessen the viability of the organs. Instead of being held, rocked, and
comforted in the time intervening between their birth and their death,
they have organs cut out of them alive.”
“There
is no way that a spontaneous abortion could result in the cell line (as
the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they
must be harvested) or that some brilliant researcher found a way for
great good to come out of a rare tragedy by making use of a child’s body
donated to science after it was aborted. The deliberate killing of an
unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the
tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The
harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to
which, she was a living child, outside the womb.”
“I
fear that Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this
information when they received the vaccines. If we re-examine the
Vatican statement that ‘it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19
vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their
research and productions process,’ we see that it does not apply here.
It does not imagine this scenario. To approve of the currently-available
vaccines, it would have to read ‘it is morally acceptable to receive
COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from living persons, killed
by the harvest of their organs for use in medical research and
productions processes,’ but the Church’s moral teachings could never
truly bend so far.
Similar
to the human rights abuses exposed by international tribunal in today’s
China, where unwanted individuals such as religious and political
dissidents are executed by the harvest of their organs for profit, the
little girl whose cells gave rise to the COVID-19 vaccines was brutally
sacrificed for the purpose, as were all the children whose cell lines
failed before her.”
After
reading Cardinalli’s analysis---not only should the granting of
religious exemptions from vaccination be a foregone conclusion; the
whole field of fetal tissue research, going back many years and
involving many pharmaceutical products, should be put on trial.
The
people who have been carrying out the murders, the people who have been
using the harvested tissue, the companies---all of them---on trial.
I
hope many medical professionals will take Cardinalli’s article as a
springboard, and weigh in on what she is very clearly stating.
And not just doctors. All people who are shocked by her conclusions.
So far, I see one counter-claim to Cardinalli’s assertions:
The
notion that the kidneys of the aborted baby must be harvested very
quickly is false. The kidneys can survive for a longer period.
On
that score, I refer you to a devastating video interview conducted by
Robert Kennedy Jr. His guest was SOUND CHOICE PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE
“President and Founder, Dr. Theresa Deisher Ph.D., [with] over 30 years
of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience. She discovered
adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked on their therapeutic uses
as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and leads a team of scientists at
AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing what a diagnosis of cancer,
autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease means to patients and their
loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr. Deisher is named as an
inventor on over 47 patents.”
In
the first 15 minutes of the interview, Deisher makes it quite clear
that infants in the womb are taken out alive, with their blood supply
functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or
their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will
be turned into fetal cell lines.
Since
this act of murder is standard practice, it would appear it was
committed against the live baby whose kidney cells became cell line HEK
293, used in testing the COVID vaccines.
At
the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn’t want to get into the
moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was
quite shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral
aspect.
The whole world has to.
Here is the basic ramification: THERE IS A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR THE WHOLE WORLD.
For all people of faith. Every faith.
“According
to my religious belief, the murder of an undeniably live infant for any
reason is unconscionable and evil, and I refuse the vaccine.”
Here is a Force against which no government, no establishment, no secret society, no wealth can stand.
I
fully understand all sorts of professionals will spout language that
purports to show “the aborted infant was not alive, the lab followed all
the legal guidelines, this is an old argument that has been debunked…”
But this is not just an old argument. This is the equivalent of an opening statement in a murder trial. Nothing less.
If religious leaders will read AnnaMaria Cardinalli’s article, they will see how important her charge is.
The
question isn’t “will people of faith wake up and do what they should”;
the question is “how can any person of faith NOT do what they should”.
If they will make a stand; if all people of faith will; the entire dire situation we are facing changes in the blink of an eye.
Solomon
to God: “You have made Your servant king instead of my father David,
but I am a little child; I do not know how to go out or come
in…Therefore give to Your servant an understanding heart to judge Your
people, that I may discern between good and evil.”
Gautama Buddha: “To cease from evil, to do good, and to purify the mind yourself, this is the teaching of all the Buddhas.”
John 10:10: “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.”
Would any church, any religion in the world say that God wants the killing of live infants for the purpose of medical research?
In the midst of this COVID tyranny, haven’t we all been looking for a truth that will galvanize huge numbers of people?
And not as some kind of stunt. But rather as an inevitable outcome of deep faith.
Faith and justice come from the same everlasting tree.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment