3446-3448: About Forms of Citizenship from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Americans,
if they hold any citizenship obligation at all, operate as American
Citizens, not as U.S. Citizens and not as Municipal citizens of the
United States. See the difference?
We
are known as American Citizens in international venues and State
Citizens at the national level —- meaning in our case, state level.
Our States are nations.
It’s
one allegiance to one State operating in two different jurisdictions.
You are an American Citizen in international jurisdiction and a State
Citizen within the borders of your State.
It
is, of course, possible for an American Citizen to give up this status
and choose to become a Dual Citizen of some other counties.
Many
members of the U.S. Congress are Dual Citizens of other countries — for
example, New Zealand and Israel, or Ireland and Tunisia.
It
is a nasty shock to realize but the rats in Washington, DC, who pretend
to represent you and your State don’t even have to be citizens of this
country. They don’t have to live in or own land in your State. And
once they are elected to a Senate, you are stuck with them for six years
with no ability to recall them.
That
is, while pretending to “represent” Americans, they have been making
their homes in other countries and giving their allegiance to other
countries. And passing “laws” to insulate themselves from any
accountability.
While
pretending to represent you and your State they may have no Citizenship
related to your State, no home within your State, and no real
knowledge, care, or concern about your State.
We
have a guy, Randy Purham, running for an Alaska Congressional Office—
who does not live in Alaska and openly says he has no intention of
living in Alaska. It’s too cold. His family wouldn’t ever move here.
Does anyone see a problem with this?
Nancy
Pelosi (last time I looked) was a Dual U.S. and Israeli Citizen—-
meaning she is a British Territorial owing allegiance to the Queen and
an Israeli Citizen owing allegiance to Jacob Rothschild, the actual
owner/operator of “Israel”. It was given to him by the British
Government— as a payment for financing the First World War. And it is
all part of the Public Record if you look for it.
Israel
is not a country. It’s a private estate operated as an independent
international city-state similar to the District of Columbia, with
Jerusalem operating as the Municipal Government in the same way as the
Municipality of Washington, DC.
Some people buy islands like Jeffrey Epstein. Jacob Rothschild bought Israel. Lock, stock, and Wailing Wall.
Why
isn’t that taught in every public school? Why isn’t Mr. Rothschild held
accountable for what goes on — or fails to go on — in Israel? Why
don’t the Israelis know that they are living as serfs on a private
estate?
Probably the same reason that you don’t know the history of your own government….
But
I digress — Fancy Nancy owes allegiance to the Queen and Jacob
Rothschild. She owes no allegiance — zero, none— to this country or to
the people of California she claims to “represent”.
All
Nancy does while “representing” those feckless Californians is to give
away their wealth and the wealth of their State to her own political
cronies and her foreign masters.
Maybe
that’s why Israel gets billions and billions and billions every year
and the people in Nancy’s Voting District squat on the sidewalks and get
beat up by police.
But
it’s their own fault. They identify themselves as “Voters”. They
accept being in a District — as in “District of Columbia”.
They don’t take responsibility for conducting their own business, and they keep electing Nancy to do it for them.
So, obviously, they are all mentally incompetent and must be Wards of the State?
Dual
Citizenship at the Federal Level was allowed so that American Citizens
could function as U.S. Citizens or Municipal citizens of the United
States while working in international or global-based federal jobs.
It
was never intended that the members of any Congress — Federal,
Territorial or Municipal— would jump ship entirely and adopt two
completely foreign citizenships while in office, but that’s what they
have done.
That’s
one of the ways our country has been misled, defrauded, and defiled by
Undeclared Foreign Agents masquerading as Public Elected Officials and
as Americans — when they are not.
All
you clueless Californians still want to be “Voters” instead of
Electors? Still think you live in a “Voting District”? Still think
that Nancy Pelosi is “representing” you, your State, or even your
country?
The
sad part is that she, Fancy Nancy, isn’t just one Big Crook on the take
and selling out this country—- she’s the Mom teaching all the Junior
members of “Congress” to do the same.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Nasty Little Men with Nasty Little Minds
By Anna Von Reitz
There is a scene in one of my favorite movies, "Secondhand Lions" in which the hero tells his Grandnephew a profound truth. You need to believe in things because they are worth believing in.
Eric Dingus was a Dingus --- means "penis" in Irish --- and that is another obvious, arrogant, Territorial Raj "nom de guerre" --- a name adopted for warfare against the Fearsome Enemy: a mousy Great-Greatgrandmother from Big Lake, Alaska. His mission was to screw us over, and he very nearly did. But in the end, he didn't succeed, and I pray daily that neither he nor anyone of his ilk ever will.
I have known many "Undeclared Foreign Agents" in the course of my life, and seen a great many such nom de guerres. They have gotten really sloppy and arrogant over the years and often choose names that announce what they are doing, by way of "serving notice" of their intent and activities.
Here's another example---
Christina Cowherd --- who came into the California Assembly and quickly got herself into the office of Treasurer. "Cowherd" is another adopted nom de guerre, referring to us as "cows" that need to be "herded". Thanks, but no thanks. She left with the Secessionists.
"Tarvin" is another such name, meaning a follower of the original Ancient Romans who founded Rome in 753 BC. They are part of the whole Thirteen Family Cabal. Just like Russell-Jay: Gould, too. Look up who his relatives are, if you like.
And what are they all preaching and teaching? Falsehoods meant to lead you astray and get you into trouble, or seduce you with "candy" of various kinds that will obligate you to them and their corporations instead of having brains and guts enough to run your own government.
Which is what I am preaching and teaching and helping you to do. Run your own business. Take charge of your own lives. Be worthy of your inheritance.
For the record, I am proud of my family, all of them, and have good reason to know the good, strong, generous, humble, and kind people they are. I love and honor my long-suffering innocent husband and my beloved Sister, Em, who, it is true, is "just" a housewife in Minnesota. Did we ever say otherwise? But my family is not the issue, is it?
America is the issue. Your standing as an American is the issue. What you are owed from these Vermin is the issue. The security of your home and your family and your land is the issue.
And never forget it. Never let your eyes stray from the prize.
Indeed, all this "personal attack" nonsense is just a sideshow, someone trying to distract and raise doubts about things that don't matter, as a means to keep you in line, sucking up their BS and towing their line. And paying them for the privilege of being defrauded.
Freedom is worth believing in. How many of you feel free as you lay awake in your beds worrying about letters and visits from the IRS and FBI?
Love is worth believing in. How many of you feel loved, as these Vermin have reduced the very concept of love and marriage down to a laundry list of "gives and gots"? Marriage to them is a commercial deal made by the State-of-State and two corporations forming a Joint Venture.
Our country and its people are worth believing in. Despite all the snide, nasty, gossipy, and yes, stupid, folk, the Territorial Imposters and their criminal friends, the vast bulk of the people in this country are like my family --- good honest Joes who work and contribute and want nothing but peace.
The truth is that Americans are not crooks and not war-mongers. It's our British Raj Employees who stepped into that role back in the 1860's and who have promoted it ever since.
Knowledge, facts, and truth are the issues, and those I have provided in great abundance, exposed and left for all of you to see and examine for yourselves. And as the days go by, researchers from all points of the globe are reporting in and reiterating the same information as it applies to their countries, too.
So, you no longer have to worry about whether or not you can believe me. You've got hundreds if not thousands of people all over this planet exposing the same rot and the same plots that were used to enslave them, using the same "system".
My old friend, The Informer, told me something early on in my career as an Unwilling Lawyer.
"You can never make anyone believe anything. You can show them the facts. You can show them the logic. But after that, it's up to them. So I never waste time on those with closed minds or those who have axes to grind."
And neither do I.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Floyd Tarvin and Continued Ignorance About Oaths and Pledges
By Anna Von Reitz
I have studied these matters for over forty years. "Floyd Tarvin", if that is his actual name, has studied them for maybe two years? And he wants to call me out? On Christmas Eve and make a big stink of some sort? Hahahahahah!
We, Americans, don't take "oaths" of any kind. Our land and soil law is based on the Bible, which forbids the taking of oaths, as I have often demonstrated. The taking of oaths is a pagan practice and is associated with the sea jurisdiction and its officers. It is foreign to us and to be avoided, because number one --- it's against God and the True Law (look up the definition of "legal" as opposed to "lawful") and second, because it is a practice of a foreign jurisdiction (that of the sea and specifically, Admiralty Jurisdiction) where no civilian belongs. This is why I have taught all the Assemblies to eschew "oaths of office" and to do "acceptances of office" and "affirmations" instead.
We don't do "pledges" either, for similar reasons. A pledge is an ancient practice by which a man is bound to serve a Monarch, thereby becoming Subject to a Monarch's demands. Our English brethren make "pledges" to their Queen and they try to make us make pledges to our own flag, which is ridiculous, but this is again a foreign practice having nothing to do with Americans standing on the land and soil jurisdiction.
Both oaths and pledges are foreign. Most of us encountered these practices and ideas in foreign courts and foreign public schools --- even though we assumed that these institutions were American at the time --- or, we encountered these practices upon induction into the foreign U.S. Territorial Military Services ---- and we simply didn't have the knowledge to know that these practices were foreign to America and Americans.
Now, we have that knowledge.
You can quickly settle these issues in your own mind by consulting a good Bible Concordance and seeing what the Bible says about "oaths" and "oath taking", and especially Jesus's advice regarding the practice of oath-taking. Knowing that our American Public Law is based on the Bible and not the Federal Code settles the point nicely in our favor.
No average American, no Christian, no Jew, and no Muslim, should ever be asked to take an oath of any kind, because it is a pagan practice forbidden by all three major western religions; technically, oath-taking violates the separation of church and state, because it is a pagan religious act being promoted by a subcontractor of our actual government. It is also a blasphemous disrespect of God.
Remember the observation of Jeremiah, the Prophet -- we can't determine our next footstep. How would we have the power to make promises (pledges) or take oaths?
Let your yes be yes and your no be no.
The foreign subcontractors have no exemption or contractual agreement allowing them to promote their religion, or demand practice of it, as a condition of employment.
You can also look up the meaning of "pledge" in any decent dictionary or encyclopedia and/or law dictionary and get a full run down on where the practice of pledging comes from--- and it will be abundantly clear that this is a practice of Feudalism and Monarchies unsuited to our government in all respects.
"Floyd" is clearly attached to these foreign practices as a result of both ignorance and early indoctrination and needs to be taught the truth. Much of what he and others now mistake as "American" traditions are in fact foreign practices and remnants of foreign religious practices.
Both oath-taking and pledge-making are considerably less American than Lasagna and Cricket. That's why you will see neither practice followed in any of our American State Assemblies.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment