More on the missing Biden EO and the missing vaccine mandate
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
Medical weapons and fake data sets; how destruction multiplies
|
The
mainstream reports I’m including in this article---I’ve written about
them before. They form a grotesque track record of medical-cartel harm
inflicted on the population.
I give you these reports again to point out how fake data sets multiply and spread, causing even more destruction.
For
example---let’s consider a drug called X. In fact, it is killing
patients. However, studies of X published in leading medical journals
report glowing results.
Those studies are then cited by researchers who publish more positive material on the drug.
Doctors, reading all these studies, continue to prescribe the killer X to their patients.
Pharmaceutical
companies, seeing the profit picture of X, formulate their own versions
of the drug, and market them---multiplying the killer effects
throughout the population.
In
the burgeoning field of AI medicine, which is increasingly used to
automatically diagnose symptoms and prescribe drugs, X takes its place
in MANY data sets as a powerful and safe remedy.
Medical
schools, internship and residence programs blindly follow suit, using X
and its knockoffs in standard treatment protocols.
Insurance companies, in their data sets, favor X and its cousins and cover claims based on the prescription of these drugs.
In every venue, data sets that mention killer X laud it as a useful tool in treating patients.
The fraud is deeply embedded, and the murders expand.
It’s an example of the old adage, “Garbage in, garbage out,” except in the field of medicine it’s, “Killing in, killing out.”
All right, here we go. MEDICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION:
ONE: “The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The
author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the
2013 recipient of ASA’s [American Sociological Association’s]
Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a
founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of
Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for
Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford
University.
Donald
Light: “Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs
are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460
deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each
year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the
drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6
million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually]
about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts,
and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for
others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and
self-medication would increase these figures.” (ASA publication, “Footnotes,” November 2014)
TWO: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.”
The
authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients
in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were
admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors
had given them, met the following fate:
Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.
Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The
authors write: “...Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which
excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that
there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly
prescribed and administered.”
So
this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or
improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed or maimed
who were admitted to hospitals. It didn't begin to tally all the people
taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, at home.
THREE:
July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr.
Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins
School of Public Health; “Is US health really the best in the world?”
Starfield
reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per
year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a
result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers
to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that
last number again.
I
interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of any
overall effort by the US government to eliminate this holocaust. She
answered a resounding NO. She also said her estimate of medically caused
deaths in America was on the conservative side.
FOUR:
BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer
refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It
[the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were
associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing
‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”
The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”
The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”
Therefore,
to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA
knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the
FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are
routinely maiming and killing Americans. Every public health agency
knows the truth.
FIVE: None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.
Medical crimes.
Medically caused deaths of friends, family members, loved ones, who are buried along with the truth.
No criminal investigations, no prosecutions, no guilty verdicts, no prison sentences.
But of course, you can believe everything leading lights of the US medical system tell you about COVID.
You can believe everything the press---who buries the truth about this medical holocaust---tells you about COVID.
Given the reports on medically caused death and maiming I’ve just cited and described in this article, it’s obvious that…
Leading medical journals around the world, which routinely publish glowing accounts of clinical trials of medical drugs…
Are spilling over with rank fraud, on page after page.
Indeed,
here is a stunning quote from an editor who has quite probably read and
analyzed more medical-drug studies than any doctor in the world:
“It
is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research
that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or
authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion,
which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor
of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review
of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”)
Compare
that quote with one from “the father of COVID science,” Tony Fauci. In
an interview with the National Geographic, Fauci stated: “Anybody can
claim to be an expert even when they have no idea what they're talking
about…If something is published in places like New England Journal of
Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or JAMA---you know, generally that is
quite well peer-reviewed because the editors and the editorial staff of
those journals really take things very seriously.”
They take things so seriously, they routinely publish glowing studies of medical drugs that are killing people in great numbers.
~~~
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment