Metal particles in many vaccines; but don’t worry, line up and take your shots like happy little robots
|
First, current news---Japan and the Moderna COVID vaccine. Fiercepharma reports:
“…another
one million doses of the vaccine were suspended over concerns of
possible contamination found in two additional vaccine lots…The material
was determined to be metallic particles, Japan news outlet NHK reported
last week. Last week, Japan suspended the use of 1.63 million doses.”
But
this is just the beginning of the problem. Here is a piece I wrote more
than a year ago, about a widely ignored study. The implications are
staggering:
---Dangerous nanoparticles contaminating many vaccines; groundbreaking study---
“The
Lung,” Second Edition, 2014: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to
subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into
biological systems.”
A
2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by
leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously
unreported fact:
The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.
Many of the particles are metals.
We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.
To
begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating
nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:
International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari
“The
analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain
non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not
declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case.
This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be
adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this
contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted
components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used
to produce vaccines…”
“The
quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual
chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are
neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are
biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either
immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different
from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”
“After
being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can
stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they
can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to
guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign
bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction
that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded.
Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can
produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating
the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that
particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and
interact with the DNA…”
“In
some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can
corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the
tissues…”
“Given
the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines,
adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and
credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on
where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only
obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more
serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their
presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”
“We
come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those
found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental
contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most
circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no
technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like
the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is
burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present
in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular
those meant for infants.”
This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.
Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.
Many
legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate
vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating
nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend
the right of the State to inject them.
Here
is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and
compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep
breath and buckle up:
“…further
presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies
(ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases
[all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets
delivered in the package of the product…”
“…single
particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and
aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron,
Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and
Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”
“…the
particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all
the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym,
Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel
(Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1,
Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and
MMRvaxPro).”
“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”
“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”
“Some
metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also
identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and
Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix,
Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or
Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron,
Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1)
were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while
Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The
investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological
substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As
soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a
nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The
nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not
biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized
as self by the body.”
“…examples
of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable
composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of
stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and
Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations
(patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already
been described in literature.”
I’m
sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing
problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other
medical lies.
“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”
Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:
Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?
Does
the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY
lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?
New
nano-technology is already being employed in vaccines---supposedly
“improving effectiveness.” Does this manufacturing process carry with it
the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of nanoparticle
contaminants?
How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?
And
finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above
study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope of the
research. It’s common knowledge that, for example, in the case of the
US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not produced
domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say, China,
where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected to
contamination of products?
The
vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in answering
any of these questions. They are busy pretending the questions don’t
exist.
Trusting the establishment would be suicidal.
~~~
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
The Pandemic Planners: Conversations in the Dark
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment