Pop quiz: During their clinical trial…
If Pfizer insists that certain unvaccinated persons who come into contact with a vaccinated person creates a…
SAFETY SITUATION that must be reported to Pfizer within 24 hours…
Would you say that implies…
The transfer of vaccine components from person to person can occur?
If
you answered YES, you win four tickets to Oobladee, a little-known
island nation where vaccines are forbidden and the people naturally
remain healthy and live to a ripe old age.
Here
is a Pfizer document, admitting and warning of person-to-person
transfer of dangerous vaccine components: “A PHASE 1/2/3,
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO
EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF
SARS-COV-2RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY
INDIVIDUALS,” (see page 67).
I’m going to take this in small chunks, and translate the fake-speak clinical language as we go along.
“Exposure
to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding
and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24
hours of investigator awareness.”
The
“study intervention” means the RNA COVID shot. That’s what the study is
FOR---intervening with a jab. “Hi, I’m your intervener, you’re a
volunteer in the clinical trial, and I’m going to hit you in the arm
with this needle and inject you.”
“Exposure”
to the shot doesn’t mean injection. It means somebody who hasn’t been
injected gets physically close to somebody who has been injected. Or it
could mean an un-injected person touches vaccine-liquid from a vial.
And
that un-injected somebody would be a woman who is pregnant or
breastfeeding. For example, she could be a lab worker, or a person who
is giving the shots.
If THIS exposure event happens, it’s a safety situation, and it has to be reported within 24 hours.
A
lab worker who is pregnant or breastfeeding gets physically close to a
person who has received the vaccine and BANG, it’s serious, and it has
to be reported.
Why? Because,
obviously, there is a potential danger to the unborn baby. Or the
mother, who is already breastfeeding her baby, could pass this danger to
the baby through her breast milk.
The
woman just came physically close to a person who already received the
vaccine. That’s all. That’s all that happened. But it’s enough. It means
THERE CAN BE A TRANSFER OF VACCINE COMPONENTS FROM PERSON TO PERSON,
AND THIS IS NOT GOOD, THIS IS DANGEROUS TO PREGNANT AND BREASTFEEDING
MOTHERS AND THEIR BABIES.
Here is the next piece of the Pfizer document. It’s crucial:
“An
EDP [exposure to the vaccine during pregnancy] occurs if a male
participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention
exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
This
is a dangerous situation, too. A man who did get the shot then gets
physically close to his female partner, who didn’t get the shot. This
doesn’t necessarily mean sex. It means close physical contact. But the
warning is obviously all about danger to the woman who is going to
conceive a child or has just conceived, and the warning is also about a
danger to that child. Some kind of severe injury. Or a
miscarriage. Again, the document is obviously referring to the transfer
of vaccine components from a vaccinated to unvaccinated person.
And
then, in the Pfizer document, we find an example of this dangerous,
immediately reportable situation: “A female family member or healthcare
provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the
study intervention by inhalation or skin contact….”
Here,
as plain as day, we see two meanings of “come in close contact
with.” Inhalation, and skin contact. Do not assume this has to mean
physically rubbing up against or breathing in the liquid in the vaccine
vial. Go back and read the other quotes I gave you from the Pfizer
document. They are clearly talking about something much
different. They’re talking about close contact between PEOPLE, one of
whom has ALREADY had the shot, and one who hasn’t.
They’re talking about vaccine components passing from the inside of one person’s body to another person.
Call
it shedding, call it transfer, call it transmission, call it whatever
you want to. Pfizer was clearly worried about it, because they insisted
that any such occurrence had to be reported to company safety personnel.
They
were aware that damage could be the result. Damage to mothers
conceiving, mothers pregnant, mothers who are breastfeeding, and damage
to babies.
Through person to person passage of components in the vaccine.
A
person might object, saying, “Well, maybe the pregnant woman had skin
contact with someone who was just vaccinated, and the vaccinated person
has a small amount of vaccine on his skin, because that tiny amount of
liquid somehow escaped from the needle during injection.”
That’s
highly doubtful. And if you go back and read the Pfizer statement about
the man who received the vaccine and then had close contact with his
female partner, there is no time line mentioned. A) He received the shot
and then b) at some point later, he came into close contact with his
female partner. It could be days later, weeks later. There would be no
amount of vaccine left on his skin.
We ARE talking about the passage of vaccine components from the inside of one person’s body to another person.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment