What I’m about to lay out might seem “too staggering to believe.”
Fortunately, what people do or don’t believe isn’t the issue.
And with that, here we go. Buckle up.
For the past year, I’ve been presenting evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. It’s never been proven to exist.
Those
who claim it does exist have two legs to try to stand on. One: the
virus has been isolated (discovered). And two: its genetic sequence has
been found.
However,
the mainstream scientific definition of “isolated” turns out to mean:
“We have the virus in a soup in a dish in a lab. The soup contains all
sorts of material. We never extracted the virus from the soup.” In other
words, “isolated” means its opposite.
In
the soup, in addition to the purported virus, there are human and
monkey cells, toxic drugs, chemicals, and other genetic material. When
the cells begin to die, researchers assert (with no proof) that the
cause of cell-death must be the virus.
Therefore, the virus IS in the soup, and it is deadly.
However,
the drugs and chemicals could be killing the cells, and the cells are
being starved of nutrients, so that could certainly account for their
death.
Bottom line: There is no proof of isolation. It isn’t even close. There is no evidence that the purported virus is in the soup.
I’ve
published a typical account of virus-isolation from a study, and Dr.
Andrew Kaufman did a step-by step analysis of this process and tore it
to pieces. I published his analysis. Dr. Kaufman showed there was no
merit to the claim that SARS-CoV-2 had been isolated.
What
about the genetic sequencing of the virus? You can’t sequence something
you haven’t isolated (discovered). To claim you have sequenced it would
be like saying, “We have a generic fragment of iron dust, and we know
it comes from a 1932 Ford Moon Rover fender.” There was never a 1932
Ford Moon Rover.
Researchers
presume, assume, guess, pretend that “SARS-CoV-2” WOULD HAVE certain
pieces of genetic material, and referring to libraries which contain
data about such material, they use a computer program to cobble together
pieces of data and present a genetic portrait of “SARS-CoV-2.”
If
we were discussing a science fiction novel about a virus, we might say,
“That’s an interesting genetic sequence. An interesting castle in the
air.”
~~~
Now---to
bridge over from this part of the article to the Wuhan lab, gain of
function research, tweaking a coronavirus to produce a dangerous entity,
we need to know one thing:
Mainstream
researchers---virologists, molecular biologists---BELIEVE they are
working with a real virus. Most of them certainly believe this. They are
married to their fallacious and fantastical processes of proving a
given virus exists.
And because they believe, so do politicians and public health officials and military leaders.
Therefore,
we could certainly say, if the evidence is convincing, that there has
been an effort to ramp up the function of a coronavirus in Wuhan.
But EFFORT and TRYING have nothing to do with the truth.
Based
on unproven and untenable beliefs, people have TRIED TO DO all sorts of
things. And some of those people have CLAIMED that they SUCCEEDED.
Therefore,
it’s really quite easy to see how a) the virus has never been proven to
exist and b) some researchers have been trying to ramp up the function
of a fantasy they call a virus.
“But…but
if the virus doesn’t exist, what are these researchers in their lab in
Wuhan doing? What are they working with? What’s going on?”
Yes,
I like that question. But you see, in the Church of the Virus, the
inner sanctum, the holy of holies---THE HIGH-SECURITY LAB---is not open
to you or me or anyone from the outside.
We
(and dissenting scientists) can’t look over researchers’ shoulders. We
can’t film every step they take. We can’t stop them at any point and
make them explain what they’re actually doing. We can’t say, “You just
fabricated a conclusion out of thin air, so justify it.” We can’t
challenge their ironclad beliefs about the truth and validity of their
procedures as they’re actually carrying out those procedural steps.
“What? You
call that isolation? You didn’t isolate anything. You just stirred the
soup in the dish. Explain yourself. And the gene you say you just
tweaked? What gene? Let’s go back over that again. You just fiddled with
DATA about a gene in a so-called virus. Makes no sense. Let’s review
that move. Let’s break it down.”
No, we can’t do any of this.
Instead, we’re supposed to have faith in what these researchers have faith in.
If this amounts to science, Kool-Aid is the nectar of the gods.
“Excuse
me, Doctor Towering-Arrogant, but you just plugged your latest
‘finding’ into a computer program, which is supposed to spit out the
genetic sequence of the ‘new tweaked virus you just created’.”
“Yes? So?”
“First
of all, you’re working with DATA here, not actual physical
material. But we’ll put that aside for the moment. I want to know
exactly what’s in this computer program. These five people standing with
me here in the lab? They’re software pros. They have no allegiance to
any government or funding entity. I want them to take the computer
program apart and analyze it.”
“I’m not responsible for the program.”
“Who is?”
“Colleagues. I don’t know them personally.”
“Well,
get them in here now. All research stops until we have them here in the
lab. They’ll open the whole computer program to the light of day,
explain it, and then I’ll have my people go through it with a fine-tooth
comb.”
“That’s outrageous. Why?”
“To
see if the program is credible, or just another fantasy constructed to
give the false appearance that you’re actually sequencing something.”
We’re not permitted to do that, either.
We’re in Church. We must accept all the prescribed articles of faith.
For
those people who not only claim SARS-CoV-2 was tweaked or invented in a
Wuhan lab, but was made deadly there…they should consider the
extraordinary lengths to which public health officials have gone to
FALSELY pump up COVID case and death numbers.
None of that pumping would be necessary if an actual PANDEMIC virus existed and were loose in the world.
During
the past year, I’ve covered all the criminal schemes to inflate case
numbers. To cite just one scheme: Running the PCR test at an
unconscionably high sensitivity has automatically created millions and
millions of “positive COVID cases.” In concert with this fraud, the CDC
has changed its definition of “a case,” so people who test positive but
remain healthy with no symptoms can be counted as “COVID cases.”
~~~
Now,
I’m going to present a Part Two to this article. It isn’t necessary,
but some people are thinking: “If it isn’t the virus, why are so many
people dying?” I’ve written perhaps a dozen pieces that answer this
question. Here is a shortened version:
---The disease switcheroo; they don’t teach this in medical school.
I’ve
mentioned this shell game hundreds of times in articles and lectures
over the years. Here I want to boil it down to a protocol that has
earned the medical cartel trillions of dollars.
We begin the story with an “outbreak.” Somewhere on Earth, we are told there is a cluster of unusual cases of illness.
The
key word is “unusual.” Otherwise, who would care? People would instead
say, “Forty people in Wuhan have lung congestion.” And that would spark
no interest.
In
Wuhan, it was “unusual pneumonia.” How so? No convincing answer. Some
people have cited a “ground glass” appearance in pictures of patients’
lungs. Meaning gray areas, or opacity. Another claim: patients had
extreme shortness of breath.
But opacity and shortness of breath were mentioned and described in medical literature long before COVID.
Something
else must be offered, to justify the term “unusual cases.” And we get
it almost immediately, while we’re still trying to figure out what makes
these patients’ illness new and different:
It’s a virus. A never-before-seen virus.
Already
a switcheroo is in progress. There is actually nothing unusual in the
Wuhan cluster of cases. And just as we’re about to realize that, we’re
hit with “new virus.” And then we forget there was no reason to look for
a new virus in the first place.
Deadly
air pollution has been hanging over Wuhan for a long time. It explains
all sorts of lung infections, including pneumonia, the cardinal COVID
symptom. And by the way, roughly 300,000 people in China die every year
from pneumonia.
The
“new virus” is trumpeted. But of course, as I’ve demonstrated many
times, it hasn’t actually been found. No one isolated it. The so-called
genetic sequencing of it was a fictional castle in the air based on
supposition. How could it be otherwise? No one has an isolated and
purified specimen of the virus that can be analyzed.
Accepting
“new virus” as fact produces this situation: a list of very familiar
clinical symptoms can now be called unique, because the cause is unique.
Suddenly,
cough, chills, fever, fatigue, congestion, shortness of breath---which
have been called flu, or just infection, or other names---are
COVID. That’s the big switcheroo.
Next
step: provide a diagnostic test for “the virus” that would
automatically spit out false-positives like water from a
firehouse. That’s the PCR. I’ve taken the PCR apart six ways from Sunday
and exposed it as a fraud.
With
the PCR in hand, the switcheroo is deepened. That list of familiar
illness symptoms---taken together with the test---paints the picture of
millions of cases of a “new plague.”
All
this fabrication is on the order of---“Hey, Jim, sales of our widget
number 6 are in the toilet. What can we do? Unless…let’s call it widget
number 7, put it in a new box…”
People say, “But there ARE mysterious COVID cases that can’t be explained away as repackaged lung infections…”
Of
course there are. When you make the net big enough, it will sweep in
groups of cases that seem to defy explanation. But when you move in
close enough, you discover a variety of factors that cause illness and
death. New poisonous vaccination campaigns, toxic pesticides, lagoons of
feces in giant pig factory-farms, opioid drugs; even various
electromagnetic technologies.
I first caught on to the switcheroo in 1987, when I was doing research for my first book, AIDS INC. Scientists
in Africa were investigating a “new” outbreak among people who,
“incidentally,” were suffering from protein-calorie malnutrition,
hunger, and starvation.
The
scientists, cheap con artists that they were, called this “wasting
syndrome,” then “Slim disease,” and finally “AIDS.” They announced the
cause was HIV---a virus no one had isolated.
And
lurking in the background, if you needed another cause of illness and
death, there was the infamous World Health Organization mass
smallpox-vaccination campaign in Africa, one of the most dangerous mass
medical experiments ever carried out on a population. That campaign had
wrapped up injecting millions of people several years before “the
discovery of AIDS.”
The
campaign was so dangerous that, at a secret WHO meeting in Geneva, a
decision was made never to use that vaccine again, because it had caused
smallpox (or something that looked like it).
In
1987, I combed through volumes of medical journals at the UCLA bio-med
library, and discovered that the single most prevalent cause of T-cell
depletion (“AIDS”) in the world is MALNUTRITION.
In
Africa, malnutrition, hunger, starvation, contaminated water supplies,
lack of basic sanitation, toxic vaccines, grinding poverty, war, fertile
farm land stolen from the people by major agricultural corporations,
toxic medical drugs…were all repackaged as a new disease caused by a new
virus, HIV.
I
then went on to study every so-called high-risk group for AIDS. I found
that in each group, all the “AIDS symptoms” could be explained by
non-viral causes.
At
that point, I realized I was looking at a classic
intelligence-agency-type covert operation, applied within the medical
universe. The virus was the cover story. It was being use to hide
ongoing government and corporate crimes. For example---forced
starvation.
A con is a con.
Only the disease-names are changed, to protect the guilty.
With
COVID, you must also consider the following: an extraordinarily high
percentage of cases and deaths are occurring in people over the age of
65. The elderly. Many of these people are living in nursing homes and
other long-term care facilities.
IB
Times, 7/27/20: “New research from the Kaiser Family Foundation has
indicated that while adults 65 and older only account for 16% of the
U.S. population, they make up 80% of COVID-19 deaths.”
CDC, May 14, 2021: “8 out 10 COVID-19 deaths reported in the US have been in adults 65 years old and older.”
Why are these older people dying?
Because
they have long-standing serious health problems. And for years, even
decades, they’ve been treated with an array of toxic medical drugs.
Then, in 2020, they’re terrified they might be diagnosed with COVID. And then they ARE diagnosed. Which ramps up their terror.
On
top of all of this, they’re neglected by nursing home staffs, even
handled brutally in some cases. They’re isolated “because of COVID,”
imprisoned, cut off from family and friends. They’re alone.
So they give up and fold up and die.
No virus required as an explanation.
In
a large study of New York state hospitals, it was discovered that
people over the age of 65 who were diagnosed with COVID, and put on
breathing ventilators, died at the rate of 97.2 percent.
No
matter what the prior condition of the patient, any treatment that has a
death rate of 97.2 percent must be discontinued at once. But it wasn’t
discontinued. It still goes on. This amounts to murder.
“People are dying, it must be the virus.” No. Wrong.
There is no “it.” People dying from various causes are fictionally brought under one umbrella, called COVID-19.
This is titanic fraud, tragedy, mass murder---murder compounded many times by the destructive vaccine, aka genetic treatment.
It didn’t originate in a lab in Wuhan.
But the story that it did originate there cements the premise, in many minds, that we are dealing with a virus.
Quite convenient.
The Wuhan lab, intentionally or unintentionally, becomes a cover story that obscures the truth.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment