3174-3176: Dear Everyone Regarding The "Shit Storm" from Lincoln CountyWatch
By Anna Von Reitz
There was never any reason for a second Declaration of Independence. The first one did a masterful job and it still stands today.
Any presumption otherwise was brought forward because of a false claim made by agents of the central banks, and so, Teri and others joined together to reply to the nonsense being pushed by the bankers who were at that time trying to claim that our Government no longer existed and all our assets were subject to "claim on abandonment" by the Creditors of the US CORP. They returned their answer exactly as Teri Hinkle describes; I was present and heard the debates and the acrimony with Tim Turner and RuSA over the whole thing.
And I was shaking my head through the whole thing, too.
U.S. Citizens can't speak for Americans--- even if they were born and raised in America, their registered political status prevents them from having lawful standing under international law. At most they have a limited legal custodial interest in specific properties.
The actual issue was decided many years prior to the flap in 2012, and all that was really necessary was to remind the High Courts of that fact.
Which we did.
What nobody grasped then, and what you are still failing to grasp now, is that the Constitutions are still intact, The Declaration of Independence (original) is still intact, even The Articles of Confederation are still intact.
What has changed is your own political status. You have been registered as a Brit, and as a Brit, you have no rights as an American.
It's like when you are sitting still in an automatic car wash and it seems that your car is moving when it's not.
You all assume that you are Americans and counted as Americans because you were born here, but shortly after you were born, you were "seized upon" and unlawfully converted via the birth registration process into a "U.S. Citizen" --- a dependent of the British Territorial Government.
So nothing that you have ever done and nothing that you are doing with your "Jural Handbooks" and your "Nation States Project" or anything else has ever had the actual desired effect.
British Territorial Subjects can natter all day long and still never have any legal or lawful standing with respect to our land and soil jurisdiction--and never had anything but limited and enumerated delegated powers at sea.
The "Shitstorm" has come and gone. The actual work was accomplished despite all the handicaps. It's over.
We won.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Dear Mr. Putin -- Acknowledging the Security Council Debate
By Anna Von Reitz
We were touched but also dismayed by recent reports that the Security Council was discussing our situation and that you, Mr. Putin, were even suggesting armed intervention.
Our unincorporated Federation of States has several venerable international treaties with Russia, which have always been upheld by both sides, and which cannot be removed absent a new treaty with our Federation.
These mutual assistance treaties do in fact require Russia to act on our behalf in the event that we are unable to bulwark our own efforts or held to such a disadvantage that our national sovereignty is imperiled. We thank you, and we remember those several occasions when Russia alone among the nations came to our assistance. We are not ungrateful.
It is in fact the existence of these treaties and bonds which have lasted through multiple generations that have been the focus of evil men seeking to demonize Russia for befriending the American Government and holding "the US" in well-earned suspicion.
The entire Russian Collusion witch hunt brewed up against Donald Trump is only the most recent chapter of a long history of British guile and efforts to palm off blame for its own collusion with China. We understand.
We acknowledge the debate in the Security Council and also acknowledge the treaty obligations underlying it; however, our national sovereignty has weathered the worst threats against it, and though there are numerous issues yet to be resolved, we feel confident and competent overall to resolve these under our own steam.
We have chartered the largest International Trade Bank in a hundred years, and recalling the proper structure for the banks, we have also chartered a wholly-owned subsidiary commercial bank for it. Both stand under our Public International Law. As these measures bear fruit and sanity returns to the world under a new banking paradigm, we believe that all nations will benefit ---including Russia.
Any armed intervention at this point would only serve to bulwark and assist the network of international criminal interests collectively known as "the Cabal" ---and having suffered the slings and arrows of this institutionalized crime syndicate as much as any other nation, we doubt that Russia would desire that outcome.
There are so many better things to do and to think about.
Rather, we, the Americans, feel that it would be best to bring political pressure to bear on the Bank of International Settlements to delay enforcement of its Basel 3 provisions long enough to deploy the International Trade Bank safety net that will be needed to avoid widespread genocide due to disruption of commodity supply lines and lack of cash-value currency.
The more fanatical elements may not be pleased by our actions, but the vast bulk of the living people and their national governments will be happy--and safe, prosperous, and at peace.
The bad ideas of the past must not be allowed to intrude upon the future, Mr. Putin. So far as we are concerned, the bankers have sung their last refrain, and a new banking system is on the way. This, among many other positive developments, is no cause for fear or violence.
It's time to celebrate instead
by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
----------------------------
See this article and over 3100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
What's the Purpose of a State Assembly?
By Anna Von Reitz
Today I was asked, "What's the real purpose and role of a State Assembly? There are already at least two District Assemblies in place. Why do we need another assembly?"
Short answer --- there are fundamental differences between a State Assembly and any form of District Assembly.
They operate in different jurisdictions.
They represent different populations.
They serve different purposes.
The purpose of a State Assembly is to protect the people who live within the borders of their State, to protect the assets of those people, and preserve their birthright as Americans. The further purpose of a State Assembly is to uphold and enforce the Public Law --- including enforcement of the Federal Constitutions.
State Assemblies are supposed to make all major decisions about State-owned property and resources, to form the fundamental nexus of the American Government in international jurisdiction, to educate new generations of Americans about their own history and government, and do all the other things necessary to preserve our government of, for, and by the living people of this country, complete with its bottom-up power structure, and it's daunting responsibility to self-govern.
Now, actual, properly defined, and fully functioning State Assemblies haven't been in Session for a long time. As a result, some of their responsibilities have been shuffled off and undertaken by District Assemblies acting as custodians of State Trusts---- but District Assemblies are not really empowered to act in these capacities, and it is our responsibility to carry our own water.
As you look around, you will see that our courthouses (for example) are occupied by foreign courts --- federally-connected courts of strictly limited jurisdiction, allowed to exist on our shores by constitutional contract. Our State Courts are supposed to be occupying our court buildings, but are nowhere to be found.
As this example demonstrates, it isn't that the foreign courts are prohibited, but they shouldn't be the primary occupants of our court buildings. Everything is upside down. The guests are acting "as" the landlords, and the landlords are acting as the guests.
Our Courts simply haven't been in Session, because our State Assemblies haven't been in Session, and they haven't been in Session for so long that our employees have forgotten who we are and what our role is.
It's up to us to remind them. And ourselves, if necessary.
When you encounter a "District Assembly" the first question in your mind should be --- what kind of district? A Military (Territorial) District? A Municipal District? Some other outpost of the District of Columbia?
These are foreign entities. They are not part of our State and are not pretending to be. Like the foreign federally connected courts of limited jurisdiction called "District Courts" and "State of State Courts", the district employees and dependents are allowed to be here among us, by contract, but their assemblies are not our assemblies.
They have no responsibility to preserve the American birthright for us, and they equally have no obligation to uphold our Public Law for us. They have to adhere to the Public Policies and Codes, Rules, Regulations, and Statutes of the foreign corporations that employ them, but this is private law, not Public Law.
As Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc., makes abundantly clear, enforcement of the Constitutions is entirely a matter of personal choice and "discretion" for district employees and franchisees who subjugate themselves to foreign private law.
Enforcement of the Constitutions instead falls to us, the members of the State Assembly, and particularly to State Citizens.
So, if you are wondering why your constitutional guarantees aren't being honored, search no farther. It's because your State Assemblies haven't been in Session and your State Courts haven't been in Session, either. The State Citizens and State Assemblies who are Parties to the Constitutions have been "absent" --- "missing" --- "in interregnum" --- "presumed dead" --- "lost at sea".
All this confusion, all this corruption, all this flat-footed enforcement of foreign law on Americans, all the craziness--- is because you, Joe Q., haven't been doing your Public Duty and we as Americans haven't booted up our properly declared and constituted State Assemblies into Session since the 1860's.
So what is the purpose of a State Assembly? To operate the American Government, to enforce the Constitutions, to uphold the Public Law, to preserve the birthrights of each and every American. We hold the Public Power and the Public Duty, but it has seldom been exercised in the past hundred years.
And that, people, is the biggest problem with this country. Too many of us have forgotten who we are and what our duty is and what the purpose of a State Assembly is.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment