I
covered the Zika outbreak extensively in 2016. It was yet another
fraud, and it collapsed under the weight of warnings to women to avoid
pregnancy. Women wouldn’t obey in great enough numbers.
Basically,
the official position was: an outbreak of microcephaly was occurring,
worldwide, starting in Brazil. Babies were being born with smaller heads
and brain damage. The cause was the Zika virus, carried by
mosquitoes.
When
I was exposing the lies, in 2016, I wasn’t questioning the existence of
the Zika virus. Now, in 2021, I would be demanding proof that the virus
had actually been isolated.
Here
are excerpts from the many articles I wrote during the “Zika
crisis”. There is more, much more to the story, but what I’m publishing
here is enough to reveal the standard pattern of pandemic ops: pretend
the “medical condition” is entirely the result of a germ; fake the exact
cause; cover up ongoing government/corporate crimes.
EXCERPT ONE, 2016: There is no convincing evidence the Zika virus causes the birth defect called microcephaly.
Basically,
Brazilian researchers, in the heart of the purported “microcephaly
epidemic,” decided to stop their own investigation and simply assert
Zika was the culprit. At that point, they claimed that, out of 854 cases
of microcephaly, only 97 showed “some relationship” to Zika.
You
need to understand that these figures actually show evidence AGAINST
the Zika virus as the cause. When researchers are trying to find the
cause of a condition, they should be able to establish, as a first step,
that the cause is present in all cases (or certainly an overwhelming
percentage).
This never happened. The correlation between the presence of Zika virus and microcephaly was very, very weak.
As
a second vital step, researchers should be able to show that the
causative virus is, in every case, present in large amounts in the body.
Otherwise, there is not enough of it to create harm. MERE PRESENCE OF
THE VIRUS IS NOT ENOUGH. With Zika, proof it was present in
microcephaly-babies in large amounts has never been established.
But
researchers pressed on. A touted study in the New England Journal of
Medicine claimed Zika infected brain cells in the lab. IRRELEVANT. Cells
in labs are not human beings. The study also stated that Zika infected
baby mice. IRRELEVANT. Mice are not humans. And these mice in the lab
had been specially altered or bred to be “vulnerable to Zika.” USELESS
AND IRRELEVANT.
EXCERPT
TWO, 2016: Millions of bees have just died in South Carolina, because
Dorchester County officials decided to attack Zika mosquitoes from the
air, from planes, with a pesticide called Naled.
The
Washington Post reports, in an article headlined: “‘Like it’s been
nuked’: Millions of bees dead after South Carolina sprays for Zika
mosquitoes.”
“The
county acknowledged the bee deaths Tuesday. ‘Dorchester County is aware
that some beekeepers in the area that was sprayed on Sunday lost their
beehives,’ Jason Ward, county administrator, said in a news release. He
added, according to the Charleston Post and Courier, ‘I am not pleased
that so many bees were killed.’”
That’s the highest degree of outrage County Administrator Ward can muster? He’s not pleased?
If
you want to dig further, you can discover that, despite assurances to
the contrary, Naled, like other toxic organophosphate pesticides, harms
humans as well. Organophosphates are neurotoxins. The original research
was done in Germany, in the hunt for nerve-agent weapons.
And how about this? The cure for the problem causes the problem…
Naled, the organophosphate pesticide now being sprayed on Miami to kill “Zika mosquitoes,” has dire effects.
Reference:
a 2014 study, “Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential
proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study.” [Environmental
Health Perspectives, 2014 Oct;122(10):1103-9.]
Key quotes from the study:
“Gestational exposure to several common agricultural pesticides can induce developmental neurotoxicity in humans, and has been associated with developmental delay and autism.” [Emphasis added]
“We
evaluated whether residential proximity to agricultural pesticides
during pregnancy is associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or
developmental delay (DD)…”
“Approximately
one-third of CHARGE study mothers lived, during pregnancy, within 1.5
km (just under 1 mile) of an agricultural pesticide application.
Proximity to organophosphates at some point during gestation was
associated with a 60% increased risk for ASD [Autism Spectrum
Disorders], higher for third-trimester exposures…and second-trimester
chlorpyrifos [an organophosphate pesticide] applications…”
“This
study of ASD strengthens the evidence linking neurodevelopmental
disorders with gestational pesticide exposures, particularly
organophosphates…”
The pesticide spraying affects pregnant mothers by raising the risk of neurological damage to their babies.
EXCERPT THREE: Here’s an “oops” Zika revelation:
“New doubts on Zika as cause of microcephaly.” ScienceDaily, 24 June 2016.
Source: New England Complex Systems Institute
“Brazil’s
microcephaly epidemic continues to pose a mystery — if Zika is the
culprit, why are there no similar epidemics in other countries also hit
hard by the virus? In Brazil, the microcephaly rate soared with more
than 1,500 confirmed cases. But in Colombia, a recent study of nearly
12,000 pregnant women infected with Zika found zero microcephaly cases.
If Zika is to blame for microcephaly, where are the missing cases?”
FOUR:
It makes far more sense to listen to what South American doctors are
saying about the areas where birth defects are occurring. These would be
doctors who actually care about what is destroying lives and the lives
that are being destroyed.
We
have such reports passed along to us, thanks to Claire Robinson of GM
Watch. She is one of those people who still makes the profession of
journalism mean something.
Here
are quotes from her most recent article, “Argentine and Brazilian
doctors name larvicide as potential cause of microcephaly.”
“A
report from the Argentine doctors’ organisation, Physicians in the
Crop-Sprayed Towns, challenges the theory that the Zika virus epidemic
in Brazil is the cause of the increase in the birth defect microcephaly
among newborns.”
“The
increase in this birth defect, in which the baby is born with an
abnormally small head and often has brain damage, was quickly linked to
the Zika virus by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. However, according
to the Physicians in the Crop-Sprayed Towns, the Ministry failed to
recognise that in the area where most sick people live, a chemical
larvicide [pesticide] that produces malformations in mosquitoes was introduced into the drinking water supply in 2014.
This poison, Pyriproxyfen, is used in a State-controlled programme
aimed at eradicating disease-carrying mosquitoes.” [Emphasis added]
“The
Physicians added that the Pyriproxyfen is manufactured by Sumitomo
Chemical, a Japanese ‘strategic partner’ of Monsanto. Pyriproxyfen is a
growth inhibitor of mosquito larvae, which alters the development
process from larva to pupa to adult, thus generating malformations in
developing mosquitoes and killing or disabling them. It acts as an
insect juvenile hormone or juvenoid, and has the effect of inhibiting
the development of adult insect characteristics (for example, wings and
mature external genitalia) and reproductive development. It is an
endocrine disruptor and is teratogenic (causes birth defects).”
“The
Argentine Physicians commented: ‘Malformations detected in thousands of
children from pregnant women living in areas where the Brazilian state
added Pyriproxyfen to drinking water are not a coincidence, even though
the Ministry of Health places a direct blame on the Zika virus for this
damage.’”
“They
also noted that Zika has traditionally been held to be a relatively
benign disease that has never before been associated with birth defects,
even in areas where it infects 75% of the population.”
“…The
Argentine Physicians’ report…concurs with the findings of a separate
report on the Zika outbreak by the Brazilian doctors’ and public health
researchers’ organisation, Abrasco.”
“Abrasco
also names Pyriproxyfen as a likely cause of the microcephaly. It
condemns the strategy of chemical control of Zika-carrying mosquitoes,
which it says is contaminating the environment as well as people and is
not decreasing the numbers of mosquitoes. Abrasco suggests that this
strategy is in fact driven by the commercial interests of the chemical
industry, which it says is deeply integrated into the Latin American
ministries of health, as well as the World Health Organization and the
Pan American Health Organisation.”
“Abrasco
names the British GM insect company Oxitec as part of the corporate
lobby that is distorting the facts about Zika to suit its own
profit-making agenda. Oxitec sells GM mosquitoes engineered for
sterility and markets them as a disease-combatting product – a strategy
condemned by the Argentine Physicians as ‘a total failure, except for
the company supplying mosquitoes’.”
“…Abrasco
added that the disease [microcephaly, other birth defects] is closely
linked to environmental degradation: floods caused by logging and the
massive use of herbicides on (GM) herbicide-tolerant soy crops – in
short, ‘the impacts of extractive industries’.”
FIVE:
In a recent greenmedinfo article---“What is the Zika Virus Epidemic
Covering Up?” by Jagannath Chatterjee---the author traces other
Gates-Brazil connections. For example:
“While
investigating the procedures directed at pregnant women in the year
2015, shocking facts emerged. Acting as per a WHO [World Health
Organization] decision to inject pregnant women with vaccines despite
contraindications the Brazilian Government had allowed its pregnant
women to become the equivalent of guinea pigs. Besides the tetanus
vaccines (provided as Diphtheria Tetanus vaccines), the women had also
received the Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccine in pregnancy. What is
worse a DTaP vaccine was mandated for pregnant women in 2014. Citing a
shortage of the DTaP vaccine the highly reactive [dangerous] DTP vaccine
was also administered. Clearly huge risks had been inflicted on the
unsuspecting women. None of these vaccines are known to be safe during
pregnancy and the MMR and the DaPT/DPT vaccines are lapses that cannot
be condoned. The rubella virus in the MMR vaccine and the pertussis
component in the DPT vaccine are known to cause microcephaly…”
“The DTaP vaccine initiative to vaccinate pregnant women was financed by BMGF [Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation] funds…”
SIX:
For example, every year in the US, there are 25,000 cases of
microcephaly. And the literature is very clear about causes: any insult
to the fetal brain during pregnancy can result in microcephaly. Severe
malnutrition, falling down stairs, a blow to the stomach, a toxic street
drug or medical drug or vaccine or pesticide, and so on.
SEVEN:
For science bloggers who live in mommy’s basement and love the
statements of the experts, try this. I’ll give you the full citation.
Ready?
“Practice
Parameter: Evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based
review)”; Neurology 2009 Sep 15; 73(11) 887-897; Report of the Quality
Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the
Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.
Here’s the money quote:
“Microcephaly
may result from any insult that disturbs early brain growth…Annually,
approximately 25,000 infants in the United States will be diagnosed with
microcephaly…”
Bang.
Let me take apart that quote. Microcephaly can result from any early insult to the brain. Any.
That
could mean a highly toxic pesticide, for example. It could mean severe
and prolonged malnutrition of the mother. It could mean a toxic
substance injected into the mother---a street drug or a vaccine. It
could mean a physical blow. It could mean a mother’s chronic high fever.
And so on.
Moving
on: 25,000 cases, not just once, but every year in the US, means what?
Christopher Columbus actually brought the Zika virus to America in 1492,
and it lay dormant for a very long time and then, in the modern age,
exploded on the scene in the US?
No.
25,000 cases a year in the US means we’re being treated to an
unsupported major bullshit story right now about the Zika virus.
That’s what it means.
EIGHT:
Now we have a January 27, 2016, Associated Press story out of Rio,
published in SFGate: “270 of 4,180 suspected microcephaly cases
confirmed.” That’s called a clue, in case you’re wondering. Of the
previously touted 4,180 cases of microcephaly in Brazil, the actual
number of confirmed cases so far is, well, only 270. Bang.
But
wait, there’s more. AP: “Brazilian officials said the babies with the
defect [microcephaly] and their mothers are being tested to see if they
had been infected. Six of the 270 confirmed microcephaly cases were
found to have the [Zika] virus.”
Bang,
bang, bang. Out of all the microcephaly cases re-examined in Brazil,
only six have the Zika virus. That constitutes zero proof that Zika has
anything to do with microcephaly.
---end of my excerpts from 2016---
Getting the picture?
In 2015-16, the World Health Organization and the press whiffed on the Zika virus-microcephaly hustle.
But they re-grouped, analyzed their mistakes, and prepared a wall-to-wall messaging campaign for the next fake pandemic.
China would provide the model:
LOCKDOWNS.
House arrest of a major percentage of the global population. Economic devastation.
COVID.
As I’ve been demonstrating for the past year, the COVID story is as full of holes as Zika.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment