This article is part of a current series of pieces I’m posting---with the purpose of exposing the PCR fraud.
The
war against humanity relies on this test. If the test falls, the whole
official COVID narrative dissolves in front of our eyes.
You can perform a valuable service by spreading this information far and wide.
NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”
“Dr.
Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center,
could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the
hospital were coughing…”
“For
months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a
huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000
health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a
preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in;
142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the
disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for
protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some
in intensive care.”
“Then,
about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to
receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing
them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”
“Now,
as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious
disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith
in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them
astray.”
“There
are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on
such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns
Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care
Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all
the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest, but it was
by no means an exception, she said.”
“Many
of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding,
and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called
‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good
estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false
positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested,
as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is
an epidemic.”
“’You’re
in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests,
said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief
scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a
nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”
“With
pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100
different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the
country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have
had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of
P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger
added.”
“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”
“’The
big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’
Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even
more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”
TAKEAWAY
FROM THE TIMES: No large study validating the uniformity of PCR
results, from lab to lab, has ever been done. At least a dozen very
large studies should have checked for uniform results, before unleashing
the PCR on the public; but no, this was not the case. It is still not
the case. Also, the extreme sensitivity of the test causes MANY
false-positives.
Now
imagine the scandalous information in this NY Times article appearing
everywhere---on social media, blogs, websites, etc. It would be terrible
for Bill Gates, Fauci, and other great leaders in the Holy Church of
Biological Mysticism.
Political
leaders and public health experts would have, on their hands, a major
refutation of their whole narrative about the “deadly pandemic.”
Do something. Spread this information.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
No comments:
Post a Comment