As
my readers know, I’ve spent the last year refuting every so-called
COVID fact promoted by public health officials---including the false
notion that SARS-CoV-2 has been proven to exist.
In
this article, I’m simply showing that devotees of the Cult of COVID are
contradicting their own assumptions. For purposes of argument only,
we’ll assume the virus exists, spreads rapidly, and causes illness.
If so, lockdowns don’t work.
This is shown by reports from almost every nation in the world. The longer the lockdowns, the greater the number of COVID cases.
The virus is unstoppable. It travels to all corners of the globe at lightning speed.
Conclusion? The
only way to achieve herd immunity is to have the whole population of
the planet live and work out in the open, fight through the pandemic,
and eventually win.
That’s the inference to draw, once you accept the mainstream view of the virus and the pandemic.
But
of course, opening up the world is not the conclusion of the experts or
the political leaders. They take the opposite view: more lockdowns.
They’re acting against their own “science.”
Why?
Obviously,
because they want to imprison populations, destroy lives and
economies. Or, at the very least, they’re going along with the people
who want to.
What
about the vaccine as a method of inducing herd immunity? We’re already
hearing about a second mutated strain of the COVID virus. If there are
two strains, there will certainly be more. Many more. This sets up an
analog to the flu vaccine: a new version every year, with the hope of
predicting the latest mutation.
How
is that working for the flu? Is it producing anything faintly
resembling herd immunity? Far from it. Public health agencies report a
BILLION cases of the flu each and every year, worldwide. Could the
protective effects of the vaccine be any weaker?
Note:
Has anyone recommended locking down the planet because of the flu? Of
course not. A billion cases a year are just “what we have to live with.”
Why not adopt the same strategy for COVID?
Public officials should be demanding an end to lockdowns.
Dr.
Scott Atlas, former White House coronavirus advisor: “We know the
lockdowns don’t work, they do not eliminate the virus, we see it all
over the world. We have 80% of people in the US wearing masks, we have
all these various levels of restrictions on businesses, on in-person
schools, and the virus is not eliminated by that.”
Researchers
Sunetra Gupta (Oxford University), Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford
University), Martin Kildorff (Harvard): “Current lockdown policies are
producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”
Dr.
John Ioannidis, professor of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population
Health, and of Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics at Stanford
University, responding to a question about laying on lockdowns in
Greece: “It would be a devastating mistake to do so and it will run the
risk of severely damaging and crippling the country.”
The
Lancet, July 21, 2020: “…government actions such as border closures,
full lockdowns, and a high rate of COVID-19 testing were not associated
with statistically significant reductions in the number of critical
cases or overall mortality,”
2006
paper in Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, “Disease Mitigation Measures in
the Control of Pandemic Influenza” by Thomas V. Inglesby, Jennifer B.
Nuzzo, Tara O’Toole, and D.A. Henderson. The authors conclude: “There
are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the
confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for
extended periods in order to slow the spread of influenza.”
This
is a just a sprinkling of mainstream references from a much larger
trove, indicating that lockdowns are harmful and don’t work.
Well, they work when a police state is the goal.
The
conventional mainstream scientific view of the virus and its ability to
spread inevitably leads to the conclusion: stopping it through
lockdowns is like trying to keep water out of a forest.
“Well,
if we build a canopy above all the trees, if we wrap each tree in
layers of plastic, if we install underground suction pumps every six
feet, if we spray chemicals in the sky to disperse cloud formation, if
we drain every brook and stream, if we build dams in the mountains to
keep the melting snow contained…we’ll still fail.”
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.) 
No comments:
Post a Comment