2736: Correction to correction. from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
It
is apparent that the purveyors of iDeed and the Independent Living
Being identification system are either unaware of or being deliberately
obtuse about the effects of copyrighting.
We
have just gone through a period of our history where identity theft and
impersonation have both been accomplished via copyright and patent and
trademark infringement and “name capture”.
It
would be stupid of us to fall back into any similar situation or
scheme, despite the apparent goodwill and idealism of those promoting
iDeed.
It
is necessary for the promoters of these systems and products to
explicitly and contractually and in every case fully disclose all
results of using their system to identify private property and to
explicitly, contractually forego all rights, claims, and interest in the
names and other data of their clients.
The
lack of such disclaimer indicates that this system could be misused and
abused in the future in exactly the same way that the birth
certification process has been used to latch on to the names and other
private property interests of Americans and we do not propose to have
any more of that going on.
We
also don’t propose to promote any other or fundamentally different kind
of government. We are here to lawfully and peacefully restore the
American Government. As a public effort and entity our Government is
fundamentally different and set apart from the many private enterprises
that contribute goods and services to our government.
Not
understanding and recognizing the difference between public and private
endeavors has led to the present problems we all face in this country,
so we are again bound to remind everyone that private copyrighted
materials are private and do not pertain to our public purposes.
The
American Government has no association with iDeed and the use or
non-use of iDeed products by individuals must be understood as a private
and individual product or service purchase on a work-for-hire basis and
not part of any government program.
The
American Government is providing its people with valid, official
credentials for identification purposes and is maintaining a public data
base for the protection of individual property rights and assets.
This
is not a private enterprise and any private enterprise that latches
anyone’s name or other intellectual property so as to incorporate it in
any private business held under any private copyrights or charters, is
merely a repeat of what the British Crown Corporation has done in
violation of both international law and our Public Law.
IDeed
would do well to appropriately and officially define exactly what it’s
terms of service and ownership interests, if any, are.
The
promoters and users of this system should also realize that their
private system is not a replacement for public protection of
intellectual assets.
IDeed
is not a government. It’s a private corporation and incorporated
business enterprise. I said what I said and I meant what I said and I
am not feeble-minded or mistaken about the implications and possible
abuses of what iDeed is doing.
I
find it necessary to remind everyone of the jurisdictional issues
involved and also to remind iDeed that full disclosure is a requirement
of all valid contracts on land.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment