Millions of masked people, who border on hysteria, believe they know COVID science.
On
closer examination, these people believe what their television sets
tell them. They believe Fauci because he's on television, and he's
talking from the White House, and he disagrees with Trump. These
elements are not exactly what Galileo had in mind when he challenged the
Roman Church on the issue of the Earth revolving around the sun.
Of
the millions who believe in Fauci television science, there are many
who will say science is "studies." They are quite sure these studies
back up what Fauci and Redfield are spouting, and any contradictory
studies would be artifacts dreamed up by secret minions of Trump. This
sort of argument is not exactly what Galileo had in mind, either.
I recently analyzed COVID-19 from the point of view of false data.
COVID
case numbers and death numbers are being fraudulently inflated to the
skies. That's an enormous crime, because the lockdowns and the economic
devastation have been based on these data.
Now I want to apply that same direct analysis to the entire US medical system. In this instance...
True data are buried, hidden, and ignored.
What data? Actual numbers of deaths and maiming CAUSED by medical treatment.
When
you see the dimensions of this crime and this mass human tragedy,
you'll also see further implications---titanic insurance fraud, tax
fraud, and, indeed, millions upon millions of work-hours irretrievably
lost to the nation's economy.
Insurance companies are paying out billions of dollars for medical treatment that is destructive, not helpful.
Insurance companies are also paying billions in death benefits as a result of doctors, not diseases, killing people.
And all this medical destruction is being subsidized by the taxpayer.
No one has calculated the $$ cost. No one can calculate the tragic human cost.
Now here is the analysis. Understand that the vital data in these mainstream reports have been briefly revealed, then hidden.
ONE:
"The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs." The
author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the
2013 recipient of ASA's [American Sociological Association's]
Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a
founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of
Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for
Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford
University.
Donald Light: "Epidemiologically, appropriately
prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death,
tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States.
About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the
United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20
times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls,
road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems
such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity
or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from
overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these
figures." (ASA publication, "Footnotes," November 2014)
TWO:
Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: "Incidence
of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients."
The authors,
led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in
hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were
admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors
had given them, met the following fate:
Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.
Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The
authors write: "...Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which
excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that
there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly
prescribed and administered."
So this study had nothing to do
with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And
it only counted people killed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn't
begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as
consequence of the drugs, at home.
THREE: July 26, 2000, Journal
of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield,
revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public
Health; "Is US health really the best in the world?"
Starfield
reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year.
106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a
result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers
to a decade: that's 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that
last number again.
I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her
whether she was aware of any overall effort by the US government to
eliminate this holocaust. She answered a resounding NO. She also said
her estimate of medically caused deaths in America was on the
conservative side.
FOUR: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989).
Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for
Safe Medication Practices: "It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011
prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in
the US experiencing 'serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including
128,000 deaths.'"
The report called this "one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity."
The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA's own database of "serious adverse [medical-drug] events."
Therefore,
to say the FDA isn't aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA
knows. The FDA knows and it isn't saying anything about it, because the
FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are
routinely maiming and killing Americans. Every public health agency
knows the truth.
FIVE: None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.
The US system for reporting severe adverse effects of vaccines is broken.
Barbara Loe Fisher, of the private National Vaccine Information Center, has put together a reasonable analysis:
"But
how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it
really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently
disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler
observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse
events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, 'Introducing
MEDWatch,' JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]"
"There have been
estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report
hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems
following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal
sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no
consequences."
"Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made
to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS]; parents as well
as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, 'Vaccine
safety,' Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]"
"However, if that
number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then
the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events [per year]. If
doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said
they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1
percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million
vaccine-adverse events annually."
Medical crimes.
Medically caused deaths of friends, family members, loved ones, who are buried along with the truth.
No criminal investigations, no prosecutions, no guilty verdicts, no prison sentences.
But of course, you can believe everything leading lights of the US medical system tell you about COVID.
You can believe everything the press---who buries the truth about this medical holocaust---tells you about COVID.
Given the reports on medically caused death and maiming I've just cited and described in this article, it's obvious that...
Leading medical journals around the world, which routinely publish glowing accounts of clinical trials of medical drugs...
Are spilling over with rank fraud, on page after page.
Indeed,
here is a stunning quote from a woman who has quite probably read and
analyzed more medical-drug studies than any doctor in the world:
"It
is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research
that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or
authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion,
which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor
of The New England Journal of Medicine." (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review
of Books, January 15, 2009, "Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of
Corruption)
Compare that quote with one from "the father of COVID
science," Tony Fauci. In an interview with the National Geographic,
Fauci stated: "Anybody can claim to be an expert even when they have no
idea what they're talking about...If something is published in places
like New England Journal of Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or
JAMA---you know, generally that is quite well peer-reviewed because the
editors and the editorial staff of those journals really take things
very seriously."
Sure, Tony, sure.
Now put on your mask and get lost.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment