COVID: Major case filed against Ohio governor and the state of Ohio for restricting freedom without legitimate justification
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) |
Ohio
attorney, Thomas Renz, on behalf of plaintiffs, has filed a case
against the state of Ohio and Governor Mike DeWine. Renz is asking for a
jury trial.
This case, in the current climate, should provoke
intense interest from the public, and from every lawyer within hailing
distance.
Here is the impressive opening salvo in the court filing:
"In
recent months, entire states have been imprisoned without due process
and with the clear threat to impose such lockdowns again, interstate
travel has been severely restricted, privacy rights have been
devastated, numerous business takings without compensation, and many
regulations being implemented without statutory process requirements
under the guise of a health emergency that is roughly as dangerous as a
seasonal influenza outbreak. The plaintiffs in this case have all been
injured in various capacities by these unconstitutional actions, and
without action by the Court, will be left without redress. More
terrifying, without action by the Court, the Court will be setting
future precedent that will allow states to withhold fundamental
Constitutional rights, in violation of US Supreme Court precedent,
circumventing the various levels of scrutiny applied to such rights, and
justify such actions under public health emergency orders without
subjecting those orders to any real review---just trust the bureaucrats
because they are the experts."
Here is the most important point:
"We humbly ask the Court in this case to...Recognize that the political
process and operative orders are invalid if based on false or misleading
information... and recognize the criticality that all future emergency
orders be based and maintained on clear, honest facts---particularly
when such orders are infringing on Constitutional rights."
In other words, a declared State of Emergency cannot stand on the mere basis of arbitrary edict.
Facts matter. Actual science matters. Reasons why an Emergency is declared matter.
People
can't be locked down and restrained from earning a living and having
contact with other humans simply because a state authority decides to
issue such orders.
If this case goes to trial, the door will open to the presentation of fact and science.
Attorney Renz, for the plaintiffs, is well aware of this, and his filing is studded with bold and accurate claims of fact:
"According
to recent data from the Ohio COVID-19 Dashboard, we can see that the
'spike' in cases is actually just a spike in testing. The State went
from a few thousand tests per day to 25,000 tests plus per day. The
positivity rate for COVID-19 has remained fairly steady but there have
been more tests."
"When the Emergency was declared we heard a
daily drumbeat about the danger and deaths related to COVID-19. Now that
the case fatality rate has been shown to be roughly the same as the
yearly flu...those [death] numbers are simply not scary to the public.
As a result, the State sees no impact from talking about fatalities and
has instead begun testing more so they could tell us there are more
cases."
"The PCR tests are generally viewed as the means of
determining if a patient has COVID-19. The problem is that the inventor
of the PCR test, who won a Nobel Prize in chemistry for the invention,
specifically stated that the test was not well-suited to and never
designed to diagnose disease. Much has been made about this in the press
and elsewhere but the reason there are issues with PCR testing in
relation to COVID is that PCR testing cannot detect how much of a virus
exists in a person. Exposure of the existence of incomplete traces of a
virus do not mean a person is infected with a disease [,] which is part
of the reason the PCR tests have an elevated rate of false positives."
"...there
is not even a true standard for testing...Instead we have numerous
tests from numerous vendors that may or may not have a similar standard
for what it means to 'have' COVID-19. The CDC, governor, and ODH [Ohio
Department of Health] know this so they have allowed for the diagnosis
of cases based on as meaningless criteria as a cough in a community in
which COVID supposedly exists."
Plow through this quote and then
receive the translation below: "Another document also came to light that
is critical in demonstrating the egregiously misleading nature of the
public COVID-19 data. On the final paragraph of page 39 of a document
published by the FDA regarding instructions for a COVID-19 test is the
following quote: 'Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV
are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV
RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full
length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA
copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human
A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical
specimen'."
"In plain English this means that there are no
available pure 2019-nCOVvirus isolates to test against so instead an
educated best guess is being used. The question this leads us to is how
accurate can a test be for a virus that has not been defined...? If our
freedoms are to be abridged under an emergency declaration related to a
disease, should it not be a requirement that the disease at least be
defined?"
As you can see, this case is being argued not only on
Constitutional grounds, but on major and deep issues of science. The
plaintiffs are not accepting "the Word from the experts."
There is no reason why they, or anyone, should surrender and accept.
In Ohio, a bright light is shining in the darkness.
(The link to the plaintiff's document submitted to the court can be found in this article posted on my blog.)
|
 |
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.
No comments:
Post a Comment