Sunday, August 30, 2020
2673-2674: The Economics of The Other Great Debate - 2.0 from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Meet John Maynard Keynes, the British
architect of modern world economic policy, and try not roll your eyes upward
toward the blue, blue sky.
The reason I say this is that Keynes
came up with a lovely but patently wrong theoretic framework and concept for
economic progress in the wake of the Second World War, which involved leveraging
assets belonging to the people of this country to provide credit to rebuild all
the other countries (Marshall Plan, my ass.) and, here's where it gets hip-wader
deep, a constantly and forever expanding world economy.
This was largely based on the
presumption that the world's population would continue to expand, and that
"perceived needs" could be manipulated and increased via propaganda, to provide
such a perennially expanding economy.
This is attractive and exactly what
the battered and worn European countries wanted to hear after the Second World
War; the American Generals who were sitting on a pile of American assets
(garnered from all of us under conditions of Gross Breach of Trust, fraud, and
deceit) were ready to invest, and so the deal was done and throughout the world,
the name of John Maynard Keynes was heard to resound.
Not so much anymore.
The reason for the failure of
Keynesian Economics is as obvious now as it was then:
(1) National and World Economies are
the result of beliefs held by, and activities engaged in, by living people, and
will forever contract and expand based on changes in those beliefs and
activities as well as changes wrought by natural disasters and technological
advancements. Read that: a perpetually expanding economy is a pipe dream akin to
The Big Rock Candy Mountain.
(2) The Generals were investing money
and assets that weren't theirs in investments that amounted to endless Black
Holes; once the European nations got access to our credit to rebuild their war
damages and pay for their defense, they became a queer combination of dependent
and greedy, and wasted no time in "failing their way to success".
The concept of failing one's way to
success is best exemplified by the career of General Robert McNamara, whose
affable and high-minded personality enabled him to ingratiate himself despite
having no talent at all at managing a business, and whose sense of timing
enabled him to always exit his disasters right before the ax fell.
In the same way, the nations of
Europe that became dependent on American largess in the wake of WWII,
deliberately milked it above and beyond any sense or reason, and when they had
succeeded in killing the cash cow, beat a hasty retreat and have attempted to
wash their hands of the results.
One pregnant example of this is the
fact that most European countries have spent 2-4% of their own money on their
own defense for the past 75 years, the actual tab being picked up by "the
Americans" and charged to us by U.S. Territorial Generals, who were also ---- of
course ---- profiting themselves mightily by peddling their services as part of
this Round Robin of self-interested fraud on the part of all Parties
concerned--- except for the actual Americans who were The Goats.
It wasn't until Donald Trump got a
look at this that it was even addressed as an issue. Apparently, we are expected
to pay the defense costs of Western Europe and most of the rest of the world for
eternity, and this is all part of Keynes' half-baked perpetually expanding
theory of world economics.
Sooner or later, reality sets in, and
as Margaret Thatcher observed-- other people's money runs out. Endless outflow
requires at least an equal endless inflow, or the system consumes itself, and as
the European nations and members of the former Commonwealth taught the U.S.
Generals--- its hard to get inflow from turnips.
So the expense heaped upon us without
our knowledge or consent has bankrupted "the US Incorporated" and "the USA
Incorporated" --- both, and what we hear from the Generals is either silence or
threats. To all appearances, all they have been able to come up with is another
half-baked plan to steal the mineral resources of Third World countries and
manipulate currency markets.
Now, everyone is looking at us, the
Americans, who weren't consulted about any of this, and who never authorized any
such deals, as if any of it were our fault and as if we benefited from any of
this fraud and Breach of Trust by our Employees.
The first apparent result is that
Keynesian Economics is an Epic Fail, and the admission of this fact is seen in
the worldwide "Sustainability" Movement.
Someone, somewhere, most likely at
the Vatican, jerked awake in the middle of the night and realized that endless,
thoughtless, unbridled expansion of the world population is not a good thing ---
even though it is required to keep the Keynesian Model going.
Other Parties realized that the
efficacy of generating "felt needs" in the American population via endless
advertising and propaganda --- and generating sales as a result --- was not
enough. Our gross consumerism couldn't, by itself, keep the Keynes Model pumping
iron.
And no matter how many juicy
hamburgers and jock straps they inserted into the TV programming, and no matter
how much fear they generated to promote more government services, things were
topping out.
The Law of Diminishing Returns
arrived with a thump on September 11, 2001 and the de facto default on Brady
Bonds.
This is by far the most theatrical
bond default in history, but what can you expect when Hollywood West and
Hollywood East (DC) combine their efforts?
The answer of the U.S. Generals on
that occasion was the same as it has always been--- more war, more take-overs,
more pillaging of the people and resources of other countries --- to prop up
their own service contracts and avoid the looming specter of what they call the
"real economy".
For the uninitiated, the "real
economy" is where we live; the "false economy" is where they live.
The false economy is generated by an
endless supply of paper chits issued as U.S. military script, enforced by legal
tender laws, based on American credit and backed by American assets, and all
predicated upon the unjustified and unjustifiable presumption that we knew about
this and approved of it.
However, these Employees who are
supposed to act under a very famous and very public contract -- The Constitution
of the United States of America --- are not legally or lawfully enabled to act
under self-declared but otherwise non-existent "Emergency Powers" to do any of
this, and the other Principals exercising our Delegated Powers "for" us, the
Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor of London, are all fully aware of these
facts.
It's a con game, and a shameful one;
and, though perhaps somewhat necessitated at the beginning by the destruction in
Europe and Japan and elsewhere caused by WWII, its continuance and all attempts
to blame the American victims of all this "US" finagling "in our names" cannot
be justified.
So here we come to rebuilding a new
economic paradigm. The answer of the Roman Catholic Church, acting in its
profane secular capacity? In a word, "Sustainability"-- full stop, reduce the
population dramatically by any means fair or foul, circle the wagons and try to
come up with new excuses to claim an ownership interest in living people by
using patented DNA and RNA inserted into their natural DNA to turn them all into
legally-defined GMO Products.
The Church has done some really
odious things in its long struggle to impose worldwide poverty --- their answer
to The Other Great Debate --- but this one takes the birthday cake.
We are supposed to be good little
cows, and as the motto of the BBC loudly proclaims, "Listen and obey." and
meekly accept being bankrupted and oppressed by people on our payroll?
Right.
Need we point out that this proposed
Second Round is even crazier than John Maynard Keynes?
Not only are the Americans awake now,
they have called their actual and properly declared Government into Session to
deal with this nonsense. No, we are not remaining silent and complacent. We have
been grossly defrauded in Breach of Trust. These criminal acts against a
non-combatant civilian population that has been at peace since 1814 cannot be
excused as acts of war or waved away as a "mistake" owing no restitution.
Nor can we be induced to "trust" --in
any fashion-- those who have brought the world to the brink of this insanity and
allow them to act in our behalf or in our names.
We are owed the bulk of everything on
this planet and we are not "missing" and cannot be "presumed dead". We are not
war-like people, not bent on vengeance; we are far too practical for that, but
we do demand fair-minded and practical answers for ourselves and everyone else
going forward.
Violence of any kind including
weather warfare, lawfare, psyops, civil war, aggression in the Middle East, or
aggression against China ---- none of that is justified and we unilaterally
oppose it.
It turns out that Jesus has always
had the answer, and we have economic models that actually make sense and work,
as well as the technology to deliver the benefits to the world. Above and beyond
that, our underlying assets and the credit and the profits thereof, belong to
us, so we have every right and reason to speak up and tell our employees what we
want done.
What we want done is not thus far
what they are doing, so unless the other Principals want to be exposed as
Hypocrites, Liars, Thieves, Con Artists, Incompetents--- and worse, it's time to
direct our Employees according to our Will, and for all of them to fulfill their
very public contracts.
We, the actual Americans, shall be
securing our assets around the world and taking charge of this nightmare; anyone
who wants to oppose us should reflect upon the fact that they are all bankrupt,
both in the air and on the sea, and our jurisdiction is the only jurisdiction
left that has the assets and insight and ability to sort this madness out
without devolving into totalitarianism.
So, if you want abundance and the
freedom that goes with it, support us and our actual Government in international
jurisdiction, which is our unincorporated Federation of States, doing business
since 1776 as The United States of America.
If you want more results from the
same "Planners" that brought us to this impasse, support the UN CORP and let
them use the United Nations organization as a storefront for ever-increasing
criminal activities.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers
Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses
So get this straight – based on the recommendation of doctors Fauci and Birx the US shut down the entire economy based on 9,000 American deaths to the China coronavirus.
The Other Great Debate 1.0
By Anna Von Reitz
We are familiar with the debate set
off by the publication of Darwin's Theory of Evolution, but for well over a
hundred years prior to that and continuing to the present, there was another
such debate raging.
This Other Great Debate arose in the
wreckage of the English Civil War, but unlike the debate over Darwinism which
was (and is) a very public discourse, this earlier Great Debate was a different
kind of ecclesiastical fistacuffs, touching areas that we were not deemed to be
sufficiently interested to engage in public debate.
Listen and decide for yourselves if
you are sufficiently interested.
This Other Great Debate centered on
the existence of poverty. If God loves us, why does he show so little concern
for the millions of impoverished, stunted, and miserable people on this planet?
Is God a Deadbeat Dad? Or is there some other hidden meaning or benefit to
poverty?
The Creationists (not the same
Creationists who have disagreed with the conclusions of Darwin, but a name
attached to the proponents in this prior debate, too) looked around at the
abundance of the Earth and took the stance that if we were impoverished, it was
because of our own bone-headed refusal to do the job that our Creator assigned
to Adam. If we would act as better caretakers of God's abundant gifts, and share
with each other as Jesus commanded us, then all would be well. Poverty as a
systemic problem would disappear. Naturally.
Ben Franklin's irreverent reply is
still part of modern culture: "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to
be happy."
The Opposition, mainly clergy of the
Roman Catholic Church, said, but, wait a minute. Our Lord and his Disciples were
all mendicants, traveling from town to town, depending on the kindness of others
to give them shelter and food. Is this not proof that poverty engenders virtue
and is virtuous?
Oddly, after going a few rounds, one
discovers that both sides of this argument center around one word: freedom.
There are two ways in which a man can
be free. Either he has everything sufficient to support himself and his life and
functions in a state of abundance, or, he has nothing, and so, is set free of
worldly attachments and concerns.
The Founding Fathers stood with the
Creationists and upheld the belief that if we accept "Adam's burdens" and
care-taking responsibilities, everything is already divinely set up and ready to
produce all the abundance anyone could wish for, and more than enough to provide
every man, woman, and child with what they need to live happy and productive
lives.
The Roman Catholic Church (and their
Holy Roman Empire) took the other tack and adopted "The Doctrine of
Scarcity"---attempting to end poverty by deliberately fostering more of it.
Their answer to the Other Great Debate was that poverty is virtuous and leads to
freedom from worldly cares, so the more poverty, the better.
Are you "burdened down" with your
wealth, tired of managing your stock portfolio, yearning to be free of such
responsibilities? The Church will take that burden from you, in exchange for
food, shelter, and basic medical care.
Enter the modern welfare system and
the schmarmy dark world of "social engineering".
In the process of relieving millions
upon millions of people of their worldly goods, the Church has become
unimaginably wealthy, has created the modern welfare state, and wittingly or
unwittingly, also created a system of enslavement to the Church--- because when
people are dependent upon you for food, shelter, and medical aid, not to
mention, supposedly, the fate of their eternal souls, you exercise immense
coercive power over them.
As usual, what started out as good
intentions and scripture-based logic on the part of Catholic clergy three
centuries ago, has led straight to Hell. While the Doctrine of Scarcity has led
to social welfare via a different route than communism, it has had much the same
result---- deprivation, suppression of individual motivation and initiative, and
misuse of coercive power.
What of the other side of the
argument?
We have mixed results. The Founding
Fathers were correct that the Earth is more than abundant enough to support us
all and provide abundance for everyone. Unfortunately, the moral and educational
basis behind their original concept was never brought forward into the popular
consciousness. Instead, the opportunity they created was seized upon by Robber
Barons.
These men did not embrace the concept
of Adam's care-taking role, much less did they embrace Jesus's concept of
sharing the benefit of mutually owned resources; instead, these Robber Barons
sought possession and control of natural resources for their own profit -- the
more exclusive the control and the more monopolized, the better.
Thus we have the specter of giant
mining operations in which resources belonging to the entire nation are stripped
and used to profit a few, transportation that is controlled and monopolized for
profit-taking, electrical and water and waste management utilities that are
similarly monopolized for exercise of coercive power and the profit of a few,
medical and pharmaceutical industries that are centered on profit instead of
health, and so on.
As the only goal of these men and
their corporations was profit for themselves and their shareholders, society has
suffered as a whole and the Earth has suffered, too.
The Founders were right about our
ability to create abundance, but the moral imperative for doing so --- and the
envisioned end result, freedom, was lost in the shuffle.
Nobody on the street understood that
freedom was the goal and that the creation of abundance was merely a mechanism
to create freedom via abundance for Mankind as a whole.
The other part of the Founder's
vision was that we could, with sufficient initiative, easily provide ourselves
with ample largess, enabling us to support the weak, the old, the sick, the
mentally infirm, orphans, and others unable to support themselves -- not with
coercive institutionalized welfare, but with love.
In a world of abundance, there is no
need to feel burdened by the poor, the young, the old, or the sick. Rather, once
set free of the hard-scrabble, we are also set free to open our hearts and to
care for those in need in our communities on a private basis.
The Founders took it for granted that
from whatever religious or ethnic or racial background we came from, we would at
least have the moral and ethical motivation to take care of our own and share
our resources within our own communities. Our republican form of government
supports and expedites this outcome, by allowing us to marshal both our public
and private resources in pursuit of the Public Good.
After 350 years, the results are in
and have yet to be tabulated.
Contestant Number One, the Roman
Catholic Church through its secular institutions, including the United Nations
and its megalomaniac UN CORP, standing for institutionalized poverty, cradle to
grave welfare state, the end of private property, universal pauperism, coercive
power wielded by the Church using forced dependency and control of access to
food, water, shelter, money, and other resources to compel obedience to whatever
the Church aka UN planners want.
Contestant Number Two, the American
Dream Team, through their individual efforts, vision of freedom through
abundance, community spirit, and common sense and enterprise ---- salted down
with much-needed control over corporations and a refurbishing of corporate goals
and management objectives worldwide. Continuance of private property and private
enterprise, community-based welfare, local control of natural resources, and
self-governance.
You are the judges. You get to decide
the outcome of the Other Great Debate.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment