This article is intended for close study. I urge you not to jump to an
early conclusion about what I'm proposing here. For example, I'm not
ruling out the engineering of a virus. But an unusual twist is
involved.
This article is also part of a larger position. That position can be defined as:
AUTOMATICALLY ASSUMING THE SO-CALLED EPIDEMIC IS CAUSED BY A VIRUS IS INCORRECT.
THE TRUTH DOESN'T SUPPORT FEAR.
FEAR IS SELF-DEFEATING.
FEAR CLOSES DOWN POSSIBILITY.
DON'T CLOSE DOWN POSSIBILITY IN ANY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE.
Among other subjects, this article comments on the hypothesis that the
COVID-19 virus is a modified weaponized germ from a lab, either
deliberately or accidentally released.
A general comment: weaponizing a virus as an instrument for causing
widespread destruction faces a significant barrier. From the get-go,
viruses mutate very quickly as they replicate. Therefore, the criminals
wouldn't maintain the viral structure they started
with. Ensuring continued lethality would therefore appear to be
impossible.
Then there is this: I fully understand that researchers in certain labs
are always fiddling and diddling with viruses. That's their job. The
question, in a given situation, is: are they successful at
weaponization, even ignoring the rapid mutation factor
I just mentioned?
THERE IS A MAJOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN: THEY TRIED TO WEAPONIZE A
CORONAVIRUS IN LABS, AND THEY SUCCEEDED AND RELEASED IT. EVIDENCE FOR
THE FORMER, NO MATTER HOW CONVINCING, IS NOT EVIDENCE OF THE LATTER.
Anything is possible, but so far, what I see is this: when I add up all
the reasons people are sick and dying, I don't see a new germ as the
basis.
I've detailed, in past articles, all the Chinese cases who have been
diagnosed for no other reason than they have pneumonia, a traditional
disease of major proportions in China. Studies estimate that roughly
300,000 citizens die of it every year. Which means
there are millions of Chinese people who have develop pneumonia each
year. Furthermore, the Chinese government quickly abandoned the idea of
testing for the purported coronavirus---favoring instead, CT scans of
the lungs. A finding of pneumonia was sufficient
for a diagnosis of an "epidemic case." That is absurd on its face.
Pneumonia has many causes, none of which requires a new virus.
Then we have the cases in Italy, the second largest reservoir of the
so-called epidemic. Here, the deaths occur massively on the side of the
elderly, who already have serious prior medical conditions, long term.
In the reports issued by the Italian government
so far, the people dying are said to "have the virus," but the
conclusion is they're dying because of their prior medical conditions.
The conventional wisdom, often spouted, is: "the coronavirus strikes the
elderly, who are less able than the young to ward it off." This is a
misnomer, deployed to cover up the reality that the elderly are passing
away, as they usually do, from the illnesses
they already have---no need for a new virus.
I've also discussed deaths in Australia and the state of Washington.
Again, it's elderly people. As in Italy, add up their long-term
diseases; the treatment of those diseases with toxic medical drugs; the
fear engendered by the diagnosis of "COVID"; sudden
isolation from family and friends; the use of breathing ventilators,
which have their own set of adverse effects, including bacterial
pneumonia; and new treatment with toxic antiviral drugs, to "fight the
virus"; and you have a terribly potent array of factors
which account for the elderly dying. No need for a new virus.
As I've detailed in past articles, flu-like diseases (quite often, with
no evidence of a flu virus) are traditional in Europe and the US. Their
symptoms overlap the symptoms listed for so-called COVID. In recent
years, there have been huge numbers of such
people with these flu-like illnesses, and many have died---before the
emergence of the so-called COVID virus. Again, no need for a unique new
virus.
And as far as overall global case numbers of COVID are concerned, a
large percentage of these people have been diagnosed purely on the basis
of their symptoms, with no test, or via the accepted diagnostic test,
called PCR. I'll cover that test in a moment.
Suffice to say, it fails to prove illness is stemming from COVID virus
or any virus---but it does create a picture of supposedly swelling case
numbers. In a recent article, I've quoted the literature of official
public health authorities, who themselves admit
the test has fatal flaws.
Then we have unexplained relatively small clusters of people who appear
to be suddenly falling ill. A closer examination of these people is
necessary, to see whether they, in fact, ARE "sudden and unexplained."
If they are, I would suggest investigating whether
the rollout of new 5G wireless technology at 60GHz is occurring in
those locales. It is possible 5G is causing oxygen deprivation, among
other serious effects. And rather than an engineered virus---which has
unpredictable effects owing to its rapid mutation---if
we're looking for sinister operations, I suggest that, to cause
sensational alarm and bafflement and "proof" that a mysterious event is
underway, the intentional seeding of locales with little-known toxic
chemicals would be the action undertaken. The effects
of chemicals are far more predictable in terms of intensity and
duration, and if no one is specifically looking for them, they are
undetectable.
Finally, in major cities of China (e.g., Wuhan) and Italy (particularly
in the north), highly toxic air quality has been far more than "a
serious problem" for some years. This alone would account for huge
numbers of people suffering from all sorts of lung
conditions, including pneumonia. Pneumonia is one of the cardinal
listed symptoms of the "epidemic." In China, the mix of toxic
pollutants in the air is unprecedented in human history, spanning both
early and modern eras of industrialization.
Conclusion: All in all, I would say that, if a weaponized coronavirus
has been achieved, and then released or accidentally leaked, it is not a
success. Far too much of what is being called COVID is explained by
the causative factors I've just presented.
In fact, if we want to talk about engineered viruses---including what
would probably be an easier technical job in the lab---the most
successful operation would involve slightly altering a common
coronavirus to cause nothing more than a common cold. Then,
with a "self-fulfilling prophecy" diagnostic test in hand, people all
over the world would test positive; many case numbers would thus be
created; and with the non-virus illness-causes I've just described, the
illusion of a global pandemic would be stitched
together---all leading to the real goal: LOCKDOWNS, economic
destruction, and the further pacification of the population. A bereft
population more dependent than ever on governments and official
authorities. A dazed population guided into a heavily technocratic
future---wall to wall surveillance, smart cities, Internet of Things,
universal guaranteed income tied to social credit score. Most
importantly: Assigned energy quotas for every citizen. CONTROL.
Moving on from biowar labs to ordinary labs, has the COVID virus ever
actually been DISCOVERED and isolated there by proper procedures? As
I've written in another article, COVID-19 lacks correct proof in that
regard. What I believe is the best method for
that job---traditional electron microscope studies on HUNDREDS OF
PATIENTS, in a side-by-side controlled test---was never done at the
outset. This is convenient, to say the least, if in fact a common
coronavirus has been engineered to cause nothing more than
a cold. The absence of true isolation and discovery permits such a
virus to slip in under the radar.
The widespread diagnostic test for the COVID virus now in use, called
the PCR, falls far short of proving that ANY person is sick or will get
sick. In other articles, I have proposed a vetting process for the
PCR---which should have been done decades ago---in
order to show it works or doesn't work in the real world. This vetting
procedure would be suggested by any college science student as obvious
and necessary. It has never been carried out. It involves proving the
test can determine that a huge quantity of
virus, actively replicating in the human body, is present---and
therefore, the patient would, in the real world, be sick. Carrying out
such a test, on hundreds of patients, in a controlled and blinded
setting, AND THEN SEEING WHETHER THE TEST DOES POINT TO
ACTUALLY SICK PEOPLE, has never been done. Therefore, claiming the
test confirms that COVID virus is causing great damage is unsupported.
This, too, is quite convenient, if a common coronavirus that causes
nothing more than a common cold has been engineered.
In that situation, you would want a diagnostic test that can't predict
or detect serious illness, because the virus doesn't cause serious
illness. The virus is only there as a prop, to create the illusion of
case numbers stemming from one source: a harmless
COVID-19 VIRUS.
Now, let's move on to the effects of propaganda.
People say: patients are sick and dying all over the world---so IT MUST
BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE? Aristotle worked out the fact
that the effect does not prove the cause. The effect (people sick and
dying) does not prove the cause (COVID virus).
And history matters. It offers clues and precedents. We've seen dud
epidemics in the past blamed on a virus, and yet, embarrassingly, the
virus couldn't be found. BUT WHO CARES, PEOPLE SAY, moved by
propaganda. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. (See my articles on
SARS and Swine Flu 2009.)
---People sick, people dying. How many people? Unknown. Massive
lockdowns of Chinese cities. Citizens trying to escape. For the global
audience, this equals coronavirus, not because they know the virus is
the cause---proof is beside the point. The virus
is the cause because IT MUST BE. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?
When brutal air pollution in Wuhan obviously brings on lung disease; and
when the primary symptom of the coronavirus is supposed to be lung
disease; and when citizens of the city have been falling ill and dying
from lung disease long before the virus appeared---does
this matter?
OF COURSE NOT. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. Propaganda.
When governments and corporations have been using THE VIRUS as a cover
story to obscure and explain away their crimes against populations, for
decades and decades---does this matter?
When previous so-called epidemics---for example, West Nile, SARS, Zika,
and Swine Flu---turned out to be complete unproven duds---does this
history matter?
OF COURSE NOT. IT HAS TO BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?
A face on a television screen watched by millions of people says CORONAVIRUS. Therefore, case closed.
In 2009, in La Gloria, Mexico, on a giant commercial pig farm, pig feces
and urine are allowed to bake and steam and bubble in the sun. These
deposits are called lagoons. They're so large, you can see them from
outer space. Toxic chemicals are routinely
sprayed and laid out like whipped cream on the lagoons. Workers are
falling ill. New workers are brought in to spray even more toxic
chemicals. Workers die. Then the Centers for Disease Control sends in
their tuned-up virus hunters to look for the germ
causing the "mysterious" illness. They claim to find a Swine Flu
virus. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE? THE DECAYING PIG
SHIT AND URINE? The layers of poisonous chemicals? Don't be
ridiculous.
Later, in the summer of 2009, CBS investigative reporter Sharyl
Attkisson discovers that the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples
from US Swine Flu patients are coming back from labs with no sign of ANY
KIND OF FLU. The virus isn't there.
And yet, of course, we have this, written in the summer of 2009: From
healthwyze[dot]org: "The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has a patent
for, Genetically Engineered Swine Influenza Virus and Uses Thereof
(patent #8124101). It was filed in 2005 for approval.
The makers of the human variant of the swine flu virus waited until the
patent was finally approved in January of 2009, before unleashing the
virus into the wild. The makers of the swine flu vaccine had begun the
lengthy patenting process long before the swine
flu supposedly existed, which means that the outbreak was no accident,
and the virus is clearly not natural. Patents only apply to man-made
items, and natural things cannot be patented. The virus conveniently
went public only after its vaccine patent was approved,
after patiently waiting 3 years for that to happen. The pandemic was
declared just five months after the patent was approved, in June of
2009. The tremendous hysteria following the outbreak was promoted by the
same groups who had invented this genetically
engineered virus. The word 'invented' was actually used to describe the
virus in the patent application."
What do you know about that? Back then, there were reports that the
Swine Flu Virus---which couldn't even be found in the overwhelmingly
number of US patients---was actually a biowarfare germ. Sound
familiar? Swine Flu was a DUD.
Another epidemic that was going to infect the world? West Nile Virus.
Another dud. But here from an old whale[dot]to article: "None of these
theories [about West Nile] has deterred Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy
from urging federal officials to determine
if the introduction of WN virus is a terrorist attack. On September 12,
2002, Leahy declared: 'I think we have to ask ourselves: Is it a
coincidence that we're seeing such an increase in WN virus - or is that
something that's being tested as a biological weapon
against us'." Sound familiar?
And here, from an old article at rediff[dot]com, a piece about another
epidemic dud, SARS 2003 (800 people died out of 7 billion, and WHO
researcher, Frank Plummer, told the press they couldn't even find the
virus in all but a few Canadian patients): "The virus
of atypical pneumonia, better known as SARS, or Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome, was created artificially, possibly as a
bacteriological weapon, Sergei Kolesnikov, academician of the Russian
Academy of Medical Sciences, told a press conference in the Siberian
town of Irkutsk on Thursday, the Russian RIA Novosti news agency
reported."
"According to Kolesnikov, the virus of atypical pneumonia is a synthesis
of the viruses of measles and infectious parotiditis or mumps, the
natural compound of which is impossible. This can be done only in a
laboratory, he said."
"Kolesnikov added that in creating bacteriological weapons, a protective
anti-viral vaccine is, as a rule, worked out at the same time, so a
medicine for atypical pneumonia may soon appear."
"He did not, however, rule out the possibility that the virus could have
spread accidentally as a result of "an unsanctioned leakage" from a
biological weapons laboratory."
Sound familiar? And yet the "epidemic" was a dud.
I would take these duds, and the concomitant warnings of engineered
pandemic viruses, as further evidence that, if any engineering was going
on, it was the "lite" version I've described in reference to COVID-19:
the duds were previous attempts to stitch together
the illusion of a pandemic---attempts that fell short of success, or
were designed as smaller test runs leading up to what we have now.
The ceaseless propaganda promoting "deadly viruses" is essential to
creating the pandemic illusion...and sometimes you can see through the
illusion in graphic terms. Quite, quite clearly. In 1987, a doctor
calls me, while I'm writing my first book, AIDS INC.
He tells me he's built a small AIDS clinic where a group of
poverty-stricken patients can rest in clean surroundings, eat nutritious
food, and grow beans and sell them for a small amount of money. This
doctor is mainstream. He's given his patients no medical
treatment. He knows that THE VIRUS, HIV, is said to be a remorseless
killer. But, he tells me, all his patients have recovered; they no
longer have symptoms. They're healthy. He's puzzled, confused, and
distraught. He asks me, "What should I do next?"
He knows the AIDS drugs are highly toxic. He senses that giving them
to his now-healthy patients would bring on a disaster. Oh but you see,
according to the propaganda masquerading as science, IT MUST BE THE
VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD BE CAUSING THESE PEOPLE
TO BECOME SICK IN THE FIRST PLACE? Drinking the water in their
villages---water mixed directly with sewage? Hunger? Starvation?
Toxic vaccines pushing their depleted immune systems over the edge of
the cliff? Don't be ridiculous. IT MUST BE HIV.
In an interview, a famous New York doctor tells me all scientists agree
that HIV is the cause of AIDS because, well, the scientists who don't
agree can't get their findings published. He's telling me all VISIBLE
scientists agree.
Several years ago, during the Zika virus hysteria (another dud epidemic,
of microcephaly, that surely would "decimate populations"), researchers
in the epicenter, in Brazil, report that only between 10 and 15 percent
of Zika patients have any trace of the virus---they
can't find it in the other patients. This amounts to a bald confession
that Zika is eliminated as the cause of disease in pregnant women. But
no one listens. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?
Well, it turns out it could be ANY INJURY OF ANY KIND TO A PREGNANT
MOTHER---causing her baby to be born with a smaller head and brain
damage, called microcephaly.
But here, in a 2016 article from thesleuthjournal[dot]com, we have this:
"It's [Zika virus] being spread by genetically engineered mosquitos. Is
it the latest example of US biowarfare? America's sordid history
suggests it."
If it was being spread in that fashion, it wasn't working to cause
disease. It was a failure. But as propaganda, it was a success.
And of course, the World Health organization hit the hysteria button at
the time with their own brand of propaganda. From marketwatch[dot]com,
January 28, 2016: "The World Health Organization will convene an
emergency committee in Geneva on Monday to discuss
the mosquito-borne Zika virus, which the organization's head said is
spreading 'explosively' and which many doctors and health officials
believe is linked to an unprecedented outbreak of babies born with small
heads in Brazil...'The level of alarm is extremely
high,' WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said in remarks to the
public-health agency's executive board...WHO's announcement underscores
the speed with which a virus that began as an obscure tropical malady
afflicting Africa and then several remote Western
Pacific islands has transformed into a major international health
concern, particularly in the Americas."
Dud. If WHO could squeeze out more fear, NOW, in 2020, about an
ever-expanding Zika crisis, don't you think they would? Even THEY'VE
given up the ghost on that campaign. Meaning: they achieved their goal
of creating alarm and public acceptance of THE VIRUS
one more time. No need to go further for the moment.
The key event in the current COVID operation was the sudden Chinese
government lockdown of 50 million citizens overnight in three major
cities. That was the signal the CDC and the World Health Organization
received with open arms.
"Well, they broke the ice. This is what we've been waiting for. This
is now a model we can sell. Lockdowns on a massive scale."
And they did sell it.
As I discovered in 1987, when I was researching AIDS, the basic epidemic
con involves grouping all sorts of people and groups who are suffering
from different traditional diseases, environmental toxicities, and
certain new NON-VIRUS conditions UNDER ONE UMBRELLA
LABEL. And then saying they're all sick because of one virus. That is
the central illusion.
Finally, I need to make a general comment about the effects of viruses
on humans. These effects have been vastly overrated. Consider the
proponents of the so-called "hot zone" hypothesis. For many years,
they've claimed that viruses coming out of rainforests
and traveling, in the modern age, to distant countries would cause
horrific consequences---in the form of a cascade of MANY new diseases.
Why? Because the immune systems of people, unacquainted with these
novel germs, would lack the capacity to ward them off. But that
prediction has not come to pass.
The hot zone advocates have also failed to mention that the reverse
vector of travel should also result in massive epidemics: in other
words, viruses which are routinely carried by Americans and
Europeans---and cause them no harm---should be decimating native
peoples in rainforests, since the "more civilized" people travel in
great numbers into jungles. The decimation has not come to pass.
Native peoples have been uprooted and damaged by industry, but they
haven't been wiped out by American or European viruses.
In fact, when you think about it, all countries and locales tend to have
their own viruses which are endemic and harmless to locals, but when
carried to other lands, should be wreaking havoc.
But they aren't. We should all be dead many times over. But we aren't.
The hot zone fear stories should also be dead by now. But they still attract adherents. |
No comments:
Post a Comment