Could there be a link between the Coronavirus and 5G? Researcher and
building biologist Paul Doyon has just spent the last 18 months in
China. He’s written a brilliant article laying out the evidence. And how
you can protect yourself—an EMF based protection strategy. Warning:
this is a heavy science based article with nearly 100 references to
studies—neither Paul or myself want to be accused of fear-mongering:
My heart goes out to China and to all its people who have suffered so
much due to this new “novel” Wuhan coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19).
However, as someone who had become very sick and had his immune
system break down and was sick for six months looking for answers before
even suspecting that living in close vicinity to several cell phone
towers was actually what was causing the problem and making him sick, I
feel I cannot in good conscience remain silent, and I strongly suspect
that China and the rest of the world are looking under the wrong stone
for what is actually the problem here. At the moment, with 10,000 recently installed 5G antennas
plastering its city, Wuhan is probably one of the most
5G-electropolluted cities on the planet.
Electrosmog Warnings from Scientists for Over 40 Years
Respected scientists, researchers, doctors, and activists have been —
for over forty years — warning us about the dangers of wireless
radiation and electromagnetic fields. In 1977, the reporter Paul Brodeur
published a book called The Zapping of America; in 1985, the
late Dr. Robert O. Becker (twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in
Medicine for his work on cellular dedifferentiation and
re-differentiation in the healing process) wrote The Body Electric, and later published Cross Currents: The Perils of Electropollution,The Promise of Electromedicine in 1990; in 1995 (and again later in 2007), B. Blake Levitt, author and researcher, published Electromagnetic Fields: A Consumer’s Guide to the Issues and How to Protect Ourselves. Since then there have been a slew of other books and documentary movies put out on the subject. And the list goes on and on.
Dr. Leif Stafford, Swedish neuro-oncologist, has called this wireless rollout
“the largest biological experiment ever.” 1
And Dr. Robert O. Becker wrote in 1985 that
The dangers of electropollution are real and well documented. It changes, often pathologically, every biological system [emphasis
added]. What we don`t know is exactly how serious these changes are,
for how many people. The longer we as a society, put off a search for
that knowledge, the greater the damage is likely to be and the harder it
will be to correct. (p. 304) 2
And finally, Dr. Martin Pall, PhD, and Professor Emeritus of
Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University
has stated recently that
Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single
biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone
has had in the history of the world. 3
The BioInitiative
In 2007, a report titled the BioInitiative was
published, it was republished again in 2012, and there have been
ongoing updates between 2014 and 2019. Its website states that
the BioInitiative 2012 Report has been prepared by 29 authors from
ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three
MsC, MA or MPHs. Among the authors are three former presidents of the
Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS. 4
These are highly respected scientists coming from some of the world’s most respected universities and institutes. 5
The BioInitiative further warns
… that evidence for risks to health has substantially increased since
2007 from electromagnetic fields and wireless technologies
(radiofrequency radiation). The Report reviews over 1800 new scientific
studies…. Health topics include damage to DNA and genes, effects on
memory, learning, behavior, attention, sleep disruption, cancer and
neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. New safety standards are
urgently needed for protection against EMF and wireless exposures that
now appear everywhere in daily life. 6 See more scientific research here.
5G Warnings
With the coming advent of the newest in wireless technology, 5G,
numerous researchers, doctors, and professional and activist
organizations have been administering health warnings regarding its
coming implementation. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 See here the dangers of 5G radiation.
And even recently, there were marches in major cities throughout the world protesting the advent of this technology. 14
Unfortunately, for the majority of the population, these warnings
have fallen on deaf ears, with the seemingly widely held view out there
believing that 5G is the next best thing since Ben & Jerry’s™ Cherry
Garcia™ ice cream.
Of course, the downplaying of the hazards is understandable given the
extreme benefits and conveniences all this technology has continuously
offered an unsuspecting populace. Unfortunately, these people are also
often quick to ridicule and marginalize those who try to warn of these
dangers by labeling them as Luddite tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy
theorists, until, of course, either they or someone close to them
suddenly gets sick and they then see a possible connection with these
EMF exposures, and then suddenly there is a change of tune, and they are
quick to inquire about what they can do to protect themselves: e.g. how
to shield their homes and offices, what EMF meters to buy. In Ripon, California, south of Sacramento, a 5G antenna was
removed from a primary school, after some parents there started to
suspect that it was linked to a number of cancer cases in the school.15 16
The Coronavirus Outbreak
The recent COVID-19 outbreak has stimulated mass fear and mass
hysteria across the planet, in spite of the fact that there have only
been 93 deaths (at the time of this writing on February 29th, 2020)
outside China, with 2835 of the deaths 17 and 99 percent of infections occurring within China. 18
In fact, the highest death rates outside of China have been in places
already implementing 5G technology, South Korea and Italy, for example.
The exception is Iran, which at present has 978 cases, and 54 deaths,
is officially not implementing it, but very well may secretly be
trialing it given the reason why
on December 1, 2018, at the request of the US government, Meng
Wanzhou — Huawei’s CFO and daughter of its founder — was arrested in
Canada on allegations she participated in a conspiracy to defraud banks
in connection with Iran sanctions violations, 19
was indeed because Huawei was working to sell their 5G technology to
the Iranians. In fact, Iran — in a joint operation between Irancell and
Ericsson — had started trialing the technology back in September of
2017. 20 In the article, titled “Irancell, Ericsson Test 5G Systems,” (2017) it is stated that
the technology will be available by 2020 and become globally accessible a year later.
During the event at Irancell headquarters, the company’s CEO Alireza Dezfouli said “We are aiming to keep pace with the international operators. Iran will not be left behind again.”
Furthermore, a number of articles in the media, have stated that Iran has carried out “preparations” and is ready to launch 5G. 21 22 23 Well,
preparations usually include trialing. Hence, it is easy to believe
that Iran already has the 5G infrastructure set up and they have been
secretly trialing it.
Belgium, on the other hand, — which had decided not to even trial 5G, let alone implement it, due to radiation concerns 24 — has had only one case so far of the coronavirus (recovered) and no deaths.
In fact, for the majority, the symptoms of patients outside of China,
(especially with those away from the 5G), for the most part, have
seemingly been relatively mild, as one would most likely see with a
regular cold or flu virus, and with many of those infected not showing
any symptoms at all.
Mild Symptoms Outside China
It is stated by Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, (Head of the WHO’s Health
Emergencies Program), in the continuously updated Al Jazeera article,
“What happens if you catch the new corona virus?” that “some patients do not show any symptoms,” and that
“You have mild cases, which look like the common cold,
which have some respiratory symptoms, sore throat, runny nose, fever,
all the way through pneumonia. And there can be varying levels of severity of pneumonia all the way through multi-organ failure and death,” she told reporters in Geneva last week. However, in most cases, symptoms have remained mild.
“We’ve seen some data on about 17,000 cases and overall 82 percent of those are mild, 15 percent of those are severe and 3 percent of those are classified as critical,” said Van Kerkhove. 18
Moreover, in numerous YouTube videos 25 26 27 28 29 we are seeing interviews with patients that have been seemingly showing only mild symptoms.
One example is that of Rebecca Frazier, interviewed numerous times on
numerous news programs, after being admitted to a Tokyo Hospital after
being found to be infected with the COVID-19 on the Diamond Princess
Cruise Ship. In one of the interviews, conducted by the New Zealand news
program on the Radio New Zealand (RNZ) network titled “I never really felt unwell,” for example, the interviewer states the following and then goes onto interview Ms. Frazier:
“Incapacitated, needing help to breath, and surrounded by doctors
in hazmat suits, is perhaps the go-to image of those infected with
coronavirus. Not so for Rebecca Frazier, who has Covid-19 as it is now
known. Curiously, she looks just fine. She’s in
isolation in a Tokyo hospital after testing positive for the virus,
while onboard the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship that is now docked in
Yokohama, in lockdown for 14 days…. Rebecca says she’s shocked that she has tested positive for the deadly virus given how fit and well she feels.”
“I just can’t believe it. Just can’t believe this is happening to you. Umm. I… You know, I am not one to freak out….”
“Did you feel unwell? Do you feel unwell?”
“No. I never really felt unwell. I had a little bit of a
cough when they told me, and when I got here, I had a little bit of a
fever, but all of that has normalized and I have no symptoms….“25
In another YouTube video,29 this one from a Chinese TV
network, is a report by a nurse in Wuhan, who contracted the virus, and
decided to stay home to recover (which might very well have been what
saved her life).
In the video, we see her going about her daily life as if only seemingly bothered by what would only be a normal cold virus.
In a BBC 30 report about Steve Walsh, labeled a “Super
Spreader,” a man who was apparently infected by COVID-19 in Singapore
and apparently spread it to numerous others at a ski resort in France,
we hear one of his neighbors state that
“His wife told me on the phone that really he is not that ill and
she thinks it is a complete basically a load of rubbish umm and it’s no
worse than flu. Probably not as bad.” (2:20)
So… why is it that, while these people are seemingly only manifesting
mild symptoms, many people in China, and especially in the city of
Wuhan (and some other provinces), are having such a difficult time with
many unfortunately succumbing to the virus, and (for want of a better
expression) “dropping like flies”?
At least 10,000 5G Antennas Installed in Wuhan Alone
What has not been apparent in the news reports is the fact that China
in its rush to take the lead in the 5G race, had by the end of 2019
(and mostly within the last several months leading up to the COVID-19
outbreak) installed 130,000 5G antennas throughout the country, 31 with at least 10,000 antennas installed in Wuhan alone. 32 (As a comparison, the USA only has approximately 10,000 5G antennas presently installed throughout the whole country.)
“Wuhan City, the capital of Hubei, is expected to have 10,000 5G base stations by the end of 2019…” 32
“According to previous reports, the three operators were expecting to operate nearly 130,000 5G base stations by the end of 2019.”
Wuhan: One of the Initial Cities Trialing 5G
In fact, Wuhan was one of the initial 16 cities selected to trial 5G back in 2018.
China Unicom will begin testing 5G network in 16 cities including Beijing, Tianjin, Qingdao, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Guiyang, Chengdu, Shenzhen, Fuzhou, Zhengzhou, and Shenyang.
China Mobile will conduct external field test and set up more than a
hundred 5G base stations in each of the following five cities: Hangzhou,
Shanghai, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Wuhan. 34
From the article, “Wuhan 5G Industry Development: Five-Chain Coordination, Three-Wheel Drive,” (武汉5G产业发展：五链统筹 三轮驱动), 35 (written
in Chinese) published October 11th, 2019, it becomes clear that Wuhan
was in a race with other Chinese cities to position itself at the
forefront of 5G technology, and with approximately 10,000 5G antennas,
is probably one of — if not the most — 5G-radiated city in China:
At present, Wuhan is seizing major developmental opportunities in 5G
commercialization, with the construction of a national first-class 5G
network as a guide, with the development of a national first-class 5G
industry as the main body….
…Wuhan City has fully implemented the “Wuhan 5G Base Station Planning
and Construction Implementation Plan,” with an extraordinary policy
effort, to guide and support basic telecommunications companies and
China Tower Corporation to accelerate the construction of 5G networks.
This year and next, Wuhan will build more than 20,000 5G base stations,
form a 5G basic network with leading scale, first-class quality, and
strong demonstration to ensure full coverage of the 5G network in the
city and be at the leading level among similar cities in the country. 35
Finally, it was stated in an article titled “5G network coming to Wuhan,” (April 16, 2018), that “3,000 macro base stations and 27,000 micro base stations” would soon be constructed, and that by 2020, the “5G network will cover every corner of the city and be available at an affordable price.” 36 This
means that there may in fact be a lot more than just 10,000 antennas in
Wuhan, though 10,000 alone would make Wuhan one of the most 5G
concentrated cities in the world.
5G Systems Deployed in Hospitals
What is also concerning here is that China has, since about November of 2019, been installing 5G systems in its hospitals. 37 38 39 40
“Key Chinese hospitals, leading telecom carriers and Huawei
Wednesday launched a project to establish standards for 5G-based
networks in hospitals.” 37
“China released a pioneering standard for its 5G hospital
networks, following a joint drafting and verification process between
the medical and telecommunication industries.” 38
5G Systems Installed at Wuhan Coronavirus Hospitals
And to seemingly add insult to injury here, Huawei was very quick to
install 5G systems in the new coronavirus hospitals — Wuhan Volcan
Mountain Hospital and Thunder Mountain Hospital — the two hospitals
known for only being built in just over a week. 41 42
The two articles cited here are ironically titled, (1) “Huawei
installs 5G in China Hospital to fight Coronavirus,” and (2) “Huawei
builds 5G in Wuhan Hospital, aims to indirectly fight the Coronavirus”
as this might very well be the complete opposite of what they are indeed
intending to do here. There is also an interesting video on YouTube
entitled “Chinese hospitals deploy robots to help medical staff fight
coronavirus outbreak,” 43 demonstrating this in action.
Chinese Telecoms Started Offering 5G Commercially in Nov, 2019
The Chinese telecom companies started to offer commercial 5G services to its customers on the first of November last year.
China’s three major wireless carriers— China Mobile, China Unicom ,
and China Telecom —will begin selling 5G services to consumers on
Friday, November 1st in 50 major cities, including Beijing and Shanghai,
said Chen Zhaoxiong, vice minister of the Ministry of Industry and
Information Technology on Thursday October 31st at a Beijing
conference…. The Chinese government has made building 5G a national priority, clearing red tape and reducing costs so the three wireless providers introduce the new technology as swiftly as possible. “They’ve made this a national priority. It’s part of the [Communist] Party‘s ability to show that it’s delivering the goods,” said Paul Triolo, head of geo-technology at the Eurasia Group consultancy. “And
in the middle of the trade dispute and the actions against Huawei, it’s
even more important for China to show that they are continuing to move
forward despite all these challenges,” he added….
China’s central government wants 5G coverage extended to cover all of
Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou and Guangzhou by the end of the year. The
country’s largest carrier, China Mobile, which has 900 million cellphone
subscribers, says it will be able to offer 5G services in more than 50
cities this year….
Approximately 13,000 5G base stations have been installed in Beijing, the communications administration said this week. About 10,000 are already operating. China already has a total of more than 80,000 5G macro base stations, typically
cellular towers with antennas and other hardware that beam wireless
signals over wide areas, government officials said. See this article on 5G towers.
They said China will end the year with about 130,000, while Bernstein
Research estimates South Korea will be in second place with 75,000,
followed by the U.S. with 10,000. Piper Jaffray estimated that of the
600,000 5G base stations expected to be rolled out worldwide next year,
half will be in China. 31
This basically means that China had suddenly turned on the 5G switch,
just less than two months before the COVID-19 outbreak, suddenly
blanketing many cities with this 5G wireless radiation. And as of this
writing, South Korea’s numbers of COVID-19 cases are also starting to
skyrocket. As we can see from the above article, South Korea has the second highest number of 5G antennas with 75,000.That is a lot for a country its size. Is there a connection? I think there is with at present (Feb. 29, 2020) also the highest number of coronavirus cases (3150) and one of the highest number of death rates (17) outside of China.
Forty Cities Drinking 5G Service
In the online article, “These 40 Cities Will Drink 5G Service,” 44 published
June 7th, 2019, it was revealed that it had been decided that 5G would
be launched in 40 cities across China in 2019 by China Mobile and China
Unicom (with no specific information from China Telecom yet at that
time).
Cities on this list included in Zhejiang Province were Hangzhou,
Ningbo, and Wenzhou, not to mention places like Beijing, Shanghai,
Wuhan, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Shenzhen. The initial plan it seems,
called the “7+33+n” 5G network deployment strategy, was to have full
coverage in Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Nanjing,
and Xiong’an, with hotspot coverage in the other 33 cities, and then
customized 5G networks in so-called “n” cities, though this might have
very well changed as other cities seemingly also wanted full coverage
(note Wuhan’s installation of 10,000 5G antennas).
Top Most Coronavirus-Hit Provinces After Wuhan:
Zhejiang and Guangdong
Interestingly, at one point in this saga, the second most hit (with
the COVID-19) provinces were Zhejiang and Guangdong Provinces, (though
as of this writing, Zhejiang has now been taken over by Henan). 45 The
provinces listed below, in Chinese, and in order of most cases, are (1)
Hubei （湖北）, (2) Guangdong （广东）, (3) Henan （河南）, (4) Zhejiang （浙江）, and
(5) Hunan （湖南）.
It has been so bad in Zhejiang Province that Japan, on Feb. 12th,
even extended its entry restrictions to virus-hit Zhejiang (at the time
was third in number of COVID-19 cases).
It includes the cities of Hangzhou and Wenzhou, which have among the
country’s highest concentrations of coronavirus cases. Hangzhou hosts
the headquarters of Alibaba Group Holding, while Wenzhou is famed as a
cradle of small business. 46
On the map (Wikipedia) below 47, Zhejiang Province is the
darker red province off to the right and Guangdong Province is the
darker red one at the bottom. The darkest red province in the middle is
Hubei with Wuhan in its center. Henan Province is above Hubei Province
and Hunan Province is below it. Attribution: Wikimedians / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)
These cities (Hangzhou, Wenzhou, and Ningbo) have also been cities selected to trial the 5G in Zhejiang province. Ookla 5G Maps48 tracks 5G deployment around the world, the number of telecoms offering 5G service in various cities in China.
In the city of Hangzhou, all three Chinese telecoms are providing 5G
service in the city; whereas in Ningbo, only two are, and in Wenzhou,
only one (China Mobile) is.
The three cities in Zhejiang Province with the most cases have been
Hangzhou (168 cases), Ningbo (156 cases), and Wenzhou (503 cases), 50 which
are also curiously the cities selected to trial the 5G. The city proper
of Wenzhou itself (though when one includes the outer-lying prefectures
the total comes 9 million), for example, with only 200,000 people, has
an inordinately high number of people infected with COVID-19, and the
city has been on lockdown.
But as you can see from some of the articles selected below that
there has been a major push in this city to implement and blanket cover
their cities with 5G technology.
In the online article, “China Tower Built 8400 5G Stations in Zhejiang” 51 (Oct.
21st, 2019), it is revealed that 8400 5G base stations have recently
been installed in Zhejiang Province, with 4775 (out of an order of 6154)
installed in Hangzhou alone, and 3200 of these installed within 100
days (in just a little over three months).
China Tower Built 8400 5G Stations in Zhejiang
According to a person in charge of China Tower (Zhejiang), since this
year, it has undertaken more than ten thousand 5G construction demands.
At present, 8397 stations have been completed, more than 96% of which
were built on the stock station sites. In Hangzhou, since this year,
6154 5G demands have been accepted and 4775 have been completed and
delivered, of which 93% are directly met and transformed through stock
station sites.
In the downtown of Hangzhou, after receiving the 5G construction
demand of three telecom enterprises, China Tower (Zhejiang), with the
support of the government, completed 3200 5G base stations in the West
Lake scenic area, Olympic Sports Center and other scenes within 100
days, and cooperated with telecom enterprises to complete quick
installation and debugging of equipment, based on existing telecom
rooms, cabinets, power supporting facilities and 5G antenna added on
stock station sites, street lamp poles, buildings, etc. 51
In another online article, published in Chinese, “China Tower
installs 8,400 5G antennas in Zhejiang, 96% based on existing sites,”
[中国铁塔在浙江建成8400个5G站址，96%基于既有站址], 52 we can see China Tower blanketing Hangzhou with 5G antennas in a very short period of time.
In this article, it is stated that “Zhejiang is one of the earliest provinces in the country to start building 5G networks,” and that “China Tower Zhejiang Company … started the acceleration of 5G construction in the first year of 5G commercialization….” And further that, “more than 10,000 5G construction requirements have been undertaken since this year,” with “8397 sites … completed.”
It becomes clear that the Zhejiang Province, home to the tech giant,
Alibaba, is one of the provinces slated to become one of the first to
introduce the 5G. In the following article, “Delta region to build world-class information communication hub,” 53 (Updated: 2019-11-01) it is stated that with the commercialization of 5G services on Oct. 31st,
[f]ifty cities were selected to become among the first to access
commercial 5G services, including 10 cities in the Yangtze River Delta
(YRD) region, half of which are from Zhejiang province – Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, and Shaoxing.
It is further stated that the three telecom companies plus China
Tower would be investing in the region a total of 200 billion yuan (USD
$28.4 billion) for the 5G infrastructure construction in order to “build it into a world-class information communication hub.”
According to a development plan for the region released in 2016,
China Telecom, China Unicom, China Mobile and China Tower are planning
to invest more than 200 billion yuan ($28.4 billion) in 5G
infrastructure construction in the region by 2021 to help “build it into
a world-class information communication hub” promoting the “region’s
pilot use of 5G network and applications,” and making “it clear that the
YRD region will be the first in China to conduct trial commercial use
of 5G services,” while aiming to “realize the coverage of the 5G network
throughout the province by 2025.” 53
Coastal City of Wenzhou Worst Hit in Zhejiang Province
In the province of Zhejiang, the cities of Hangzhou, Ningbo, and
Wenzhou, have the highest numbers of COVID-19 cases. These are also the
main places where 5G has been installed so far in the province.
Wenzhou, for a relatively small Chinese city, has the inordinately
highest number — at present 503 — of cases in Zhejiang Province, and has
been on lockdown 54 since Feb. 2nd when the number of cases there reached 304.
Wenzhou: Internet and 5G Hub
In the past year, there have been numerous conferences in this small city promoting 5G directly or indirectly. 55 56 57
For example, the Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT) for
Industry and Energy opened there in September of last year and the Sixth
World Internet Conference opened there in October of last year. The
Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT) for Industry and Energy
exhibited the latest state-of-the-art IoT technologies and 5G
applications for big data technologies and IoT platforms. The Sixth
World Internet (three-day) Conference brought together over 1,500
attendees from over 70 countries and regions, including Nobel Prize
winners, and executives from major tech companies like Qualcomm,
Alibaba, and Huawei.
In an article titled, “Experience the construction of 5G base
stations under high temperature,” published in Chinese (体验高温下5G基站建设) 58 on Aug. 26, 2019, it is stated that “Wenzhou is one of the first 5G pilot cities of the three major operators, and 5G network coverage is in full swing.”
In another article, “Wenzhou shows big ambition in IoT industry,” 59 (Sept. 10th, 2019), it is further stated:
“Wenzhou is building itself into a pilot city for China’s smart city construction and 5G applications,” Chen said, “Now, there are 13 cloud computing centers, over 500 5G base stations and more than 10,000 narrow-band IoT bases in the city.“
Finally, looking at yet another article published approximately six
months later titled “The first case in Zhejiang! S1 line is the first to
achieve full coverage of mobile 5G signals,” (Jan. 19th, 2020), (also
published in Chinese, 浙江首例！S1线率先实现移动5G信号全覆盖) 60 which revels
at the 5G signal penetration along the “Longwan Airport-Wenzhou South
High Speed Rail S1 line,” it becomes obvious that Wenzhou has also taken
part in the 5G race to plaster its city with 5G electromagnetic waves.
Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and the Immune System
Wireless radiation from 1G to 5G have all emitted modulated
“Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs)” and there are
literally thousands of studies showing biological effects from exposures
to man-made electromagnetic waves, and out of these, hundreds showing
biological effects on the immune system.
To give just one example, research by Kolomytseva, et al. (2002) described in the paper, “Suppression
of nonspecific resistance of the body under the effect of extremely
high frequency electromagnetic radiation of low intensity,” 61 found that with
whole-body exposure of healthy mice to low-intensity
extremely-high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (EHF EMR, 42.0 GHz,
0.15 mW/cm2, 20 min daily)… phagocytic activity of peripheral blood
neutrophils was suppressed by about 50% (p < 0.01 as compared with
the sham-exposed control) in 2-3 h after the single exposure to EHF EMR…
and that this
… effect persisted for 1 day after the exposure, and then the
phagocytic activity of neutrophils returned to the norm within 3 days.
And furthermore,
a significant modification of the leukocyte blood profile in mice
exposed to EHF EMR for 5 days was observed after the cessation of
exposures: the number of leukocytes increased by 44% (p < 0.05 as
compared with sham-exposed animals), mostly due to an increase in the
lymphocyte content.
They concluded that,
the results indicated that the whole-body exposure of healthy mice to
low-intensity EHF EMR has a profound effect on the indices of
nonspecific immunity.
In a paper 62 (written by myself along with Prof. Olle
Johansson of the Karolinska Institute) — which I believe offers the most
solid hypothesis to date on the main mechanisms by which EMFs do in
fact disable the immune system —a number of these related to immune
system effects can be found listed in the citations.
Johansson (2012) further details, in Section 8 of the BioInitiative, “Evidence for EMF Effects on the Immune System,” 63 numerous studies demonstrating those effects, especially with regards to how radiofrequency EMFs alter the immune system.
In the previously mentioned Aljazeera article,18 it is stated that a study published in the medical journal, The Lancet, on January 24th, found
what it called a “cytokine storm” in infected patients who were
severely ill. The condition is a severe immune reaction in which the
body produces immune cells and proteins that can destroy other organs.
Hence, it should be noted here that there are, in fact, numerous
research studies showing an EMF effect on cytokines: A PubMed search,
for example, produced 119 search results. 64
Back in 1998, a biologist named Roger Coghill conducted an experiment
where he “took white blood cells, known as lymphocytes, from a donor,”
and kept them alive via the use of nutrients while exposing them to
either cell phone radiation or the natural electromagnetic field of the
human body. He discovered that of the immune cells exposed to cell phone
radiation, only 13% remained undamaged and able to function properly;
whereas, of cells exposed only to body’s natural electromagnetic field,
70% remained undamaged and able to function properly. Naturally, while
his research did provide insight, he was attacked and criticized by the
wireless industry for being “unscientific.”
Dr. Robert O. Becker (1985) wrote of how the immune system is
weakened by manmade electromagnetic fields via the induction of
“subliminal stress”:
Initially, the stress activates the hormonal and/or immune systems to
a higher than normal level, enabling the animal to escape danger and
combat disease. If the stress continues, hormone levels and immune
reactivity gradually decline to normal. If you stop your experiment at
this point, you’re apparently justified in saying, “The animal has
adapted; the stress is doing no harm.” Nevertheless, if the stressful
conditions persist, hormone and immune levels decline further, well
below normal. In medical terms, stress decompensation has set in, and
now the animal is now more susceptible to other stressors, including
malignant growth and infectious diseases.
… One aspect of the syndrome was very puzzling. When undergoing these
hormonal changes, an animal would normally be aware that its body was
under attack, yet, as far as we could tell, the rabbits were not. They
showed no outward signs of fear, agitation, or illness. Most humans
certainly wouldn’t be able to detect a 100-gauss magnetic field, at
least not consciously. Only several years after Friedman’s work did
anyone find out how this is happening.
In 1976 a group under J. J. Noval at the Naval Aerospace Medical
Research Laboratory at Pensacola, Florida, found the slow response in
rats from very weak electric fields, as low as five thousandths of a
volt per centimeter. They discovered that when such fields vibrated in
the ELF range, the increased levels of the neurotransmitter
acetylcholine in the brainstem, apparently in a way that activated a
distress signal subliminally, without the animal’s becoming aware of it.
The scariest part was that the fields Noval used were well within the
background levels of a typical office, with its overhead lighting,
typewriters, computers, and other equipment. Workers in such an
environment are exposed to electric fields between a hundredth and a
tenth of a volt per centimeter and magnetic fields between a hundredth
and a tenth of a gauss. (pp. 277-278) 2
Suffice it to say, while there are multiple mechanisms involved by
which EMFs do weaken the immune system, there is no question that EMFs
can indeed have an adverse effect on the immune system.
5G Is Much More Powerful and Dangerous Than Its Predecessors
The 5G rollout — either the trialing stage or implementation stage —
has already started in most major developed countries of the world, with
majority of the rest seemingly preparing for its debut.
The European Commission has asked each member state to select one
city to be 5G-ready by 2020 as part of the EU’s 5G Action Plan for a
Digital Single Market. The European Commission has asked EU member
countries to start trialing 5G in at least one city making it 5G ready
by 2020 under its “5G Action Plan for a Digital Single Market.”
Belgium refused — even the trialing phase, not to mention the
implementation phase — due to the higher radiation levels that the 5G
would bring, which was way above what its radiation standards permitted.
Switzerland started with both trials and implementation, but put a halt
to further rollout, due to all the complaints about the health effects
it was getting. Other countries seemingly just lowered their standards
probably because they could not resist the next best thing to Ben &
Jerry’s Chunky Monkey Ice Cream. And the USA and China have seemingly
been in a 5G race to blanket their countries in this 5G radiation (and
most likely inadvertently the coronavirus), with China now seemingly
winning on both those fronts.
5G has been divided into low, mid, and high bandwidths. The
low-to-mid-bandwidth frequencies “are contiguous and range from 600 MHz
to 6 GHz,” 66 and have been used for 1G-4G for the past forty
years. On the other hand, the higher-frequency millimeter wave
bandwidths are new frequencies starting at approximately 24 GHz (in the
US anyway), and have not been used for commercial cell phone service in
in the USA until recently with the advent of these commercial 5G
services.
For the most part, at present, most 5G is now in the low to mid
bandwidth range, with limited high millimeter wave coverage, though that
will probably change as the technology develops and is implemented.
Also, 5G technology is being implemented alongside with and piggybacking
on already-in-place 4G technology. The 5G technology brings with it
both larger macro-base stations and smaller micro-base stations
installed between the larger macro-base stations. And because these
micro-base stations are often closer to people’s homes in residential
areas, according to Building Biology Certified Electromagnetic Radiation
Specialist (EMRS), Oram Miller,
we are now measuring higher RF levels in client’s homes, especially in second story bedrooms (read Lloyd’s article on EMFs in bedrooms), up to tens to hundreds of thousands of microWatts/meter squared (uW/m2) from these new antennas,
whereas,
the building biology profession and EMF experts around the world say
10 micro-Watts per meter squared or less is safe for sleeping areas
(actually, 0.1 uW/m2 is our “No Anomaly” level for sleeping areas). Here is a list of EMF Experts.
Furthermore, as we have gone up the spectrum from 1G to 5G, with each
new generation there has been increased modulation, and increased
modulation means increased biological effects and biological harm for
all life on this planet. 5G is no exception. Oram Miller goes onto
further explain
All of these advanced technologies push more cell signals into the
same airspace at faster speeds with far more modulation than current 4G
cell technologies.
And…
This modulation of cell signals transmitted in the low and mid bands
from new 5G and 4G LTE-Advanced small cell radios and antennas popping
up everywhere probably accounts for the majority of people living near
these antennas who report the onset of health symptoms not experienced
previously.
Dr. Martin Pall, Ph.D. (Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic
Medical Sciences, Washington State University), — who brought the
world’s attention to the fact that EMFs cause biological harm via the
opening up voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC), allowing for excessive
flow of calcium ions inside the cell and the prompting of nitric oxide
(N.O.) production via the stimulation of the enzyme nitric oxide
synthase to form a host of reactive oxygen species via downstream
effects 67 — has warned that the rollout of 5G will have
massive deleterious effects on the world’s population, not to mention
all life forms. He believes that 5G will be much more dangerous for the
following reasons:
1. The extraordinary high numbers of antennae that are planned.
2. The very high energy outputs which will be used to ensure penetration.
3. The extraordinary high pulsation levels.
4. The apparent high-level interactions of the 5G frequency on charged
groups presumably including the voltage sensor charged groups. 68
In a recent paper of his titled “Massive Predicted Effects of 5G,” (Dec. 17, 2019) 69 Pall
states that “given the high pulsation level for 5G radiation, even
short exposures may well produce severe biological effects,” not to
mention the power densities of up to 30 times higher than previous
systems of 1G to 4G and with penetration being enhanced via the magnetic
component. He is predicting that with the full-fledged turning on of 5G
(versus just its trial phase, where there is little communication yet
happening with the 5G), that we will be seeing (1) decreased human
reproduction, (2) lowered collective brain function, (3) very
early-onset Alzheimer’s, (4) increased autism and ADHD, (5)
deterioration of the human gene pool, and (6) massive increases in
cardiac arrests.
While following the rollout of 5G, he has tracked numerous signs of
its biological effects. For example, he has outlined increases in
neuropsychiatric effects, cardiac effects, and electromagnetic
hypersensitivity, taken from Swiss online articles, 70 71 as what we are already starting to see with the advent of this technology:
• Increases in insomnia, tinnitus, headaches, inability to concentrate, and fatigue.
• Increases in electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).
• Increases in cardiac arrhythmias.
He reports that while these effects had been reported before with occupational exposure studies and smart meter studies, “the effects appear to be much more severe following [the rollout of] 5G” with “even more severe apparent [yet to be published] 5G neuropsychiatric effects [appearing] in Southern California,” with their own recent massive rollout of 5G.
Furthermore, he states that “we have every reason to believe that
any full-fledged 5G system, communicating with the ‘internet of things’
will produce still vastly greater effects than any of these initial
findings.” This might very well be what we are seeing in the city
of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, in China — which has already
implemented this technology along with the 5G — with extraordinary high
rates of the coronavirus, and who knows what other increases in health
effects (e.g. increases in heart problems, blindness, electromagnetic
hypersensitivity, etc.) there have been that have not been made public.
He goes onto further outline — in correlation with 5G testing — UK 5G ambulance service suicides, 72 cases of panic in cattle in the Netherlands, 73 and bizarre, aggressive behavior in cattle and sheep in Germany, 74 birth defects in Germany and France, 75 76 and
hundreds of birds dropping from the sky due to sudden cardiac arrest
during three days of 5G testing in a park near Rotterdam, 77 and the list goes on and on to also include insect death and increases in fires in South Korea. 78 79
(See also the article on is 5G dangerous?)
Could the 5G Be Making the Coronavirus More Virulent?
When we look at the following video, it becomes apparent that smaller
life forms like insects are indeed more sensitive to this wireless
microwave radiation, with this clear example coming only from radar:
This picture shows some aphids on the leaf of an orange tree. Shortly
after radar was installed at a nearby airport a number of years ago, I
noticed that every few seconds, all the aphids would tense up in unison
and do sort of a little dance, as you see in the picture. Upon further
investigation, I found that the interval of time in between the activity
of each dance, coincided exactly with the rotation of the radar rotor
device at the airport, which was a distance of approximately fourteen
miles.
In the following video, Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt talks about an experiment where mold exposed to EMFs proliferated:
Now I am going to make the link to the electromagnetic fields. An
acquaintant physician in Switzerland who is a main mold researcher in
Europe made a beautiful experiment. He grew mold cultures under a
Faraday cage simply like a silver coat, it looks like a mosquito net,
that is made out of silver-coated cloth. [It had] been draped over the
mold culture. And he measured how much mycotoxins, how much toxins, are
these molds producing on a daily basis. Very easy to do. Then he lifted
the mosquito net and exposed the mold culture to the ambient
electromagnetic radiation in his laboratory, which was caused by the
lights that were on, by the computer in the corner, and especially, and
he found out later, the ambient cell phone radiation, from the nearby
cell phone tower that was broadcasting cell phone radiation. He found
out that the production of biotoxins in this culture went up more than
600 times. Not only that the mold suddenly put out significantly more
mycotoxins to protect themselves, but also much more virulent, much more
vicious, more poisonous mycotoxins. And I took that experiment as was
for me a big lightbulb went on….
So what if the same kind of thing is happening with the 5G radiation
and the coronavirus? Pall (2020) lists in a newer version of his paper 80 (previously mentioned) a number of studies which in fact strongly support this theory.
The question that is being raised here is not whether 5G is
responsible for the virus, but rather whether 5G radiation, acting via
VGCC activation may be exacerbating the viral replication or the spread
or lethality of the disease.
Let’s backtrack and look at the recent history of 5G in Wuhan in
order to get some perspective on those questions. An Asia Times article,
dated Feb.12, 2019 stated that there were 31 different 5G base stations
(that is antennae) in Wuhan at the end of 2018.
There were plans developed later such that approximately 10,000 5G
antennae would be in place at the end of 2019, with most of those being
on 5G LED smart street lamps.
The first such smart street lamp was put in place on May 14, 2019, but
large numbers only started being put in place in October, 2019, such
that there was a furious pace of such placement in the last 2 ½ months
of 2019.
These findings show that the rapid pace of the coronavirus epidemic
developed at least roughly as the number of 5G antennae became
extraordinarily high. So we have this finding that China’s 1st 5G smart
city and smart highway is the epicenter of this epidemic and this
finding that the epidemic only became rapidly more severe as the numbers
of 5G antennae skyrocketed.
Are these findings coincidental or does 5G have some causal role in
exacerbating the coronavirus epidemic? In order to answer that question,
we need to determine whether the downstream effects of VGCC activation
exacerbate the viral replication, the effects of viral infection,
especially those that have roles in the spread of the virus and also the
mechanism by which this coronavirus causes death. Accordingly, the
replication of the viral RNA is stimulated by oxidative stress: J Mol
Biol. 2008 Nov 28;383(5):1081-96. Variable oligomerization modes in
coronavirus non-structural protein 9. Ponnusamy R, Moll R, Weimar T,
Mesters JR, Hilgenfeld R.
Other aspects of viral replication including those involved in the
spread of the virus are stimulated by increased intracellular calcium
[Ca2+]i, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and
apoptosis, each of which are increased following EMF exposure. The first
citation below shows an important role of VGCC activation in
stimulating coronavirus infection.
Virology. 2020 Jan 2;539:38-48. Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV)
modulates calcium influx to favor viral replication. Bai D, et al.
J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different
nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.
Cell Calcium. 2018 Nov;75:30-41. NAADP-dependent Ca2+ signaling
regulates Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus pseudovirus
translocation through the endolysosomal system. Gunaratne GS, et al.
J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different
nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.
Proteome Sci. 2011 Mar 8;9:11. Proteomic analysis of chicken
embryonic trachea and kidney tissues after infection in ovo by avian
infectious bronchitis coronavirus. Cao Z, et al.
Res Vet Sci. 2015 Jun;100:12-7. Serum biomarkers of oxidative stress
in cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Tecles F, et al.
J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;197(6):812-6. Glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase deficiency enhances human coronavirus infection. Wu YH et
al.
J Virol. 1998 Jun;72(6):4918-24. Transmissible gastroenteritis
coronavirus induces programmed cell death in infected cells through a
caspase-dependent pathway. Eleouet JF, et al.
The predominant cause of death from this coronavirus is pneumonia.
Pneumonia is greatly exacerbated by each of those five downstream
effects of VGCC activation, excessive intracellular calcium, oxidative
stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis. The first of
the citations listed below shows that calcium channel blockers, the same
type of drugs that block EMF effects, are useful in the treatment of
pneumonia. This predicts that EMFs, acting via VGCC activation, will
produce increasingly severe pneumonia and therefore 5G radiation as well
as other types of EMFs may well increase pneumonia deaths.
Zheng et al. 2016 Preadmission Use of Calcium Channel Blockers and
Outcomes After Hospitalization With Pneumonia: A Retrospective
Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Ther. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):e30- e38.
Fang et al. 2017 Pneumolysin-Dependent Calpain Activation and
Interleukin-1α Secretion in Macrophages Infected with Streptococcus
pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2017 Aug 18;85(9). pii: e00201-17.
Fettel et al. 2019 Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) induces potent
anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo by S1P receptor
4-mediated suppression of 5-lipoxygenase activity. FASEB J. 2019
Feb;33(2):1711- 1726.
Liu and Shi. 2019 Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator 1
(CLCA1): More than a regulator of chloride transport and mucus
production. World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Nov 29;12(11):100077.
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15393. Surfactant protein D attenuates
acute lung and kidney injuries in pneumonia-induced sepsis through
modulating apoptosis, inflammation and NF-κB signaling. Du J, et al.
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020 Jan 28. MicroRNA (miR)-429 promotes
inflammatory injury by targeting kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in
neonatal pneumonia. Zhang L, et al.
Life Sci. 2019 Jul 1;228:189-197. Long noncoding RNA SNHG16 targets
miR-146a-5p/CCL5 to regulate LPS-induced WI-38 cell apoptosis and
inflammation in acute pneumonia. Zhou Z, et al.
These all argue that 5G radiation is likely to greatly exacerbate the
spread of the coronavirus and to greatly increase the lethality of the
infections produced by it. The good news is that it is likely that those
of us that live in areas with no 5G radiation and who avoid other EMFs
wherever possible will probably escape much of the impacts of this
prospective global pandemic. It is highly probable that one of the best things Wuhan can
do to control the epidemic in the city is to turn off the 4G/5G system.
Captured Agencies and the Hijacking of the Science
And you might ask yourself, “Why haven’t I heard about this problem?”
or you might tell yourself that “Certainly the authorities have our
best interests at heart when they make these kinds of decisions.”
Well, in a recent book review 81 of the book Triumph of Doubt (by
David Michaels, 2020), Kathleen Rest, Executive Director, Union of
Concerned Scientists (UCS), (February 14, 2020) outlines how deception
is used to manufacture doubt and uncertainty in many industries’ public
relations playbooks:
• Attack the science. There are lots of tools in
this toolbox: commission new “scientific” studies to reanalyze existing
data with methodologies biased toward predetermined results; review the
literature and risk assessments to question the weight of the evidence;
publish these reviews and re-analyses in selected scientific journals;
shop for and hire so-called “independent” experts to question the
science; provide tasty and contrarian soundbites for the media and
public consumption; and more.
• Create and deploy front groups with
innocuous-sounding names to undermine science, influence public opinion,
and gain access to policy makers while maintaining the illusion of
independence.
• Harass and intimidate independent scientists whose
research demonstrates or suggests harm. Or alternatively, curry favor
with academic institutions and scientists by providing some form of
financial support while also varnishing their public interest image.
• Overwhelm regulatory agencies with comments on proposed regulations.
• Use their outsized money, power, and access to
influence actions/inactions of elected policymakers and agency
officials. (Oh, and there’s also that well-oiled revolving door. Just
take a look at how many agency leaders and decision-makers in the Trump
administration come straight from the very industries they are now
supposed to regulate.)
Another tactic that I have noticed is that these people seem to use
is to get their plants on a discussion list to make some completely
off-the-wall statements so that they can get the media to cover this to
try to make everyone involved look like complete whack jobs, which an
unsuspecting public is quick to consume and believe. This is seemingly
happening right now with this issue. Learn more about the EMF cover-up.
Certainly, how Western governments and corporations manipulate public
opinion is different than how it might be done in China, since in the
latter case, there is strict government control (e.g. Internet firewall)
over what is permitted and not permitted to be accessed via the
Internet, etc. Hence, they may not really have to use the above playbook
and this may very well be the reason they have been able to move so
quickly to implement this technology. But at what cost?
“Everything must be taken into account. If the fact will not fit
the theory — let the theory go…. Real evidence is usually vague and
unsatisfactory. It has to be examined — sifted.” — Agatha Christie
As Agatha Christie says, “Everything must be taken into account.”
Ignoring — especially willfully ignoring — any very possible causal
factors — especially EMF — in my humble opinion, is just not good
science, if you can call that science at all.
According to Dr. Martin Pall, Ph.D.,
The failure of the “safety guidelines” to predict biological effects
and therefore safety means that these are not safety guidelines.
Consequently, any claims of safety made by the multi-trillion
euro-telecommunications industry based on these “safety guidelines” are
simply fraudulent.
These failures of the “safety guidelines” must be considered in terms
of the principle that is at the core of the scientific method. That
principle is that when we have a scientific theory and we test
predictions of that theory and the theory predictions are shown to be
false, then we must throw the theory out. It follows that when we have
eight highly repeated findings each of which show that the “safety
guidelines” do not predict biological effects and do not, therefore,
predict safety, it is a scientific requirement that the “safety
guidelines” be thrown out. The failure of ICNIRP, the European
Commission and various regulatory agencies to throw out the “safety
guidelines” clearly shows that their actions are both unscientific and
anti-scientific. 65
“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.” — Harlan Ellison
And anyone who would like some insight into how — what is perceived
as the sacred cow of international health organizations — the W.H.O. has
been unduly influenced by industry, they need look no further than
Swedish oncologist and professor, Dr. Lennart Hardell’s paper, “World
Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to
crack (Review).” 82
What Can You Do to Protect Yourselves?
Well given that accordingly the EMF effects act via the activation of
VGCCs with a resulting increase in calcium ions inside the cell
stimulating nitric oxide synthase to produce more nitric oxide leading
downstream to the creation of free radicals (aka reactive oxygen
species), it is important to, first of all, limit EMF exposures as much
as possible. As Oram Miller recommends, Reduce use, increase distance, and favor hardwired connections whenever
and wherever possible. You can put your cell phone in Airplane mode,
making sure WiFi and Bluetooth are off while in Airplane mode, and do
most every function on your cell phone on a different, hardwired device
when inside your house. That includes talking, texting, emailing, audio
and video streaming, and using various apps. 66 Learn more about Bluetooth,WiFi and cell phone radiation protection here.
Secondly, hire a Building Biology Certified Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist to
help with the measurement and then reduction of EMFs in the home, for
example, by shielding your home and sleeping area to block out
health-damaging RF, eliminating any wiring errors in the home to reduce
magnetic fields, and reducing sources of dirty electricity. Read about EMFs on wiring here.
Thirdly, I would say that implementing what I have dubbed “The Radio-protective Diet and Supplement Program™,” is essential.
There are two main supplements that I have used over the years that
have greatly reduced my own sensitivity to electromagnetic fields
dramatically and these are (1) magnesium, as it acts as a natural VGCC
blocker, in that it blocks calcium from entering the cell, and (2)
L-lysine, an essential amino acid, which works to calm down the
production of nitric oxide (N.O.), (whereas the amino acid arginine is
needed by nitric oxide synthase to stimulate the production of N.O.).
Learn more about Electrical sensitivity diagnosis and treatment here.
L-lysine has the added benefit in that it acts in a similar fashion
to selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in that it binds with
the serotonin receptors in the brain to increase serotonin levels.
Taking both of these supplements before bed should also help you sleep
better.
“The Radio-protective Diet and Supplement Program™,” is essentially
(1) immune system boosting, (2) anti-inflammatory, (3) detoxifying, and
(4) free-radical quenching. Hence, it consists of foods and supplements
that support these processes in the body. Here is an article on EMF Protection and the food you eat.
This would entail taking, for example, denatured organic whey powder
to boost glutathione (the body’s super antioxidant) levels, which not
only quenches free radicals, but also helps with boosting the immune
system and detoxification, and also targeted transfer factors which
boost one’s immune system by increasing natural killer cells;
anti-inflammatories like ginger and turmeric; detoxifying foods like
onions, garlic, and broccoli; and fruits and vegetables high in
antioxidants; not to mention foods that replenish hormones and
neurotransmitters lost from exposures to EMFs like serotonin, melatonin,
dopamine, gamma amino butyric acid (GABA), and phenylethylamine (PEA)
which include bananas (tryptophan), pineapple (serotonin), cashew nuts
(serotonin), tart cherry juice (melatonin), sprouted rice milk (GABA),
and chocolate (PEA).
Another supplement I find essential for boosting the immune system,
stimulating detoxification, and healing leaky gut (and probably other
leaky barriers) are humic minerals.
There have been a number of posts on social media websites
recommending herbs and supplements that are supposed to be effective
against the coronavirus. For example, Ty Bolinger lists a number of
supplements and herbs one can take in an article he posted on his
website, the Truth About Cancer, titled, “Coronavirus: ‘The Good, the
Bad, and the Answers.’” 83 And Doris Loh explains why taking Vitamin C will protect and enhance your immune system in two of her articles. 84 85 I
know from previous research that both EMFs and viruses deplete Vitamin C
reserves, so supplementing with it seems like a very good idea.
Finally, I would say that exposing yourself to beneficial EMFs
through Earthing, and also using a PEMF machine. I personally use one
that has for me, I feel, (1) stimulated the healing process, (2) reduced
inflammation, and (3) boosted my immune system. If you are interested
in this last solution, contact me at EMF Refugee.
Conclusion
China is a great country with an amazing populace who have made
astounding advancements creating a very sophisticated modern country in
the last ten years, surpassing many other modern countries in many ways.
However, given the facts that
1. we have real data that shows indeed that wireless radiation impacts the immune system;
2. we have numerous patients outside of the 5G zone showing no or only mild symptoms,
3. there have recently been 10,000 5G antennas installed and turned on
in Wuhan, not to mention 130,000 5G antennas installed throughout
greater China;
4. there have recently been 5G systems installed in numerous hospitals in China, not to mention the new COVID-19 hospitals;
5. we are seeing higher numbers of COVID-19 infections in places like
Hangzhou and Wenzhou, not to mention South Korea, etc. where they have
also recently installed numerous 5G antennas; and
6. there has been no testing done to find out the biological implications of exposing life forms to this radiation; we can conclude that the real problem here may very well in
fact be with the 5G electromagnetic radiation weakening people’s immune
systems, not to mention possibly making the virus itself more virulent. And
if this is true and if China does not change course, 5G might very well
become its — and the rest of the world’s Titanic — with the COVID-19
(and others like it) its icebergs.
Maybe this is what people really need to start worrying about and
perhaps it is time for the Chinese government, as well as governments
throughout the world to seriously investigate and address 5G possible
health effects and put a halt to the premature rollout of 5G technology
until they can prove that it is safe (which I doubt they can) and until,
safer alternatives can be developed.
The government in Belgium never implemented it and there was talk of
the government of Switzerland putting a halt on the 5G rollout, 87 but they now seem to be going ahead with it. 88 And it seems like, unless people wake up to this, China will certainly be following a similar path. I am sorry to have to rain on your electromagnetic parade
here, but it might actually very well be your 5G that is contributing to
making everybody sick.
“The only people angry at you for speaking the Truth, are those living a lie. Keep on speaking it.”
— Unknown
“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident.” — Arthur Schopenhauer
Many thanks to Paul Doyon for this guest post.
Paul Doyon is a researcher, writer, and teacher and educator of 33
years, who inadvertently became involved in researching the EMF issue
after becoming sick in 2005, whilst living in the vicinity of several
cell phone towers. He has spent 27 years of his adult life living
outside his home country of the USA, teaching English as a Foreign
Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL), mostly at the
university, college, and in international school levels.
Paul is a Building Biology Practitioner (BBP) and Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist (EMRS) with the International Institute for Building Biology and Ecology(IBE). He is also the founder of the website EMF Refugee.
20
0
20
No comments:
Post a Comment