Coronavirus Epidemic: WHO Declares a “Fake” Global Public Health Emergency
Can We Trust the WHO? Can We Trust The Media?
On 22 January, the members of the WHO Emergency Committee “expressed divergent views on
whether this event constitutes a PHEIC or not”.
On January 30, The Committee reconvened and declared the coronavirus epidemic as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
(for details on the Committee meetings scroll down to ANNEX)
What justified this far-reaching decision by the WHO Director General?
About 9,600 corona virus (pneumonia) confirmed cases (Jan 30). And 213 deaths recorded in China on Jan 30, which has a population of almost 1.4 billion.
No deaths have been reported out of Mainland China.
Out of 9600 confirmed cases, approximately 150 cases of infection have been recorded outside China. Moreover, (based on the above data, Jan 30), the 2019 nCoV has a low mortality rate (2.1%) compared to the Seasonal flu.
CBS Screen scan, Jan 30, 2020
The above CBS quotation is misleading.
Based on January 30 data, what should be emphasized is the following
- No deaths occurred outside China,
- More than 9500 recorded cases in China,
- Approximately 150 cases recorded outside China, (see list below)
In contrast, in the US, the Centers of Disease Control estimate that so far for the 2019-20 season, at least 15 million flu virus illnesses, 140,000 hospitalizations and 8,200 deaths in the U.S, which has population of 330 million, about a quarter that of China.
And there was virtually no coverage or concern regarding the Seasonal Flu, which in 2017 resulted globally in 650,000 deaths.
Source CDC
The media has gone into hight gear: The Wuhan coronavirus is portrayed as a global threat.The latter is corroborated by the recorded cases of infection and death.
Only 100 cases outside of China Mainland. No deaths recorded outside China.
Ironically, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a press conference confirmed that:
“The main reason for this declaration is not because of what is happening in China, but because of what is happening in other countries. Our greatest concern is the potential for the virus to spread to countries with weaker health systems, and which are ill-prepared to deal with it.”What was happening “in other countries” (aka approximately 150 cases of infection and no recorded deaths in 23countries and 2 territories (Macau and Hong Kong) (Jan 30)) does not justify the launching of a WHO sponsored Worldwide Public Health Emergency. (See below for distribution by country).
Coronavirus cases of infection: by country
Source Al Jazeera quoting official sources, January 31, 2020
- Australia – 9
- Cambodia – 1
- Canada – 3
- China – 9,809
- Macau -7 The city of Macau, a gambling hub
- Hong Kong, 12
- France – 6
- Finland – 1
- Germany – 7
- India – 1
- Italy – 2
- Japan – 16
- Malaysia – 8
- Nepal – 1
- Philippines – 1
- Russia – 2
- Singapore – 16
- South Korea – 11
- Spain – 1o
- Sri Lanka – 1
- Thailand – 19
- United Kingdom – 2
- United States – 6
- United Arab Emirates – 4
- Vietnam – 5
TOTAL 152 (without China)
My question to the Director General of the WHO.
Do these numbers justify the launching of a Worldwide Public Health Emergency?
6 in the US, 2 in Canada, 16 in Japan, 2 in the UK, 7 in Germany, etc. (Jan 30)
No deaths outside China recorded (Jan 30). And expert opinion under the helm of the World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed a Worldwide health emergency, which is creating havoc. What is required is routine WHO support to China and countries which have recorded virus infections.
The decision of the Director-General of the WHO is dramatic and unnecessary. It has triggered an atmosphere of fear and intimidation.
My question to the Director General of the WHO.
Do these numbers justify the launching of a Worldwide Public Health Emergency?
6 in the US, 2 in Canada, 16 in Japan, 2 in the UK, 7 in Germany, etc. (Jan 30)
No deaths outside China recorded (Jan 30). And expert opinion under the helm of the World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed a Worldwide health emergency, which is creating havoc. What is required is routine WHO support to China and countries which have recorded virus infections.
The decision of the Director-General of the WHO is dramatic and unnecessary. It has triggered an atmosphere of fear and intimidation.
In turn, the corporate media serves as an instrument of disinformation. The public has been misled.
About 150 infections Worldwide (excluding China). The World population is 7.7 billion, China’s population is 1.4 billion.
A rash Committee decision adopted at WHO headquarters in Geneva.
Déjà Vu: Flashback to 2009. The H1N1 swine flu pandemic
There are precedents: In 2009, based on incomplete and scanty data, the WHO predicted (“with authority”) that the H1N1 swine flu virus would result in :“…as many as 2 billion people could become infected over the next two years — nearly one-third of the world population.” (World Health Organization as reported by the Western media, July 2009).It turned out to be a multibillion bonanza for Big Pharma supported by the WHO’s Director-General Margaret Chan.
In June 2009, Margaret Chan made the following statement:
“On the basis of … expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met. I have therefore decided to raise the level of influenza pandemic alert from Phase 5 to Phase 6. The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic. … Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO), Press Briefing 11 June 2009)What “expert assessments”?
In a subsequent statement she confirmed that:
“Vaccine makers could produce 4.9 billion pandemic flu shots per year in the best-case scenario”,Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO), quoted by Reuters, 21 July 2009)A financial windfall for Big Pharma Vaccine Producers including GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck & Co., Sanofi, Pfizer. et al.
Swine Flu Fake News, Fake Statistics, Lies at the Highest Levels of Government
The media went into overdrive. (without a shred of evidence). Fear and Uncertainty. Public opinion was deliberately misled
“Swine flu could strike up to 40 percent of Americans over the next two years and as many as several hundred thousand could die if a vaccine campaign and other measures aren’t successful.” (Official Statement of Obama Administration, Associated Press, 24 July 2009).But the pandemic never happened.
“The U.S. expects to have 160 million doses of swine flu vaccine available sometime in October”, (Associated Press, 23 July 2009)
There was no pandemic affecting 2 billion people…
Millions of doses of swine flu vaccine had been ordered by national governments from Big Pharma. In the meantime the H1N1 virus had mutated. Millions of doses were subsequently destroyed: a financial bonanza for Big Pharma, an expenditure crisis for national governments.
There was no investigation into who was behind this multibillion fraud.
Several critics said that the H1N1 Pandemic was “Fake”.
Reported by Forbes:
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” (Forbes, February 10, 2010, emphasis added)For more details on the 2009 H1NI pandemic see:
Remember the 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic: Manipulating the Data to Justify a Worldwide Public Health Emergency
By , January 25, 2020
Important Lessons from the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic:
Can we trust the Western media?
Can we trust the World Health Organization (WHO) and Western governments including the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), all of which are serving the interests of Big Pharma (at tax payers’ expense)?
What are the stakes, why the media propaganda?
ANNEX
This annex provides details on the January 3oth WHO Decision to identify the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
Members and advisors of the Emergency Committee were convened by teleconference
The Director-General welcomed the
Committee and thanked them for their support. He turned the meeting over
to the Chair, Professor Didier Houssin.
….
Representatives of the Ministry of Health
of the People’s Republic of China reported on the current situation and
the public health measures being taken. There are now 7711 confirmed
and 12167 suspected cases throughout the country. Of the confirmed
cases, 1370 are severe and 170 people have died. 124 people have
recovered and been discharged from hospital.
The WHO Secretariat provided an overview of the situation in other countries. There are now 83 cases in 18 countries. Of these, only 7 had no history of travel in China. There has been human-to-human transmission in 3 countries outside China. One of these cases is severe and there have been no deaths.
At its first meeting, the Committee expressed divergent views on whether this event constitutes a PHEIC or not.
At that time, the advice was that the event did not constitute a PHEIC,
but the Committee members agreed on the urgency of the situation and
suggested that the Committee should continue its meeting on the next
day, when it reached the same conclusion.
This second meeting takes place in view
of significant increases in numbers of cases and additional countries
reporting confirmed cases.
…
The Committee welcomed the leadership and
political commitment of the very highest levels of Chinese government,
their commitment to transparency, and the efforts made to investigate
and contain the current outbreak. China quickly identified the virus and
shared its sequence, so that other countries could diagnose it quickly
and protect themselves, which has resulted in the rapid development of
diagnostic tools.
The very strong measures the country has
taken include daily contact with WHO and comprehensive multi-sectoral
approaches to prevent further spread. It has also taken public health
measures in other cities and provinces; is conducting studies on the
severity and transmissibility of the virus, and sharing data and
biological material. The country has also agreed to work with other
countries who need their support. The measures China has taken are good
not only for that country but also for the rest of the world.
The Committee welcomed a forthcoming WHO multidisciplinary technical mission to China, ..
The Committee wished to re-emphasize the
importance of studying the possible source, to rule
out hidden transmission and to inform risk management measures
The Committee also emphasized the need
for enhanced surveillance in regions outside Hubei, including pathogen
genomic sequencing, to understand whether local cycles of transmission
are occurring.
WHO should continue to use its networks of technical experts to assess how best this outbreak can be contained globally.
WHO should provide intensified support for preparation and response, especially in vulnerable countries and regions.
Measures to ensure rapid development
and access to potential vaccines, diagnostics, antiviral medicines
and other therapeutics for low- and middle-income countries should be
developed.
WHO should continue to provide all
necessary technical and operational support to respond to this outbreak,
including with its extensive networks of partners and collaborating
institutions, to implement a comprehensive risk
communication strategy, and to allow for the advancement of research and
scientific developments in relation to this novel coronavirus.
WHO should continue to explore the
advisability of creating an intermediate level of alert between the
binary possibilities of PHEIC or no PHEIC, in a way that does not
require reopening negotiations on the text of the IHR (2005).
WHO should timely review the situation with transparency and update its evidence-based recommendations.
The Committee does not recommend any travel or trade restriction based on the current information available.
The Director-General declared
that the outbreak of 2019-nCoV constitutes a PHEIC and accepted the
Committee’s advice and issued this advice as Temporary Recommendations
under the IHR.
…
The Emergency Committee will be reconvened within three months or earlier, at the discretion of the Director-General.
The Director-General thanked the Committee for its work.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2020
Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page
Become a Member of Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment