In my ongoing coverage of the "epidemic," I've written about the covert-operation aspect of the brutal game.
I want to add a few notes.
By its very nature, a covert op is meant to CONCEAL its true goals and
details and players, so it's no surprise we have unanswered questions.
Rushing to supply all the answers in five minutes is a futile exercise.
A covert op can be invented and planned from the get-go; or players,
seeing an event unfold, can jump onboard in mid-stream, take control,
and use the event to launch an operation.
A covert op has cover stories and false trails. These are standard in the intelligence business.
A cover story is designed to divert attention from what is actually
going on. It is basically a false picture floated to obscure the
truth. The intent is: get people dividing into camps and arguing with
each other about VARIATIONS of the cover story---thus
taking them further from the hidden facts and motives.
In this case, the cover story would be: a contagious virus jumped
species in China and started harming and killing people; it's spread.
People began taking sides: the contagious coronavirus is a natural
microbe; it's a leak from a biowar lab; it was weaponized in a lab and
intentionally released; it's rather harmless for the most part; it's
deadly; its effects are somehow magnified by interacting
with chemtrails; because people are dying, the virus must be the cause, etc.
Once people have divided into camps, the covert operators can twist
several of these cover-story variations, thus creating false trails,
down which people can travel, without ever reaching an end.
For example, a loose study might appear "which proves the coronavirus is
a bioweapon." If you read the study carefully, though, you realize the
authors aren't claiming the virus has been weaponized. Further, the
study authors are saying the virus has a peculiarity
which MIGHT mean THIS or COULD mean THAT or POSSIBLY IMPLIES something
else. And there appear to be no other studies which confirm any of
these equivocal findings.
But within an hour of the study being published, fifty thousand people on the Web are circulating this "proof of weaponization."
In any so-called epidemic, you will see some ex-military or
ex-intelligence spook appear out of nowhere with "expert insider
testimony" about the virus. He "knows it's a weapon." Therefore, it
must be.
Likewise, other authority figures will show up to capture audiences with
unproven revelations about the "bioweapon virus," or "the leak of the
virus from a lab," or the "theft of the virus." Their audience, having
rejected conventional media and government
authorities, is looking for alternative substitutes. And they'll get
substitutes.
Notice that, in all these insider pronouncements, whatever they are,
there is a re-enforcement of the basic idea that THE VIRUS is the cause
of the "epidemic." BUT REMEMBER, "THE VIRUS" IS THE BASIC COVER STORY.
Planners of a covert op want people to buy
the basic cover any which way.
To illustrate these points, imagine that, in an area of forest 30 miles
from a town, people discover a large patch of dead trees. Some have
fallen over. Others, leafless and gray, are still standing. At first,
no one takes action. Then, it's obvious the
patch is growing larger. More trees are falling down. More branches
and leaves are drying up and dropping on the ground.
The town newspaper, aided by pronouncements from local officials, runs a
story about a fire. There was a fire in that part of the forest. It
was "so severe and hot, its effects are still being felt." NOW, people
begin arguing about the cause of the fire.
It was a lightning hit. Someone set a blaze, using flammable liquid
that burned at an exceptionally high temperature. Drug dealers fought
with one another and burned up the drugs. A sinister creature,
half-animal, half-human, rumored to live in the woods,
set the fire. ET aliens set the blaze. Their small ship crashed and
burned.
The fire is the cover story. People are arguing about variations of the
basic cover. Actually, six months ago, a town firm that secretly sells
a dangerous and illegal pesticide, believing they were about to get
busted, sent employees with drums of the poison
into the forest to dump them. That's what happened. But the cover
story is now so ingrained in minds, few people will consider there was
no fire...THERE HAD TO BE A FIRE.
After having researched and written about epidemic duds (SARS, Swine
Flu, Ebola, Zika, etc.) for many years, I've taken a different approach.
I've asked more BASIC questions at every turn.
If public health officials and governments announce an outbreak and a
virus, I ask, "How did they discover the new virus?" That's a
reasonable inquiry. "Did they really find and isolate a new virus?"
"What procedures did they use for the job?" "Are those
procedures accurate and valid?" "Did the scientists who rushed to the
outbreak-locale to take tissue samples---are these the CDC or World
Health Organization virus hunters who always find a new virus, even if,
at the designated location, an industrial corporation
is releasing torrents of polluted poison into the ground and the water?
Which leads me to my next basic question: assuming some harm is being
visited on people, are there clear causes that have nothing to do with a
virus, causes that would account for the profile of harm that has been
announced? And if so, who would benefit from
hiding these other clear causes by using the cover story of a virus?
Corporations, governments? Who would benefit, on the back end, from the
virus cover story? Drug companies? Vaccine companies?
I ask: how many cases of the "epidemic" have been announced? How many
deaths? Exactly how are these cases being identified and counted? What
diagnostic tests are being done? Are the tests accurate and valid?
Again, this is a reasonable inquiry. If the
authorities are claiming a certain number of people are being harmed, I
want to find out HOW these "experts" are coming to that conclusion.
I ask: what is the list of symptoms being attributed to the "epidemic
illness?" Are these symptoms so generalized they already fit large
numbers of people without the claim that the cause is a new virus? For
example, are typical flu-like symptoms, which apply
to millions of people, suddenly being shifted over and counted as cases
of the "new epidemic?"
I ask: in all modern epidemics, are there common, long-accepted medical
tests and procedures which are arbitrary and unproven, which should be
openly debated, but aren't? Is the story of a virus used to hide
corporate and government crimes?
There are other questions I ask, but you get the idea. I go under the
cover story of the moment and look for more fundamental lies and
truths. I hit the "stress points" of the cover story.
These basic questions have generated all my previous articles on the current "coronavirus crisis."
I keep asking, looking, and answering.
If I find out, in asking and answering these questions that, yes,
questionable procedures have been used in discovering the new virus in
the first place; unworkable, dubious, and worthless tests have been used
to diagnose and label patients with the epidemic
disease; cases are undoubtedly "imported" from traditional diseases, in
order to falsely inflate the number of cases in the epidemic; causes of
illness, other than the virus, are present in an area where the
epidemic started; the epidemic illness is a familiar
generalized list of symptoms which are present in millions of
people---if I find out all these things, then the "new epidemic" with a
new viral cause is a con job.
If, after stripping away the number of people claimed to be "epidemic
cases" who most likely aren't, I find that the true number of cases
appears to be small, then there is no epidemic.
If the number of cases still seems to be high, then I look deeper into
non-viral causes which are currently operating, and influencing illness.
For my findings on this "coronavirus epidemic," I suggest going back and reading all my articles in this ongoing series.
For those who have been with me from the beginning, I thank you for your support and interest.
I'll close this piece with an example. In 2003, there was another
coronavirus epidemic: SARS. Its symptoms were basic flu with, in some
cases, acute respiratory problems.
As I've detailed, a Canadian biologist, Frank Plummer, working for the
World Health Organization, spoke frankly to the press, saying the number
of SARS patients with the coronavirus was fewer and fewer. In fact, it
was approaching zero. This, obviously, cut
the legs out from under the claim that SARS was a new disease caused by
a new coronavirus.
Where did SARS begin? Where was it first found? Guangdong, China. In their excellent book,
Virus Mania, Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Kohnlein explore
non-virus causes of flu-like illness in that locale. They found causes.
It turns out this area is one of the world's largest re-cyclers of
e-waste:
"Guangdong is China's largest industrial area...extremely polluted.
Garbage lies everywhere; above all high-tech waste...For $1.50 a day,
locals disassemble computers, monitors and printers with their bare
hands, endangering both their own health and the
environment... There, workers empty toner cartridges from laser
printers the whole day long without protective masks, breathing in fine
carbon dust. Others, mostly women and girls, dip circuit boards into
baths of liquid lead to separate and collect the soldering
materials with which the memory chips and processors are attached to
the plates. Unprotected, they are exposed to toxic fumes. While the
plastic plates are simply burned up, the chips and processors are put in
acid baths, to extract their gold. Here as well,
poisonous fumes are generated, and the unusable leftover acids are just
dumped into the river. A lot of garbage is simply burned up or dumped
onto rice fields, irrigation facilities or into waterways. The bodies of
water and groundwater around Guiys have become
so contaminated that drinking water has to be brought in daily from
other cities..."
A real cause of real illness. No need for a virus. Except...as a cover story.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment