Most people are accepting the news that the Chinese coronavirus is
spreading across China and the world. They don't understand
ground-level facts.
First of all, in every so-called epidemic, diagnoses of patients are
eventually made by simple observation. The patient has typical flu
symptoms? Fever, cough, fatigue, weakness, respiratory problems? He
lives or works in an area where the epidemic has been
reported? Boom, tell the patient he has the epidemic disease.
Obviously, this is absurd. But it happens. And then you hear or read,
"Today, three more people were found to be infected with the virus in
(insert name of city)."
If a patient is actually tested, before a diagnosis is made, the most
prevalent method is the antibody test. It's fast. But there is a
problem---a major problem. A positive test means the patient's immune
system has come in contact with the virus. Before
1984, this was generally interpreted as a good sign for the patient:
his immune system responded well and defeated the virus. But then the
science was turned upside down. Suddenly, a positive test meant the
patient had a disease. Therefore, huge numbers
of people were falsely told they were in danger. During times of
hysteria, they became "new cases" of some purported epidemic. They were
cited on the news to bolster the idea that the "the virus was
spreading." One more point: antibody tests are known to
cross-react. This means: some irrelevant fact about the patient makes
the test falsely read "positive for a virus." He drank wine the night
before the test. He has a cold. Etc.
In very few cases, a patient might be tested with a method called PCR.
In simple terms, this test takes a tissue sample from the patient---a
tiny, tiny piece of something that might be a virus...but it's much too
small to be observed and identified. To overcome
this problem, the PCR test amplifies that tiny fragment many, many
times---like blowing up a photograph. If the test overcomes several
challenges and is done correctly, researchers and doctors might be able
to infer that the patient has the virus. BUT the
test would reveal nothing about HOW MUCH of the virus he has. And why
is that important? Because two or three little particles of virus
floating around in the patient's body mean nothing. In order to cause
disease, there would have to be millions and millions
of a virus in the patient's body. However, that obvious fact is
ignored. A patient with a positive PCR test is added to the list of
epidemic cases---and the news reports, "Today, four more infected people
were found in Alaska, leading experts to state the
epidemic is spreading unchecked across the world..."
As you can see, these major blunders and false interpretations will result in news about "the spreading epidemic."
I should also mention low-level security personnel, police, and
soldiers, in airports and other transportation centers, waving wands at
people to see if their temperature is elevated---signifying they might
be "carrying the virus." These "tests" are about
as reliable as randomly pointing to a figure in a photo of a crowd and
saying, "He was the one who just robbed the bank, arrest him."
Referring to Wuhan, called the center of the epidemic in China, photos
of people jamming hospital waiting rooms are cited as "evidence" of the
spreading virus and epidemic. This is preposterous. Many of these
people, experiencing a few typical flu symptoms,
have been brainwashed by public announcements into believing they have
the "epidemic virus." And then, Wuhan has highly dangerous levels of
air pollution. Wuhan is notorious for polluting smog. Last summer,
thousands of people in the city showed up on the
streets protesting the air quality and a newly planned waste
incinerator they believed would cause even more harmful smog. This
pollution causes lung problems---cited as a symptom of the "coronavirus
epidemic."
Keep these issues in mind when people automatically claim "the virus and the epidemic are spreading."
|
No comments:
Post a Comment