You Know
Something is Wrong When…An American Affidavit of Probable Cause by Anna Maria
Riezinger and James Clinton Belcher
Part Six:
The Civil War
--Where Everything Ran Amok--
1860 -
Abraham Lincoln is elected President of the United States [commercial Company].
March 27,
1861 - Eleven Congressional Delegates from the Southern States walk out,
leaving
the
Congress adjourned without an agreed upon date to meet again.
Lincoln formed
a Delaware Corporation doing business as The United States of America, Inc.,
and
installed the remaining members of Congress as a Board of Directors to continue
to
conduct
business.
The Third Big Lie
The united
States of America never signed any service contract with Lincoln's new
corporation
doing
business as "The United States of America, Inc." Lincoln merely
"traded upon" The
Constitution
for the United united States of America and substituted his corporation as a
successor
Trustee.
Please
Note: United States (Commercial company) does not equal
The United
States of America, Inc., does not equal
the United
States of America, Inc., does not equal the UNITED
STATES
(INC.), does not equal USA (INC), does not equal US CORP, does not equal THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA INC., does not equal E PLURIBUS UNAM THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, INCORPORATED, and so on...
All these
similarly named corporate entities have been used to deceive and defraud the
American
States and the American People ever since.
As a Result...
There is no
valid contract binding the united States of America to any corporation merely claiming
to be a successor to the United States (Commercial Company) which Lincoln bankrupted
on April 25th, 1863.
NO
CONTRACT....NONE. ZERO. NADA. ZIP.
The
International Trustees - the Pope, the Rector of the National Shrine, the
British Monarch,
and since
1924, the Secretary of the Treasury, should have intervened to protect the
National
Trusts and
they all failed to do so.
Despite the
requirements of the only equity contract the Global Estate Trust had with the
States
of America,
despite all the treaties promising "friendship" and "amity in
perpetuity" and despite
the loyal
support of the Americans through two World Wars, these False Trustees allowed
this
situation
to continue and have profited from it for over 150 years.
One Stinking Word ----
Person
1862 - the
"corporate" Congress changes the meaning of a single word. That word
was"person".
From 1862
to today, the word "person" means "corporation" to
Federal-ese.
Ever since
that time members of Congress have functioned as officers of a private mostly
foreign-owned corporation.
--For Government Purposes
Only--
*A
"person" is no longer a "people". It is a corporation. 37th
Congress, Second Session, Chapter 49, Section 68.
In other
words, a body of men no different than that of Board of
Directors
of IBM, change the meaning of a single word - only and explicitly for use
within their corporation.
On April
24, 1863, Lincoln issued General Order 100 and put the Grand Army of the
Republic in charge of the nation's destiny.
On April
25, 1863, he bankrupted the original United State [Commercial Company].
April 1865
...as the Armistice is
signed...
The
Southern States are in ruins and under military occupation.
The
Northern States are bankrupt. There is no real government---just the Army and a
phony
Congress
operating a commercial corporation called The United States of America, Inc.
President
Andrew Johnson declared peace on the land three time:
Peace is
declared....May 10, 1865
Peace on
the land...April 2, 1866
We are at
peace...August 20, 1866
Yet despite
the Armistice signed by Grant on the land, and the peace declared by Johnson,
the Rump “Congress” acting only as the Board of Directors of a private,
for-profit corporation kept the war going in the jurisdiction of the Sea.
Together,
the 39th & 40th Congressional Sessions violated
“The Constitution of The United States of America” they Chartered under six
different ways:
1. Article
V. Section 5 was violated as shown by The House Journal, March 3, 1866, page
353.
2. Article
VIII, Section 3, was violated by The Reconstruction Acts of 1867.
3. Article
I, Section 9, Clause 3 was violated by The Reconstruction Acts of 1867.
4. Article
IV, Section 4 was violated by The Reconstruction Acts denial of a Republican
Form
of
Government to the Southern States AFTER the Armistice.
5. Article
I, Section 8, Clause 17 was violated by the 39th
Congress
unlawfully exercising exclusive legislation outside their District and allowed
Federal Enclaves.
6. Article
IV, Section 3 was violated when the 39thCongress
formed unlawful defacto “Federal States” within the organic States of the union
to operate as franchises of “The United States of America, Inc.”
– Poisoning the Well --
The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 - 68
The same
corporate "Congress" claiming to "represent" the American
States -- while acting as officers of a private, for-profit, deceptively named
governmental services corporation – created five military districts in ten
Southern States and allowed the military district commanders to
appoint
"judges" to run civil tribunals to deal with "rebels" still
at large.
This
created a form of law called "Special Admiralty" or
"Presidential Admiralty" which is not addressed under any
constitution and not under any constitution then or now. The courts practicing
it display a Stars and Stripes with a heavy gold fringe. This administrative
abuse of both civil authority and military power has continued unabated for
lack of a coherent and honest civil government ever since.
More filth
from the rump Congress -- the corporate "Constitution". In 1868 the
corporate "Congress" published its corporate articles and by-laws as
a new "Constitution" which it gratuitously wrote all by itself and
for itself.
This
document called the "Constitution of the United States of America"
was purposefully givena deceptively similar name to "The Constitution for
the united States of America" to fool people, and it adopted much of the
same language.
It was a
look-alike, sound-alike fake -- and
a different
kind of document entirely.
As the
article and by-laws of a commercial corporation there was no need for and
ratification of "amendments" by the Several States. Any
"states" created under its auspices could only be franchises of the
parent company anyways. Secretary of State William Seward simply declared
the 14th
Amendment to this Constitution ratified. Mere lip service was given to the
process of ratification by the States.
Under
Secretary of State
William
Seward........
28 USC 3002
(15) (A):
United
States = Federal Corporation = “Commercial Corporation” doing business as
“United
States”
~ The 14th Amendment ~
The 14th
Amendment excludes American State Citizens from voting in the private corporate
elections held by "The United States of America (Inc.)" American
State Citizens are referred to as "peaceful inhabitants of the land"
and they are specifically disenfranchised.
The Fourteenth Rotten Fraud Upon the
People
All persons
(which means corporations in Federalese) and citizens of the United States
(didn't say United States of America-- this
is talking about the commercial corporation) and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof...which is not the Jurisdiction of the Land, but instead a corporate
and commercial jurisdiction that existed only in the international Jurisdiction
of the Sea.
The
Fourteenth Amendment seems to be talking about people on the land, but instead
is talking about corporations belonging to the United States (Inc.) operating
in the Jurisdiction of the Sea.
It is
purposefully, maliciously deceitful in every respect, designed to confuse
anyone who wasn't in on the scam and aware of the "federal" meaning
of "person" adopted in 1862.
That same
14th Amendment established Federal "states" -- that is, state
franchises of the federal corporation and extended "territorial
jurisdiction" to them.
A group of
crooks running a private, for-profit, mostly foreign-owned corporation usurped
our rightful government. Sure, they were elected to some kind of office in something
called the United States Congress -- whatever "United States" that
might be and whichever "Congress"
either. Was
it The Congress of the United States? The congress of the united States? The
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES? Or maybe THE congress of the united States of
America? Or maybe THE US CONGRESS? Or could it be....
The fraud
has been ongoing since 1861.
Just so we are clear.....
When
American State Citizens elect members of Congress to public office, those
people take their oaths to The united States of America (Major) and they act as
deputies -- fiduciary officers
-- who are
100% individually and commercially liable for their acts.
When United
State Citizens elect members of their corporate "Congress" to private
corporate offices, they take their oaths to the United states (Corporation) and
they merely claim to"represent" the people and the places they come
from.
Representatives
can "represent" people and way they wish, and they bear no
responsibility for a poor performance.
February
2nd, 1871 - 41st "Congress", 3rd session, Chapters 62, 63, 64,
65.....the "Congress" declared itself to be the "successor"
of all "United States corporations" and the property of all said
"corporations". they claimed to own every corporation in America that
was formed under
"U.S"
auspices.
And THAT
claim to own all corporations is why they incorporate "YOU"...!
The Dilemma
of the states, States, STATES, and States of States
The
original "State of New York" represented the land mass state and the
people inhabiting the actual state. As a result of the Civil War conundrum,
this original "State of New York" was reconstituted as the "New
York State" and the name "State of New York" was instead applied
to
the newly
created Federal State of New York operating in the Jurisdiction of the Sea.
We also
have the "STATE OF NEW YORK" operating under the draconian military
law of the Washington, DC Municipality.
As if that
wasn't enough, the UN Corporation has gotten into the act and sponsored its "STATE"
franchise operating simply as "NEW YORK".
Thanks to
the duplicity and deceit involved in operating two "States" (or more)
at the same time, the "State Legislatures" are not fulfilling their
proper function for the Jurisdiction of the Land. This has resulted in the
"federal government" running amok and rampant over the rights
of the
actual States and the people inhabiting them.
The problem
has been exacerbated by the fact that no new States on the land have been added
to the Union since 1860. This is because Congress stopped functioning as a
congress of Deputies representing the States on the Land and has no power to
actually create and add new
States on
the Land via the Northwest Ordinance and Equal footing Doctrine ever since. Technically,
the Western States are not States. they are States-in-Waiting, promised all the
perks and rights by commercial contract and trust indenture, but having no
separate and sovereign
status
under international law.
Correction
requires the legislatures of the original States on the Land formed prior to
1860 to resume functioning on behalf of the land jurisdiction and to hold the
federal government and the Global Estate Trust to account. It remains for all
Americans to hold the members of
Congress to
account and force to force them to convene as Deputies as required by The Constitution
for the united States of America and to invoke the Northwest Ordinance and
Equal Footing Doctrine to fully seat and create the Western States as States on
the Land not quasifederal possessions owed "equivalent rights".
As a brief
expose shows, a tremendous amount of confusion has been deliberately and inexcusably
added to the original government structure and that confusion has been used by crooks
to defraud and control both Americans and American States on the Land. As is
also
evident, a
good deal of the blame for this comes home to the "United States
Congress" which has grotesquely and criminally malfunctioned for many
decades, leaving a great deal of housekeeping and housekeeping to be done.
As is also
apparent, the Global Estate Trust and the International Trustees responsible
have failed to honor their sacred trusts. The Popes have ignored and profited
from this situation and so have the British Monarchs. The actual Trustee
responsible for administering the Land
Jurisdiction
was outflanked by the renegade Congress and his office was made subservient to none
other than the Secretary of the Treasury and the criminally inclined baking
cartel's hand chosen Bankruptcy Trustee, the Secretary of the Treasury of
Puerto Rico.
If there
remains any kind of lawful authority vested in any human institutions on Earth –
the Church, the British Monarchy, the Congress, the individual State
Legislatures, the United Nations, the World Court, anything, anywhere -- then
these acts of fraud and neglect must be
recognized
for what they are and forthrightly corrected. Otherwise, we must stop
pretending that there is any such thing as the "Rule of Law" and
admit that those pretending to administer "Law" have instead operated
as brigands and con artists acting as predators against the people
and nations
they have always been under contract and obligation to serve and protect.
Natural Law, “Democracy” and The
Contract
The
Founders of the united States of America defined “Law” to be the “Law of Nature
and Nature's God” which is Law that derives its moral authority from nothing
less than Nature and the Holy Spirit.
Men are
born free to walk, talk, gather together, express their complaints, contract,
work, trade, to have a home, to enjoy the fruits of their labor, own property,
and do many, many other things freely by Nature. Those rights are “Natural Law”
and are unalienable—they cannot be deprived
nor taxed
nor licensed.
Those who
live within the Law are “Law-abiding” and those who live outside the Law are
“Outlaws” when on land and “Pirates” on the sea.
The Bible
forbids Man-kind from making legislation (Deuteronomy 4:2) and for Christians
the True Law was further reduced to only two precepts: to love God (Matthew
22:37) and love your neighbor as yourself (Mark 12:31).
These
Laws—if properly observed-- are complete, entire, and sufficient for the
conduct of all business, all relationships, and all needs. They lead directly
to moral behavior among men.
Unfortunately,
democracy-- which literally means “mob rule” – is immoral because it constantly
violates the inherent rights of individuals, and the United States of American
(Minor) composed of 57 Federal States is a “Constitutional Democracy”.
If 51% of
your neighbors wish to eat you for dinner, they may do so by invoking “majority
rule” in a democracy, which is precisely why our Forefathers ordained – a
“republican form of government” which respects the Natural Rights of
individuals above the wishes of majorities.
This is a
major contractual failure on the part of the Global Estate and those
individuals and offices responsible for
maintaining the “Rule of Law”.
No comments:
Post a Comment