september 3, 2019
The Fluoride Action Network published the following press release in response to the continued criticism of the
JAMA Pediatrics IQ/Fluoride study. We plan to respond with
additional press releases in the coming days. In the meantime, here
again is a link to the
video of Paul Connett's response to some of the unfounded criticisms of the
JAMA study.
We strongly urge you to share
the PR
Newswire version of
our release with the elected officials and media outlets in your
community (newspaper, radio, TV, online). The issue is still very hot
in the
news, and now is the time to take advantage of the coverage locally to
educate your neighbors and decision-makers.
Several
In Utero Fluoride/IQ Studies Should
Provoke A Nation-Wide Fluoridation Moratorium
Provoke A Nation-Wide Fluoridation Moratorium
Critics of the fluoride-IQ study published this month in
JAMA
Pediatrics claimed
it needed
replication. However, the Canadian study by Green (2019) was
already a replication of another U.S. government-funded study published
in 2017 by Bashash, which found
similar effects, reports the Fluoride
Action Network (FAN).
Both
were Mother-Offspring studies that used urinary fluoride levels during
pregnancy to assess cognition in the paired offspring.
Both
studies have shown a strong relationship between maternal exposure to
fluoride and lowered IQ in offspring. Each revealed that the fetal stage
appears to be the most vulnerable
time period for fluoride's neurotoxicity.
Actually, FAN points out that there have been five studies
that have found this relationship between maternal exposure and lowered
IQ in children (see listing below). However,
the Canadian study is the first to compare fluoridated vs
non-fluoridated cities. The pregnant women in Canada with higher urinary
fluoride levels had offspring with lower IQs and were from the
fluoridated cities.
Paul
Connett, PhD, FAN Executive Director, says, "For years promoters of
fluoridation have argued that there is no harm from fluoridation; these
and other studies indicate that there
is potential harm and it is serious. It is unconscionable to continue
fluoridation until this is resolved. For those who doubt the current
findings more studies can be done once a moratorium on fluoridation is
in place. To do otherwise is to condone a human
experiment on millions of children."
Connett adds, "To ignore brain health and continue fluoridation in name of dental health is a huge disservice to the children of this country. FAN argues that there are
more effective programs to reduce dental inequities (eg, 'Childsmile'
in Scotland) and communities can easily implement them."
The Mother-Offspring studies, listed below, can be accessed
on our website.
- Green
(2019). Largest study with 512 mother-offspring. Lower IQ in children 3- 4 years of age.
- Bashash
(2017). Longest study. 299 mother-offspring pairs in Mexico. Lower IQ in children 4 and 6-12 years of age.
- Thomas
(2018). 401 mother-offspring pairs in Mexico. Lower IQ in children 1-3 years of age Only the abstract has been published.
- Valdez
Jiménez (2017). Lower IQ between the ages of 3-15 months with 65 mother-offspring pairs in Mexico.
- Li (2004). Significant differences in the neonatal behavioral neurological assessment score in 91 offspring aged 1-3 days old.
No comments:
Post a Comment