Wednesday, April 24, 2019

1771-1772: For All the Jural Assemblies - 51 NAMES and Debts from Lincoln County Watch




Tuesday, April 23, 2019

1771-1772: For All the Jural Assemblies - 51 NAMES and Debts from Lincoln County Watch


By Anna Von Reitz

Immediately following and attendant upon Texas entering the Union, a reshuffling of the Federal Territorial Government began and a change in nomenclature was adopted by the Municipal United
States Government. This started in 1845 and culminated in 1851.  Prior to that, the Municipal Government functioned using the nomenclature of Roman Civil Law and the conventions of Latin. 

In Latin, the greatest power and respect and political status is indicated by the use of all small letters.  A name written in all small letters indicates the political status of a free patrician in their private capacity: flavius josephus.

Thus, until 1851, the republican states occupying the soil jurisdiction of this country are all referenced and written in Municipal documents using all small letters: texas, wisconsin, florida…. and these states are all known to be represented by business organizations dba texas republic and republic of texas, for example.

This made it easy to literally see what jurisdiction of each republican state was being referenced, and in this case, the soil jurisdiction is being indicated by the use of all small letters.

After 1851, the Municipal United States Government adopted English conventions.  After that, the soil jurisdiction had to be directly referenced in the text, because the soil jurisdiction of Texas looks the same as the land and sea jurisdiction of Texas in English. 

It's all "signed" as "Texas" without any finer distinction available in English text.

This causes confusion for people delving into old documents, but its not really that confusing.  In the earlier "Latinized" documents, "texas" is the national soil jurisdiction of the republican state operated by the "people", "Texas" is the land jurisdiction State operating the international jurisdiction of the People. 

As letters are capitalized in Latin, a loss of political status and power is indicated: 

"flavius josephus" is a free man.
"Flavius Josephus" is an indentured servant or Office Holder.
"FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS" is a slave of Rome.

Thus in the old Latinized documents that you run across in your research a reference to "virginia" is talking about the soil jurisdiction of the colony or the republican state, depending on the time frame, while a reference to "Virginia" is talking about the international land or sea jurisdiction of the colony or the republican state, and if --- very rarely --- you run across a reference to "VIRGINIA" in old pre-1851 papers of the Territorial or Municipal Governments, this indicates the global jurisdiction of the air that is subject to Rome, but nonetheless attached to the ownership of the republican state, virginia.

There was a resurgence of these "Latinized" conventions in this country following the Second World War, when the Romanized Municipal United States Government exerted itself and issued "PERSONS" in the "name of" American State Citizens who were wrongly registered as Territorial United States Citizens. 

This is because the Territorial United States [Military] Government was in debt to the Pope and the Holy See.  They had earlier in the 1920's - 1940's created Territorial "franchises" for themselves, operating in names identical to our Given Names and appearing to be Proper Names in English, but having been "Registered" as British Foreign Situs Trusts operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea, not recorded as the Given Names of American State Nationals. 

The British Territorial United States Government having accomplished this fraudulent "unlawful conversion" and identity theft, then sold these fake franchises as "salvaged property" presumed to belong to the former Confederate States of States to the Roman Pontiff. 

The Roman Pontiff then converted these into WARDS of the Municipal United States Government, and various incorporated entities operating under these slave NAMES were created --- most especially, a Pauper doing business under a NAME styled as "JOHN DOE", a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust doing business under a NAME styled as "JOHN MICHAEL DOE", and a Public Transmitting Utility doing business under a NAME styled as "JOHN M. DOE".

As things stand, the British Territorial Government has been briefly subjected to Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and the Municipal United States corporation claiming to own all these various entities as "WARDS" of the various Municipal STATES OF STATES is undergoing liquidation.

At which point, we have stood up and said --- ah, wait a minute --- there's been a mistake. 

1. We were never at sea and never knowingly or willingly acting as British Territorial "United States Citizens" despite the unconscionable falsified registrations indicating that we were;

2. Therefore, we and our assets were not available for the British Territorial United States Government to sell to the Roman Pontiff;

3. We are here at home, standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of our States, owed every jot of the Constitutions, and also owed the return of our natural birthright estates free and clear of any debt or encumbrance. We are also owed any profit realized from the lease and use and trading upon of our private and public property.

This is why we are owed a lot of money from both the British Government and the Vatican. 

Both are under solemn treaties and commercial service contracts and both have acted in Gross Breach of Trust. 

Both have taken advantage of and attempted to cheat generations of Americans via the undisclosed and unconscionable contracts provided by phony birth registrations --- used to create the legal presumption that we were all choosing to be counted as "United States Citizens" and that we were, moreover, leftover "rebels" and abandoned assets of the defunct Confederate States of States---- instead of being peaceful American State Nationals native to States of the Union that were never involved in the Civil War, never at sea, and never engaged in international commerce at all.  

No doubt, after eighty years of silence, they thought they were going to get away with it, and it has been quite a shock to find that we are still awake and still alive and that we contest and rebut their falsified records and presumptions being made against our country, our populace, and our lawful government.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

For All the Jural Assemblies - 50 Congresses


By Anna Von Reitz

We all think of "the" Congress, but in fact, "Congress" is a very broad word and basically means "meeting" and, to be honest, a "verbally raucous meeting" --as in a "Congress of Crows".  It has in its original meaning and context none of the dignity accorded to the word today, and a return to the earlier understanding would be healthier and far more realistic for our purposes.

The original Congress that we think of, known as "The First Continental Congress" was exactly such a meeting --- raucous and undisciplined and largely unofficial, as it was the equivalent of a Committee of the House of Burgesses meeting off-site in the City of Philadelphia, a jurisdiction foreign to the Colonies being represented. "The Second Continental Congress" was no different or better in terms of being a contentious and largely unofficial meeting of men recognized as deputies (fiscal officers) of their colonies.

A "colony" is itself a "farm family community"--- it has no land of its own, because a king or pope or other potentate has assumed ownership of the land, nonetheless, these two Congresses of fiscal deputies sent from thirteen colonies are styled as "Continental Congresses" for a reason. 

It is from their actions that The American Revolutionary War derived, was prosecuted, and brought to the successful conclusion in which the colonists gained control of the land and soil of this country and ultimately, this portion of the North American Continent.

The American Revolution was substantially about ownership of soil and land, about the right to expand westward (in contravention of Treaties that the King of England had with the Native Tribal Leaders) as much as it was about freedom and the rights and dignity of mankind.

The colonists, all considered members of their respective farm family communities, whether they lived in towns or not, naturally and immediately gave rise to separate nations-- groups of people identifying with a common cultural, historical, political and geographical history. 

That is, the people of the colonies gave rise to nations once they declared their interest in the land and soil: the Colonists of Georgia--- became in the words of the (eventual) Treaty of Paris (1783) a "free, sovereign and independent people"--- Georgians, the Colonists of New York became New Yorkers, and the Colonists of Virginia became Virginians... and so on.

Similarly, having obtained the right to the soil and land and having declared their ownership, the former colonists were suddenly in possession of land jurisdiction states that occupied the same boundaries as the former colonies, more or less, and the people who were now recognized as Georgians, New Yorkers, Virginians and so on, were left to define these new sovereign States, nail down their official borders, and in all other ways decide upon all the issues which would enable them to act as responsible members of the international community of states and nations.

And all of this devolved upon them while they were engaged in fighting the Revolutionary War and throughout the decades following.

Chaos reigned. And England meddled.

Each new State issued its own currency for the purposes of trade. Some of the new States did a better, more responsible job of this than others, and prospered, but some States suffered inflation and other ills of bad monetary policy---- aided by British counterfeiting of the American States' currencies---all of which served to undermine the stability and economic viability of the new States. 

Their first attempt to issue a mutual international currency, the Continental Dollar, was counterfeited and inflated into oblivion.

So another "Congress" was called, and this was a meeting -- a congress --- of The United States in Congress Assembled.

Please notice the exact words and styles of the words. 

Jointly and severally, The United States, meaning those "States" that derived from the original Colonies and their Union of States formed by The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, did what?  Ah, they "Assembled" for a meeting--- a Congress, but it was no longer a "Continental Congress", it was The United States Congress.

Why?

Because this body of delegates was meeting to discuss business that concerned a different jurisdiction.  They were next meeting to discuss political (for example, international trade) and financial (currency) issues. Every Congress since then has met to address these sorts of issues.

There has never again been a Continental Congress held to specifically address land and soil issues.

As you page through the history of this country you will find that there have been many different kinds of "Congresses" called to meet, both in Philadelphia, and later in Washington, DC.  The topics that these "Congresses" addressed and the nature and composition of the delegations attending these meetings have changed over time.  This is always indicated by the records kept of these meetings.

Thus we have the Continental Congresses, The United States in Congress Assembled, The United States of America in Congress Assembled, The Congress of the united States of America,  The Congress of the United States, The Congress of the United States of America, and so on and on. 

Any idea or impression that there is now or has ever been an entity known as "the" Congress representing this country is just that --- an impression, not a truth, not an actuality.  Instead, what has happened over time, is that a practice of electing "Congressional Delegations" has developed, and whatever kind of "Congress" meets, meets.

Washington, DC, itself, is like a hotel or a conference center, where delegations of various kinds and statures can hold "Congresses" --- that is, meetings--- on neutral turf.  The fact that "a" Congress meets in Washington, DC, grants it no special or pre-determined purpose or identity. Rather, Washington, DC, is like a bird's nest that can be occupied sequentially by robins, cuckoos, crows, and meadow larks.

For the sake of sanity, only one such Congress can meet in Washington, DC at a time, but there have been occasions in our history when multiple complete Congressional Delegations have met at the same time, one in Philadelphia and another in New York and another in Washington, DC. 

All the Delegates of all these Congresses are empowered to speak for their own body politic and to speak to their own particular issues.

Thus, a meeting of "The United States of America in Congress Assembled" is a meeting of Delegates who are elected by land jurisdiction States and by the People of those States who are American State Citizens, and such a Congress is empowered to exercise the full range of "powers" possessed by those States of the Union. 

A meeting of "The Congress of the United States of America" by comparison, is a meeting of Delegates elected by "United States Citizens" comprising the Territorial United States "citizenry" and such a Congress is empowered to exercise the limited range of powers and address such issues as "The Constitution of the United States of America" places in their grasp.

You are no doubt beginning to get the true flavor of the situation that our country faces: "the" Congress presently meeting in Washington, DC, is not our Congress of the American States and People.  It's "a" Congress representing Federal Citizens -- not American State Citizens.

It has been a very long time since the People of this country exerted themselves to act in their sovereign capacity and assembled their States of the Union and sent Fiduciary Deputies to a meeting of The United States of America in Congress Assembled, and it is long overdue.

That is why those of you who have the ability to claim your birthright political status as American State Citizens are being called to correct all the falsified Territorial United States Birth Registrations that have been issued in your names without your knowledge or consent, and also part of the reason that you are being called to Assemble your States of the Union. 

Your States will, once they are ready, elect their Delegates to attend a meeting of The United States of America in Congress Assembled, and they will then address and define those issues which only the actual States and People of this country can address.

Most likely, this meeting of our Congress will occur in Philadelphia, owing to the fact that the Municipal and Territorial Congresses are almost continually holding court in Washington, DC.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Monday, April 22, 2019

Webinar tonight with Anna Von Reitz

You are invited to a Zoom webinar with Anna Von Reitz.  
Send your questions to info@theamericanstatesassembly.net   
Visit the website at www.theamericanstatesassembly.net 


When: Apr 22, 2019 6:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
    Every week on Mon, until Dec 30, 2019, 37 occurrence(s)
     
Please click the link below to join the webinar: 

Or iPhone one-tap :
    US: +16699006833,,597600142#  or +19292056099,,597600142# 
Or Telephone:
    Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): 
        US: +1 669 900 6833  or +1 929 205 6099 
    Webinar ID: 597 600 142
    International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aezuON19iw

No comments:

Post a Comment