Tuesday, April 23, 2019
1771-1772: For All the Jural Assemblies - 51 NAMES and Debts from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Immediately following and attendant
upon Texas entering the Union, a reshuffling of the Federal Territorial
Government began and a change in nomenclature was adopted by the
Municipal United
States Government. This started in 1845 and culminated in 1851. Prior to that, the Municipal Government functioned using the nomenclature of Roman Civil Law and the conventions of Latin.
States Government. This started in 1845 and culminated in 1851. Prior to that, the Municipal Government functioned using the nomenclature of Roman Civil Law and the conventions of Latin.
In Latin, the greatest power and
respect and political status is indicated by the use of all small
letters. A name written in all small letters indicates the political
status of a free patrician in their private capacity: flavius josephus.
Thus, until 1851, the republican
states occupying the soil jurisdiction of this country are all
referenced and written in Municipal documents using all small letters:
texas, wisconsin, florida…. and these states are all known to be
represented by business organizations dba texas republic and republic of
texas, for example.
This made it easy to literally see
what jurisdiction of each republican state was being referenced, and in
this case, the soil jurisdiction is being indicated by the use of all
small letters.
After 1851, the Municipal United
States Government adopted English conventions. After that, the soil
jurisdiction had to be directly referenced in the text, because the soil
jurisdiction of Texas looks the same as the land and sea jurisdiction
of Texas in English.
It's all "signed" as "Texas" without any finer distinction available in English text.
This causes confusion for people
delving into old documents, but its not really that confusing. In the
earlier "Latinized" documents, "texas" is the national soil jurisdiction
of the republican state operated by the "people", "Texas" is the land
jurisdiction State operating the international jurisdiction of the
People.
As letters are capitalized in Latin, a loss of political status and power is indicated:
"flavius josephus" is a free man.
"Flavius Josephus" is an indentured servant or Office Holder.
"FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS" is a slave of Rome.
Thus in the old Latinized documents
that you run across in your research a reference to "virginia" is
talking about the soil jurisdiction of the colony or the republican
state, depending on the time frame, while a reference to "Virginia" is
talking about the international land or sea jurisdiction of the colony
or the republican state, and if --- very rarely --- you run across a
reference to "VIRGINIA" in old pre-1851 papers of the Territorial or
Municipal Governments, this indicates the global jurisdiction of the air
that is subject to Rome, but nonetheless attached to the ownership of
the republican state, virginia.
There was a resurgence of these
"Latinized" conventions in this country following the Second World War,
when the Romanized Municipal United States Government exerted itself and
issued "PERSONS" in the "name of" American State Citizens who were
wrongly registered as Territorial United States Citizens.
This is because the Territorial
United States [Military] Government was in debt to the Pope and the Holy
See. They had earlier in the 1920's - 1940's created Territorial
"franchises" for themselves, operating in names identical to our Given
Names and appearing to be Proper Names in English, but having been
"Registered" as British Foreign Situs Trusts operating in the
international jurisdiction of the sea, not recorded as the Given Names
of American State Nationals.
The British Territorial United
States Government having accomplished this fraudulent "unlawful
conversion" and identity theft, then sold these fake franchises as
"salvaged property" presumed to belong to the former Confederate States
of States to the Roman Pontiff.
The Roman Pontiff then converted
these into WARDS of the Municipal United States Government, and various
incorporated entities operating under these slave NAMES were created ---
most especially, a Pauper doing business under a NAME styled as "JOHN
DOE", a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust doing business under a NAME styled
as "JOHN MICHAEL DOE", and a Public Transmitting Utility doing business
under a NAME styled as "JOHN M. DOE".
As things stand, the British
Territorial Government has been briefly subjected to Chapter 11
Bankruptcy and the Municipal United States corporation claiming to own
all these various entities as "WARDS" of the various Municipal STATES OF
STATES is undergoing liquidation.
At which point, we have stood up and said --- ah, wait a minute --- there's been a mistake.
1. We were never at sea and never
knowingly or willingly acting as British Territorial "United States
Citizens" despite the unconscionable falsified registrations indicating
that we were;
2. Therefore, we and our assets were
not available for the British Territorial United States Government to
sell to the Roman Pontiff;
3. We are here at home, standing on
the land and soil jurisdiction of our States, owed every jot of the
Constitutions, and also owed the return of our natural birthright
estates free and clear of any debt or encumbrance. We are also owed any
profit realized from the lease and use and trading upon of our private
and public property.
This is why we are owed a lot of money from both the British Government and the Vatican.
Both are under solemn treaties and commercial service contracts and both have acted in Gross Breach of Trust.
Both have taken advantage of
and attempted to cheat generations of Americans via the undisclosed and
unconscionable contracts provided by phony birth registrations --- used
to create the legal presumption that we were all choosing to be counted
as "United States Citizens" and that we were, moreover, leftover
"rebels" and abandoned assets of the defunct Confederate States of
States---- instead of being peaceful American State Nationals native to
States of the Union that were never involved in the Civil War, never at
sea, and never engaged in international commerce at all.
No doubt, after eighty years of
silence, they thought they were going to get away with it, and it has
been quite a shock to find that we are still awake and still alive and
that we contest and rebut their falsified records and presumptions being
made against our country, our populace, and our lawful government.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
For All the Jural Assemblies - 50 Congresses
By Anna Von Reitz
We all think of "the" Congress, but
in fact, "Congress" is a very broad word and basically means "meeting"
and, to be honest, a "verbally raucous meeting" --as in a "Congress of
Crows". It has in its original meaning and context none of the dignity
accorded to the word today, and a return to the earlier understanding
would be healthier and far more realistic for our purposes.
The original Congress that we think
of, known as "The First Continental Congress" was exactly such a meeting
--- raucous and undisciplined and largely unofficial, as it was the
equivalent of a Committee of the House of Burgesses meeting off-site in
the City of Philadelphia, a jurisdiction foreign to the Colonies being
represented. "The Second Continental Congress" was no different or
better in terms of being a contentious and largely unofficial meeting of
men recognized as deputies (fiscal officers) of their colonies.
A "colony" is itself a "farm family
community"--- it has no land of its own, because a king or pope or other
potentate has assumed ownership of the land, nonetheless, these two
Congresses of fiscal deputies sent from thirteen colonies are styled as
"Continental Congresses" for a reason.
It is from their actions that The
American Revolutionary War derived, was prosecuted, and brought to the
successful conclusion in which the colonists gained control of the land
and soil of this country and ultimately, this portion of the North
American Continent.
The American Revolution was
substantially about ownership of soil and land, about the right to
expand westward (in contravention of Treaties that the King of England
had with the Native Tribal Leaders) as much as it was about freedom and
the rights and dignity of mankind.
The colonists, all considered
members of their respective farm family communities, whether they lived
in towns or not, naturally and immediately gave rise to separate
nations-- groups of people identifying with a common cultural,
historical, political and geographical history.
That is, the people of the colonies
gave rise to nations once they declared their interest in the land and
soil: the Colonists of Georgia--- became in the words of the
(eventual) Treaty of Paris (1783) a "free, sovereign and independent
people"--- Georgians, the Colonists of New York became New Yorkers, and
the Colonists of Virginia became Virginians... and so on.
Similarly, having obtained the right
to the soil and land and having declared their ownership, the former
colonists were suddenly in possession of land jurisdiction states that
occupied the same boundaries as the former colonies, more or less, and
the people who were now recognized as Georgians, New Yorkers, Virginians
and so on, were left to define these new sovereign States, nail down
their official borders, and in all other ways decide upon all the issues
which would enable them to act as responsible members of the
international community of states and nations.
And all of this devolved upon them
while they were engaged in fighting the Revolutionary War and throughout
the decades following.
Chaos reigned. And England meddled.
Each new State issued its own
currency for the purposes of trade. Some of the new States did a better,
more responsible job of this than others, and prospered, but some
States suffered inflation and other ills of bad monetary policy----
aided by British counterfeiting of the American States' currencies---all
of which served to undermine the stability and economic viability of
the new States.
Their first attempt to issue a
mutual international currency, the Continental Dollar, was counterfeited
and inflated into oblivion.
So another "Congress" was called, and this was a meeting -- a congress --- of The United States in Congress Assembled.
Please notice the exact words and styles of the words.
Jointly and severally, The United
States, meaning those "States" that derived from the original Colonies
and their Union of States formed by The Unanimous Declaration of
Independence, did what? Ah, they "Assembled" for a meeting--- a
Congress, but it was no longer a "Continental Congress", it was The
United States Congress.
Why?
Because this body of delegates was
meeting to discuss business that concerned a different jurisdiction.
They were next meeting to discuss political (for example, international
trade) and financial (currency) issues. Every Congress since then has
met to address these sorts of issues.
There has never again been a Continental Congress held to specifically address land and soil issues.
As you page through the history of
this country you will find that there have been many different kinds of
"Congresses" called to meet, both in Philadelphia, and later in
Washington, DC. The topics that these "Congresses" addressed and the
nature and composition of the delegations attending these meetings have
changed over time. This is always indicated by the records kept of
these meetings.
Thus we have the Continental
Congresses, The United States in Congress Assembled, The United States
of America in Congress Assembled, The Congress of the united States of
America, The Congress of the United States, The Congress of the United
States of America, and so on and on.
Any idea or impression that there is
now or has ever been an entity known as "the" Congress representing
this country is just that --- an impression, not a truth, not an
actuality. Instead, what has happened over time, is that a practice of
electing "Congressional Delegations" has developed, and whatever kind of
"Congress" meets, meets.
Washington, DC, itself, is like a
hotel or a conference center, where delegations of various kinds and
statures can hold "Congresses" --- that is, meetings--- on neutral
turf. The fact that "a" Congress meets in Washington, DC, grants it no
special or pre-determined purpose or identity. Rather, Washington, DC,
is like a bird's nest that can be occupied sequentially by robins,
cuckoos, crows, and meadow larks.
For the sake of sanity, only one
such Congress can meet in Washington, DC at a time, but there have been
occasions in our history when multiple complete Congressional
Delegations have met at the same time, one in Philadelphia and another
in New York and another in Washington, DC.
All the Delegates of all these
Congresses are empowered to speak for their own body politic and to
speak to their own particular issues.
Thus, a meeting of "The United
States of America in Congress Assembled" is a meeting of Delegates who
are elected by land jurisdiction States and by the People of those
States who are American State Citizens, and such a Congress is empowered
to exercise the full range of "powers" possessed by those States of the
Union.
A meeting of "The Congress of the United
States of America" by comparison, is a meeting of Delegates elected by
"United States Citizens" comprising the Territorial United States
"citizenry" and such a Congress is empowered to exercise the limited
range of powers and address such issues as "The Constitution of the
United States of America" places in their grasp.
You are no doubt beginning to get
the true flavor of the situation that our country faces: "the" Congress
presently meeting in Washington, DC, is not our Congress of the American
States and People. It's "a" Congress representing Federal Citizens --
not American State Citizens.
It has been a very long time since
the People of this country exerted themselves to act in their sovereign
capacity and assembled their States of the Union and sent Fiduciary
Deputies to a meeting of The United States of America in Congress
Assembled, and it is long overdue.
That is why those of you who have
the ability to claim your birthright political status as American State
Citizens are being called to correct all the falsified Territorial
United States Birth Registrations that have been issued in your names
without your knowledge or consent, and also part of the reason that you
are being called to Assemble your States of the Union.
Your States will, once they are
ready, elect their Delegates to attend a meeting of The United States of
America in Congress Assembled, and they will then address and define
those issues which only the actual States and People of this country can
address.
Most likely, this meeting of our
Congress will occur in Philadelphia, owing to the fact that
the Municipal and Territorial Congresses are almost continually holding
court in Washington, DC.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Monday, April 22, 2019
Webinar tonight with Anna Von Reitz
You are invited to a Zoom webinar with Anna Von Reitz.
Send your questions to info@
Visit the website at www.theamericanstatesassembly.
When: Apr 22, 2019 6:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Every week on Mon, until Dec 30, 2019, 37 occurrence(s)
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,597600142# or +19292056099,,597600142#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 929 205 6099
Webinar ID: 597 600 142
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aezuON19iw
No comments:
Post a Comment